# data[].attributes.body
1. By the end of Wednesday, March 29,  create a post with the video you and your partner(s) prepared.

2. Write the full names of both/all the presenters at the top of your post.

3. Remember that your video cannot exceed 250MB. If you cannot upload it, try to compress the video. Alternatively, use a different recording device to record your introduction and upload the new video afterwards.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Be respectful, polite, and specific.

2. By the end of Friday, March 31, together with your co-presenter, comment on two videos assigned to your team.

3. Include at least two  comments about what was done well. Provide details.

4. Type at least two comments about what could be done in a different way. Make a suggestion how to do that.

5. Sample comments are available in the instructions for this mini-assignment. Make sure you do not copy the sample comments or any ones typed by other students. Such an action is plagiarism and will require reporting to your academic dean. Let's avoid that!

# data[].attributes.body
1. Teamwork: frequent swaps with partner and use of non-verbal cues

2. Content: 2-3 stages of product development (innovations) after the prototype, each developed with relevant details as per instructions

3. Transitional phrases demonstrating clear organization: partner transitional phrases, product development gambits, and others as needed

4. Non-verbal communication of each of the presenters

5. Pausing & focus words

6. Slides & citations

During the contrast presentations, many of you used a screening question as an opening technique. Let's try to be more creative this time. :) A relevant & original opening technique can help you earn a bonus mark.

# data[].attributes.body
The videos below remind you of a couple of choices you have to recording your video. However, you need to use slides for this mini-assignment.

# data[].attributes.body
This video should not be treated as a perfect model, but as an example of what to do & what not to do. This information will be discussed in class.

# data[].attributes.body
Please read the examples of appropriate and inappropriate (superficial feedback) shown in the posts below.

# data[].attributes.headline
Sample Well-developed Comments (effective) 

# data[].attributes.subject
Sample Well-developed Comments (effective) 

# data[].attributes.body
Comments by Maggie Wang & Andy Lee
Positive
1.  Non-verbal communication:  Both of you have spread eye contact effectively by looking at the groups on your right and left and those in the middle. You also maintained eye contact for a few seconds. Good work.
2.  Content development: I think the two of you clearly showed how the innovations improved the previous versions of the product. You used expressions like "more support" and "more durable." I also heard about some problems that different innovations still had, so the background is complete.

# data[].attributes.body
Comments by Maggie Wang & Andy Lee
Suggestions
1.  Non-verbal communication: In terms of eye contact, Rob, you focused mostly on the right side of the audience and on your notes. Try to look at your audience on the left and in the middle as well as at your co-presenter. Do not look at your notes so often.
2. Pausing & focus words: You both emphasized key words a little. However, they could have stood out from the other words a little more. Try to use a louder volume when saying such words. Also, Rob, it seemed you made too many pauses. Remember not to pause inside thought groups e.g. in “at__the beginning__of the 20th century.” Try to read such phrases without pausing. Perhaps if you rehearse more, you could avoid such unneeded pauses.

# data[].attributes.headline
Superficial or Irrelevant Comments (not appropriate—should not be used)

# data[].attributes.subject
Superficial or Irrelevant Comments (not appropriate—should not be used)

# data[].attributes.body
Comments by Cathy Li & Sammy Zhang
Hi Anna and Rob,

1 Both of you did an amazing job! You used so many gambits. Well done!

2   Your presentation was on topic. I think it was good.
3. Rob, you have to avoid swaying! You were doing it all the time.

Why are these comments inappropriate:

1. Comments in #1 & 2 are  too general (without sufficient explanation or examples) to be helpful.

2. Comment #3 is not very polite or completely accurate.

3. There are too few comments.

4. Comments are not labeled to indicate 4 different aspect of the presentation.

# data[].attributes.headline
Kyle Heo, Kane Li, and Zheuri Dong's Presentation

# data[].attributes.subject
Kyle Heo, Kane Li, and Zheuri Dong's Presentation

# data[].attributes.headline
Buck Chen’s and Zhi Yuan ’s presentation 

# data[].attributes.subject
Buck Chen’s and Zhi Yuan ’s presentation 

# data[].attributes.headline
Hoon Kim and Varun Gupta - Product Review Introduction Presentation

# data[].attributes.subject
Hoon Kim and Varun Gupta - Product Review Introduction Presentation

# data[].attributes.headline
Elsie Wang and Angela Zhong--Product Review Introduction Presentation

# data[].attributes.subject
Elsie Wang and Angela Zhong--Product Review Introduction Presentation

# data[].attributes.headline
Serena Feng, Fisa Zhu - Product Review Introduction Presentation

# data[].attributes.subject
Serena Feng, Fisa Zhu - Product Review Introduction Presentation

# data[].attributes.body
We are looking forward to hear any comments.