# data[].attributes.body
Animal testing is just as severe as animal hunting. They hunt the animals but not to kill but to actually hold in cages to use for labortory experiments such as for makeup, medication, crayons, and more. These animals experience loads of neglect, hurt, and loneliness as they were catpured from their homes to be used as test subjects for the human race.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Right now, millions of mice, rats, rabbits, primates, cats, dogs, and other animals are locked inside cages in laboratories across the country. They languish in pain, ache with loneliness, and are deprived of everything that's natural and important to them. All they can do is sit and wait in fear of the next terrifying and painful procedure that will be performed on them. A lack of environmental enrichment and the stress of their living situations cause some animals to develop neurotic behaviors, such as incessantly spinning in circles, rocking back and forth, pulling out their own fur, and even biting themselves. After enduring lives of pain, loneliness, and terror, almost all of them will be killed.

How PETA Helps Animals in Laboratories

Since PETA's inception and the landmark Silver Spring monkeys case, we've been at the forefront of exposing and ending experiments on animals. Our scientists, campaigners, researchers, and other dedicated staff work hard to persuade universities, hospitals, contract laboratories, other companies, and government agencies to abandon animal tests and embrace modern, non-animal methods.

Two teams lead PETA's efforts to end tests on animals. Our Laboratory Investigations Department focuses on ending the use of animals in experiments not required by law, and our Regulatory Toxicology Department focuses on replacing the use of animals in tests required by law with human-relevant, animal-free toxicity testing approaches. With help from supporters like you, these teams and other hardworking staff at PETA win numerous victories for animals imprisoned in laboratories every year. Here's how they do it:

Promoting PETA's Research Modernization Deal, the first comprehensive, science-backed plan to phase out tests on animals

Conducting groundbreaking eyewitness investigations and colorful advocacy campaigns to shut down laboratories and areas of animal experimentation

Filing groundbreaking lawsuits to challenge public funding of wasteful, cruel animal experiments

Working with members of Congress to enact laws to replace animals in laboratories

Persuading government agencies to stop conducting and requiring experiments on animals

Encouraging pharmaceutical, chemical, and consumer product companies to replace tests on animals with more effective, non-animal methods

Ending the use of animals in experiments at colleges and universities

Helping students and teachers end animal dissection in the classroom

Developing and funding humane non-animal research methods

Publishing scientific papers on reliable non-animal test methods and presenting them at scientific conferences

Hosting free workshops and online seminars to share information about animal-free toxicity testing methods

Urging health charities not to invest in dead-end tests on animals

How Animals Are Exploited in Laboratories

More than 110 million animals suffer and die in the U.S. every year in cruel chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics tests. They also experience this fate in medical training exercises, curiosity-driven experiments at universities, classroom biology experiments, and dissection even though modern, non-animal methods have repeatedly been shown to have more educational value, save teachers time, and save schools money. Exact numbers aren't available, because mice, rats, birds, and cold-blooded animals-who make up more than 99% of animals used in experiments-aren't covered by even the minimal protections of the federal Animal Welfare Act and therefore go uncounted.

Examples of chemical and toxicity tests on animals include forcing mice and rats to inhale toxic fumes, force-feeding dogs chemicals, and applying corrosive chemicals into rabbits' sensitive eyes. Even if a product harms animals, it can still be marketed to consumers. Conversely, just because a product was shown to be safe in animals doesn't guarantee that it will be safe to use in humans.

Much product testing conducted on animals today isn't required by law. In fact, a number of countries have implemented bans on the testing of certain types of consumer goods on animals, such as the cosmetics testing bans in India, Israel, New Zealand, Norway, and elsewhere.

Meanwhile, at universities and other institutions, experimenters inflict suffering on and kill animals for little more than curiosity's sake-even though the vast majority of their findings fail to advance human health. They tear baby monkeys away from their mothers, sew kittens' eyes shut, mutilate owls' brains, puncture the intestines of mice so that feces leak into their stomachs, and terrorize songbirds with the sounds of predators. At the end of experiments like these-which consume billions in taxpayer funds and charitable donations each year-almost all the animals are killed.

How You Can Help Animals Used in Experiments

Each of us can help prevent the suffering and deaths of animals in laboratories. Here are a few easy ways to get started:

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Animal Testing: Animals Used in Experiments | PETA

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Millions of animals are held in laboratories across the U.S. for animal testing. PETA is at the forefront of stopping this abuse.

# data[].attributes.body
While in these labatories the animals experience alot of abuse and work that their bodies arent built for. Some experiments dealing with chemicals can be failed attempts that can cause burns, rashes, discomfort, and more to the animals bodies.

# data[].attributes.body
Animals are alone and are aquiring more and more a sense of pain and neglect. This results in being seperated from their possible family and other animals of their species.

# data[].attributes.body
The caoturing of these animals was not inn attempts to rescue them or bring them into better conditions but instead to use them for human use and expansion. The animals are used for economic benefits while not thinking about the harm the animals endure during their capture and captivity.

# data[].attributes.body
The main controvesey of this article is that animal hunting is for recreational purposes. In agreeance this article believes its inhummane for such actions. Yet, the viewpoints of the hunters is important in stating. Hunting for recreation isnt the right reasons to hunt.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
"The big beast stood like an uncouth statue, his hide black in the sunlight; he seemed what he was, a monster surviving over from the world's past, from the days when the beasts of the prime ran riot in their strength, before man grew so cunning of brain and hand as to master them."

Theodore Roosevelt, former U.S. president and renowned big-game hunter, waxed poetic about a massive bull rhinoceros in his 1910 book, "African Game Trails: An Account of the African Wanderings of an American Hunter-Naturalist," after glimpsing the rhino during a safari in British East Africa and the Belgian Congo earlier that year. [ In Photos: A Museum Honors Teddy Roosevelt]

What happened next? Roosevelt shot the beast.

He fired with his gun's right barrel, "the bullet going through both lungs," and then with the left, "the bullet entering between the neck and shoulder and piercing his heart," Roosevelt wrote. A third volley from another member of the hunting party brought down the great animal, "just thirteen paces from where we stood," according to Roosevelt.

A black-and-white image of the aftermath shows Roosevelt in what was a common pose for him: standing alongside the lifeless body of a creature that he had hunted and killed. [ In Photos: Endangered and Threatened Wildlife]

More than 100 years later, thousands of people each year still visit wild spaces across Africa with guns in hand. They apply for permits to recreationally hunt big animals, many of which - leopards, lions and elephants, to name just a few - represent threatened or endangered species.

And the "sport" is not without risks for human hunters - on May 19, a hunter in Zimbabwe was crushed to death by an elephant after the animal was shot by another member of his hunting party. So what motivates people to hunt these animals for pleasure, and to proudly display the bodies or body parts of their prey as precious trophies?

Power play

The slaughtering of large, dangerous animals as a spectacle dates back thousands of years, with records from the Assyrian empire (about 4,000 years ago to around 600 B.C.) describing kings that boasted of killing elephants, ibex, ostriches, wild bulls and lions, according to a study published in 2008 in the journal Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research.

These hunts were carefully orchestrated and conducted for the amusement of royalty and as demonstrations of their strength, Linda Kalof, a professor of sociology at Michigan State University, told Live Science in an email.

"Ancient canned hunts were spectacular displays of royal power and dominance, and always took place with the king's public watching from the sidelines," Kalof said. "A successful hunt requires the death of unrestrained wild animals - animals who are hostile, shun or attack humans, and are not submissive to human authority."

Even today, acquiring trophy animals is a way of displaying power, Kalof noted. In some African countries, where big-game hunting and trophy display are expensive forms of entertainment practiced predominantly by white men, hunting recalls ideologies that are deeply rooted in colonialism and patriarchy, Kalof said.

The high cost of hunting

And then there's the money involved. Legal hunting, which is conducted under the supervision of government agencies and official guides, involves expensive permits and is limited to specific animal populations and only in certain areas. Illegal poaching, on the other hand, circumvents all regulations and targets animals regardless of their age, sex, or endangered status.

The price tag attached to legal big-game hunting is considerable, once you tally up the costs of travel and lodging expenses, state-of-the-art equipment, local guides, and hunting permits. Government-sanctioned hunting is a booming enterprise in some African countries, with visiting hunters spending an estimated $200 million annually, The New York Times reported in 2015.

And when American dentist Walter Palmer notoriously shot a 13-year-old lion named Cecil in Zimbabwe in July 2015, he purportedly spent approximately $54,000 just on permits for the privilege.

In other words, people who hunt recreationally - and share photos of their trophies - are broadcasting that they can support lavish habits, biologist Chris Darimont, a Hakai-Raincoast Professor in the Department of Geography at the University of Victoria in British Columbia, told Live Science in an email.

In a study on contemporary trophy hunting behavior, published in March 2016 in the journal Biology Letters, Darimont and his co-authors investigated whether evolutionary anthropology could provide answers about motives for recreational hunting. They suggested in their findings that men use hunting to send signals about their fitness to rivals and potential mates, noting that even subsistence hunters (those who kill animals for food) targeted animals that were more challenging for them to catch, simply to let others know that they could afford to take that risk.

"The inference is that they have the physical and mental characteristics that allow them to behave in a costly way and absorb those costs," Darimont said.

And by sharing images of their trophies on social media, hunters can now trumpet messages about their personal wealth and social status to a global audience, he added. [ Black Market Horns: Images from a Rhino Bust]

Funding conservation

But there's yet another side to the recreational hunting story: Some hunters argue that the money spent on their hobby is funding important conservation work. When hunters pay thousands of dollars to government agencies for the privilege of hunting certain types of wildlife in designated zones, portions of those costs can be invested in federal programs and community efforts to preserve animals living in protected areas - and even safeguard them against poaching, according to the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF).

"In certain limited and rigorously controlled cases, including for threatened species, scientific evidence has shown that trophy hunting can be an effective conservation tool as part of a broad mix of strategies," the WWF states on its website.

Because legal hunting provides local jobs and revenue, it can work as a deterrent against poaching and helps to conserve ecosystems, professional hunter Nathan Askew, owner of an American company that leads hunting safaris for "dangerous game" in South Africa, Tanzania, Botswana and Mozambique, explained in a Facebook post.

"The positive economic impact brought about by hunting incentivizes governments, landowners and companies to protect the animals and their habitats," Askew said.

By demonstrating that wildlife has economic value, hunting can actively engage local communities in efforts to stop poachers and preserve wild spaces that might not otherwise be maintained for wildlife, a representative of the hunting organization Safari Club International (SCI), told Live Science in an email.

Hunting under government supervision can also preserve the health of animal populations in the wild by weeding out individuals that are less fit. In Namibia, for example, black rhinos are listed as critically endangered, with only 5,000 individuals remaining in the wild. Yet the Namibian government maintains an annual hunting quota of five post-breeding males, to stimulate population growth by allowing younger males to breed, the SCI representative explained. [ A Crash of Rhinos: See All 5 Species]

"Not only does the black rhino hunting benefit rhino population growth, it also generates hundreds of thousands of dollars in revenue that by law has to be put toward rhino conservation in Namibia. Therefore, hunting provides a direct cash benefit to rhino conservation that tourism can't provide," the representative said in a statement.

Conservation questions

However, recent studies suggest that modern hunters may be overestimating their contributions to wildlife conservation. Not all countries that support recreational hunting are transparent about where that income goes, and it can be uncertain how much - if any - is actually benefiting African communities or conservation efforts.

A report that the Democratic staff of the House Committee on Natural Resources (a congressional committee of the U.S. House of Representatives) issued in June 2016 suggested that income from hunting in African countries such as Zimbabwe, Tanzania, South Africa and Namibia, from which the greatest number of hunting trophies are imported into the U.S., was not meeting conservation needs.

"In assessing the flow of trophy hunting revenue to conservation efforts, we found many troubling examples of funds either being diverted from their purpose or not being dedicated to conservation in the first place," the report's authors wrote.

Other experts have also questioned hunting's usefullness as a tool for conservation. In fact, when it comes to lions, "trophy hunting adds to the problem," Jeff Flocken, North American director for the International Fund for Animal Welfare, wrote in August 2013, in an opinion column for National Geographic.

Flocken argued that trophy hunting weakens the African lion gene pool because the most desirable trophy kills are young, healthy males. Removing them from the population means that their DNA won't contribute to the next generation of lions. Killing young males also destabilizes their prides, and can result in more lion casualties as rival males compete to take their place, he wrote.

But perhaps most importantly, he added, legalized recreational hunting derails conservation efforts by simply devaluing the lives of the hunted animals.

"It's a message that won't be heard as long as it is common and legal to kill lions for sport," Flocken said in the article. "Why should anyone spend money to protect an animal that a wealthy American can then pay to go kill?"

Editor's Recommendations
Copyright 2017 LIVESCIENCE.com, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Hunting Big Game: Why People Kill Animals for Fun

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
"The big beast stood like an uncouth statue, his hide black in the sunlight; he seemed what he was, a monster surviving over from the world's past, from the days when the beasts of the prime ran riot in their strength, before man grew so cunning of brain and hand as to master them."

# data[].attributes.body
The larger issue is that hunting animals is usd in private institutions for production. But the pain and historical damage that trails after is never a consideration. The animals are not the only ones suffering due to hunting, nature and humans are all being affected. The solutions proposed are only their hopes of success but there not a definate yes at work.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Although it was a crucial part of humans' survival 100,000 years ago, hunting is now nothing more than a violent form of recreation that the vast majority of hunters do not need for subsistence. ¹ Hunting has contributed to the extinction of animal species all over the world, including the Tasmanian tiger and the great auk. 2,3

Less than 4 percent of the U.S. population (13.7 million people) hunts, yet hunting is permitted in many wildlife refuges, national forests, and state parks and on other public lands. ⁴ Almost 40 percent of hunters slaughter and maim millions of animals on public land every year, and by some estimates, poachers kill just as many animals illegally. 5,6

Pain and Suffering
Many animals endure prolonged, painful deaths when they are injured but not killed by hunters. A study of 80 radio-collared white-tailed deer found that of the 22 deer who had been shot with "traditional archery equipment," 11 were wounded but not recovered by hunters. ⁷ Twenty percent of foxes who have been wounded by hunters are shot again. Just 10 percent manage to escape, but "starvation is a likely fate" for them, according to one veterinarian. ⁸ A South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks biologist estimates that more than 3 million wounded ducks go "unretrieved" every year. ⁹ A British study of deer hunting found that 11 percent of deer who'd been killed by hunters died only after being shot two or more times and that some wounded deer suffered for more than 15 minutes before dying. ¹⁰

Hunting disrupts migration and hibernation patterns and destroys families. For animals such as wolves, who mate for life and live in close-knit family units, hunting can devastate entire communities. The stress that hunted animals suffer-caused by fear and the inescapable loud noises and other commotion that hunters create-also severely compromises their normal eating habits, making it hard for them to store the fat and energy that they need in order to survive the winter.

Nature Takes Care of Its Own
The delicate balance of ecosystems ensures their survival-if they are left unaltered. Natural predators help maintain this balance by killing only the sickest and weakest individuals. Hunters, however, kill any animal whose head they would like to hang over the fireplace-including large, healthy animals who are needed to keep the population strong. Elephant poaching is believed to have increased the number of tuskless animals in Africa, and in Canada, hunting has caused bighorn sheep's horn size to fall by 25 percent in the last 40 years. Nature magazine reports that "the effect on the populations' genetics is probably deeper." ¹¹

Even when unusual natural occurrences cause overpopulation, natural processes work to stabilize the group. Starvation and disease can be tragic, but they are nature's ways of ensuring that healthy, strong animals survive and maintain the strength of the rest of their herd or group. Shooting an animal because he or she might starve or get sick is arbitrary and destructive.

Another problem with hunting involves the introduction of exotic "game" animals who, if they're able to escape and thrive, pose a threat to native wildlife and established ecosystems.

Canned Cruelty
Most hunting occurs on private land, where laws that protect wildlife are often inapplicable or difficult to enforce. On private lands that are set up as for-profit hunting reserves or game ranches, hunters can pay to kill native and exotic species in "canned hunts." These animals may be native to the area, raised elsewhere and brought in, or purchased from individuals who are trafficking in unwanted or surplus animals from zoos and circuses. The animals are hunted and killed for the sole purpose of providing hunters with a "trophy."

Canned hunts are big business-there are an estimated 1,000 game preserves in the U.S., with some 5,000 so-called "exotic ranchers" in North America. 12,13 Ted Turner, the country's largest private landowner, allows hunters to pay thousands of dollars to kill bison, deer, African antelopes, and turkeys on his 2 million acres. ¹⁴

Animals on canned-hunting ranches are often accustomed to humans and are usually unable to escape from the enclosures that they are confined to, which range in size from just a few yards to thousands of acres. Most of these ranches operate on a "no-kill, no-pay" policy, so it is in owners' best interests to ensure that clients get what they came for. Owners do this by offering guides who are familiar with animals' locations and habits, permitting the use of dogs, and supplying "feeding stations" that lure unsuspecting animals to food while hunters lie in wait.

While many states have limited or banned canned hunts, there are no federal laws regulating the practice at this time. ¹⁵

Other Victims
Hunting accidents destroy property and injure or kill horses, cows, dogs, cats, hikers, and other hunters. In 2006, then-Vice President Dick Cheney famously shot a friend while hunting quail on a canned hunting preserve. ¹⁶ According to the National Shooting Sports Foundation, thousands of injuries are attributed to hunting in the U.S. every year-and that number only includes incidents involving humans. ¹⁷

The bears, cougars, deer, foxes, and other animals who are chased, trapped, and even killed by dogs during (sometimes illegal) hunts aren't the only ones to suffer from this variant of the "sport." Dogs used for hunting are often kept chained or penned and are denied routine veterinary care such as vaccines and heartworm medication. Some are lost during hunts and never found, whereas others are turned loose at the end of hunting season to fend for themselves and die of starvation or get struck by vehicles.

What You Can Do
Before you support a "wildlife" or "conservation" group, ask about its position on hunting. Groups such as the National Wildlife Federation, the National Audubon Society, the Sierra Club, the Izaak Walton League, the Wilderness Society, and the World Wildlife Fund are pro-sport-hunting, or at the very least, they do not oppose it.

To combat hunting in your area, post "no hunting" signs on your land, join or form an anti-hunting organization, protest organized hunts, and spread deer repellent or human hair (from barber shops) near hunting areas. Call 1-800-628-7275 to report poachers in national parks to the National Parks and Conservation Association. Educate others about hunting. Encourage your legislators to enact or enforce wildlife-protection laws, and insist that nonhunters be equally represented on the staffs of wildlife agencies.

References
¹National Research Council, "Science and the Endangered Species Act" (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1995) 21.
²Grant Holloway, "Cloning to Revive Extinct Species," CNN.com, 28 May 2002.
³Canadian Museum of Nature, "Great Auk," 2008.
⁴Outdoor Life, "Why We Suck at Recruiting New Hunters, Why It Matters, and How You Can Fix It," 15 Oct 2019.
⁵U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, "2011 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation" (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 2012) 28.
⁶Illinois Department of Natural Resources, "How the Program Works," accessed 25 July 2013.
⁷Stephen S. Ditchkoff et al., "Wounding Rates of White-Tailed Deer With Traditional Archery Equipment," Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (1998).
⁸D.J. Renny, "Merits and Demerits of Different Methods of Culling British Wild Mammals: A Veterinary Surgeon's Perspective," Proceedings of a Symposium on the Welfare of British Wild Mammals (London: 2002).
⁹Spencer Vaa, "Reducing Wounding Losses," South Dakota Department of Game, Fish, and Parks, accessed 25 July 2013.
¹⁰E.L. Bradshaw and P. Bateson, "Welfare Implications of Culling Red Deer ( Cervus Elaphus)," Animal Welfare 9 (2000): 3-24.
¹¹John Whitfield, "Sheep Horns Downsized by Hunters' Taste for Trophies," Nature 426 (2003): 595.
¹²Morgan Loew, "Arizona Organization Protects 'Canned' Hunting," CBS5 9 Nov. 2012.
¹³CBS News, "Can Hunting Endangered Animals Save the Species?" 60 Minutes 29 Jan. 2012.
¹⁴Robert M. Poole, "Hunters: For Love of the Land," National Geographic Magazine Nov. 2007.
¹⁵Morgan Loew, "Arizona Organization Protects 'Canned' Hunting," CBS5 9 Nov. 2012.
¹⁶Dana Bash, "Cheney Accidentally Shoots Fellow Hunter," CNN.com, 12 Feb. 2006.
¹⁷National Shooting Sports Foundation, "Firearms-Related Injury Statistics," Industry Intelligence Reports 2012.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Why Sport Hunting Is Cruel and Unnecessary | PETA

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Although it was a crucial part of humans' survival 100,000 years ago, hunting is now nothing more than a violent form of recreation that the vast majority of hunters do not need for subsistence. 1 Hunting has contributed to the extinction of animal species all over the world, including the Tasmanian tiger and the great auk.

# data[].attributes.headline
Should citizens o the United States be able to hunt animals for reccreational purposes?

# data[].attributes.subject
Should citizens o the United States be able to hunt animals for reccreational purposes?

# data[].attributes.body
This organization uses its pwoer to fight animal suffering. They resue many animals and use donations to help protect animals who are close to or on the verge of becoming extinct. They also use their practices to help fight against animal cruelty such as hunting, and testing.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
We take on the biggest threats to all creatures, great and small. Here are some of the issues we work on.

# data[].attributes.body
Many that hunt animals hunt for suvineurs. They take the heads of deer, bears, moose, and more to hang on the walls of their homes in order to decorate. This is abuse of the animals when they take away their meaning of life to a piece on the wall of their home.

# data[].attributes.body
Parks dont put out regulations on hunting animals that live in the area. This allows for hunters to over hunt and abuse the envionrment which is not only harming the animals theyre killing but also others that use that enviornment for their home

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
STARS IN THE SKY: A Hunting Story is an examination of the lives of American hunters and their sometimes complicated relationship to our environment, presented as an honest exploration of th... STARS IN THE SKY: A Hunting Story is an examination of the lives of American hunters and their sometimes complicated relationship to our environment, presented as an honest exploration of the controversies, emotions, and traditions inherent to this most primal human activity. The... STARS IN THE SKY: A Hunting Story is an examination of the lives of American hunters and their sometimes complicated relationship to our environment, presented as an honest exploration of the controversies, emotions, and traditions inherent to this most primal human activity. The latest feature documentary from the award-winning team at ZPZ Films and directed by accla... Read all Read all Read all

Contribute to this page

Suggest an edit or add missing content

What is the English language plot outline for Stars in the Sky: A Hunting Story (2018)?

Answer

Back to top

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Stars in the Sky: A Hunting Story (2018) - IMDb

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Stars in the Sky: A Hunting Story: Directed by Steven Rinella. With Steven Rinella, Robert Abernathy, Greg Blascovich, Buck Bowden. STARS IN THE SKY: A Hunting Story is an examination of the lives of American hunters and their sometimes complicated relationship to our environment, presented as an honest exploration of the controversies, emotions, and traditions inherent to this most primal human activity.

# data[].attributes.headline
Source 3- negative effects on the enviornment

# data[].attributes.subject
Source 3- negative effects on the enviornment

# data[].attributes.body
Killing the animals disrupts nature by taking out key species from the environment day to day to day process. This is decreasing the primary and secondary consumers needed in the food chain of animals which can cause a catastrophic change in nature

# data[].attributes.body
Solutions should be used t limit the amount of hunting and how much of the animal population should be used for human consumption instead of just killing and killing for the economic prospect of it

# data[].attributes.body
Men use hunting as a way to find release in a "sport" they classify hunting as a sport. This recreation allows them to freely hunt deer and other animals while leaving the carcass where ever it died. These men have no use for the material that can be used from the animal but more so for taking the life of a helpless animal

# data[].attributes.body
The issue with production is that they overkill many animals which results in lost of population. Due to this overhunting to feed the human population animals are not given time to reporduce leaving them closer to extinction.

# data[].attributes.body
Animals not only suffer from captivity but they suffer as their homes are destroyed due to hunting and also to their families being killed are taken away. To help witht his the animals they rescue are able to be surrounded by other animals of their species that they can mate with or to have a sense of familiarity