# data[].attributes.body
Is formatted in a way that captures the audiences attention and is structured well with the use of subheadings it answers the question however it doesn’t give details

# data[].attributes.body
This is well and directly answers the question but doesn’t explain the writing directly and is too formal so it doesn’t capture the audiences attention

# data[].attributes.body
it was well structured and the sentence structure was good, good vocabulary but doesn’t answer the question

# data[].attributes.body
1) Responds to the questions directly
2) Well structured, subheadings included, helping the audience understand each portion better
3) Includes relevant information and isn't flooded with too much
4) Well created and is appeals towards the younger audience

# data[].attributes.body
-Article had an engaging tone and perspective
-Directly addressed the audience and used inclusive language to make it relatable
-Answered the question well

# data[].attributes.body
-The article provides relevant thoughts and ideas it also provides the readers with advice
-Views both the positive and the negative
-Answers the question

# data[].attributes.body
1. There are titles for each body paragraph.
2. Appropriate register is used.
3. The content is relevant, and there is a variety of ideas.
4. It uses strong vocabulary.

# data[].attributes.body
This article provides valuable guidance for young travelers on responsible and thoughtful destination choices. However, it does not delve into the specifics of cultural sensitivity and the importance of understanding and respecting local customs, which is another crucial aspect of responsible travel. This article also uses subheadings for each paragraph, unlike the others.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Includes sub-heading, helps audience understand what each paragraph talks about
2) Balanced argument, includes positives and negatives along with the appropriate action that can be taken
3) Addresses the question and structured well allowing audience to understand each section clearly
4) Answers the question

# data[].attributes.body
The response is well structured, as there are subheading to every point. It uses good vocabulary, and most importantly, answers the question, as well as uses appropriate register.

# data[].attributes.body
The article had a good structure and was well-organised
The writer uses good vocabulary but the question wasn't answered

# data[].attributes.body
uses good vocabulary, partially answers the question as it diverts from the question, doesn't evaluate all the points- its mainly focused on only the bad, register may not be appropriate/too formal for the young audience, no subheadings, may be a little too long

# data[].attributes.body
This article effectively emphasizes responsible travel practices in the era of over-tourism, encouraging readers to make mindful choices. However, it does not go into depth to explain  the broader policy and industry-level solutions that could help address the issue of over-tourism more comprehensively.

# data[].attributes.body
-directly answers the question (a bit too formal for the intended audience)
-structured well (not over the word limit)
-doesnt use subheadings

# data[].attributes.body
The parts have been developed well and answers the questions.

# data[].attributes.body
1) A bit too long for a magazine article
2) Sounds very formal, doesn't appeal towards the younger audience
3) Doesn't include sub-headings for each paragraph written, not convenient for reader to understand each section
4) Leaning towards negative side, not balanced

# data[].attributes.body
This response has a consistent tone throughout that directly addresses the audience and has relevant details that answers the question.It also has varied vocabulary.

# data[].attributes.body
- appropriate register
- use of collective pronouns to establish a connection with the audience
- good development of ideas

# data[].attributes.body
Well structured and has pretty good points though it diverts from the question

# data[].attributes.body
While the article addresses the negative aspects of over-tourism, it does not deeply dive into potential solutions or alternatives to mitigate these issues, offering a more comprehensive perspective on how to balance the benefits and drawbacks of travel.

# data[].attributes.body
This article maintains a consistent register throughout and answers the question well.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The response develops multiple relevant ideas.
2. Answers the question.
3. Doesn't address the target audience of young people.

# data[].attributes.body
Answers the question well and lists the main problems and solutions.
It is much easier to comprehend and is well structured (tending to the younger audience)
Uses Subheadings and structured writing
There is a clear direct address to the audience

# data[].attributes.body
Developed ideas, and concise language

# data[].attributes.body
• Answers question in detail
• Use of connectives
• Subheadings are used
• Good use of vocabulary
• Use of devices
• Hook in introduction
• Range of sentence structures
• Uses details from the text and does not lift
• Develops these details into their writing

# data[].attributes.headline
This article is well structured, as there are subheadings to each of the paragraph. It also has wide range of ideas and perspectives. Uses appropriate vocabulary. The response is relevant to the question. 

# data[].attributes.subject
This article is well structured, as there are subheadings to each of the paragraph. It also has wide range of ideas and perspectives. Uses appropriate vocabulary. The response is relevant to the question. 

# data[].attributes.body
1) Sounds formal and complex which might not be appealing to a younger audience
2) The answer is well structured, talking about the pros and cons of tourism and addresses steps to take to make a trip full-filling without causing too much damage
3) Quite concise, doesn't include too much of additional information and includes a few examples to help the reader understand the consequences

# data[].attributes.body
-responds accurately to the question keeping the audience in mind (young people)
-uses techniques such as direct address
-subheadings + catchy title used
-structured well

# data[].attributes.body
The question has been answered and the text is well structured and addresses the audience

# data[].attributes.body
Well structured and has good points. More angled towards a younger audience and is a lot easier to navigate.

# data[].attributes.body
The article is clearly structured, answers the question, uses appropriate register and clear subheading.

# data[].attributes.body
This response has ideas that are developed and evaluated well ,answering the question and addressing the audience.It is also concise and uses good vocabulary.

# data[].attributes.body
This article is well written with extensive use of vocabulary and subheadings for all the paragraphs. It is also well structured. It uses relevant points and no extra information.

# data[].attributes.body
The text uses an appropriate register for young people and a range of details from the text. It also uses many linguistic devices to engage the reader and the use of subheadings makes it much easier to follow.

# data[].attributes.body
This answer stays on track with the question and the writer has written to the specific audience. This also has most of the details from both the extracts and have been developed well.

# data[].attributes.body
Answers the question, isn't too long, contains only the main points, well structured but doesn't have subheadings, has a consistent tone throughout, doesn't go on a tangent.

# data[].attributes.body
well structured and is well written using sub headings and appropriate vocabulary, uses relevant points and ideas and answers the question

# data[].attributes.body
The article is well-structured; the use of subheadings and precise points makes it easy to understand. The writer has used relevant language considering the audience, and there is varied sentence structure

# data[].attributes.body
well written and structured but diverts from the question

# data[].attributes.body
Concise article - very direct and relevant to the subject, expressed well and answers the questions appropriately while using adequate phrases and vocabualry

# data[].attributes.body
Answers well the question and is written for the right answer even mentioned in the title, it uses complex vocabulary and has a good structure

# data[].attributes.body
It has appropriate sub headings and uses wide range of vocabulary and relevant information.

# data[].attributes.body
This text is well structured and presents a variety of ideas from the text. It directly answers the question. It also uses complex vocabulary and is easy to follow

# data[].attributes.body
Doesn't contain unecessary information and isn't long.
Thouroughly analyzes the opinions and ideas of both texts and forms a well structured solution to it.
Answers the questions.
There is a wide range of sentence structures

# data[].attributes.body
It answers the question, has a clear structure, uses a subheading and wide range of vocabularies.

# data[].attributes.body
This article answers the question properly with correct use of vocabulary, relevant and detailed points and has a good structure

# data[].attributes.body
Doesn't answer the question

# data[].attributes.body
1. This example includes good vocabulary and varying sentence lengths.

2. Although, it doesn’t use a suitable register/captivating content (targetted towards young people).

3. It also doesn’t mention the positive impacts of tourism, hence there isn’t much evaluation.

# data[].attributes.body
This article is well structed with many points/ ideas. It also uses good vocabulary however doesn't answer the question.

# data[].attributes.body
The question is well answered and uses an appropriate tone and addresses it towards the correct audience(young people)

# data[].attributes.body
1. Answers the question well
2. Views from both sides of the topic
3. Well structured

# data[].attributes.body
It is well divided into paragraphs for different points and there are no more extra information and answers the question as well.

# data[].attributes.body
This article answers the questions appropriately. It has relevant subheadings and has the best structure compared to the other articles. The register is appropriate and is maintained throughout. It answers the question and also give context in the beginning for the reader.

# data[].attributes.body
Well structured and has a wider range of ideas. Answers the question appropriately with a good range of vocabulary.

# data[].attributes.body
This article uses a subheading, along with good use of vocabulary for the detailed points.

# data[].attributes.body
• Use of connectives
• Answers question
• Range of sentence structures
• Structure of magazine article is clear and it provides an overview in the introduction
• Explores both sides of the argument ("popular spots endorsed by celebrities is tempting", "the allure of untouched landscapes and ancient monuments is undeniable" but also writes the negative consequences of these)

# data[].attributes.body
This response has a range of ideas that are well structured and developed but it is not answering the question.

# data[].attributes.body
- does not address the audience by advising them what they need to consider when deciding on a holiday destination

-  powerful vocabulary ; but imprecisely and unnecessarily used in some areas

- generally, the development of ideas is good, but not in the context of the question

# data[].attributes.body
The structure is good

Directly answers the question

No unnecessary points were given

Great language

# data[].attributes.body
This article is well structured, there is a wide range of ideas, and is very precise. There is also a flow to the ideas, the paragraphs are very well connected.

# data[].attributes.body
This paragraph isn't too long and doesn't have unnecessary information, it is well structure, responds to the question and uses ways to address the audience

# data[].attributes.body
The tone/register is appropriate in regard to the audience. It is relevant to the question and answers it properly.

# data[].attributes.body
Well structured, uses a diverse range of vocabulary and concise phrases to answer the question directly. The register is appropriate and it includes a variety of details.

# data[].attributes.body
While the text uses good vocabulary and some details from the text, it mostly elaborates on tourism and it doesn't answer the main question. It's also too formal for an article for young people.

# data[].attributes.body
It has a lot of vocabularies and explanation and is well structured. But doesn't quite answer the question and not a proper register for certain audience.

# data[].attributes.body
Answers the question, has a consistent register throughout, well structured, gives relevant points.

# data[].attributes.body
The article uses broad range of vocabulary with detailed information. However, it does not answer the question. It can be confusing and tedious for young people as it is a very long article.

# data[].attributes.body
It is well structured and uses good vocabularies but it doesn't answer the question and use appropriate register.

# data[].attributes.body
It addresses the right audience and it answers the question. The structure is also correct.

# data[].attributes.body
This article is well structured and uses a wide range of vocabulary, yet it talks more about the experiences, instead of advising, and is addressed to the wrong audience

# data[].attributes.body
It has most of the details given and the text and they have also been developed using varied sentence structure and a range of vocabulary. However, it feels like the writer is digressing from the question.

# data[].attributes.body
The language used is ornate but is still appropriate. It is well structured and does answer the question.

# data[].attributes.body
well structured and uses a wide range of ideas however it does not answer the question and is too long with many irrelevant points

# data[].attributes.body
-it is a bit too formal for an article written for young people
-too long (more than three paragraphs which isnt needed)
-doesnt respond to the q
-doesnt have subheadings for each section

# data[].attributes.body
Answered the question well and has detailed points and a good register

# data[].attributes.body
This article is short and crisp, it answers the questions.The structure is good and it doesn't have unnecessary information.

# data[].attributes.body
Appropriate tone and register towards a younger audience. It meets the requirements of the question as well.

# data[].attributes.body
Uses complex vocabulary
Not suited for the audience (young people) as it is too formal. (not addressed as well in the article)
Does not answer the question (only mentions the problems and does not provide advice/solutions)
Negative Tone

# data[].attributes.body
The point was clear and question was answered and it was written well

# data[].attributes.body
The article uses a wide range of vocabulary, good details, and is very well written, however it does not answer the question

# data[].attributes.body
It's very indirect and doesn't address the question directly. The vocabulary used is good and the target audience isn't addressed either

# data[].attributes.body
• Good use of vocabulary (could be too complex for magazine article?)
• Paragraphs are divided into points
• Clear negative tone towards tourism
• Use of connectives
• Devices like metaphors, rhetorical questions are used
• Does not answer the question of "advising what to consider when deciding on a holiday destination"

# data[].attributes.body
Well written and structured but doesn't quite answer the question - it isn't direct, needs to also use appropriate register if it is addressing a younger audience

# data[].attributes.body
Not very concise/too long. Not fully relevant and does not clearly or properly answer the question.

# data[].attributes.body
Well structured and organised paragraphs and sentences
Register and tone is clear
Answers the question

# data[].attributes.body
The use of vocab is really good and there are many details, however, it doesn't answer the question

# data[].attributes.body
Does not answer the question and diverts. Well written and structured though.

# data[].attributes.body
Good writing and details but doesn't answer the question and doesn't address to the audience mentioned in the question (young people)

# data[].attributes.body
Structured clearly, answers the question, there is a clear tone and registered; it is also maintained

# data[].attributes.body
The article used a wide range of vocabulary and was well written and well structured but the question wasn't answered and the main point wasn't clear.

# data[].attributes.body
Good vocabulary
Well structured paragraphs and sentences
Answers the question

# data[].attributes.body
Good use of vocabulary, however, no use of conversational tone and it is off topic

# data[].attributes.body
The writing is good, the answer is well structured and has a good range of ideas. However, it doesn't answer the question

# data[].attributes.body
Answers the question. Uses subheadings for the paragraphs. Good detail and good point. good vocabulary

# data[].attributes.body
Well structured and organised (into paragraphs)
Uses good vocabulary and sentence structure
Doesn't answer the questions and too long

# data[].attributes.body
In this article there is a lot of explanation about the different points one may consider, and has a good structure but it doesn't answer the question.

# data[].attributes.body
Answers the question
Regsister and tone is proper
Good vocab and good detail

# data[].attributes.body
Structured properly, good vocabulary. But doesn't answer the questions

# data[].attributes.body
Register and tone is well suited for the audience of young people

Managed to actually explain the points on what they should consider in detail

Answers the question