# data[].attributes.body
some buildings , or businesses may get shut down or not able to get though due to the crowd in front of it and it effects buildings surrounding it

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Pros and Cons of Protest in American History Essay | Bartleby

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Free Essay: Assembly can lead to change or it can lead to horrible circumstances, sometimes planned or sometimes accidental. Over the years people have used...

# data[].attributes.body
some people or protests cause arrest

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Pros and Cons of Protest in American History Essay | Bartleby

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Free Essay: Assembly can lead to change or it can lead to horrible circumstances, sometimes planned or sometimes accidental. Over the years people have used...

# data[].attributes.body
some cause unhealthy issues like hunger strikes and even when its cold people stand out in the cold which makes people sick and hunger strikes cause health issues

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Hunger-strike, as a form of a political struggle, is quite widely spread in the history of the newly independent Armenia.

An opposition candidate running in the February 18 presidential election, Andrias Ghukasytan, conducted a 30-day hunger-strike ahead of the voting as a sign of protest against electoral processes in Armenia. The second-placed candidate in the polls, Raffi Hovhannisian, declared a hunger-strike in the post-election period to dispute the voting outcomes. After a 21-day protest in Liberty Square, he is going to end his hunger-strike later on Sunday.

Ever since gaining independence, Armenia has seen numerous other cases of hunger-strikes, including in penitentiary institutions.

The phenomenon is known for both its positive and negative impacts. To know more about the advantages and disadvantages of fasting treatment, Tert.am has talked to supporters and opponents of the theory.

Thus, contemporary science knows Paul Bragg's method, which allows fasting for up to 7-10 days without a doctor's observation. Patients choosing this method of treatment are recommended only to use water while fasting.

Bragg's method allows fasting for no more than 21 days every year after certain adaptation procedures.

The Yoga methods of fasting have a much longer history. Useful information about that can be also found on the Armenian Yoga Federation's website.

Indications for fasting treatment are given in case of such medical conditions as bronchial asthma, ischemic heart disease, chronical bronchitis, benign tumors, pancreatitis, skin allergies etc.

The contraindications are given to patients with malignant tumors (though Bragg insists on the contrary), people who are up to 15 percent underweight, as well as those suffering from pulmonary TB, blood diseases, diabetes, heart and stomach disorders, stomach ulcer etc.

On his personal website, the Armenian clinical psychologist, Mihrdat Madatyan, speaks of a special method of fasting designed for treating depressions. Patients under treatment in psychiatric hospitals are known to have fully overcome mental problems after two or three weeks of fasting under doctors' observation.

"А patient experiences mixed feelings while on fasting. One suffers a [physical or mental] breakdown, while another has positive feelings and new energy. Hunger helps the organism overcome the ordinary monotonous condition. A long-term fasting totally eliminates the feeling of depression," says Karine Sargsyan, a proctologist and gastroenterologist.

Speaking to Tert.am, Nona Martirosyan, an endocrinologist, explained the hormonal changes caused by fasting. "Changes are possible. Depending on the duration, [the organism] may normalize at the expense of compensatory mechamisms," she said, adding that such hormonal changes depend on the organism's predisposition.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Hunger-strike: Medical aspects, advantages and disadvantages

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Hunger-strike, as a form of a political struggle, is quite widely spread in the history of the newly independent Armenia. An opposition candidate running in the February 18 presidential election, Andrias Ghukasytan, conducted a 30-day hunger-strike ahead of the voting as a sign of protest against electoral processes in Armenia.

# data[].attributes.body
some protests arent all reasonable but still get justified

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Lessons learned

Regarding "Student protests against gun violence sweep U.S." (Page A1, Thursday), watching the national coverage of the school walkouts and marches, I kept thinking of Curtis Rhodes, the Needville ISD superintendent who threatened students with harsh punishment if they dared participate. How sad that these kids had to miss the best civics lesson they could ever receive. More than 3,000 schools participated nationwide, and these are just a few of the things they learned:

How government works: A month ago, probably very few of these kids could name all the politicians from their area. In the last 30 days, they have not only learned their representatives' names, but visited their websites, learned where they stand on gun safety laws and what lobbies contributed to their campaigns.

How to find their voice: These kids have learned how to express their views. They have written and given speeches, held meetings with politicians and been interviewed by newscasters. They have learned how to hold their own in the presence of some very prominent adults.

Civic activism: They have learned that citizens working together can be a powerful impetus for change. In today's world, it's easy for all of us to feel that some problems are too big to tackle. These kids saw their message spread across the world and felt the support that flooded in. Thanks to this protest, the next generation will be less afraid to work for meaningful change.

Organization: With only minimal help from adults, these kids have learned invaluable lessons about the immense hard work that goes into putting on an event. Hashtags were created, websites were developed, and emails were sent. They obtained permission from city officials to use locations, worked with police to prevent traffic issues, and notified news channels about their events. Each of these kids has discovered the talents that he/she has to offer a group, and together they have managed to organize a nationwide event.

The power of voting: Because of this movement, millions of kids are registering to vote and vowing to take a role in shaping our country's future. Many of them will likely go on to run for office someday.

These kids are discovering their values and finding their voices. They are researching, multi-tasking and organizing. They are learning how it feels to be propelled by the desire for change. They are becoming involved and passionate adults.
Susan Ellis Brittain, Houston

Downside

I hope those schools where the students walked out without the approval or authorization of the administration are properly reprimanded for their illegal actions.

Students cannot be allowed to just get up and walk out whenever they want to. If this is allowed, then what will the administration do if the students decide to walk out in protest for something like getting too much homework? And an unauthorized walkout also puts the safety of those students in jeopardy when they are walking outside the building unsupervised.

The students need to learn that their freedom of speech is not absolute.
Robert M. Louie, Houston

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Friday letters: Student protests: pro and con

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Lessons learned Regarding "Student protests against gun violence sweep U.S." (Page A1, Thursday), watching the national coverage of the school walkouts and marches, I kept thinking of Curtis Rhodes, the Needville ISD superintendent who threatened students with harsh punishment if they dared participate.

# data[].attributes.body
peaceful protesting often leads to riots which are illegal

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Peaceful protest. It has shaped American History for the better. However, in today's society, peaceful protest can have very negative effects on a community. That's not to say that our right to protest is bad, but rather some people don't understand what "peaceful" means. Therefore, there are good and bad points to our Right to Assemble.

There are many examples of good protests that have proven their point without violence. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the most influential people in the Equal Rights movement. This movement was not easy, but an essential fight for civil rights. Today, because of King's efforts, black Americans all around the country are guaranteed the same rights as others. This is sometimes hard to see since the lens is often tainted by blacks and whites alike. His is by far the best example of positive peaceful protests that led to change. It sets the golden standard for what all peaceful protests should be.

Although peaceful protests can change history for the better, in today's age, peaceful protests have been molded into a sinister scapegoat to commit hateful actions and crimes. The Right to Assemble and to Speak, often ends with property damage, injury, and crime These are not peaceful protests,in my opinion. Intent get swayed by a "gang mentality" and the peaceful protest often ensues a riot, which is illegal. Tension and differences of opinion can lead to dangerous things.

Overall, peaceful protests have fallen from grace. They have gone from a noble cause to something that can be used as a get out of jail free card. We used to use peaceful protest to fight against tyranny, now they're being used to tear our country apart. We must remember the actions of Dr. King, Rodney King, and countless others in history. When we try to promote change, we need to communicate the need, not commit a bad deed.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Peaceful protest. It has shaped American History for the better. However, in today's society, peaceful protest can have very negative effects on a community. That's not to say that our right to protest is bad, but rather some people don't understand what "peaceful" means. Therefore, there are good and bad points to our Right to...

# data[].attributes.body
not all people win the protest

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Protesting has often been used as a way of advancing specific agendas and achieving certain outcomes in several societies. In some cases, protests have always resulted into the desired outcomes. However, in some, protests have not been able to achieve their goals.

Pros:

Cons:

report this ad

Protests are violent and they always create disorder in the society. This breaks the routine and the order in which things are supposed to be. They may lead to death: In extreme circumstances, protests may sometimes lead to death of so many people especially where the protests end up turning violent.

10 . People end up losing: It is the people who are the most losers.

report this ad

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Pros and cons of Protesting - Pros an Cons

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Protesting has often been used as a way of advancing specific agendas and achieving certain outcomes in several societies. In some cases, protests have always resulted into the desired outcomes. However, in some, protests have not been able to achieve their goals. Pros: 1. It creates awareness: Protesting has a way of creating awareness regarding ...

# data[].attributes.body
it may create 'unemployment' some business may not accept the protesting and figure it is best to fire you

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Protesting has often been used as a way of advancing specific agendas and achieving certain outcomes in several societies. In some cases, protests have always resulted into the desired outcomes. However, in some, protests have not been able to achieve their goals.

Pros:

Cons:

report this ad

Protests are violent and they always create disorder in the society. This breaks the routine and the order in which things are supposed to be. They may lead to death: In extreme circumstances, protests may sometimes lead to death of so many people especially where the protests end up turning violent.

10 . People end up losing: It is the people who are the most losers.

report this ad

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Pros and cons of Protesting - Pros an Cons

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Protesting has often been used as a way of advancing specific agendas and achieving certain outcomes in several societies. In some cases, protests have always resulted into the desired outcomes. However, in some, protests have not been able to achieve their goals. Pros: 1. It creates awareness: Protesting has a way of creating awareness regarding ...

# data[].attributes.body
may lead to damage of property , wherever you are not everybody may respect the property

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Protesting has often been used as a way of advancing specific agendas and achieving certain outcomes in several societies. In some cases, protests have always resulted into the desired outcomes. However, in some, protests have not been able to achieve their goals.

Pros:

Cons:

report this ad

Protests are violent and they always create disorder in the society. This breaks the routine and the order in which things are supposed to be. They may lead to death: In extreme circumstances, protests may sometimes lead to death of so many people especially where the protests end up turning violent.

10 . People end up losing: It is the people who are the most losers.

report this ad

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Pros and cons of Protesting - Pros an Cons

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Protesting has often been used as a way of advancing specific agendas and achieving certain outcomes in several societies. In some cases, protests have always resulted into the desired outcomes. However, in some, protests have not been able to achieve their goals. Pros: 1. It creates awareness: Protesting has a way of creating awareness regarding ...

# data[].attributes.body
it may lead to injury someone might get hurt in the crowd by accident on purpose

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Protesting has often been used as a way of advancing specific agendas and achieving certain outcomes in several societies. In some cases, protests have always resulted into the desired outcomes. However, in some, protests have not been able to achieve their goals.

Pros:

Cons:

report this ad

Protests are violent and they always create disorder in the society. This breaks the routine and the order in which things are supposed to be. They may lead to death: In extreme circumstances, protests may sometimes lead to death of so many people especially where the protests end up turning violent.

10 . People end up losing: It is the people who are the most losers.

report this ad

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Pros and cons of Protesting - Pros an Cons

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Protesting has often been used as a way of advancing specific agendas and achieving certain outcomes in several societies. In some cases, protests have always resulted into the desired outcomes. However, in some, protests have not been able to achieve their goals. Pros: 1. It creates awareness: Protesting has a way of creating awareness regarding ...

# data[].attributes.body
though it starts peaceful it may not stay that way and start a conflict

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Protesting has often been used as a way of advancing specific agendas and achieving certain outcomes in several societies. In some cases, protests have always resulted into the desired outcomes. However, in some, protests have not been able to achieve their goals.

Pros:

Cons:

report this ad

Protests are violent and they always create disorder in the society. This breaks the routine and the order in which things are supposed to be. They may lead to death: In extreme circumstances, protests may sometimes lead to death of so many people especially where the protests end up turning violent.

10 . People end up losing: It is the people who are the most losers.

report this ad

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Pros and cons of Protesting - Pros an Cons

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Protesting has often been used as a way of advancing specific agendas and achieving certain outcomes in several societies. In some cases, protests have always resulted into the desired outcomes. However, in some, protests have not been able to achieve their goals. Pros: 1. It creates awareness: Protesting has a way of creating awareness regarding ...

# data[].attributes.body
empowers respect and peace

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
At first glance, the long-standing American practice of street protesting seems very odd. Picking up a picket sign and spending hours chanting and marching in 105-degree heat or 15-degree frost are not ordinary things to do. In fact, such behavior outside the context of a protest might be viewed as a sign of mental imbalance.

The history of protest in the U.S. and around the world, however, reveals the abundant good this tradition has done for democracy and the democratic process. The U.S. Bill of Rights enshrines the right to peaceful assembly, evidence that the importance of protest has been recognized since the founding of this nation. But why is protest so useful?

Increasing the Visibility of a Cause

Policy debates can be abstract and may even seem irrelevant to the people not most directly affected by them. In contrast, protest events put warm bodies and heavy feet out into the world, representing an issue. Protest marchers are real people showing that they care enough about their cause to go out and be ambassadors for it.

Marches bring attention. The media, politicians, and bystanders notice when a protest event happens. And if the protest is staged well, it will invariably make some people look at the issue with new eyes. Protests are not persuasive in and of themselves, but they invite conversation, persuasion, and change.

Demonstrating Power

The date was May 1, 2006. The U.S. House of Representatives had just passed H.R. 4437, a bill that essentially called for the deportation of 12 million undocumented immigrants and the imprisonment of anyone who might help them avoid deportation. A massive group of activists, predominantly but not exclusively Latino planned a series of rallies in response. More than 500,000 people marched in Los Angeles, 300,000 in Chicago, and millions more throughout the country; several hundred even marched in Jackson, Mississippi.

The death of H.R. 4437 in committee was not surprising after these actions. When large numbers of people take to the streets in protest, politicians and other key decision-makers notice. There is no guarantee that they will act, but they notice.

Promoting a Sense of Solidarity

You may or may not feel that you are part of a movement even if you happen to agree with its principles. Supporting LGBTQIA rights in the comfort of your own home is one thing, but picking up a sign and supporting the issue in public is another matter: you let the issue define you for the duration of the protest, and you stand together with others to represent a movement. Protests make the movement feel more real to participants.

This gung-ho spirit can also be dangerous. "The crowd," in the words of Søren Kierkegaard, "is untruth." To quote the musician and songwriter Sting, "people go crazy in congregations / they only get better one by one." To guard against the danger of mob thinking as you become emotionally engaged in an issue, remain intellectually honest about it, however challenging that might be.

Building Activist Relationships

Solo activism isn't usually very effective. It can also become dull very quickly. Protest events give activists a chance to meet, network, swap ideas, and build coalitions and community. For many protests, activists form affinity groups, where they find allies for the very specific angle most important to them. Many activist organizations started out at protest events that united and networked their like-minded founders.

Energizing Participants

Ask almost anyone who attended the March on Washington in August 1963, and to this day they'll tell you exactly what it felt like. Good protest events can be spiritual experiences for some people, charging their batteries and inspiring them to get up and fight again another day. Such fortification is, of course, very helpful in the difficult process of working for a cause. By creating newly committed activists, and giving veteran activists a second wind, this energizing effect is a crucial ingredient in the struggle for political change.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Why Protest Events Are Far From a Waste of Time

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Grabbing protest signs and marching are not usual activities for most people. Protests, though, support citizens in various ways as they push for change.

# data[].attributes.body
gives power to citizens and gives them hope and room for change

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
At first glance, the long-standing American practice of street protesting seems very odd. Picking up a picket sign and spending hours chanting and marching in 105-degree heat or 15-degree frost are not ordinary things to do. In fact, such behavior outside the context of a protest might be viewed as a sign of mental imbalance.

The history of protest in the U.S. and around the world, however, reveals the abundant good this tradition has done for democracy and the democratic process. The U.S. Bill of Rights enshrines the right to peaceful assembly, evidence that the importance of protest has been recognized since the founding of this nation. But why is protest so useful?

Increasing the Visibility of a Cause

Policy debates can be abstract and may even seem irrelevant to the people not most directly affected by them. In contrast, protest events put warm bodies and heavy feet out into the world, representing an issue. Protest marchers are real people showing that they care enough about their cause to go out and be ambassadors for it.

Marches bring attention. The media, politicians, and bystanders notice when a protest event happens. And if the protest is staged well, it will invariably make some people look at the issue with new eyes. Protests are not persuasive in and of themselves, but they invite conversation, persuasion, and change.

Demonstrating Power

The date was May 1, 2006. The U.S. House of Representatives had just passed H.R. 4437, a bill that essentially called for the deportation of 12 million undocumented immigrants and the imprisonment of anyone who might help them avoid deportation. A massive group of activists, predominantly but not exclusively Latino planned a series of rallies in response. More than 500,000 people marched in Los Angeles, 300,000 in Chicago, and millions more throughout the country; several hundred even marched in Jackson, Mississippi.

The death of H.R. 4437 in committee was not surprising after these actions. When large numbers of people take to the streets in protest, politicians and other key decision-makers notice. There is no guarantee that they will act, but they notice.

Promoting a Sense of Solidarity

You may or may not feel that you are part of a movement even if you happen to agree with its principles. Supporting LGBTQIA rights in the comfort of your own home is one thing, but picking up a sign and supporting the issue in public is another matter: you let the issue define you for the duration of the protest, and you stand together with others to represent a movement. Protests make the movement feel more real to participants.

This gung-ho spirit can also be dangerous. "The crowd," in the words of Søren Kierkegaard, "is untruth." To quote the musician and songwriter Sting, "people go crazy in congregations / they only get better one by one." To guard against the danger of mob thinking as you become emotionally engaged in an issue, remain intellectually honest about it, however challenging that might be.

Building Activist Relationships

Solo activism isn't usually very effective. It can also become dull very quickly. Protest events give activists a chance to meet, network, swap ideas, and build coalitions and community. For many protests, activists form affinity groups, where they find allies for the very specific angle most important to them. Many activist organizations started out at protest events that united and networked their like-minded founders.

Energizing Participants

Ask almost anyone who attended the March on Washington in August 1963, and to this day they'll tell you exactly what it felt like. Good protest events can be spiritual experiences for some people, charging their batteries and inspiring them to get up and fight again another day. Such fortification is, of course, very helpful in the difficult process of working for a cause. By creating newly committed activists, and giving veteran activists a second wind, this energizing effect is a crucial ingredient in the struggle for political change.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Why Protest Events Are Far From a Waste of Time

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Grabbing protest signs and marching are not usual activities for most people. Protests, though, support citizens in various ways as they push for change.

# data[].attributes.body
gives everybody that believes this and wants to protest about it a chance to participate

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Protesters are a common sight on the University of Georgia campus, often congregating near the Arch to make speeches about topics which they find valuable. Last year, some protests focused on topics including campus carry, the presidential inauguration and the Dakota Access Pipeline.

Campus protests in the past have had significant effects on the national legislative climate. According to the New York Times, "student protests at U.C. Berkeley helped elect Ronald Reagan as governor in 1966, and the anti-war and anti-draft protests did a great deal."

Protests are effective on all sides of the political spectrum. Stan A. Veuger of the American Enterprise said that, "higher attendance at individual demonstrations correlated with more conservative voting by congressional members and a greater share of Republican votes in the 2010 election."

Most importantly, protests are important for students to engage in political movements and make their voices heard.

"[Protests] are a public forum in the streets where different groups can have discussions and show outright public support," said India Hodo, a sophomore entertainment and media studies major. "I think they are central to democracy and go back in this country a very long time."

They also publicize one's beliefs in a way that is impossible without physical protests. When one attends a protest, their values are showcased: they stand up in the limelight to support a cause. This visibility brings a new perspective to students, and allows them to evaluate their beliefs with the context of visibility.

Students must feel deeply about the events in which they participate, because protesting is a serious event. Photographic evidence is often taken at protests and may be visible to future employers online. Students must ask themselves "What do I want to be seen doing? Where do I want to stand in this time in history?"

Not only do protests assist the political climate and create change in the system, but they allow students a stepping-stone into evaluating the issues about which they truly care. No matter the cause, protests are an effective and meaningful way for students to communicate on UGA campuses.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Protesters are a common sight on the University of Georgia campus, often congregating near the Arch to make speeches about topics which they find valuable. Last year, some protests focused on topics including campus carry, the presidential inauguration and the Dakota Access Pipeline. Campus protests in the past have had significant effects on the national legislative climate.

# data[].attributes.body
prevent violence

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Peaceful protest. It has shaped American History for the better. However, in today's society, peaceful protest can have very negative effects on a community. That's not to say that our right to protest is bad, but rather some people don't understand what "peaceful" means. Therefore, there are good and bad points to our Right to Assemble.

There are many examples of good protests that have proven their point without violence. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the most influential people in the Equal Rights movement. This movement was not easy, but an essential fight for civil rights. Today, because of King's efforts, black Americans all around the country are guaranteed the same rights as others. This is sometimes hard to see since the lens is often tainted by blacks and whites alike. His is by far the best example of positive peaceful protests that led to change. It sets the golden standard for what all peaceful protests should be.

Although peaceful protests can change history for the better, in today's age, peaceful protests have been molded into a sinister scapegoat to commit hateful actions and crimes. The Right to Assemble and to Speak, often ends with property damage, injury, and crime These are not peaceful protests,in my opinion. Intent get swayed by a "gang mentality" and the peaceful protest often ensues a riot, which is illegal. Tension and differences of opinion can lead to dangerous things.

Overall, peaceful protests have fallen from grace. They have gone from a noble cause to something that can be used as a get out of jail free card. We used to use peaceful protest to fight against tyranny, now they're being used to tear our country apart. We must remember the actions of Dr. King, Rodney King, and countless others in history. When we try to promote change, we need to communicate the need, not commit a bad deed.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Peaceful protest. It has shaped American History for the better. However, in today's society, peaceful protest can have very negative effects on a community. That's not to say that our right to protest is bad, but rather some people don't understand what "peaceful" means. Therefore, there are good and bad points to our Right to...

# data[].attributes.body
is usually good for the community

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Protesting has often been used as a way of advancing specific agendas and achieving certain outcomes in several societies. In some cases, protests have always resulted into the desired outcomes. However, in some, protests have not been able to achieve their goals.

Pros:

Cons:

report this ad

Protests are violent and they always create disorder in the society. This breaks the routine and the order in which things are supposed to be. They may lead to death: In extreme circumstances, protests may sometimes lead to death of so many people especially where the protests end up turning violent.

10 . People end up losing: It is the people who are the most losers.

report this ad

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Pros and cons of Protesting - Pros an Cons

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Protesting has often been used as a way of advancing specific agendas and achieving certain outcomes in several societies. In some cases, protests have always resulted into the desired outcomes. However, in some, protests have not been able to achieve their goals. Pros: 1. It creates awareness: Protesting has a way of creating awareness regarding ...

# data[].attributes.body
promotes democracy

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Protesting has often been used as a way of advancing specific agendas and achieving certain outcomes in several societies. In some cases, protests have always resulted into the desired outcomes. However, in some, protests have not been able to achieve their goals.

Pros:

Cons:

report this ad

Protests are violent and they always create disorder in the society. This breaks the routine and the order in which things are supposed to be. They may lead to death: In extreme circumstances, protests may sometimes lead to death of so many people especially where the protests end up turning violent.

10 . People end up losing: It is the people who are the most losers.

report this ad

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Pros and cons of Protesting - Pros an Cons

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Protesting has often been used as a way of advancing specific agendas and achieving certain outcomes in several societies. In some cases, protests have always resulted into the desired outcomes. However, in some, protests have not been able to achieve their goals. Pros: 1. It creates awareness: Protesting has a way of creating awareness regarding ...

# data[].attributes.body
brings attention to an issue

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Protesting has often been used as a way of advancing specific agendas and achieving certain outcomes in several societies. In some cases, protests have always resulted into the desired outcomes. However, in some, protests have not been able to achieve their goals.

Pros:

Cons:

report this ad

Protests are violent and they always create disorder in the society. This breaks the routine and the order in which things are supposed to be. They may lead to death: In extreme circumstances, protests may sometimes lead to death of so many people especially where the protests end up turning violent.

10 . People end up losing: It is the people who are the most losers.

report this ad

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Pros and cons of Protesting - Pros an Cons

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Protesting has often been used as a way of advancing specific agendas and achieving certain outcomes in several societies. In some cases, protests have always resulted into the desired outcomes. However, in some, protests have not been able to achieve their goals. Pros: 1. It creates awareness: Protesting has a way of creating awareness regarding ...

# data[].attributes.body
it is a peaceful argument

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Jump to navigation Skip navigation

Can my free speech be restricted because of what I say - even if it is controversial?

Where can I engage in free speech activity?

How about on private property?

Do I need a permit before I engage in free speech activity?

Q.Do I need a permit before I engage in free speech activity?

A.

Not usually. However, certain types of events require permits. For example:

A march or parade that does not stay on the sidewalk, and other events that require blocking traffic or street closure;

A large rally requiring the use of sound amplifying devices; or

A rally at certain designated parks or plazas.

Many permit procedures require that the application be filed several weeks in advance of the event. However, the First Amendment prohibits such an advance notice requirement from being used to prevent protests in response to recent news events. Also, many permit ordinances give too much discretion to the police or city officials to impose conditions on the event, such as the route of a march or the sound levels of amplification equipment. Such restrictions may violate the First Amendment if they are unnecessary for traffic control or public safety, or if they interfere significantly with effective communication to the intended audience. A permit cannot be denied because the event is controversial or will express unpopular views.

If organizers have not obtained a permit, where can a march take place?

May I distribute leaflets and other literature on public sidewalks without a permit?

Do I have a right to picket on public sidewalks?

What do I do if I get stopped by the police?

Q.What do I do if I get stopped by the police?

A.

Stay calm, be polite, and don't run. Don't argue, resist, or obstruct the police, even if you are innocent or you believe that the police are violating your rights. In some states, you must give your name if asked to identify yourself, but you do not have to provide an ID or other paperwork. Make sure to keep your hands where police can see them. Point out that you are not disrupting anyone else's activity and that the First Amendment protects your actions. Ask if you are free to leave. If the officer says yes, calmly and silently walk away.
Read more about what to do if you're stopped by the police, with special information for non-citizens.

And if I'm under arrest?

Can I be searched?

What do I do if my rights have been violated?

Do I have the right to photograph or videotape during protests?

Q.Do I have the right to photograph or videotape during protests?

A.

Yes. When you are lawfully present in any public space, you have the right to photograph anything that is in plain view. That includes pictures of federal buildings, transportation facilities, and the police. When you are on private property, the property owner may set rules about the taking of photographs or video. Police officers may not confiscate or demand to view your digital photographs or video without a warrant, nor may they delete your photographs or video under any circumstances. However, they may legitimately order citizens to cease activities that are truly interfering with legitimate law enforcement operations.
Read more on the rights of photographers.

Can government impose a financial charge to exercise free speech rights?

What if we can't afford the fees?

Do counter-demonstrators have free speech rights?

Does it matter if other speech activities have taken place at the same location?

Fight for our rights

Take a stand.
Donate to the ACLU.

Donate

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The First Amendment right to join with fellow citizens in protest or peaceful assembly is critical to a functioning democracy. But it is also unfortunately true that governments and police can violate this right through the use of mass arrests, illegal use of force, criminalization of protest, and other means intended to thwart free public expression.

# data[].attributes.body
some protest get justified

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Jump to navigation Skip navigation

Can my free speech be restricted because of what I say - even if it is controversial?

Where can I engage in free speech activity?

How about on private property?

Do I need a permit before I engage in free speech activity?

Q.Do I need a permit before I engage in free speech activity?

A.

Not usually. However, certain types of events require permits. For example:

A march or parade that does not stay on the sidewalk, and other events that require blocking traffic or street closure;

A large rally requiring the use of sound amplifying devices; or

A rally at certain designated parks or plazas.

Many permit procedures require that the application be filed several weeks in advance of the event. However, the First Amendment prohibits such an advance notice requirement from being used to prevent protests in response to recent news events. Also, many permit ordinances give too much discretion to the police or city officials to impose conditions on the event, such as the route of a march or the sound levels of amplification equipment. Such restrictions may violate the First Amendment if they are unnecessary for traffic control or public safety, or if they interfere significantly with effective communication to the intended audience. A permit cannot be denied because the event is controversial or will express unpopular views.

If organizers have not obtained a permit, where can a march take place?

May I distribute leaflets and other literature on public sidewalks without a permit?

Do I have a right to picket on public sidewalks?

What do I do if I get stopped by the police?

Q.What do I do if I get stopped by the police?

A.

Stay calm, be polite, and don't run. Don't argue, resist, or obstruct the police, even if you are innocent or you believe that the police are violating your rights. In some states, you must give your name if asked to identify yourself, but you do not have to provide an ID or other paperwork. Make sure to keep your hands where police can see them. Point out that you are not disrupting anyone else's activity and that the First Amendment protects your actions. Ask if you are free to leave. If the officer says yes, calmly and silently walk away.
Read more about what to do if you're stopped by the police, with special information for non-citizens.

And if I'm under arrest?

Can I be searched?

What do I do if my rights have been violated?

Do I have the right to photograph or videotape during protests?

Q.Do I have the right to photograph or videotape during protests?

A.

Yes. When you are lawfully present in any public space, you have the right to photograph anything that is in plain view. That includes pictures of federal buildings, transportation facilities, and the police. When you are on private property, the property owner may set rules about the taking of photographs or video. Police officers may not confiscate or demand to view your digital photographs or video without a warrant, nor may they delete your photographs or video under any circumstances. However, they may legitimately order citizens to cease activities that are truly interfering with legitimate law enforcement operations.
Read more on the rights of photographers.

Can government impose a financial charge to exercise free speech rights?

What if we can't afford the fees?

Do counter-demonstrators have free speech rights?

Does it matter if other speech activities have taken place at the same location?

Fight for our rights

Take a stand.
Donate to the ACLU.

Donate

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The First Amendment right to join with fellow citizens in protest or peaceful assembly is critical to a functioning democracy. But it is also unfortunately true that governments and police can violate this right through the use of mass arrests, illegal use of force, criminalization of protest, and other means intended to thwart free public expression.

# data[].attributes.body
gives people ability to express themselves and how they feel

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Jump to navigation Skip navigation

Can my free speech be restricted because of what I say - even if it is controversial?

Where can I engage in free speech activity?

How about on private property?

Do I need a permit before I engage in free speech activity?

Q.Do I need a permit before I engage in free speech activity?

A.

Not usually. However, certain types of events require permits. For example:

A march or parade that does not stay on the sidewalk, and other events that require blocking traffic or street closure;

A large rally requiring the use of sound amplifying devices; or

A rally at certain designated parks or plazas.

Many permit procedures require that the application be filed several weeks in advance of the event. However, the First Amendment prohibits such an advance notice requirement from being used to prevent protests in response to recent news events. Also, many permit ordinances give too much discretion to the police or city officials to impose conditions on the event, such as the route of a march or the sound levels of amplification equipment. Such restrictions may violate the First Amendment if they are unnecessary for traffic control or public safety, or if they interfere significantly with effective communication to the intended audience. A permit cannot be denied because the event is controversial or will express unpopular views.

If organizers have not obtained a permit, where can a march take place?

May I distribute leaflets and other literature on public sidewalks without a permit?

Do I have a right to picket on public sidewalks?

What do I do if I get stopped by the police?

Q.What do I do if I get stopped by the police?

A.

Stay calm, be polite, and don't run. Don't argue, resist, or obstruct the police, even if you are innocent or you believe that the police are violating your rights. In some states, you must give your name if asked to identify yourself, but you do not have to provide an ID or other paperwork. Make sure to keep your hands where police can see them. Point out that you are not disrupting anyone else's activity and that the First Amendment protects your actions. Ask if you are free to leave. If the officer says yes, calmly and silently walk away.
Read more about what to do if you're stopped by the police, with special information for non-citizens.

And if I'm under arrest?

Can I be searched?

What do I do if my rights have been violated?

Do I have the right to photograph or videotape during protests?

Q.Do I have the right to photograph or videotape during protests?

A.

Yes. When you are lawfully present in any public space, you have the right to photograph anything that is in plain view. That includes pictures of federal buildings, transportation facilities, and the police. When you are on private property, the property owner may set rules about the taking of photographs or video. Police officers may not confiscate or demand to view your digital photographs or video without a warrant, nor may they delete your photographs or video under any circumstances. However, they may legitimately order citizens to cease activities that are truly interfering with legitimate law enforcement operations.
Read more on the rights of photographers.

Can government impose a financial charge to exercise free speech rights?

What if we can't afford the fees?

Do counter-demonstrators have free speech rights?

Does it matter if other speech activities have taken place at the same location?

Fight for our rights

Take a stand.
Donate to the ACLU.

Donate

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The First Amendment right to join with fellow citizens in protest or peaceful assembly is critical to a functioning democracy. But it is also unfortunately true that governments and police can violate this right through the use of mass arrests, illegal use of force, criminalization of protest, and other means intended to thwart free public expression.