# data[].attributes.body
You cant just assume its an inside plot that will never stand up in court

# data[].attributes.body
i side with Stella because McDonald's knew that the coffee being that hot was a problem from the past

# data[].attributes.body
now i side with stella because she wasn't the one driving also the car wasn't in motion while adding the cream and sugar,but however mcdonalds shouldn't have had there coffee so hot which gave her severe burns within seconds.

# data[].attributes.headline
Laiba Syeda               My opinion still hasn't changed. I still believe that Stella Liebeck should be held liable for her own damages because although the burns settled within seconds, if she chose to not risk putting herself in the danger by putting the coffee in between her legs, and possibly put it in the cup holder, the coffee would've never made contact with her skin in the first place.      

# data[].attributes.subject
Laiba Syeda               My opinion still hasn't changed. I still believe that Stella Liebeck should be held liable for her own damages because although the burns settled within seconds, if she chose to not risk putting herself in the danger by putting the coffee in between her legs, and possibly put it in the cup holder, the coffee would've never made contact with her skin in the first place.      

# data[].attributes.body
in addition, the lady was wearing sweat pants, which should be hard for you to be burned through but mcdonalds decided they wanna be extra and make it at 180 degrees for no type of reason, even though children, the elderly, etc were getting burned. i'm proud of stella she secured her bag!

# data[].attributes.body
My opinion still has not been changed due to the fact that coffee is not suppose to be put between the lap and also because the number of people getting burned from the coffee was not able to justify from the amount that was being produced

# data[].attributes.body
my opinions have changed, yesterday I had sided with Mcdonalds because I thought Stella was the one that decided to put the milk and sugar in her coffee on her own while she was driving so she burned herself at her own risk, however now that I know that she wasn't actually driving an that she was parked and she burned herself and that Mcdonalds had knowledge on how their coffee was served at extremely high temperatures and could cause 3 degree burns it changed my view on Mcdonalds.

# data[].attributes.body
I still side with stella liebeck because mcdonalds knew that the coffee was hot and could cause severe burns. Also other people have been burned by the hot coffee as well.

# data[].attributes.headline
i still agree with stella because she got bad burns due to the coffee and this has happened before to others and mcds decided to not treat it as a big problem and they didnt change the policy of keeping coffee between 180 and 190 degrees 

# data[].attributes.subject
i still agree with stella because she got bad burns due to the coffee and this has happened before to others and mcds decided to not treat it as a big problem and they didnt change the policy of keeping coffee between 180 and 190 degrees 

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Mcdonalds reliable because they knew that the coffee was hot enough to cause severe burns. Additionally Mcdonalds had multiple cases where customers have gotten burned from the coffee and they still didnt think to adjust the temperature of the coffee.

# data[].attributes.body
I side with Stella because of how hot the coffee was which gave her no time to react.

# data[].attributes.body
i side with Stella because of how old she was and the fact that she was not driving and the car was not moving also McDonald's should have never had the coffee that hot if they knew it was a problem from the past

# data[].attributes.body
After reading this article my point of view has changed slightly.Now knowing that stella was not driving & that the car wasn't in motion, I now side with Stella.To add on, Mcdonalds has been through this case several times before.They should have taken those last incidents as a way to learn

# data[].attributes.body
My opinion has not changed but as in fact proved my point even more that the court was right to rule in favor of Liebeck because she was parked and also the content within the coffee cup spilled right out as soon as she opened it. It also caused 3rd degree burns and McDonald's kinda insulted her by only trying to compensate her with only $800.

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the new information Mcdonalds is even more at fault and liable for a multitude of reasons. In this persoanl case Liebeck was in a stopped vechcile so you cant claim neglagince on her part and the spill was just an average mishap, which granted these happen but the important factor is that this 79 year od lady had only 2-3 seconds to react and clean herself up before third degree burns set in which isnt even enough time to relaize what had happened. But the greatest factor in this case is the neglagince Mcdoanlds showed with their coffee, hundreds fo complaints were made to Mcdonalds and not once did they try to fix it. Mcdonalds owes Liebcek even more than previously thought.

# data[].attributes.body
After reading, my opinion has changed as I am now in support of Liebeck. Mcdonalds received several hundred complaints about their hot coffee, and they did nothing to solve the issue. Liebeck was asking for a reasonable compensation, and that was for mdocnalds to pay for her medical bills.

# data[].attributes.body
my review has changed because the car wasn't in motion while she was putting the cream and sugar.

# data[].attributes.body
After reading the true case study, i am still on Stella Liebeck's side and i believe that this true case study reveals McDonalds to be even more liable for the damage. McDonalds had received more than 700 different lawsuits and complaints over their coffee, which was deemed "not just “hot,” but dangerously hot.”

# data[].attributes.body
i first believed stella because of the third degree burns now that the car was not in motion and she wasn't driving changes the case.also that she was trying to open the lid for her milk and sugar which mean the lids weren't easily accessible mcdonalds also had cases of the "hot coffee" issue before and knew this was an issue but proceeded to not fix anything. also the third degree burns set in less than 10 seconds after the spill and she was wearing sweatpants which are generally made out of a thick material. i think mcdonalds is fully responsible for this issue.

# data[].attributes.body
i side with stella sidebeck because it only took 2-3 seconds for third degree burns to settle in.This is a object which is meant to be   consumed and something that hot is to dangerous to be consumed without any warning .

# data[].attributes.body
i belive mcdonalds is still liable. the temputare of the coffee was way to hot to serve to a customer. there wasnt enough warnings to warn her that the coffee may or may not cause second to third degree burns, therefor this incident is mcdonalds fault.

# data[].attributes.body
my views have not changed. she is a idiot for putting a cup of hot joe between your legs . This most likely planned from the start to get money from them because this did happen before

# data[].attributes.body
My views have not changed. I still believe Mcdonalds is guilty. There has been over 700 reports of injury of coffee. So this has happened before. Also coffee takes 3 to 7 seconds to burn you so Liebeck wouldn't have enough time to wipe the coffee off. Plus she was wearing sweatpants which is more absorbent.

# data[].attributes.body
My views haven't changed, I still side with McDonald's, because there is no law explaining how hot (hot coffee) has to be. Since there is no law aka guidelines how can McDonald'
s know how hot their coffee has to be

# data[].attributes.body
After reading a more accurate study of the case my views of the case still stand with Stella but now are more justified in her favor due to the fact that McDonald's was aware of the risk of serving coffee to this degree of heat but neglected to do anything about it and stated that they were aware of their faultiness related to the coffee.

# data[].attributes.body
After reading the true case study i feel Mcdonalds is wrong in this scenario as they have had many complaints that their coffee is extremely hot and even burnt over 700 people   . if a coffee is hot enough to give third degree burns it shouldn't be served at all. i agree with Johns ideas because  neglagince cant be claimed as she spilled the coffee on accident.

# data[].attributes.body
i still side with stella liebeck because the burn was way too severe for the temperature a cup of coffee should be.