# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays , it is common sense that to be able to have a stable job attending universities is a crucial factor in doing so. There are a school of thought that universities rather than providing only knowledge through books should aim towards learning through realistic practice. I wholeheartedly agree with the aforementioned statement due to not only efficiency of passing down wisdom but also the impracticality of the opposite statement.
It can be seen through many researches conducted that learning through actions would be much more rapid and heavier in knowledge acquired. Evidently most of the knowledge acquired during the school years will be easily turned vaguer by real life doings, for instance learning how to code using computers would be much easier to remember than studying thousands of lines. To say that students just have to learn through actions and books are useless is totally false, but in order to memorise what one has studied, knitting in a couple times of practice certainly be more effective than just sitting at a desk staring at books. Moreover, other than obtaining what student have already acquired when reading, realistic action will most definitely help other unknown knowledge.
Conversely, many individuals would argue that rather than wasting time practicing pragmatically, learning academically is  would be enough. This thinking is fundamentally flawed and under valued its opposite term because of its impracticality. Most of the exquisites employees nowadays have a tendency to have already have a habit of being most of the time used to the job before hand. To be in that state, students cant be all day at the table only reading, though reading is still effective for a specific subject or future careers. All in all, universities should move on on teaching vocationally and lessen the academic period teaches.
In conclusion, though both sides have a positive impact on the students future career, I would still highly acknowledge universities approving more vocational lessons to academics.

# data[].attributes.body
Some people argue that universities should provide students with more practical training for their future career. In other words, universities should be vocational instead of being academic.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

# data[].attributes.body
Higher education, undoubtedly, has been a vital determinant of student's future career. Therefore, the consideration between different teaching methods in college is more and more crucial. A school of thought holds that universities should prioritize practical training rather than being academic. From my point of view, I concur with the statement that vocational learning is more beneficial.

On the one hand, it is understandable why people subscribe to the view that academic education is of paramount importance and an obligation to any student since it enables students to have a deeper insight into the major and secures a high-paying job in the future. However, this thinking is flawed and short-sighted in many aspects. Because if students only focus on theoretical knowledge, there will be a lack of experience and practical skills, which are highly demanded in job employment. In addition, those students might miss the chance to become flexible in thinking and action early, and have little preparation before stepping into real life.

On the other hand, vocational teaching exerts a more considerable bearing on one’s career than academic education. Students have already been trained and practiced in specific departments. Hence, they can easily adapt to the new work's position and environment. Moreover, for example, according to job magazines, recruiters from big companies tend to prefer to hire employees who have good experience and pragmatical skills because of their willingness and productivity. Therefore, students could find a job readily as soon as they graduate. Eventually, with continuous efforts, students with vocational training could have high chances to move up their career ladder.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion that vocational teaching should be prioritized widely in universities due to its practical benefits in latter career instead of being academic.

# data[].attributes.body
Higher education has been a vital determinant of economic growth. Therefore, more and more people are heading their concerns to the pros and cons of different pedagogies. There has been a notion that vocational training is ahead of academic learning, to which I completely accede for several reasons.

On the one hand, academic education provides a number of benefits, which mainly resolve around the comprehension of knowledge. This is proved by the intensive coverage of all disciplines, enabling student to become generally knowledgeable. Owing to this, they stand golden chances of mastering a wide variety of profession. Nevertheless, it is apparent that this extra amount of expertise will not exert a great bearing on their future career in that they should only focus on one particular job to ensure stability at work. This not only discredits the method of academic learning, but also further proves the superiority of the other pedagogy.

On the other hand, as mentioned, vocational teaching is of more advantage because of its concentration on only one field of work. Furthermore, learners are exposed to the working environment from an early stage, enabling their quick adaptation and flexibility to their first workspace as a school-leavers. They are also inclined to build interpersonal connections with others, thus are highly likely to get as much support from colleagues as possible. By dint of this, it is conducive that they can work in harmony with others. Eventually, their hard work shall be recognized, helping them get more chances of promotion.

In summary, practicality and experience are the main reasons that justify my preference of vocational tertiary education. To whom it may concerned, they should adapt my guideline on this problem to conduct a significant positive change on the process of teaching and studying.

# data[].attributes.body
Higher education, undoubtedly, has been a vital determinant when it comes to students' preparation for their future profession. However, there are a score of controversy whether if college ought to be theoretical or vocational. A school of thought holds that emphasis should be placed more in vocational skills rather than theoretical knowledge. This essay is going to give some evidents why vocational curriculum brings much more tremendous benefits than the practical one.

The most considerable justification that can be taken into account is that practical training enhance pupil's skill and flexibility when encountering real-life job. In comparison to the academic paradigm, which only provides students with the basis and have some flaw in many aspects such as the lack of experience vocational ones help facilitate critical thinking as well as the flexibility people need to shift from a wide range of profession. As a consequent, they stand a better chance of thriving in our economy.

Another reasons that can not be ignored is that students would be highly prompted to learn more by practical training. Were students to maintain being taught with more and more theory, they would eventually lose their joy in learning. Moreover, this could have an adverse bearing on them as they are kept behind from the society. On the contrary, given the practical ones Each day pupils are encouraged to apply new skils and work on life-related project. Therefore, it is apparent that this kind of paradigm is conducive to not only individual but the societ as a whole.

In conclusion, although i acknowledge that academic knowledge is vital, vocational models exert a more positive outcome

# data[].attributes.body
In this day and age, it is common language that education has been a very aspect to determine our future career. There are certain individuals who maintain their opinion of universities prioritising practical training rather than learning subjects academically. I wholeheartedly believe that vocational training can be more beneficial due to how practical the knowledges are to the outside world and the cognitive skills one get required for various abilities that one must have.

It can be observed that some individuals have the view of accademic learning being the superior way of education due to how these practical skills could help the individual with setting up a correct future career. This way of thinking is flawed due to the lack of experience a student could get whilst acquiring knowledge used for their academical career. Evidently, without the usage of practical skills gained from a vocational courses, the learner would not be able to put their acquired academic knowledge into great use, as they have never had actual experience with it beforehand.

Consequently, the individual has filtered time and budget onto the wrong path of education. This can be visibly observed through the fact that graduates after having had their college degree handed to them, they would tend to be unemployed or undergo an inconsiderable amount of obstacles in the adaptation to the working environment, as cooporations nowadays tends to have their workforce selection leaning to individuals with pragmatical skills in modern-day society.

All in all, I subscribe to the viewpoint of vocational school providing students with different useful pragmatical skills that can be used widely, while academic schools only promote learning about a certain subject without the usage of practicing.

# data[].attributes.body
Universities, along with vocational schools, have ever played a key role in the education system. There is a notion that more practical training should be provided in universities for students' future careers. By way of explanation, universities should be vocational instead of being academic. In my opinion, I disagree with this idea.

On the one hand, vocational schools can provide students with hands-on knowledge and practical experiences, which is vital to students' future jobs. However, this thinking has several flaws. Because students at vocational schools do not have opportunities to approach to theoretical knowledge, they cannot keep up with the development of their careers. For example, if students who want to be programmers study at vocational schools, they cannot comprehend the essence of technology due to limited knowledge. Because of this, they may find innovative technology such as metaverse or blockchain complicated.

On the other hand, academic universities have many advantages. Firstly, students can study a wide range of knowledge, which may be useful for them to choose between many distinct careers. As students have knowledge of many majors, they can indicate which majors and occupations they want to pursue easily. Secondly, in an academic environment, students can improve their soft skills better, which is important to their career paths. For example, by studying academic subjects, especially advanced math, students can develop their solving complicated problems skill.

In conclusion, I do not subscribe to the view that universities should be vocational.

# data[].attributes.body
A school of thought holds that students should be armed with practical training for their future jobs in the universities. From my perspective, irrespective of the benefits from the academic school, the value of vocational universities absolutely outstrips that of academic school.

First and foremost, some people are of belief that the academic educational establishment is beneficial for learner because it enables student to engage in numerous well-paid jobs. However, this thought is immensely unreasonable and exerts an adverse bearing student since it prompts students to not only ignore the practical skills but also excessively focus on theoretical knowledge. Therefore, there is no denying that they become easily vulnerable with shortage of experience once they start working in the profession environment. In contrast, those participating in vocational universities have already had skills and methods after graduated. Hence, they immediately adapt with their working environment and their role in the company can even surpasses that of student from university relating academy.

Secondly, another noticeable merit of engaging in vocational school is that student is able to have jobs immediately after they graduated. Since they have practiced and gained experiences from their study courses, it is unquestionable that they do not have to take part in the internship or an interview like those from academic universities. Moreover, companies in this day and age have a tendency to encourage learner from vocational schools. Because their productivities and effectiveness are far greater than those from ordinary university with academic teaching programs, it is justifiable that the recruiter from many businesses will search for them with a satisfactory wage to attract them apply for their companies.

For all above reasons, universities should give priority to create chances for students to improve more necessary skills for their careers in the future than focusing on only theoretical knowledge.

# data[].attributes.body
Since time immemorial, the university has exerted a bearing on the myriad aspects of learner career. Hence, some people adopt a view that there should be more pragmatical training rather than academic knowledge in universities which is conducive to the student's profession in the future. I am in accordance with the aforementioned statement in light of the fact that vocational universities can be tremendously beneficial to an individual's career prospects

To commence with, some people are of the narrow-minded belief that universities concentrating on practical skills is superfluous whilst the academic universities are more paramount in this day and age. This is such a foolish illusion since they ignore the vital role of practical abilities which is tended to be used in numerous corporations as of late. Without it, academic knowledge shifts to be meaningless since the learner is unable to put this knowledge into practice. Consequently, he or she has filtered time and budget away in such a fail educational establishment. This can be observed in the fact that myriad students afters graduated from universities relating to academic majors are tend to be jobless or undergo an insurmountable obstacle in adapting to the working environment since the corporation has a tendency to recruit individuals with endless pragmatical experiences in modern-day society. This is a testament to why the role of vocational universities should not be stupidly underrated.

Aside from that, school providing skills and education for individual's preparation of jobs is principal as it enables learners to apply for a job immediately. As they have practiced during their courses in the university, there is no denying that their pragmatical experiences, as well as skills in their job, are far more professional than those who merely participate in academic university. In some cases, there is no need for them to undergo the internship as they have already practiced and applied their skills in their jobs. Thus, the recruiter from the company may be inclined to those who graduated from vocational education rather than those from academic universities.

In short, from my standpoint, the vocational school exerts a bearing on learners in beneficial ways. Not only does it prevent the learners from becoming unemployed but also furnish them with professions instantly after graduated

# data[].attributes.body
We all know that education has been a vital determinant to our later career. There is a school of thought that there should be more pragmatical training rather than academic knowledge in universities which is conducive to the student's profession in the future. In my point of view, I contend that vocational exerts a substantial bearing on undergraduates’ progress.
It is understandable why some people subscribe to the view that academic skills are a must since academic training can give students a larger view about the subject that they are studying. That’s the fundamental for later profession. However, this thinking is flawed because it can make them lack of experiences and unprepared when they come to professional working environment. Consequently, without having experiences and collision, the students will fell disoriented and choke.
On the other hand, students in vocational school are taught first-hand knowledge and are trained with challenged tasks. In addition,  undergraduates in vocational school possess the chance to intern for corporations that suits their major. Undoubtedly,  they gain tremendous experiences and skills for later career. Therefore, when it comes to their profession, it’s much easier for them to find a consistent job, and it enable them to getting more recognition which allow them to achieve better position in a shorter time span.
In conclusion, despite its advantages, academic school couldn’t provide students with enough experience and major knowledge while vocational schools guarantee undergraduates a job immediately after graduation.

# data[].attributes.body
University plays an important role in the field of education. Many people has given their opinion that universities should prioritise the practical training rather than academic leaning. Despite the fact that intellectual learning brings a plenty of advantages to student, I concur with the statement that vocational training is more beneficial.

On the one hand, it is understandable why many people appreciate academic learning. It provides students with the basic knowledge that helps student understand more about the root of every problems. Moreover, it is believed that having academic degrees such as a bachelor’s degree is the key to success. However, this thinking is flawed due to the fact that the problem that every student has to face up with is how to apply the knowledge that they gained in practice. This leads to the lack of experiences gained after they graduate college and the struggle to deal with their future jobs, which results in inefficient works.

On the other hand, in vocational universities, undergraduates are taught first-hand experience and has internship at companies in their field. This in fact enable them to adapt to the work environment faster as they have experienced the work before. In addition, they are more likely to come up with a better response to the task that they are given, compared to an academic learner. This can result in better chance to success as the superiors will will notice their achievements and promote them.

In conclusion, from my point of view, vocational university is still a better choice for student because it provides students with not only the knowledge that they need to know but also how to apply that knowledge to real life situations.

# data[].attributes.body
It is common knowledge that universities are places where students can obtain profound knowledge of the fields they are following, and that both theoretical knowledge and practical experience are essential for their future career. However, there is some controversy among people about whether or not universities should place less emphasis on theoretical knowledge and more on practical training throughout their courses .In my opinion, I agree with the statement that vocational training has a more vital role in the educational field.

It is understandable why some people subscribe to the view that academic skills are a must if one wish to secure a high-paying job. Supporters of this thinking may argue that it promotes undergraduates to focus on theoretical skills and neglect practical skills, in order to have a degree or a P.H.D, stand a better chance of landing a high-paid job. However, this thinking is flawed,when it can leave them vulnerable and unprepared when they are in a professional work environment. For instance, an immature and inexperienced student who embarks on tertiary education, who keeps insist on the idea that having a bachelor degree is the shortest path of landing a job are those who are most likely to fail and fall under pressure. They are inexperience and lack the skills that are required irrespective of the massive amount of knowledge they have obtained during school training.

On the other hand, vocational provide students with practical working abilities, which enable students to approach recruiters and get the job easier. In addition, vocational universities furnish students with practical knowledge not only about the career that they have chosen but also about relating area. For example, student after graduation can have the chance when they have to work in the field that different from what they have chosen. This is when the knowledge about relating area that they studied at school becomes useful. Moreover, learner can be provided with situation-solving skills which very conductive as sometimes they have to tackle with puzzling situations, which make student become more flexible with their future career and give them more chances to choose a work in the future.

In conclusion, I hold a view that universities should be vocational due to more job opportunities as it offers and guarantee students having jobs immediately after graduation.

# data[].attributes.body
Education provided by universities has always garnered a great deal of attention . Some people reckon that universities should center on vocational skills rather than academic ones. From my point of view, I concur with the aforementioned statement due to the fact that vocational is more beneficial than academic in terms of job prospects.

Conversely, there are those who are subscribe to the assumption that academic skills are a must if one wish to secure a high-paying job. This style of thinking is not only flawed but also harmful ,as it promotes undergraduates to focus on theoretical skills and neglect practical skills ,in order to have a degree or a P.H.D, in which it can leave them vulnerable and unprepared when they are in a professional work environment. For example, a young and immature undergraduate, who harbors  the idea that having a bachelor degree is the shortest path of landing a job are those who are most likely to fail and fall under pressure for they are inexperience and lack the skills that are required . Ultimately leaving them surpassed by those who pursued practical skills for they are skilled and experienced.

Another point is that those who are experienced are more likely to easily adapt with new environment and they are more opened for chances of promotions . In vocational schools , undergraduates are taught first-hand experiences and they are trained to cope with challenges that might arise in their desired profession. Thus leading them to be more capable and more valuable in the eyes of their employers , ultimately resulting in them being an irreplaceable asset for their company .

In conclusion, despite having it advantages, liberal art schools are inferior to that of vocational schools for they do not teach their students practical and useful skills that are required when applying for a job.

# data[].attributes.body
Education has been a vital determinant to each individual’s prospect career-wise. A sum of people subscribe to the view that universities should be vocational instead of being academic. In my humble opinion, I contend that vocational exerts a more considerable bearing to one’s career than academic.

First and foremost, academic is a necessary kernel for every individual. The reason to why is because when knowledge is acquired thoroughly in university, better fundament for a profession is set. However, this thinking is short-sighted because focusing on merely academic creates lack of experience and interpersonal connections. Consequently, not having widen their social-circle, the students couldn’t get support and feel disoriented.

On the other hand, focusing on vocational aid students skills and method. Instead of burying students in loads of books, students get to practise their profession to gain experiences and acquirements. Moreover, students could exchange with many people, which increase their recognition and enhance their communication skills precursor to higher social status. Therefore, it is apparent that vocational creates better values than academic.

Take everything into account, I am of the opinion that tertiary education should concentrate on developing students vocational skills.

# data[].attributes.body
There is a rising trend toward the opinion that universities should prioritize the practical training for future career rather than academic training. Although academic teaching method are considered more beneficial in some way, I agree with the statement that vocational training has a more vital place in the educational field.

On the one hand, academic training can give students a larger view about the area that they are studying about and provide undergraduate with bigger source of documents and information. However, this thinking is nonsensicial. As the population raised gradually lately, there are less job opportunities than it used to be. Students who lack of practical working skill can be surpassed by them who came from vocational universites as they have higher knowledge about what they should do. Moreover, academic schools train student to get to higher place in their job, for instance, professor and doctor. These position requires few years of studying, researching and lots of fee, which very unsuitable for students who are struggling with financial problems.

On the other hand, vocational provide students with practical working abilities, which enable students to approach recruiters and get the job easier. Plus, vocational universities furnish students with practical knowledge not only about the career that they have chosen but also about relating area. For example, student after graduation can have the chance when they have to work in the field that different from what they have chosen. This is when the knowledge about relating area that they studied at school becomes useful. Moreover, learner can be provided with situation-solving skills which very conductive as sometimes they have to tackle with puzzling situations, which make student become more flexible with their future career and give them more chances to choose a work in the future.

In conclusion, despite academic school has its own advantages, vocational school is still a better choice due to it’s provision in practical knowledge and skills.

# data[].attributes.body
As of late, there is an escalating trend to believe that universities should prioritize vocational training for practical work rather than theoretical knowledge. Although it may initially conducive in terms of financial, I concur academic education generally hold a greater value on individual scale in long term.
The opponents of concentrating merely on practical skills training point out that by giving opportunities to immediately engage in steady employment, students can ease the financial burden they suffered from various life aspects. This thinking, however, is  seriously absurd. Normally, these available  jobs will pay well at first but stable over time and lack of opportunities for advancement as well as changing your career path. In light of this, jump into contemporary jobs instantly  instead of acquiring academic knowledge also synonymous with limiting your own choices.
On the other hand, scholars who underwent adequate theoretical programs, tend to stand at a better chance of high-salary occupations. With their insight, they identify themselves  ability as well as strength, hence following a prosperous and chronic career path. For instance, despite colossal amount of time  medical department's undergraduates   have to cost  to finish the dense program, their employment will be definitely guaranteed with wide range of possible  options such as doctor, pharmacist,..
In conclusion, I hold the view that while focusing on practical skills can solve several initial problems, invest in academic education will permanently exert a positive bearing on individual's career.

# data[].attributes.body
Opinions are divided on whether universities should be vocational or academic. Certain people strongly believe that universities should be vocational, which may be beneficial for student’s career prospects, instead of being academic. I agree with the statement due to the higher chances of landing a job, which still includes logical thinking, contrary to popular belief.

Firstly, vocational universities remain the superior option to academic ones, because students can have jobs immediately after graduating. Vocational universities focus on skills and practicality that help them to be less unprepared for the outside working environment, which is harsh and intense with loads of overtime work. This will lead to students' ability to pull off consistent performance at work and may affect the chances of them getting a promotion, which ensures their, and maybe everyone’s final goal in work - a stable source of income. Taking the opposite, academic universities, for instance. This type of school mainly teaches students complex lessons of theories related to academic fields such as science and biology. However, not all students can guarantee their job as a scientist or biologist after graduation, which wastes their years of studying. All in all, it is crucial for universities to be vocational because it secures the job opportunities for undergraduates.

Certain people contend that the vocational school can be illogical due to the fact the majority of their curriculum are skills and practices. However, it would be gullible to hold such a belief because this thinking overlooks logic in every form of learning. It is evident that people can hardly think and work efficiently without logic, let alone learning. There are numerous fields that make up vocational universities, namely business and hospitality, which hold numerous utterly important positions such as CEOs and managers, and these jobs are demand-thinking, if not, require more logic than other academic jobs. In short, every job requires logic to function, thus it is narrow-minded to believe that vocational jobs are not logical.

In conclusion, I subscribe to a view that universities should be vocational due to more job opportunities it offers to students and guarantee them having jobs immediately after graduation.

# data[].attributes.body
A sum of people believes that colleges should prioritize their student's practical training rather than academical knowledge. In my opinion, although pragmatic applications are indeed important, college is not necessary the best place to learn, whereas high-end knowledge aren't easily found outside university.
These group of people believes that practical skill will help one land a steady job as well as helping one adapt more easily to his or her work. However, there is a flaw in this mindset. Schools may be able to teach students many things, but when it comes to practicality, there are much better choices. It is best to gain hand-on experiences while working, which is exactly why universities usually probe their scholars to engage in activities such as internships.
On the other hand, undergraduate who undergo extensive academical courses will stand out among the crowd in the eyes of employers, helping them obtain more well-paid employments. Being well-educated can also allow them to adapt to work as well as picking up practical abilities easier and faster. With their good insight, they would also be value within the organization so that people are more likely to take their opinion into consideration which would lead to them getting more recognition allowing them to climb up the company hierarchy quickly and land better position in a shorter span of time.
In conclusion, although practical knowledge are nothing to scoffs at and undoubtedly very valuable, universities should still focus on teaching more academic education. There are simply better options to learn how to utilize pragmatic skills.