# data[].attributes.body
Unmasking a crooked president.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Watergate Scandal: Timeline and Background

# data[].attributes.body
The McCann's accused of neglecting their daughter.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The parents of missing girl Madeleine McCann have told a judge-led inquiry into UK media practices they were left distraught by press suggestions they were responsible for Madeleine's death.

Gerry McCann told the Leveson Inquiry many of the stories were untruthful, sinister or, he believed, made up.

His wife, Kate, said seeing her private diary published in the News of the World made her feel "totally violated".

Earlier lawyer Mark Lewis said phone hacking was not restricted to the NoW.

Madeleine went missing aged three on holiday in Portugal in May 2007.

In the first stage of his inquiry, Lord Justice Leveson is hearing from alleged victims of media intrusion at the Royal Courts of Justice in London.

Asked why he and his wife had agreed to give evidence, Mr McCann said there was "one simple reason".

"We feel that a system has to be put in place to protect ordinary people from the damage that the media can cause by behaviour which falls far below what I would call acceptable."

Mr McCann said the couple had got the impression there was a "genuine want to help attitude from journalists" shortly after their daughter's disappearance and "a huge amount of empathy".

He also acknowledged that the media had been helpful on occasions, particularly when launching appeals - and thanked people who had come forward as a result of them.

But Mrs McCann said she felt the relentless coverage was "stopping their chances" of finding Madeleine.

"She was on the front page every day for a period.... When a story is so negative, it's not helpful," she said.

Mr McCann said the couple also quickly realised there was a "tremendous amount of speculation" and he believed "elements" of the police inquiry were being leaked to the Portuguese press, which was running stories based on "snippets of information".

These were picked up by the British press, which could not tell if these stories were true or not, he said.

"They didn't know the source, they didn't know whether it was accurate, it was exaggerated and often downright untruthful and often, I believe, on occasions, made up," he said.

Mr McCann said a Daily Mirror headline, which read "She's dead", was "one of the most distressing headlines that was presented as factual and it was just taken from a supposition".

He went on to say "more sinister elements" then started to creep in, the first of which was a Portuguese article which suggested a cover-up, "some sort of sinister agreement between us and our friends".

The inquiry also heard a flavour of the articles which led the couple to successfully pursue a libel action, including a Daily Star headline which read: "Maddy 'sold' by hard-up McCanns", which Mr McCann said "was nothing short of disgusting".

Mrs McCann said the same paper accused the family of storing her body in a freezer.

Mr McCann also described how on one occasion the News of the World's editor Colin Myler called them, "irate", because they had done an unpaid interview with Hello! magazine to promote a campaign for an alert system for missing children and "berated" them for not doing a NoW interview.

"He beat us into submission verbally and we agreed to do an interview the day after," Mr McCann said.

Kate McCann also told the inquiry that finding out her private diary - which the couple believe was taken for a time by the Portuguese police - had been published in the NoW in 2008 had made her feel "totally violated" and she wanted to "climb into a hole and not coming out".

"I'd written these words at the most difficult time of my life.... It was my only way of communicating with Madeleine," she said.

Mr McCann also talked about being constantly pursued by photographers and of the journalists camped outside their house in Rothley, Mrs McCann said: "Often they would spring out from a hedge so they could get a startled look so they could attach 'frail' or 'fragile'."

Mr McCann said he felt the couple "speak with experience about how powerful the media is and how much damage they can do", adding that he believed journalists that broke rules should "lose their privilege of practising".

Earlier on Wednesday, hacking victims' lawyer Mr Lewis, who represents the family of murdered Milly Dowler, said preserving the media's current system of self-regulation was "the preservation of no regulation at all".

He said the NoW had been the focus of the phone-hacking row because private investigator Glenn Mulcaire had written things down, but that evidence from his clients inferred other news organisations also illegally accessed phones.

Voicemail interception had been easy to do and that journalists would use it to "pry on things", he said.

"I don't think they necessarily thought of it as any worse - certainly at the beginning - than driving at 35mph in a 30mph zone."

Sheryl Gascoigne - former wife of ex-footballer Paul - and journalist Tom Rowland also gave evidence to the inquiry on Wednesday.

Lord Justice Leveson's inquiry is looking at the "culture, practices and ethics of the media" and whether the self-regulation of the press works.

A second phase of the inquiry will commence after the conclusion of a police investigation into NoW phone hacking and any resultant prosecutions. It will examine the extent of unlawful conduct by the press and look at the police's initial hacking investigation.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Leveson Inquiry: McCanns left 'distraught' by press

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The parents of missing girl Madeleine McCann have told a judge-led inquiry into UK media practices they were left distraught by press suggestions they were responsible for Madeleine's death. Gerry McCann told the Leveson Inquiry many of the stories were untruthful, sinister or, he believed, made up.

# data[].attributes.body
A dangerous drug given to pregnant women.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Story of Thalidomide in the U.S., Told Through Documents (Published 2020)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A trove of archival records shows how in the early 1960s the Food and Drug Administration investigated the use of a drug that caused severe birth defects.

# data[].attributes.body
Sensational coverage of a star falsely accused of sex offenses.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Cliff Richard child abuse allegation: Police media tactics "subvert due process"

# data[].attributes.body
The killing of a young black man, which was neglected by 'racist' police officers:

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Published: 6 January 2012 Region: UK & Worldwide By Aidan White
Few national institutions emerge with dignity or enhanced credibility from the Stephen Lawrence murder case, but media have more reason to be cheerful than most.

Media coverage of the Stephen Lawrence murder from the beginning rightly emphasised the need for a radical overhaul of the police and elimination of the institutional racism exposed by the 1999 Macpherson report into police handling of the case.

They did so at a time when politicians, including the Conservative governments of Thatcher and Major, were scandalously dismissive of criticism of the police, particularly by black people who were the victims of racist policing.

Perhaps the most dramatic and surprising example of media shaking off their own stereotypes in this case is that of the Daily Mail, which launched a vigorous campaign for justice for Stephen Lawrence in the mid-1990s when it named and shamed the five racist thugs who killed him under the front-page headline "MURDERERS" and challenged members of the gang to sue. None did, but two of them were put away this week, while three others remain at large.

Almost 19 years after the killing of Stephen Lawrence racism has not been eliminated, far from it, but policing and politics have improved largely due to struggles for justice led by the Lawrence family and supported by many sections of the media.

Nevertheless, there are worrying suggestions this extraordinary campaign against searing injustice only succeeded in achieving public and media profile because Stephen's parents were reasonable, articulate and educated and their son was a young man of promise and about to embark upon an academic career.

These circumstances made it easier for the white community to identify with the family. It is not certain the case would have captured the media imagination had the family been living on benefits.

Nor is it evident why media did not act with the same resolve in dealing with three other racist murders in same area in the two years before Stephen's murder. Ruhullah Aramesh, Rohit Duggal and Rolan Adams were all attacked by gangs of young, white men wielding knives or iron bars and hurling racist abuse. Many more cases remain unresolved.

Too often, black people are presented in the press - including papers like the Daily Mail and more offensively by the Daily Express - in negative terms and often as a community defined by social problems and violence

Although the death of Stephen Lawrence changed the terms of the debate on race and policing, there are still too many unsolved racists murders and much evidence that racism lurks in every corner of society.

Today continuing controversies over migration, rights of asylum seekers and increased border controls are stories that boost circulation and strike a popular chord because they are nourished by xenophobia, racism and, more recently, by Islamophobia both in Britain and across the European Union.

The conclusion from the Lawrence trial is that the police should be held to account for their racism, but media must also redouble their efforts to eliminate all forms of stereotype and to treat equally the victims of violence and racism.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Media and the Case of Stephen Lawrence - Media Diversity Institute

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Published: 6 January 2012 Region: UK & Worldwide By Aidan White Few national institutions emerge with dignity or enhanced credibility from the Stephen Lawrence murder case, but media have more reason to be cheerful than most.

# data[].attributes.body
Prejudicial representation in the tabloid press?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
A TV journalist holds a copy of a British newspaper outside Buckingham Palace in London. (Tolga Akmen/AFP/Getty Images)

When Prince Harry and his wife, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, made their shocking announcement Wednesday on Instagram - that they plan to step back as senior royals and split their time between the United Kingdom and North America - they also encouraged their 10.4 million followers to visit their new website, SussexRoyal.com, to find more information.

One section of the glossy site that hinted at a possible reason behind their bombshell decision? The simply titled "Media."

In several long paragraphs, Harry and Meghan explained that they will be taking a "revised media approach" in their new roles. Most significantly, they will no longer be a part of the "royal rota" system - essentially a press pool - in which a group of U.K. outlets get exclusive access to royal events and share that information with other publications.

'Queen sad, Charles furious': Britain's media reacts to Megxit

However, the couple emphasized that they will "provide access to credible media outlets focused on objective news reporting," adding they understand that there is great interest in them as members of the royal family. "They welcome accurate and honest media reporting as well as being held to account if appropriate," the website reads.

The key words here, of course, are "credible," "accurate" and "honest," apparent digs at the brutal tabloid stories that Harry and Meghan have endured for the past several years. In the fall, the couple sued the Mail on Sunday newspaper for publishing a private letter that Meghan wrote to her estranged father after her wedding; Harry also filed a lawsuit against the Daily Mirror and the Sun, claiming they hacked his phone.

After the Duke and Duchess of Sussex took a "step back" as senior royals, a Buckingham Palace official confirmed Jan. 10 that Meghan had gone to Canada. (Video: Reuters, Photo: Reuters)

Royal experts and observers say there are many complicated reasons behind Harry and Meghan's new path. But it seems clear that intrusive tabloid coverage added to their motivation to step away from royal tradition.

"I think it had a significant impact. I don't think it's the whole story, but I think it's part of it," said Elaine Lui, the "etalk" and "The Social" TV personality who runs the website LaineyGossip.com and has closely monitored the media's obsession with the royals. "If we go back historically, Harry has hated the royal rota forever. That's a fact. It has been made very clear, he blames a lot on the media for what happened to his mother. . . . I've heard from people I've talked to that he was already asking questions about detaching himself from the royal rota as far back as a year ago."

Harry and Meghan started dating in summer 2016 but managed to keep their relationship under wraps until that fall, when the Daily Express broke the news that Harry had been secretly dating actress Meghan Markle, best known for her role on USA's "Suits." The articles were initially quite positive, as the paper gushed that Harry was "besotted" with his new girlfriend: "In recent weeks royal watchers have noticed that Harry, fifth-in-line to the throne, has had a notable spring in his step and can't stop smiling."

Things quickly took a turn: "The fact that she is American and a divorcée will also have raised eyebrows in Buckingham Palace," the Telegraph wrote. The Sun ran an interview with Samantha Markle - who deemed her half sister "a social climber" who "is not fit to be a royal" - and published a post about one of Markle's scenes in "Suits" that showed up on a porn website. (The tabloid deleted the latter and apologized.)

Multiple sites noted that Meghan had an African American mother and Caucasian father, resulting in racist headlines. "Harry's girl is (almost) straight outta Compton: Gang-scarred home of her mother revealed - so will he be dropping by for tea?" the Daily Mail headlined a story that included crime statistics from Meghan's mother's neighborhood in Los Angeles.

Indeed, several days later, Harry took the extraordinary step of publicly confirming their relationship by releasing a statement that condemned the "wave of abuse and harassment" that Meghan had seen. He noted "the smear on the front page of a national newspaper; the racial undertones of comment pieces; and the outright sexism and racism of social media trolls and web article comments."

Although the couple was still photographed everywhere after they got engaged in November 2017, the tone of the articles seemed to calm down - at least the ones about Meghan herself. The U.K. press still delighted in printing details about her family, from her estranged father to her nephew's legal marijuana farm. Their wedding the following spring also received fairy-tale coverage from many tabloids - although it didn't remain cozy for long.

"Not long after the wedding, they took their gloves off," royal historian Marlene Koenig said, "because it sells papers."

There was an onslaught of critical stories, most of them pointed claims about Meghan: She's too demanding and bombards her staff with messages at dawn. She's feuding with Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, about Meghan's treatment of the palace staff - oh, and she also made Catherine cry during Princess Charlotte's bridesmaids dress fitting. She's coming between Harry and his brother, Prince William. She had the nerve to ask if St. George's Chapel could be sprayed with air freshener before the wedding.

"They would always bring up the word 'protocol,' " said Koenig, pointing to the many gasps when Meghan made fashion choices that were said to be frowned upon by the queen. "Protocol applies to official state events, or who sits next to who. . . . It does not apply to off-the-shoulder dresses or nail polish."

Jan. 7, 2020 | Britain's Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, visit Canada House in London, in thanks for the warm Canadian hospitality and support they received during their recent stay in the North American country. (Daniel Leal-Olivas/Pool/AP)

The stories continued at a relentless pace, even after Meghan announced she was pregnant - how she was "flaunting" her bare legs without tights at six months pregnant, or even how she cradled her growing stomach. ( The Express: "Meghan CAN'T STOP showing off: Duchess uses these SNEAKY tricks to flaunt her baby bump.") She was ruthlessly criticized after she attended a baby shower thrown for her in New York and paid for by her friend Serena Williams.

Meghan had plenty of defenders as well: Five of her closest friends were dispatched to People magazine to "stand up against the global bullying" of Meghan. Celebrities from George Clooney to Elton John spoke up on the royal duo's behalf.

Lui said that if there was any "tipping point" for the couple's frustration with the media, she would guess that it was the "hoopla" made over their use of private jets this past summer.

"What a huge story, for almost two weeks, the British tabloids made out of that when they're not the first and only members of the royal family to fly private," Lui said, pointing out that another royal story - the revelations about Prince Andrew's association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein - didn't get the same amount of attention in the press at the time.

Though the royals are known to rarely speak out about such personal issues, in an ITV documentary this past fall, Meghan was candid as she spoke about struggling with the rough treatment.

"When I first met my now-husband, my friends were really happy because I was so happy. But my British friends said to me, 'I'm sure he's great. But you shouldn't do it. Because the British tabloids will destroy your life,'" she told reporter Tom Bradby. "I think I really tried to adopt this British sensibility of a stiff upper lip. I tried! I really tried. But I think what that does internally is probably really damaging."

Now, as Harry and Meghan start the complex process of moving away from the traditional duties of royal life, they have certainly found a solution - by leaving. Unsurprisingly, the British tabloids are critical and furious about that as well. But Lui added that the outlets' issues with royalty go far beyond nasty headlines and columnists.

"I think it's far too simplistic to just blame the tabloids," Lui said. "It's a multilayered problem - the tabloids are getting leaks from somewhere. . . . Only certain people are able to leak that information. There are vipers and backstabbers all over the place in the royal family."

For Britain's vicious tabloids, Meghan remains a constant target

Duchess Meghan: 'Not many people have asked if I'm okay'

Britain's notorious press has long targeted Meghan and Harry. A raw new documentary shows the impact.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
How much did the British tabloids' brutal coverage of Harry and Meghan impact their decision to 'step back'?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Placeholder while article actions load When Prince Harry and his wife, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, made their shocking announcement Wednesday on Instagram - that they plan to step back as senior royals and split their time between the United Kingdom and North America - they also encouraged their 10.4 million followers to visit their new website, SussexRoyal.com, to find more information.

# data[].attributes.body
Paedophilia by priests is ignored by church authorities:

This article is about the Church covering up stories of sexual abuse within its communities, and instead of dealing with the issue they instead moved the priests, monks and volunteers who were accused into different parishes (churches). The Pope had promised to deal with this issue, however no further actions were taken and victims are calling for him to resign.

It was posted after the editors code was made, however some of the names used in the article, especially un named victims quotes, questions how they got hold of them for quotes if the police weren't disclosing names.

It was in the publics interest to research into this matter as the church and Vatican have a large hold on power over countries all over the world, and if corrupt activities such as covering up sexual abuse, especially with children is occurring within it, then the people should be able to hear it. The press company would of had to find the line between public vs private and see the benefits of the community knowing this matter. Mill would describe this as harmful information so therefore the company should speak up.

As a result of the coverage, people were able to hear this story and press for the Archbishop to resign, by putting pressure on the Vatican to reach out and give an explanation for the actions.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Pope Francis asked Cardinal Vincent Nichols, the leader of the Catholic church in England and Wales, to stay in his post, despite a damning report that criticised his leadership and concluded that the church repeatedly prioritised its reputation over the welfare of child sex abuse victims.

In its final review of the church, the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse (IICSA) said the Vatican's failure to cooperate with the investigation "passes understanding".

The 162-page report said "the church's neglect of the physical, emotional and spiritual wellbeing of children and young people in favour of protecting its reputation was in conflict with its mission of love and care for the innocent and vulnerable."

Of Nichols, it stated: "There was no acknowledgment of any personal responsibility to lead or influence change. Nor did he demonstrate compassion towards victims in the recent cases which we examined."

Calls for Nichols's resignation grew in the wake of the publication of the report on Tuesday. An anonymous survivor who gave evidence told the Guardian: "Cardinal Nichols is the moral leader of the Catholic church in England and Wales, he has lost all moral authority and must go ... This report once again demonstrates that the Catholic church is not a safe place for children."

Members of the survivors group White Flowers Alba called upon Cardinal Nichols and the present papal nuncio, Archbishop Adams, to "resign immediately".

Another victim, identified by the inquiry only as A711, said: "The church needs a seismic shift in culture, especially at the top. If there is any hope at all of real change it will require a relinquishing of power, and a will to treat survivors as human beings."

Between 1970 and 2015, the church in England and Wales received more than 900 complaints involving more than 3,000 instances of child sexual abuse, made against more than 900 individuals, including priests, monks and volunteers.

The sexual abuse of children involved instances of "masturbation, oral sex, vaginal rape and anal rape". On occasions, the inquiry says, it was accompanied by "sadistic beatings driven by sexual gratification" as well as "deeply manipulative behaviour by those in positions of trust".

One child estimated that between the ages of 11 and 15 he had been abused hundreds of times by a priest. "After each incident he was required to make confession, and the priest concerned made it plain that his sister's place at a local convent school depended on his compliance," the report says.

When complaints were made, the church invariably failed to support victims and survivors but took action to protect alleged perpetrators by moving them to a different parish. "Child sexual abuse," the report says, "was swept under the carpet."

The inquiry asked the Vatican's ambassador to the UK, the papal nuncio, to participate. "Very limited information was forthcoming," the report says. "After several months of correspondence, the Holy See belatedly confirmed it would not provide a witness statement.

"Their lack of cooperation passes understanding."

Prof Alexis Jay, the chair of the inquiry, said: "For decades, the Catholic church's failure to tackle child sexual abuse consigned many more children to the same fate. It is clear that the church's reputation was valued above the welfare of victims, with allegations ignored and perpetrators protected. Even today, the responses of the Holy See appear at odds with the pope's promise to take action on this hugely important problem."

Richard Scorer, a solicitor at the law firm Slater and Gordon, which represented 32 survivors, said: "Cardinal Nichols needs to resign right away - in any other walk of life he would be gone immediately. This is a church that cannot be trusted to protect children. The only way forward now is a mandatory reporting law, so that abuse cannot be covered up, and independent external oversight of church safeguarding. "

One survivor represented by Slater and Gordon who gave evidence before the inquiry said: "Vincent Nichols will retire with a full pension - meanwhile, the victims that he denied justice to have to live on, still suffering.

"The fact is Nichols is a serial protector of paedophiles and he is the person that you should least expect it from. The head of a church should have the greatest morals of all but instead they were sending paedophiles to other areas of the country - and America - in an attempt to cover the abuse up."

David Enright, a solicitor at Howe & Co, which represented 20 of the victims, said: "The church has had many, many chances to reform and root out child abuse. It has failed. It is with heavy hearts that my clients, many of them devout Catholics, conclude that the only safe course of action is to take safeguarding of children out of the hands of the Catholic church and into the hands of accountable lay professionals."

Responding to calls for Nichols' departure, a church spokesperson said the cardinal would not be resigning following the inquiry's criticisms because he was "determined to put it right".

In accordance with Vatican rules, Nichols wrote to the Holy See about four weeks ago in the run-up to his 75th birthday, which was on Sunday, to offer his resignation. Pope Francis had asked him to continue as a cardinal, the spokesperson said.

A statement issued by Nichols and the archbishop of Liverpool, Malcolm McMahon, said the Catholic church welcomed the report, which would "inform" improvements in "safeguarding in all aspects of the church's life".

It added: "We apologise to all victims and survivors who have not been properly listened to, or properly supported by us."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Child sexual abuse in Catholic church was 'swept under the carpet', inquiry finds

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Pope Francis asked Cardinal Vincent Nichols, the leader of the Catholic church in England and Wales, to stay in his post, despite a damning report that criticised his leadership and concluded that the church repeatedly prioritised its reputation over the welfare of child sex abuse victims. In its final review of the church, the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse (IICSA) said the Vatican's failure to cooperate with the investigation "passes understanding".

# data[].attributes.body
An innocent man found guilty by the press and his life ruined:

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Jason Watkins played Christopher Jefferies in the ITV drama, The Lost Honour of Christopher Jefferies (Photo: ITV)

The Lost Honour of Christopher Jefferies, which first aired in 2014, is based on the true story of the retired schoolteacher who was falsely accused of the murder of Joanna Yeates.

The two-part dramatisation, which returns to our screens this week, follows the story of the man who was vilified by the press after his young tenant, Ms Yeates, disappeared.

Questioned by police but released without charge, what ensued was a battle to restore his reputation, despite being completely innocent.

Vincent Tabak, who had lived next door to Ms Yeates was eventually convicted of her murder.

Here's what happened to Mr Jefferies.

The case of Joanna Yeates and false allegations

It was December 2010 when 25-year-old Joanna Yeates, a landscape architect living in Bristol, disappeared.

The case dominated newspapers in the run-up to Christmas, with pictures of the missing woman and appeals for information splashed over newspapers and featured on BBC's Crimewatch.

Her body was discovered on Christmas Day.

Attention quickly turned to her landlord, Christopher Jefferies, who Ms Yeates and her boyfriend had rented a flat from in the Clifton area of Bristol. Jefferies was a former English teacher, who used to work at Clifton College for nearly 30 years, before taking early retirement.

Police initially suspected Mr Jefferies and came to his door to arrest him. He was taken to a police station for questioning, where he was kept in custody for more than two days and eventually released without charge.

He returned to his flat to find many of his possessions had been taken away for forensic examination. He had also become the centre of local and national media coverage.

Parts of the tabloid press were particularly unforgiving in their reports, focusing on his eccentric appearance, with headlines such as "The Strange Mr Jefferies" being published, which he later sued the titles over.

Mr Jefferies was eventally proven to be completely innocent, and a neighbour called Vincent Tabak was convicted of Ms Yeates' murder in October 2011 and jailed for life.

Libel claims and Leveson Inquiry

False claims in some papers, such as those wrongly calling him a "peeping Tom", led to Mr Jefferies suing for libel some 10 months after Ms Yeates murder.

He was eventually given public apologies by eight national newspapers for the false allegations they made against him, as well as winning "substantial" damages, according to his lawyer.

Mr Jefferies later told the Leveson Inquiry there had been a "frenzied campaign to blacken his character", the BBC reported.

"The national media shamelessly vilified me," Mr Jefferies statement to the inquiry said. "The UK press set about what can only be described as a witch hunt. It was clear that the tabloid press had decided that I was guilty of Miss Yeates's murder and seemed determined to persuade the public of my guilt."

He spoke about how his reputation had been tarnished and how he had been "besieged" by the press.

Speaking in the BBC Magazine in 2014, Mr Jefferies spoke of the "fugitive" lifestyle he had to lead.

"I was unable for a time to go out, except occasionally after dark, because the press were desperate for the scoop of discovering where I was," he said.

He said eventually, a "sense of normality" returned, and some months later, "the events of the start of the year seemed a distant nightmare".

Speaking to the Radio Times in 2015, he spoke about watching the ITV drama based on his experiences being filmed, saying he found it "quite impossible" to watch Jason Watkins, who plays him, acting in the scene where he is arrested.

Since the show aired Mr Jefferies is understood to have continued to manage his properties as a landlord and carried on with a degree in French.

When can I watch the programme?

Episode one of The Lost Honour of Christopher Jefferies airs tonight (Monday) on ITV at 9.00pm on ITV, with the second installment at the same time on Tuesday (18 August).

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
What happened to Christopher Jefferies, the man falsely vilified over Joanna Yeates' murder

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Lost Honour of Christopher Jefferies, which first aired in 2014, is based on the true story of the retired schoolteacher who was falsely accused of the murder of Joanna Yeates. The two-part dramatisation, which returns to our screens this week, follows the story of the man who was vilified by the press after his young tenant, Ms Yeates, disappeared.

# data[].attributes.body
Industrial level tax evasion in a secretive tax haven:

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Victims of Offshore: A Video Introduction to the Panama Papers - ICIJ

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Behind the email chains, invoices and documents that make up the Panama Papers are often unseen victims of wrongdoing. This is their story.

# data[].attributes.body
Caroline Flack took her own life after fearing it would 'all come down upon her'.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The death of Caroline Flack was first and foremost a tragedy for her family and her friends.

But it also provoked a furious backlash; the tabloids, particularly the Sun, turned on the Crown Prosecution Service for pursuing the domestic violence case against her.

Critics of the papers blamed them for hounding a vulnerable woman. A full inquest may help to establish the background and circumstances of her death, but what is not in doubt is that Flack's career and love life have been a staple for the press over many years, and that the assault charge against her caused a media frenzy.

A Guardian analysis shows the Sun published the most articles mentioning Flack in the six months before her death - with a total of 99.

The figure is around a quarter of the 387 stories published in print by all of the UK's national newspapers in the same period.

A review of the stories shows that a quarter of all these articles took a negative tone, slightly higher than those with a positive tone, which accounted for 18% of the total.

Caroline Flack press coverage_revised

Last October, for instance, Channel 4 announced Flack would present a new programme called The Surjury - in which members of the public would be given free plastic surgery.

However, this was described as "a new low for television" - and has since been cancelled.

The majority of stories about Flack during the six-month period were neutral in tone - many focusing on her successful stint as presenter of ITV's Love Island.

That ratio changed in December, after she was charged with assaulting her partner, Lewis Burton. In that month Flack received twice as many negative headlines as positive.

According to the Guardian's analysis, the proportion of negative headlines about her increased to 35%, while 18% were positive.

Many of these articles included graphic references to the alleged assault.

In February, the month of her death, there were an equal number of negative and positive headlines.

This analysis is by no means definitive. It looked at stories in which "Caroline Flack" featured in the headline or body of the article between 14 August 2019 and 14 February 2020. Three journalists then reviewed them into "positive", "negative" or "neutral" categories.

What the analysis does reveal, however, is that Flack was under enormous media scrutiny and negative coverage notably increased after the alleged assault.

The graphic on this article was amended on 27 February 2020. The chart showed an analysis of UK print media titles between August 2019 and February 2020, however an earlier version referred to the dates as 2018 and 2019. This has been corrected.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Caroline Flack: scale of negative media coverage before death revealed

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The death of Caroline Flack was first and foremost a tragedy for her family and her friends. But it also provoked a furious backlash; the tabloids, particularly the Sun, turned on the Crown Prosecution Service for pursuing the domestic violence case against her. Critics of the papers blamed them for hounding a vulnerable woman.

# data[].attributes.body
This story is about the friendship between between Prince Andrew and the convicted sex offender, Jeffrey epstein. The Prince stayed to with the sex offender in 2010 even though he was proven guilty. Jeffrey proceeded to kill himself whilst waiting for his trial and the prince "did not regret their entire reletionship, further more the Prince was then accused of forcing a 17 year old to have sex with him but he denies it all.

The daily mail broke the editors code by looking into Jeffreys privrate log, By doing this they saw when and where he had been in the months before. The log shows Epstein flew with Pince andrews ex wife 10 months before Epstien flew with Andrew.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Prince Andrew has given an unprecedented interview to the BBC about his relationship with US financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Prince Andrew said it was wrong of him to visit and stay at Epstein's house in 2010 after the financier's conviction but that he did not regret their entire friendship.

He also categorically denied having sex with Virginia Roberts, who alleges she was forced to have sex with the prince when she was 17 years old.

Here's what we know about the links between Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein.

February 1999 - US Virgin Islands

Prince Andrew said he first met Epstein, a wealthy hedge fund manager, in 1999 through Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's British girlfriend and a woman the prince said he had known since she was at university. That year was the first time the prince and the businessman were linked in press reports in the UK and US.

The destination was said to have been Epstein's private island, Little St James in the US Virgin Islands.

June 2000 - Windsor Castle

Epstein and Ms Maxwell were among a star-studded guest list at a party hosted by the Queen in June 2000.

The Dance of the Decades event, which saw more than 600 guests descend on Windsor Castle, marked four royal birthdays including Prince Andrew's 40th. Prince Andrew, the Queen's third child, told the BBC that Epstein was there at his invitation, not the Royal Family's, but was to some extent Ms Maxwell's "plus one".

Prince Andrew was pictured accompanying Ms Maxwell - daughter of the late newspaper tycoon Robert Maxwell - at private parties and celebrity functions both in the UK and in the US that year.

They were photographed together at the wedding of the prince's former girlfriend, Aurelia Cecil, near Salisbury in Wiltshire in September 2000.

Ms Maxwell was pictured dressed in gold lame and wearing a blonde wig for the Hookers and Pimps-themed party.

December 2000 - Sandringham

Just over a month later, in December 2000, the then 40-year-old prince threw Ms Maxwell a surprise birthday party at Sandringham, the Queen's estate in Norfolk, with Epstein among the guests.

He described it in the BBC interview as a "straightforward shooting weekend".

Ms Maxwell and Epstein were photographed on a pheasant shoot at the estate around that time.

Prince Andrew and Ms Maxwell went on a number of trips together including to Florida and Thailand, according to an Evening Standard report from January 2001, which claimed Epstein had joined them on five such occasions over the previous 12 months.

Prince Andrew told the BBC that he used to see Epstein a maximum of three times a year but confirmed he had been on his private plane, stayed at his private island, and stayed at his homes in Palm Beach, Florida and New York.

Allegations against Jeffrey Epstein started surfacing in 2005 when the parents of a 14-year-old girl told police in Florida that Epstein had molested their daughter at his Palm Beach home.

The financier was accused of paying girls under the age of 18 to perform sex acts at his Manhattan and Florida mansions between 2002 and 2005.

However, a controversial secret plea deal in 2008 saw him plead guilty to a lesser charge of soliciting a minor for prostitution.

He received an 18-month prison sentence and was released on probation after 13 months.

In July 2019 he was charged in New York with further allegations of sex trafficking and conspiracy and was due to face trial next year.

He pleaded not guilty to all the charges but was facing up to 45 years in prison if convicted.

The theme of the evening was 1888, and the 500 guests donned period costumes.

The previous month, Epstein was charged with one count of solicitation of prostitution.

Prince Andrew said Epstein had been invited via Ms Maxwell but that he wasn't aware at the time the invitation was sent out "what was going on in the United States".

He said Epstein never mentioned that he was under investigation.

The duke was photographed with Epstein in New York's Central Park in December 2010 - after the tycoon had served his sentence.

Prince Andrew said he had travelled across the Atlantic to end his friendship with Epstein and was having that conversation with him when they were photographed in the park.

The prince told the BBC: "I said, 'Look, because of what has happened, I don't think it is appropriate that we should remain in contact.'"

Prince Andrew said he attended a small dinner party while he was there but denied it was to celebrate Epstein's release.

Footage released by the Mail on Sunday in August showed Prince Andrew inside the financier's Manhattan mansion around the same time.

The prince told the BBC that he regretted staying at Epstein's house during the visit, saying he "let the side down" by doing so. Pressed on reports that many young girls were coming and going from the house at the time, he said: "I never saw them."

Epstein's house was like a "railway station" with "people coming in and out of that house all the time", he added.

Prince Andrew's connection to the convicted sex offender did attract criticism at the time.

After several days of newspaper reports on the Epstein connection in spring of 2011, Prince Andrew was hit with a further blow when Sarah Ferguson admitted having accepted £15,000 from Epstein, to help pay off her debts.

Prince Andrew was not party to the proceedings but was identified when a motion was filed in the court, as part of the evidence.

Ms Giuffre claimed in court papers in Florida she was forced to have sex with the prince on three occasions - in London, New York and on a private Caribbean island owned by Epstein - between 2001 and 2002, including when she was underage under Florida law.

The details were later officially struck from the court records when a judge ruled they were unnecessary to the case, saying they were "immaterial and impertinent" to the "central claim".

Separately, an allegation by a woman called Johanna Sjoberg that Prince Andrew touched her breast while they sat on a couch in Epstein's Manhattan apartment in 2001 was contained in documents from a defamation case. These documents were made public when they were released by a judge in August 2019.

Ms Giuffre had brought the defamation case against Ms Maxwell. She was alleged to have procured underage girls for Epstein and his friends, but she has always denied the allegations.

Prince Andrew said he had "no recollection" of ever meeting Ms Giuffre. He said he was looking after his children on the day in March 2001 that she alleges they went to a nightclub in London and later had sex in Ms Maxwell's house in the Belgravia area.

The prince said he had taken his daughter Beatrice to a Pizza Express restaurant in the town of Woking that afternoon for a party.

He said he remembered it "because going to Pizza Express in Woking is an unusual thing for me to do, a very unusual thing for me to do".

Prince Andrew said he had no recollection of a photo being taken, reportedly by Jeffrey Epstein, of him and Virginia Giuffre together in Ms Maxwell's house where his arm is around her waist.

"Nobody can prove whether or not that photograph has been doctored but I don't recollect that photograph ever being taken," he said, adding that "hug[s] and public displays of affection are not something that I do".

Asked whether he had sex with her in a bedroom in that house, he said: "I can absolutely categorically tell you it never happened."

Buckingham Palace has issued outright denials of all allegations against Prince Andrew.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Prince Andrew's links to Jeffrey Epstein

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Duke of York is under scrutiny for his connection to the late US financier. Here's what we know.

# data[].attributes.body
A reporter tried to contact her by slipping a note into her five-year-old daughter's schoolbag.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
JK Rowling has told an inquiry into media ethics of the scale of media intrusion into her private family life.

The Harry Potter author said a reporter had once tried to contact her by slipping a note into her five-year-old daughter's schoolbag.

She said clearly she could not put an "invisibility cloak" around her children to protect them.

Earlier, Lord Justice Leveson heard from actress Sienna Miller and former motorsport boss Max Mosley.

The inquiry, which is being held at the Royal Courts of Justice, heard:

Ms Rowling told the inquiry that children deserved privacy and that she had always tried to protect her private family life from the press, by taking measures which included wrapping them in blankets to hide them from paparazzi.

"They (children) have no choice over who their parents are or how their parents behave.

"A child, no matter who their parents are, deserves privacy. Where children are concerned the issue is fairly black and white."

She said that when her daughter was in her first year at primary school, she unzipped her schoolbag one evening and "among the usual letters from school and the debris that a child generates, I found a letter addressed to me and the letter was from a journalist".

She added: "I felt such a sense of invasion that my daughter's bag.. it's very difficult to say how angry I felt that my five-year-old daughter's school was no longer a place of complete security from journalists."

The author also recalled how the PCC found in her favour after a photograph of her eight-year-old daughter in a swimsuit on a beach in Mauritius was published in OK magazine.

"I feel that given fact that an image has a life that cannot be recalled... I'm sure it is still out there, that's the particular harm of an image."

The writer said shortly after her son was born she was besieged by photographers.

After a week had passed she believed they had disappeared so she decided to leave the house and take her children out, however she soon realised that a photographer with a long lens was there.

"I rather absurdly gave chase. How I thought I was going to outrun a 20-something paparazzo while pushing a buggy. The cumulative effect, it becomes quite draining."

The author also told the inquiry how she had to sit down with her daughter to say an unpleasant character in a Harry Potter book was not based on her ex-husband, which was a "wholly untrue" story the Daily Express had published.

'Paparazzi had found him'

Ms Rowling then went on to discuss how she had been 'blagged', which is when somebody unknowingly reveals personal information.

She said in one instance shortly after she had moved house she received a phone call from somebody purporting to be from the Post Office saying they had a package for her and wanted to confirm her address.

"When I was blagged I realised half-way through giving the person details that I was being blagged," she said.

"This man said to me 'I am from the Post Office, I've got a package for you, what's your address?' Then I said 'Wait! You're from the post office, well what does it say on the package?' and he hung up."

Ms Rowling also said her then boyfriend (now husband) was duped by a journalist who pretended to be from the tax office into giving out personal information.

"He gave them everything - address, pay grade, National Insurance number. The next day flashes went off in his face - the paparazzi had found him."

The author added: "Like a lot of people who have agreed to give evidence at this inquiry, we are not asking for special treatment.

"We are simply asking for normal treatment... and I am simply asking for that on behalf of my children."

Ms Rowling confirmed she had not been a victim of phone hacking as "she hardly used her phone in the 90s".

'Dark street'

Mr Mosley, who had won £60,000 in damages from the News of the World after a judge ruled that its story about his sex life had invaded his right to privacy, earlier told the inquiry of his outrage that photographs of him at a sadomasochistic orgy were published.

He said his son, who has since died, resumed taking drugs as he could not cope after seeing the photographs.

Mr Mosley also said a second story, purporting to be the account of a woman who had filmed the orgy, was later found to have been written by News of the World reporter Neville Thurlbeck, who he said had forced the woman to put her name to it.

Earlier, Ms Miller - who has been the subject of media attention for her relationships with partners such as actor Jude Law - told the inquiry about incidents where she said paparazzi had driven dangerously and illegally while following her.

She questioned why having a camera made it legal for people - sometimes as many as "10 to 15 men" - to chase her. "I would often find myself - I was 21 - at midnight running down a dark street," she said.

In his evidence, lawyer Mark Thomson - who has represented celebrities including Jude Law and Lily Allen - argued for a stronger regulatory system for the press.

"I really don't think that just a few adjustments to the PCC (Press Complaints Commission) will work," he said. "Some of the worst offenders are photographic agencies and paparazzi, and the PCC can't control them."

Lord Justice Leveson's inquiry is looking at the "culture, practices and ethics of the media" and whether the self-regulation of the press works.

A second phase of the inquiry will commence after the conclusion of a police investigation into News of the World phone hacking and any resultant prosecutions. It will examine the extent of unlawful conduct by the press and look at the police's initial hacking investigation.

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
JK Rowling tells Leveson inquiry of press intrusion

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
JK Rowling has told an inquiry into media ethics of the scale of media intrusion into her private family life. The Harry Potter author said a reporter had once tried to contact her by slipping a note into her five-year-old daughter's schoolbag. She said clearly she could not put an "invisibility cloak" around her children to protect them.

# data[].attributes.body
British MPs use their expenses to supplement their pay.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
MPs' expenses: the 46 claiming London rent & hotels while owning property

# data[].attributes.body
A missing girl's phone is hacked causing the parents to believe she is still alive.

The news illegally targeted a missing school girl called Milly Dowler and her family in 2002, interefering with police enquires within her disappearance. She disappeared at age 13,  they started to wrongly belive she was still alive. The News of the World started illegally intercepting mobile messages. They hacked directly into the girls phone and listened to every message left by her family. Her voicemail got full and the News deleted her voicemail messages so when family called and found out it had been cleared they belived that it was Milly herself, this also confused the police. The Paper made little effort to cover up the hacking and reported a story of a woman pretending to be Milly and apply for a job.

A part of the editors code that would have been ignored to get the story across as they have done un consented intrusion of somones privacy that cannot be justified.

It was the publics interest to look into this case as the girl was part of the community so many people may have known her.

This case should have stayed private between her family and friends/community and the option to make it public should have been made by her family not the News hackers.

Moralists would be against this as this as it was unethical and caused extreme distress to her loved ones, as well it being confusing to the police.

The result of the coverage helped to expose the news for their ill act and immorale actions.

Poppers paradox believe that an open society needs to be intolerant of intolerance, intolerant behvaiours must be fought against, for example the news who invaded the girls property conveyed immoral and unethical behaviour, consequences should have been made from their actions, in this instnace it would be them getting expose about their behaviour through media.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The News of the World illegally targeted the missing schoolgirl Milly Dowler and her family in March 2002, interfering with police inquiries into her disappearance, an investigation by the Guardian has established.

Scotland Yard is investigating the episode, which is likely to put new pressure on the then editor of the paper, Rebekah Brooks, now Rupert Murdoch's chief executive in the UK; and the then deputy editor, Andy Coulson, who resigned in January as the prime minister's media adviser.

The Dowlers' family lawyer, Mark Lewis, this afternoon issued a statement describing the News of the World's activities as "heinous" and "despicable". He said this afternoon the Dowler family was now pursuing a damages claim against the News of the World.

Milly Dowler disappeared at the age of 13 on her way home in Walton-on-Thames, Surrey, on 21 March 2002.

Detectives from Scotland Yard's new inquiry into the phone hacking, Operation Weeting, are believed to have found evidence of the targeting of the Dowlers in a collection of 11,000 pages of notes kept by Glenn Mulcaire, the private investigator jailed for phone hacking on behalf of the News of the World.

In the last four weeks the Met officers have approached Surrey police and taken formal statements from some of those involved in the original inquiry, who were concerned about how News of the World journalists intercepted - and deleted - the voicemail messages of Milly Dowler.

The messages were deleted by journalists in the first few days after Milly's disappearance in order to free up space for more messages. As a result friends and relatives of Milly concluded wrongly that she might still be alive. Police feared evidence may have been destroyed.

The Guardian investigation has shown that, within a very short time of Milly vanishing, News of the World journalists reacted by engaging in what was standard practice in their newsroom: they hired private investigators to get them a story.

Their first step was simple, albeit illegal. Paperwork seen by the Guardian reveals that they paid a Hampshire private investigator, Steve Whittamore, to obtain home addresses and, where necessary, ex-directory phone numbers for any families called Dowler in the Walton area. The three addresses Whittamore found could be obtained lawfully on the electoral register. The two ex-directory numbers, however, were "blagged" illegally from British Telecom's confidential records by one of Whittamore's associates, John Gunning, who works from a base in Wiltshire. One of the ex-directory numbers was attributed by Whittamore to Milly's family home.

Then, with the help of its own full-time private investigator, Glenn Mulcaire, the News of the World started illegally intercepting mobile phone messages. Scotland Yard is now investigating evidence that the paper hacked directly into the voicemail of the missing girl's own phone. As her friends and parents called and left messages imploring Milly to get in touch with them, the News of the World was listening and recording their every private word.

But the journalists at the News of the World then encountered a problem. Milly's voicemail box filled up and would accept no more messages. Apparently thirsty for more information from more voicemails, the paper intervened - and deleted the messages that had been left in the first few days after her disappearance. According to one source, this had a devastating effect: when her friends and family called again and discovered that her voicemail had been cleared, they concluded that this must have been done by Milly herself and, therefore, that she must still be alive. But she was not. The interference created false hope and extra agony for those who were misled by it.

The Dowler family then granted an exclusive interview to the News of the World in which they talked about their hope, quite unaware that it had been falsely kindled by the newspaper's own intervention. Sally Dowler told the paper: "If Milly walked through the door, I don't think we'd be able to speak. We'd just weep tears of joy and give her a great big hug."

The deletion of the messages also caused difficulties for the police by confusing the picture when they had few leads to pursue. It also potentially destroyed valuable evidence.

According to one senior source familiar with the Surrey police investigation: "It can happen with abduction murders that the perpetrator will leave messages, asking the missing person to get in touch, as part of their efforts at concealment. We need those messages as evidence. Anybody who destroys that evidence is seriously interfering with the course of a police investigation."

The paper made little effort to conceal the hacking from its readers. On 14 April 2002 it published a story about a woman allegedly pretending to be Milly Dowler who had applied for a job with a recruitment agency: "It is thought the hoaxer even gave the agency Milly's real mobile number ... the agency used the number to contact Milly when a job vacancy arose and left a message on her voicemail ... it was on March 27, six days after Milly went missing, that the employment agency appears to have phoned her mobile."

The newspaper also made no effort to conceal its activity from Surrey police. After it had hacked the message from the recruitment agency on Milly's phone, the paper informed police about it.

It was Surrey detectives who established that the call was not intended for Milly Dowler. At the time, Surrey police suspected that phones belonging to detectives and to Milly's parents also were being targeted.

One of those who was involved in the original inquiry said: "We'd arrange landline calls. We didn't trust our mobiles."

However, they took no action against the News of the World, partly because their main focus was to find the missing schoolgirl and partly because this was only one example of tabloid misbehaviour. As one source close to the inquiry put it: "There was a hell of a lot of dirty stuff going on." Two earlier Yard inquiries had failed to investigate the relevant notes in Mulcaire's logs.

In a statement, the family's lawyer said the Dowlers were distressed at the revelation. "It is distress heaped upon tragedy to learn that the News of the World had no humanity at such a terrible time. The fact that they were prepared to act in such a heinous way that could have jeopardised the police investigation and give them false hope is despicable," Lewis said.

The News of the World's investigation was part of a long campaign against paedophiles championed by the then editor, Rebekah Brooks. The Labour MP Tom Watson last week told the House of Commons that four months after Milly Dowler's disappearance the News of the World had targeted one of the parents of the two 10-year-old Soham girls, Jessica Chapman and Holly Wells, who were abducted and murdered on 4 August 2002.

The behaviour of tabloid newspapers became an issue in the trial of Levi Bellfield, who last month was jailed for life for murdering Milly. A second charge, that he had attempted to abduct another Surrey schoolgirl, Rachel Cowles, had to be left on file after premature publicity by tabloids was held to have made it impossible for the jury to reach a fair verdict. The tabloids, however, focused their anger on Bellfield's defence lawyer, complaining that the questioning had caused unnecessary pain to Milly Dowler's parents.

Surrey police referred all questions on the subject to Scotland Yard, who said they could not discuss it.

The News of the World's parent company News International, part of Murdoch's media empire, said: "We have been co-operating fully with Operation Weeting since our voluntary disclosure in January restarted the investigation into illegal voicemail interception. This particular case is clearly a development of great concern and we will be conducting our own inquiry as a result. We will obviously co-operate fully with any police request on this should we be asked."

The following was published on 12 December 2011 in the corrections and clarifications column: An article about the investigation into the abduction and death of Milly Dowler (News of the World hacked Milly Dowler's phone during police hunt, 5 July, page 1) stated that voicemail "messages were deleted by [NoW] journalists in the first few days after Milly's disappearance in order to free up space for more messages. As a result friends and relatives of Milly concluded wrongly that she might still be alive." Since this story was published new evidence - as reported in the Guardian of 10 December - has led the Metropolitan police to believe that this was unlikely to have been correct and that while the News of the World hacked Milly Dowler's phone the newspaper is unlikely to have been responsible for the deletion of a set of voicemails from the phone that caused her parents to have false hopes that she was alive, according to a Metropolitan police statement made to the Leveson inquiry on 12 December.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Missing Milly Dowler's voicemail was hacked by News of the World

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The News of the World illegally targeted the missing schoolgirl Milly Dowler and her family in March 2002, interfering with police inquiries into her disappearance, an investigation by the Guardian has established.

# data[].attributes.body
Parties in Number 10 whilst the country was in lockdown.

There have been many Downing Street Covid rule-breaking parties. Meanwhile, the public are having to follow the rules they have set to keep everyone safe.

15th May 2020 - the Gathering in Downing Street garden

20th May 2020 - ‘Bring your own booze’ event in Downing Street garden

25th November 2020 - Treasury office drinks

27th November 2020 - Leaving do for PM’s aide Cleo Watson

10th December 2020 - Department of Education Christmas gathering

14th December 2020 - Party with Tory London mayoral candidate Shaun Bailey

15th December 2020 - Downing Street quiz

16th December 2020 - Department for Transport Christmas party

17th December 2020 - Cabinet Office Christmas party

18th December 2020 - Downing Street Christmas party

16th April 2021 - Two Downing Street staff leaving parties

This broke editors code as it is an invasion of privacy. This is a private email was leaked for this then to become a massive issue that everyone now knows about. It is thought (but not known) that their was a person who somehow found the email and then got paid to leak it. It is likely that the person who saw this email was forced to break editors code to the publics interest.

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.text
How many Downing Street Covid rule-breaking parties have there been?
 
The BBC's Chris Mason explains what we know so far
 
#SundayMorning https://t.co/3vcYQ9oHOx

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.entities.urls[].title
Voter anger mounts over Downing Street parties

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.entities.urls[].description
Hundreds of constituents contact their MPs about events during Covid restrictions, the BBC learns.

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.original_text
How many Downing Street Covid rule-breaking parties have there been?
 
The BBC's Chris Mason explains what we know so far
 
#SundayMorning https://t.co/3vcYQ9oHOx https://t.co/7A85GB9NRC

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.embed_code
How many Downing Street Covid rule-breaking parties have there been?

The BBC's Chris Mason explains what we know so far
#SundayMorning https://t.co/3vcYQ9oHOx pic.twitter.com/7A85GB9NRC
— BBC Politics (@BBCPolitics) January 16, 2022

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props_source.data.entities.urls[].title
Lead or step aside, senior Tory Tobias Ellwood tells Boris Johnson

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props_source.data.entities.urls[].description
Tobias Ellwood says "we need leadership" as MPs are inundated with messages about Downing Street parties.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props_source.data.text
How many Downing Street Covid rule-breaking parties have there been?
 
The BBC's Chris Mason explains what we know so far
 
#SundayMorning https://t.co/3vcYQ9oHOx https://t.co/7A85GB9NRC

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.original_text
How many Downing Street Covid rule-breaking parties have there been?
 
The BBC's Chris Mason explains what we know so far
 
#SundayMorning https://t.co/3vcYQ9oHOx https://t.co/7A85GB9NRC

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.text
How many Downing Street Covid rule-breaking parties have there been?
 
The BBC's Chris Mason explains what we know so far
 
#SundayMorning https://t.co/3vcYQ9oHOx

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.entities.urls[].title
Lead or step aside, senior Tory Tobias Ellwood tells Boris Johnson

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.entities.urls[].description
Tobias Ellwood says "we need leadership" as MPs are inundated with messages about Downing Street parties.