# data[].attributes.body
Yes because the artifacts were from that country not the country that is taking it. The artifact might have also been very important to their country and the history behind the artifact may have been important to the country.

# data[].attributes.body
yes, because if artifacts are shipped from one place to another, the artifact may be damaged or even broken. Also, the artifact belongs where it was found, and keeping it in the same place could also teach people about the enviorment of where it was found.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it is ethical because leaving it in it's own location provides another knowledge about where it was found, and people overlooking it would be able to picture whatever happened happening. Also, the people of the past day might want to keep the artifact in the same spot for religious purposes.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes because if an artifact was found in a certain place it should be in a museum nearest to the place it was found. The people from the place it was found have a bigger argument because technically it is theirs.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the discoveries should be shared with the world because it's important for everyone to be able to learn more about what was found. But, I also think that the country where the artifact/artifacts were found should have the right to be able to have the artifacts stay in the country. Especially because they may be damaged if they were to be shipped to another place.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that we should keep the artifacts protected and preserved in the country that they were found in because moving the artifact place to place could cause damage to the artifact and if we just leave the artifact in the country that it was found in, there would be a less possibility of damaging the artifact.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes It is ethical to keep artifacts in the country because that way they can be preserved there and it is historical. Think of it as finding a treasure chest in your yard and not being able to keep it.

# data[].attributes.body
yes, because if that country went to all that trouble to have a protest it means that they're proud that artifact was found in their country so it should be kept in the country it was found

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, it is, because mainly, It's just wrong and disrespectful to the history of the artifact to take it from where it's found, and second, even the most protected objects can be easily damaged in shipping, making it more of an insult.

# data[].attributes.body
I think its ethical because the place of origin is its "home", so it should stay and belong there. The country can put it into a museum in the place of origin though.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, because if they ship it, it could get damaged from a storm and if they transport it from an airplane, it could crash land and destroy the artifact. They should make a copy just like some of the other artifacts.

# data[].attributes.body
yes, because if they are shipped to a different location they could become damaged or brake, and its not good to handle the artifacts. if you move it out of its country it wouldn't make sense because that is were it was found. if people really want to see it they can visit that country and see it were it originates from. it is ok to move around that one country but moving it around the world deosn't make sense.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, instead of shipping it back to America in a museum, why not put it in a museum were it was found?

# data[].attributes.body
Yes the artifact should be returned as a historical piece for that country. Also that article could be sacred to their people

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, because then it will stay preserved, like the cave paintings that were almost destroyed because of all the human contact.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that all artifacts should be kept safe no matter where they are. I think it should not travel to much cause that gives it a better chance to get ruined.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the artifacts should be brought to a research facility were they can use them in research for finding more about the significance of the artifact. I believe that after that, the archaeologist that found it has claim to it. I think they should be able to display it wherever they want and not confine it to one particular country.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that they should keep the artifact in a museum in the country where it was discovered. It is a part of the said country's historical background and I think that it is necessary to keep it in the country. I think that it is the responsibility of scientists and other people who want to see it to come to the country. That's why all of Anne Frank's things are in her original country so people can see it. Why can't the fossil's be left in their original county too.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I do think it is important to keep artifacts in the country that they were found in because you could try to find more based on its location and you also might leave or loose something behind while moving it. It may get damaged during the move. The artifact should be kept there for more exploration and safety reasons. Anyway, it can be displayed at a museum nearby, that is well protected and has good security.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes because if an artifact is being moved from where it was found it might not be able to live in a different environment also it might get damaged while it is being moved. Another reason is if you keep it in the same country you might find more information about the artifact. you could also put it in a near by museum. If you find an artifact you should be able to bring it and keep it or do whatever you want to do with it cause technically its theirs.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think it is necessary to keep artifacts in the country in which they were found, because important discoveries are meant to be shared with the world. Also, once it is found, removed, and cleaned, it doesn't have to stay where it was found just because it was found there. It should be able to be inspected by scientists or put into a museum to be displayed.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes because if they ship or transport the artifacts they could be damaged from the ride and will not be replaceable so they should keep the artifacts where they found it to make sure it is safe and doesn't get damaged. They should at least make a copy of the artifact and bring it back to study it to their county.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that when a discover is found that could change what we know about history its should be shared with the people and put into a museum for everyone to see whether it is in the country it was found in or not.