# data[].attributes.body
Pro-  Gives you pros and cons
Con- There are a lot of different people that have wrote different things.

# data[].attributes.body
Negative: Has ads that aren't needed

# data[].attributes.body
One positive thing about this website is how many peoples opinions you can get out of it. One negative thing is that the articles are old.
I would use this website because it helps me figure out if i agree with the topic or not.

# data[].attributes.body
-Shows date and author
-Has quotes from federations and professors

# data[].attributes.body
Pros:
Seems unbiased
"Nonprofit"
Cons:
Seems like an average website that has both sides of the story.
No named authors such as Michael Manning, MD.
Asked for my money several times.
Could not find their citations.
Absence of certain topics.
Overall, this seems like a source I would use if I had nothing else to use.

# data[].attributes.body
pro- There is both sides pros and cons.
con- There is not contact information for the authors.
I would use this website because the writing is based on good evidence and it has both sides.

# data[].attributes.body
Positive :It was a good source because it had a lot of different opinions,
It shows both sides of the argument.
Has empirical evidence. Its non profit.
Negatives: It was last updated about 2 years ago.
Opinions on the matter were from the late 2000's .
We agree that it was an okay source. Overall we both would use this website. But we would look for a more recent source. :-) THANK YOU
~ Group 8

# data[].attributes.body
Positive: There are different points of views.

Negative:  There are not very many ways to contact the writers and website owners.

Summary: We would use this website because the research is professionally researched and it is a nonprofit website.

# data[].attributes.body
Pro: Written by experts, who have plenty of things to say. Because there are experts writing, it is definitely reliable information.

Negative: While most are experts, some are more reliable than others. There might be a lawyer in immigration law, or a doctor. It's hard to find background information.

Summary: We would use this website, because the information doesn't seem fishy. The facts draw from many different sources to prove their points. 10/10

# data[].attributes.body
Pro: Both sides of argument, lots of details
Con: Some of the sources have different authors, may not me as trustworthy
Yes, I would use this website because it seems like most of the information is accurate and there is a lot to read and learn about.

# data[].attributes.body
Pro: uses multiple supporting articles and their goal is to help people understand both sides of an issue.
Con: uses confusing language that not everyone might understand.
I would use this website because the information was helpful and not bias to one particular side.

# data[].attributes.body
They are a nonprofit
They make more then 1 million dollars in revenue, almost all of it goes to the website

# data[].attributes.body
Identify 1 positive or negative characteristic

Summary: Why would you use or not use this website?