# data[].attributes.body
Can we ask about relationships in these interviews? I think some of these interviewees will have some of the birds-eye to see changes regionally

# data[].attributes.headline
Implementer and Recipient Q#2 "biggest issues"

# data[].attributes.subject
Implementer and Recipient Q#2 "biggest issues"

# data[].attributes.body
I might suggest asking about the "goals" you perceive RHTA trying to accomplish rather than the "issues or situations"

# data[].attributes.body
Depending on who ends up on our final internal Admin list, we may want to develop a question or two specific to that person's role with the RHTA program. ABAG can provide further specifics here.

# data[].attributes.body
It might be good to include a question about how TA Implementers experienced working with ABAG and what they would like to see change.

# data[].attributes.body
Most of us relied greatly on consultants. I passed on some of the TA materials to our consultant, but not all of it. I'm not really sure how much of what I passed on was used by our consultant.

# data[].attributes.body
I notice that the questions are posed in a positive way (e.g., "how did TA help ..."). I think it also would be good to ask, in a nice way, what was a waste of time. Alternatively, perhaps it is worth asking how much did TA help?

# data[].attributes.body
recipients - maybe as about perception of ABAG. Admin will care about this.

# data[].attributes.body
Housing element certified more quickly, build relationships with colleagues. - wouldn't ask that about new housing law webinars, for instance.

# data[].attributes.body
This question isn't marked as a priority, but I think it is really important for ABAG to know.

# data[].attributes.body
Body of TA for housing element update process AND other for new laws/everything else.

# data[].attributes.headline
People might not even know what RHTA is. Be sure to introduce it. 

# data[].attributes.subject
People might not even know what RHTA is. Be sure to introduce it. 

# data[].attributes.body
Need to include a question regarding how this process helped with the Housing Element success or other TA success.

# data[].attributes.body
I'm not sure what kind of distinction you are looking for when asking first about our county and then the region.

# data[].attributes.body
While I understand HCD is not the topic of this evaluation, I don't think you can talk about TA without talking about the intense opinions many of us have as a result of our interactions with HCD

# data[].attributes.body
Clarify what close means?

# data[].attributes.headline
Q3 Historic housing element process (Jeff)

# data[].attributes.subject
Q3 Historic housing element process (Jeff)

# data[].attributes.body
Some of us have been around a while, but for many local planners, this element has been their first

# data[].attributes.body
I'm not sure every local planner knows what RHTA stands for. I also don't expect that they will know off the top of their heads what the RHTA objectives are

# data[].attributes.body
Question #2 I think would benefit from being broken out out a little further.

# data[].attributes.body
What would you change about the process knowing the biggest challenges, issues, etc.? Maybe another question just needs a follow up or can be reworded.

# data[].attributes.body
some may not be comfortable with words like "deepening" or "closer" relationships