# data[].attributes.body
Diplomatic negotiation usually is the most commonly used response. Rather than losing a war or starting a war, negotiating could peacefully resolve conflicts without significant losses.

# data[].attributes.body
When considering both modern-day and historical developments, diplomatic negotiation was most commonly used. This solution avoided conflict, allowed for mutual benefits, saved unnecessary loss of lives, and could potentially lead to alliances.

# data[].attributes.body
Arron Guerra

When The United States came to a case fire with Vietnam. This falls into surrendering witch ended in the United states pulling out

# data[].attributes.body
The response most commonly used is negotiation, as it is the best process to figure things out peacefully before risking any lives.

# data[].attributes.body
In modern day most people and country would usually fight back or other options would be to negotiate with them to resolve the problem.

# data[].attributes.body
When you consider a modern-day or historical development, the most common response is to fight back. Throughout time, surrendering has commonly been seen as a way of losing power and "accepting defeat". Back in World War II, Pearl Harbor was bombed by Japan due to conflict with the United States. The US ended up bombing Hiroshima to show Japan that America would not back down in crisis, they would fight.

# data[].attributes.body
Most leaders respond to political unrest or conflict with diplomatic negotiation, because it offers a peaceful way to resolve problems

# data[].attributes.body
Considering modern-day or other historical developments, many leaders today and in history used Diplomatic Negotiation, and the reason behind this is because it saves lives, it allows the country/empire to keep their land, and it allows for them to keep culture.

# data[].attributes.body
In modern-day and other historical development the most common response is diplomatic negotiation to avoid wars and loss of life, loss of resources and loss of a potentially beneficial political alliance.

# data[].attributes.body
What seems most commonly used was warfare. Broadly the United States is a military powerhouse and fights to keep this title by using its advantages to overpower states and other countries. This can go back to early days where they would rebel and use military strategies to get their way.

# data[].attributes.body
When anazlyzing modern day or other historic developments, military resistance tends to be the most commonly used response. This is often used because when other territories attack, they aren't just gonna sit there and take it. A lot of the time, the countirews won't even be willing to make a peace deal, they just want to conquer or assert dominance over others. So countries fight back against them, like the Russia and Ukraine war.

# data[].attributes.body
When considering modern day historical development. Diplomatic negotiation in the most common response. Because it can most likely end in peace without conflict.

# data[].attributes.body
When one considers modern-day or other historical developments, a commonly used response is military resistance. This approach is used by different countries to fight back from events like terrorist attacks. It manages conflicts through country-wide reactions which put the point across to the rivals, ending conflict through battle.

# data[].attributes.body
The most commonly used response in a modern-day or historical event is to surrender. It was used in the end of World War 2 when America started to use bombs, and this caused Japan to surrender the war.

# data[].attributes.body
When considering a modern-day and historical developements, leaders will rise up and approach the conflict with dignity. Most modern countries have an established military and would not want to be considered weak by backing down.

# data[].attributes.body
When considering a modern-day or other historical development, the type of response most commonly used is surrender and incorporation because usually one side is stronger and is able to get the other side to give up because they won't have a chance up against them, eventually leading to most people going to the winning side and somehow being apart of them.

Jessica Lyon P5

# data[].attributes.body
When considering modern-day or other historical developments, Governments usually negotiate to prevent the conflict from get bigger.

# data[].attributes.body
When considering modern-day and historical developments, diplomatic negotiation is the most commonly used response. This response is most commonly used because it allows both sides to come to an agreement which prevents wars and holds peace.

# data[].attributes.body
When considering the modern-day world Military resistance is most commonly used. It depends were things are specifically located but for the most part military is always used. They don't want to show a weakness and want to be as powerful as possible thus using their military is the only way to do that.

# data[].attributes.body
The most common response to historical conflict would be trying to make some form of negotiation. This would result in the meeting of a middle ground and not as many physical casualties, benefits both sides of the discussion.

# data[].attributes.body
The first option used by countries is usually diplomatic negotiation. This has been seen with many countries, including our own. It is most commonly used because it can result in peace without any death or conflict.

# data[].attributes.body
Most leaders try to fight back then if that doesn't work they will surrender. For example, Japan in WWII fought against the USA but then we sent nukes and they surrendered.

# data[].attributes.body
In both modern-day and historical contexts, the most common responses to major developments are reform, aimed at adapting to changes, and resistance, focused on challenging or opposing those changes.

# data[].attributes.body
SAMPLE RESPONSE: When analyzing modern-day and historical developments, diplomatic negotiation tends to be the most commonly used response. This approach is often preferred because it offers a way to resolve conflicts and manage disputes without the large-scale loss of life or resources associated with military resistance or evacuation.