# data[].attributes.body
1. #20
My land was good because I got a lake and some soil. My land could've been better though.
#3 This method could be improved by luck being more on my side or being assigned land when you bought you ticket.

# data[].attributes.body
I got land plot number 26. This plot is okay because it has a small part of the river that I can use for food and I can build a house there. I can use the mountains for mining and make money off of that. The method can be improved by allowing people to buy the land they want instead of needing luck.

# data[].attributes.body
I got land plot 17. It is good because I have enough room to farm and I have a little bit of water from the lake. This method could be improved by making the land plots a little more equal for people.

# data[].attributes.body
1. 11
2. It was okay, because I don't have anything stopping me from making resources, such as cotton, but I dont have any water.
3. If you paid more money then you get into a drawing to get brtta land

# data[].attributes.body
my plot was ok because i only got the sea and a swamp. This method could be improved because its all luck.

# data[].attributes.body
1.  10
2.My land wasn't the best because it had a part of the swamp.
3. This method could be improved by making the drawing equal, so that everyone has a chance at land

# data[].attributes.body
I think my plot is just fine. It could use some more trees, but other than that the method of getting it was the only inconvenience. I think we should have picked our own land.

# data[].attributes.body
I'd say it is a good plot of land but it is very small. I lack resources but have a small amount of farmland that I can grow things on. I also have a river and lake so I have plenty of water to irrigate my crops. The only reason it is kinda bad is because it is a very small plot with very little natural resources. I think the method could be improved if it was based on money. If the person pays more money they can get a better plot of land. If the person pays money but not as much as the higher people then they get a little less and worse plot of land.

# data[].attributes.body
It was good because it had a river a swamp and it was not land locked. They could use this system better if each plot of land could be only for certain people such as the good farming land could be for people with lots of people to man the fields.

# data[].attributes.body
23. It was good. I had a lot of farm land and mountains I could mine, and I had the river on my land. It could be improved by not just randomly giving out land.

# data[].attributes.body
Land Plot 1

I think that my land plot could be much better. It could be better because I have barley any water and no trees. This could be improved by building lakes, and planting trees.

# data[].attributes.body
1. 4
2. This land is bad because I hint of forest, as well as a desert. My land is a little bigger than some and a little smaller than some.
3. This could be improved by letting everyone have equal land and chances of getting good land when picked

# data[].attributes.body
18 was my land plot. I feel like my land plot was really good because it has a river and mountains on it. This method could be improved by making it so that you have to earn the land instead of doing the lottery in the first place

# data[].attributes.body
1.Land Plot #29
2.My land has potential to be pretty good because it borders water.  I do not have any greenery there now, but I could plant some seeds to grow food and trees.
3.I think that the land should be separated so that all the pieces of land are about the same size.

# data[].attributes.body
Land Plot #-22
I think mine was good because it has water but i would have liked to have water and a forest.
This method could be improved by making it money based instead of luck based. If you pay more money you get better land,and it you pay less money you get land but it is not that good.

# data[].attributes.body
14. My land was good and bad because it was right on a lake and have trees on my land but it was very small. The method would be letting people pay for what they get not all paying the same for a ticket and getting different things.

# data[].attributes.body
1.31
2.It was okay, I got swamp and the ocean. Not great, but good food and maybe shelter...
3.This method could be a lot more equal if people actually worked for what they got instead of getting random land that is either not enough or too much for someone. Especially since only certain people could do it, it need to be more open and specific on who gets what and etc.

# data[].attributes.body
#8.Mine is pretty good because it has a little bit of a river in it.I don't have many resources like lumber.This method could be improved if I had more lumber and a little more size.

# data[].attributes.body
35.My land was decent. I got a lot of land but the only physical feature I got was the ocean. It could be improved by making people pay for how much land they want because it could be a single mother than doesn't own slaves getting a whole bunch of land. When a slave owner could use the land and profit from it.

# data[].attributes.body
1. 19
2. It was good because I have a huge part of Lake Eaton, some small rivers, and a part of mountains
3. There could be some forest included so there would be more wildlife

# data[].attributes.body
1. My land plot was number 7
2. My land plot was ok. I had water and nothing else. Just water. No swamp. No desert. No trees. Just water. How do I survive on pure water. I am going to die.
3. This method could be improved by making it where the land is more equaled out and even so that maybe everyone has a bit of trees and water.

# data[].attributes.body
My land plot number was 2. I would consider it bad because I only have a swamp and swamps soil isn't the greatest and that's the only water source I have. The method could be improved by trying to even out the land plots and not making some very small and some very big.

# data[].attributes.body
1. 25
2. I think it was good because I have forests and ocean which would be good for materials and trade.
3. I think that the method could be better by whoever gets picked has to like do something to earn it and not just gain it.

# data[].attributes.body
I got 30. My land plot was NOT good. It is very small and all i have is the sea. This could be improved if my plot was a little bigger and I had some trees

# data[].attributes.body
I'd say it's good, but it's lacking in natural resources like lumber, I am living next to a lake so I have lots of water. The method could be improved by letting people pay for land instead of making it completely luck based.