# data[].attributes.body
Know: Social categorization can affect people's decision to conform, and that the experiment has low ecological validity.

Think: I think that the results could have been different if there was a condition applied based on people's responses.

Wonder: Why are we more likely to choose to conform with people in our in-group even though we know they might be wrong?

# data[].attributes.body
know: study had  a low ecological validity
think: That it would be easy to replicate this study
wonder: if it would be possible to replicate this study in a more natural environment

# data[].attributes.headline
Know: People are more likely to conform when there is group pressure to do so

# data[].attributes.subject
Know: People are more likely to conform when there is group pressure to do so

# data[].attributes.body
Think: This study has low ecological validity since the participants were not in their natural environment
Wonder: Is this also known as The Asch Paradigm and if so why?

# data[].attributes.body
Know: The aim of the study was to determine if in-group identity would affect one's willingness to conform.
Think: I think the study was a good idea however it had a low ecological validity and may not predict what would happen in a naturalistic situation.
Wonder: I wonder what would have happened if it was more in a naturalistic situation?

# data[].attributes.body
Know: This study was created to test conformity
Think: This study was well put together and easy to understand and not too complicated
Wonder: What prompted the creation of this experiment?

# data[].attributes.body
Know - Abrams wanted to find out if in-group identity would affect a person's conformity.
Think - I think he had the right idea but should have had a different approach to the situation.
Wonder - What led him to conducting this type of experiment?

# data[].attributes.body
I know that the Abram study has a low ecological validity. I think that even through immoral the deception was important to get results that are genuine. I wonder why there is a difference in conformity between men and women.

# data[].attributes.body
Know: Conforming publicly depends on ones Social Categorization.
Think: I think his use of an independent measures design was useful for the study.
Wonder: How much did he affect the results? Would a different psychologist running this experiment change the results?

# data[].attributes.body
Know: I know that this study was thorough due to the fact that the experiment had 18 trials before end results. I also know that the aim of the experiment was to find out if ones in-group identity could affect someones willingness to conform with others.

Think: I think this experiment was well put together, however, I believe that this experiment had a low ecological validity.

Wonder - I wonder if the experiments results would be different if it was done in a naturalistic setting. Due to the experiment having a low ecological validity, the experiment seemed to be highly artificial. I wonder if the results would be different if the conditions of the experiment took place in a more naturalistic environment.

# data[].attributes.body
Know: The aim of the study was to determine if in-group identity would affect one's willingness to conform.

Think: I think that this would be true because people tend to go with the group and conform.

Wonder: I wonder how they could have made the study have more ecological validity and made it so that it wasn't culturally biased or deceptive.

# data[].attributes.body
Know: I know that Abrams conducted a study in order to see if in group identity affects ones desire to conform
Think: I think that this was a very good experiment because it is easy to replicate and was very standardized.
Wonder: I wonder if they could have made this experiment have more ecological validity and limit the culture bias to get different results.

# data[].attributes.body
Know: Abrams wanted to determine if in-group identity would affect one's willingness to conform.

Think: This study was easy to understand and the task was simple.

Wonder: How could this study be changed in order to not be as artificial and not have any ethical concerns.

# data[].attributes.body
Know - that this study depicts a true trait that we have as a society.  Think - I think the study helps us to understand the reasonings behind why we have in and out groups as people Wonder - I wonder how they could have gotten true data because if people where awear this was happing they had to be more present.

# data[].attributes.body
I know: people tend to conform due to their in-group's response
I think: this study makes a lot of sense because when you think about it, a lot of people really just say the same thing as the people they trust or as those in their in-group
I wonder: how it would have been different if one group was adults and one group was college students

# data[].attributes.body
Know - People who are in the same in-group see members as more correct
Think -  The study is easy to replicate
Wonder - I wonder how much gender plays a role in the decision making

# data[].attributes.body
Know- Most people will conform to the in-group's response

Think- I think this study would not have real-world applications

Wonder- I wonder if gender plays a roll, there would have to be more replications of this study in order to see.

# data[].attributes.body
Know - Abrams did this study in order to see how in-group identity affects the conformity rate
Think - I think this is a good study that is easy to follow, but not good to relate to a real-world situation
Wonder - I wonder if there is a way to replicate Asch's experiment in a real-world setting

# data[].attributes.body
Post your name and something you know-think-wonder about the Abrams study (include a picture above)