# data[].attributes.body
0 or 1

# data[].attributes.body
0 or 1

# data[].attributes.body
0 or 1 or 2 or 3 or 4

# data[].attributes.body
The author does a decent enough job of answering the question and stating the devices the rest of the author's essay would be referencing.

# data[].attributes.body
The author or person who wrote the essay did have a thesis. It wasnt not found in the first senctance but the thesis was present and they had facts to back it up

# data[].attributes.body
Though it takes three full sentences, the author does state a full thesis with the name of the text, the author, the author’s purpose and intent, and the tools that are used.

# data[].attributes.body
The author does not consistently use commentary to explain why their evidence matters. They do, however, give a good amount of evidence and some occasional genuine commentary.

# data[].attributes.body
The writer creates a thesis that answers the question and is arguable.

# data[].attributes.body
1 resonds to prompt with thesis

# data[].attributes.body
The author does a good job of answering the question and stating the devices that were used in the story. I would give the author the point.

# data[].attributes.body
The author does create a defensible thesis in the 5th sentence, 1 point

# data[].attributes.body
The writer gives lots of evidence to prove their point and also explain why. Some of the descriptions could use more explanation.

# data[].attributes.body
1
The author provides a defensible thesis that includes the comment on the human condition, along with the specific devices used by the author, and strategically includes the WHY.

# data[].attributes.body
The author uses contractions and, without an intriguing hook or smooth transitions, the author does not really deserve a point of sophistication.

# data[].attributes.body
The evidence is there they give enough examples to prove the statement, but they evidence isn't strong I'm pretty sure they could have found more quotes and ways to prove their point or thesis

# data[].attributes.body
The author uses examples from the text and defends them, but seems to get a little lost in their commentary, not entirely relating their points back to their thesis and staying on track with their original claims.

# data[].attributes.body
The author provides a lot of evidence but does not relate it back to their thesis statement.

# data[].attributes.body
The majority of this response could be shortened in order to be more direct and concise. The transitions are not smooth, and the overall essay seems a bit cluttered and disjointed.

# data[].attributes.body
1
They responded with a defensible thesis that was able to address the prompt and paints a bigger picture

# data[].attributes.body
They pretty much just got through the assignment they wrote a thesis and evidence but nothing more, so I think they did not get the sophistication.

# data[].attributes.body
I'd say 3, it provides evidence but isn't that strong

# data[].attributes.body
3
The author does explain how their evidence connects their thesis multiple times, but when explaining some explanations do seem to fall short of achieving the score of a 4.

# data[].attributes.body
0
While exploring some interesting ideas about the text the authors writing is not the most smooth and there are areas where the language could be improved not quite enough to get the point

# data[].attributes.body
3
The author does go by the devices rather than ideas that are established but provides very interesting ways that some of the devices are explored and gives some more precise examples of those devices and does expand on them decently well

# data[].attributes.body
0, they didn't go past the thesis and evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
Altogether, the essay is written really. The amount of evidence and details was really impressive. The bit about the B sound was especially skillful.

# data[].attributes.body
0
The author does put some sophistication into their essay, but the way it was ultimately structured does not give it the ability to fully achieve a 1.