# data[].attributes.body
1). Who is the author? When did they write it?

2). For what purpose do you think the writers of these accounts wrote about these events?

3). What are the writers’ perspectives about the events? What do they focus on and how do they describe the event?

4). How are these accounts similar or different?

# data[].attributes.headline
1) Ibn al Athir, written in the thirteenth century

# data[].attributes.subject
1) Ibn al Athir, written in the thirteenth century

# data[].attributes.body
- Julnar

# data[].attributes.headline
Also Crusader Raymond D'aguilers, in the twelfth century.

# data[].attributes.subject
Also Crusader Raymond D'aguilers, in the twelfth century.

# data[].attributes.body
- Julnar

# data[].attributes.headline
Question 3: I think the writers touch a lot on the Muslim & the Franks for the most part. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Question 3: I think the writers touch a lot on the Muslim & the Franks for the most part. 

# data[].attributes.body
- Samara

# data[].attributes.headline
Question 1: Ibn al Athir was the Muslim historian who wrote this and it was written in the 13th century 

# data[].attributes.subject
Question 1: Ibn al Athir was the Muslim historian who wrote this and it was written in the 13th century 

# data[].attributes.body
- Samara

# data[].attributes.body
1. The author of the first source is Crusader Raymond d'Aguiliers (1099). The author of the second source is Ibn al-Athir (thirteenth century).

2. I think that the writers wrote about these events for the purpose of saying their version of history because they had the perspective of themselves being the victims and wanted the world to know what happened to their people.

3. Since the first writer is a crusader, he described the events as seeing dead people all over the city streets and even more importantly at the temple of Solomon, implying that something bad happened there to the crusaders. The second writer being Muslim wrote that many Muslim scholars and Imams had been killed. The franks invaded the dome of the Rock and refugees from Syria reached Bahgdad and told everyone the tragic story of what happened.

4. These accounts are different because each person wrote about their people from their religion as being the victims in this situation. The similarity is that generally there were people being killed.

# data[].attributes.headline
2) The Crusader focuses on the gory details of the violence's aftermath. The scholar writes about the refugee's and the people and places of religious significance that were lost.

# data[].attributes.subject
2) The Crusader focuses on the gory details of the violence's aftermath. The scholar writes about the refugee's and the people and places of religious significance that were lost.

# data[].attributes.body
- Julnar

# data[].attributes.body
1) The first was written by a crusader in 1099, when the crusade happened, and the other was written by a muslim imam, a few years later in the 13th century

2) I think that the first author wrote about the event to retell the stories about the crusade, but mainly showing the crusaders as not bad people while the second author wrote the text showing crusaders as bad people who went around killing people

3) The crusader writes the story in a way that shows the event tragic for the crusaders, and almost shows the Muslims as the bad people in the story, whereas the second excerpt explicitly says that the crusaders killed many innocent people.

4) Both pieces of text talk about many people dying and a lot of tragedy taking place in Jerusalem

# data[].attributes.body
4) They both shared that there was a lot of death they had to witness, however the scholar also mentioned the refugees.

# data[].attributes.headline
Question 4: Both the texts shared about lots of death and tragedies 

# data[].attributes.subject
Question 4: Both the texts shared about lots of death and tragedies 

# data[].attributes.body
- Samara

# data[].attributes.body
1. The author of the first text (1099) was a crusader, while the author of the second text was a Muslim historian.
2. I think the authors wrote about this event to inform the reader about what happened from both perspectives.
3. Both of the writers have a different perspective on what happened. The first text focuses on the after result and explains all the death and blood, while the second text focuses on what was happening during the event, like what the crusader took from the Dome of Rock.
4. They both focus on the same event but have a different perspective on it. The second text explains what the crusaders did, while the first text explains the after result.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Crusader Raymond d'Aguiliers, written in 1099.
Muslim Historian Ibn al-Athir, written during the thirteenth century.

2) The first account was written to tell the audience how much blood was shed, how people were killed during the fall of Jerusalem.
The second account was written to inform how the Muslims were affected when Jerusalem was taken.

3) The writer of the first account was a Crusader, so his perspective was more on how other people were killed, and his description is more dark when he says that "If I tell the truth, it will exceed your powers of belief."
The writer in the second account was from a Muslim perspective, he described how the Muslim Imams and scholars were killed,  how the Dome of the Rock and other things in the temple mount was stripped.

4) Both of these accounts talk about death of many people. The first account describes more on the intensity of the death.While, in the second account it is also mentioned how other things in the Temple Mount were also destroyed. The second account also talked about Refugees from Syria.

# data[].attributes.body
1)The author of the first paragraph was Crusader Raymond D'auguilier in 1099. The second paragraph was written by Ibn al Athirf in the 13th century.

2) I think the crusader wrote about these events because they wanted to tell people their version of the story's and they each tried to make the people from other religion sound worse than they were in their paragraphs.

3) The first writers perspective is that he was in the city and he was actually there when these events took place he focused on what happened after and he made it so the temple of Solomon was a more impactful thing than the people dead on the streets. Secondly the second authors perspective was that hes writing about how many Muslim's died and how they looted a lot. He focused on the crusaders killing Muslim's and Imams.

4) They are similar because they are both talking about how people died. But they are different because it is two different perspectives from two different authors and also they wrote these excerpts at different times.