# data[].attributes.body
1.Discuss the therapeutic relationship that places adults at the centre of their own decision making wherever possible.

2.Demonstrate the evidence base required to care for and support adults with acute health conditions.

3.Examine a range of health assessment strategies and tools in order to apply them in relevant adult practice settings.

4.Apply the principles of risk assessment and management that reflect positive risk taking in adult care.

5.Consider the relevant legal and ethical issues when delivering and evaluating care for adults with health difficulties

# data[].attributes.body
Submission to Turnitin. pdf powerpoint. Storyboards relevant to module start from slide 26. These were Hard Copies originally

# data[].attributes.headline
State your grade and comment when we meet . Review guidance 

# data[].attributes.subject
State your grade and comment when we meet . Review guidance 

# data[].attributes.headline
Sim characters that students will be using regardless of different condition in the handbook. see handbook. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Sim characters that students will be using regardless of different condition in the handbook. see handbook. 

# data[].attributes.body
Connor-AKI;
Elias-Ulcerative colitis;
Nellie-Unstable Angina
Sally- Asthma.
The all present in A & E or a MAU/SAU (Elias if surgically managed)

# data[].attributes.headline
Extra Marker comments that could be made 

# data[].attributes.subject
Extra Marker comments that could be made 

# data[].attributes.body
can be added to your feedback

# data[].attributes.headline
March 2019 students  who are 80:20 STUDENTS and MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES SUBMISSION DATE -email sent to students 29th november

# data[].attributes.subject
March 2019 students  who are 80:20 STUDENTS and MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES SUBMISSION DATE -email sent to students 29th november

# data[].attributes.body
80:20-First time submissions: 5pm Monday 30th

Be mindful that modules being carried over into year three are problematic if failed other apspects of year 2. check similarity

Important dates

March 2019

80:20 group first submission: 30th November (results 22nd Dec). Extension:14th December (results in 18th jan 2021);
Mitigating Circumstances /Long Extension:25th January, 2021. Results: 16th February, 2021
Resubmission date for all:25th March, 2021 NOTE CHANGE. IT IS TO HELP YOU GO INTO YEAR 3 WITHOUT YEAR 2 WORK. STILL COULD CHANGE

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mitigating Circumstances/Late starters: 5pm Monday 30th

Note that your first submissions were june 2020, then resubmissions were august, so you need to be submitting at this point. ? Can apply for extension of 10 days extra. Long extension date not arranged

Important dates

March 2019

Mitigating Circumstances Group/Late Starters:

First Submission was June 2020; Resubmission was August 2020.

Mitigating Circumstances/Long Extension:30th November, 2020 12md (results 22nd december).
Resubmission: 11th Feb 2021
Results:4th March, 2021

BE MINDFUL OF IMPLICATIONS OF NOT GOING INTO YEAR 3 IF FAIL ON THIS WORK AND OTHER YEAR 2 MODULES

Extensions: https://www.uclan.ac.uk/students/support/extensions.php

Mitigating circumstances

https://www.uclan.ac.uk/students/support/extenuating_circumstances.php

# data[].attributes.body
I was failed because i did not have enough references and they said so.

# data[].attributes.body
the feedback was constant correction of grammar and spelling and i felt they did not read the content

# data[].attributes.body
what does it mean i partially met the learning outcome

# data[].attributes.body
i think they did not understand positive risk because they said xxx patient would not be sent home to self care.

# data[].attributes.body
they said it was a good piece throughout and i still got 30%

# data[].attributes.body
Feedforward does not make sense to me. i cannot build if everything is rubbish

# data[].attributes.headline
They failed me for using subheadings-is that right

# data[].attributes.subject
They failed me for using subheadings-is that right

# data[].attributes.body
Discuss; Demonstrate; Examine, Apply, Consider.

References

1. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals.

2. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn & Bacon.

# data[].attributes.headline
Learning Outcome verbs mapped to the 6 level Bloom Model (Original/Revised)

# data[].attributes.subject
Learning Outcome verbs mapped to the 6 level Bloom Model (Original/Revised)

# data[].attributes.body
The verb of learning outcome 1 | Discuss: Comprehension/Understand (level 2)
| The verb of learning outcome 2 | Demonstrate | Application/Apply (level 3)

| The verb of learning outcome 3 | Examine  | Analysis/Analyse (level 4)

| The verb of learning outcome 4 | Apply  | Application/Apply (level 3)

The verb of learning outcome 5 | Consider | Synthesis/Evaluate   (level 5)

https://www.utica.edu/academic/Assessment/new/Blooms%20Taxonomy%20-%20Best.pdf

# data[].attributes.headline
Process for Marking Allocation based on module hours

# data[].attributes.subject
Process for Marking Allocation based on module hours

# data[].attributes.headline
Adopting ‘Standards of Feedback on Written Assignments’ across the Faculty of Health and Wellbeing

# data[].attributes.subject
Adopting ‘Standards of Feedback on Written Assignments’ across the Faculty of Health and Wellbeing

# data[].attributes.body
states more detail on uclan website here

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
University of Central Lancashire Students’ Union,

# data[].attributes.headline
Guidance on moderation from Sarla. 22.6.20 email

# data[].attributes.subject
Guidance on moderation from Sarla. 22.6.20 email

# data[].attributes.body
As moderator, you should moderate 3 from each marker, and any marker with 3 or fewer – all of their scripts –- -please moderate low or referred scripts/ mid range and high band scripts from each marker. I would prefer all refers to be moderated.

The assessment handbook is a really useful resource – page 40 has the moderation report proforma that was introduced this academic year that we should be using, as well as the what internal moderation entails:

‘Internal Moderation

Each module must have an identified internal moderator who will be responsible for checking a representative sample (see details of minimum requirements above) of work and confirming that the assessment criteria for every element of assessment have been correctly and accurately applied and for recording the appropriate evidence of moderation.’

# data[].attributes.body
SEE ATTACHED

# data[].attributes.body
this is the parity paper: 133898477

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
NU2372 Acute care assignment for parity 19th october paper

# data[].attributes.headline
Please note guidance on LO3  Health assessment tools and LO4 Risk Table and Positive Risk Taking

# data[].attributes.subject
Please note guidance on LO3  Health assessment tools and LO4 Risk Table and Positive Risk Taking

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
ASSIGNMENT GUIDANCE REVISED JULY 2020 FOR NU2372 ESSENTIALS 1 module (3)

# data[].attributes.body
Rachel
Wendy 90
Angela C  110
Renette  70
Maddy 100
Angela I  60
Sheena  40
Sue 40
Pippa   70
Kim 30
Gemma  110
Stan  40
Michaela 55
Sue Q 40
Alison 110|
Suzie   50
Blakey 90
Annabelle 70

# data[].attributes.body
students have been given

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Learning Outcome 3 and 4 Guidance september 2019 cohort july to sept

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
assignment guidance template for turnitin

# data[].attributes.body
Clear, albeit brief intro
LO 1 - Good literature, paragraghs to be more succint and flow better with literature placed to support discussion. Linkage is limited in places.
LO 2 - Limited knowledge demonstrated, indepth on UC, does the student really undertand UC?
LO3 - Two tools choosen which are applicable to UC, critique visible in places, student could have elaborated more on why they perform procedures to demonstrate understanding.
LO4 - Risk tool, supported with literature. Descriptive on the whole in written section.
LO5 - Ethical issues discussed, however limited understanding demonstrated and linkage made.
Grade: 48/52%
Post parity meeting - 62/65%

# data[].attributes.body
Has achieved all learning outcomes.
LO1 - could have reduced the discussion to use word count in later LOs.
LO2 - i have checked the similarity and there isn't a match but i am not convinced the writing to define the process of UC is understood by the author - sufficient to pass though
LO5 - weakest point of discussion but sufficient to pass the LO.
Needs to proof read better, although huge list of references still some area of descriptive and ? used all? Paraphrasing could be improved. Has some good areas also where used evidence well.
I would have said higher but given some areas i'd say 52-55% from a quick read.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
marking and the markers  19th october submission September Cohort 2019

# data[].attributes.headline
Resubmission Guidance sent 10th november, 2021

# data[].attributes.subject
Resubmission Guidance sent 10th november, 2021

# data[].attributes.body
Please ensure you have seen the resubmission checklist too. Also note that Storyboards must have the same academic rigour as assignments. you resubmit the whole piece of work, not partial work

# data[].attributes.headline
Group who started  in july 2020 and ended sept 2020

# data[].attributes.subject
Group who started  in july 2020 and ended sept 2020

# data[].attributes.body
First Sub: 19th October, 2020

Results 10th November, 2020

Extension: 2nd November, 2020

Results: 24th November, 2020

RESUBMISSION (for those that did not pass when submitted in october and november dates):Submission:11th February 2021@12pm  RESULTS:5th March

MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES/LONG EXTENSION/FIRST SUBMITTERS (those that have not yet submitted any work for NU2372 and who did not submit in october or november 2020): SUBMISSION: Thursday 21st January, 2021@12pm. RESULTS: 12th February, 2021@10am

Extension: apply in normal way-predicted date ?4th Feb to submit-Admin do this.

RESUBMISSION: Thursday 13th May, 2021 Results 4th June

Resubmission:7th January, 2021 for all
Results 29th January 2021

EC/MITS (1st Submission): 7th January 2021.

Results 29th January 2021
Resubmission: 15th March, 2021 for all

Results 6 th April, 2021
-------------------
if many students cannot do 7th jan then 10 day extension on this would be 21st january, 2021.
Mitigation on Mitigation would be 15th March 2021

# data[].attributes.headline
FRFM STUDENTS who started 28th september, 2020.

# data[].attributes.subject
FRFM STUDENTS who started 28th september, 2020.

# data[].attributes.body
First Submission 14th December, 2020

Results: 18th January, 2021

Resubmission:15th March, 2021

Extensions: 8th Jan 2021
Results:25th January 2021
Resubmission:15th March, 2021

EC/Mits (1st Submission): 15th March, 2021

Result: 6 th April, 2021

# data[].attributes.headline
MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES GUIDANCE FOR YEAR TUTORS

# data[].attributes.subject
MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES GUIDANCE FOR YEAR TUTORS

# data[].attributes.headline
MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES FOR STUDENTS GUIDANCE 

# data[].attributes.subject
MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES FOR STUDENTS GUIDANCE 

# data[].attributes.headline
Mitigating Circumstances GuidanceExtensions – up to 10 days are granted by the Hub.MCs applications can be made usually within 3 days of the deadline or up to 3 days after the deadline. However, we can offer some flexibility here – especially if students have several deadlines which are close together. Remember, students only have to have one co-creation meeting/provide evidence once. After this you can provide subsequent (related MCs) without a meeting/evidence.  

# data[].attributes.subject
Mitigating Circumstances GuidanceExtensions – up to 10 days are granted by the Hub.MCs applications can be made usually within 3 days of the deadline or up to 3 days after the deadline. However, we can offer some flexibility here – especially if students have several deadlines which are close together. Remember, students only have to have one co-creation meeting/provide evidence once. After this you can provide subsequent (related MCs) without a meeting/evidence.  

# data[].attributes.body
Colleagues. (long one!)

March 2019: marking comes in on 30th november. this cohort has about 100 and only 25 submitted in june 2020 and resubs were done in August, 2020. SO there is about 75 students

So who will be marking?: (Sue Quayle moderator)

1.all 80:20 students (30.11): i will do these, there are about 30-35 (karen)

2.Ordinary full time theory Long Extensions/Mits (30.11):wendy, renette, michaela, Maddy, Stan, (why? because you marked first and had no extensions for sept 2019).

Extensions for all routes: (14.12-longer marking time built in)-sheena, suzie, Angela I, Angela C, Rachel (why? because you had no first submissions)

PLEASE CHECK BB SPACE  (march to july) AS THEIR GUIDANCE SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT FROM SEPT 2019. Can do swops between you

Dates are here: https://uclan.padlet.org/kblake1/cu0dbbbc9qzn41jb

NOTE THAT ALL THESE FAILS WILL NEED DEALING WITH TOO

In the background i am still trying to get through sept 2018 students and i will sort these

----------------------------------------------------------------

September 2019: Currently there are 65 fails in Sept 2019 that i have counted so far. so these 65 fails and perhaps 80 long extensions will be in both on the 7th Jan 2021.

So this date will have over 120 potentially. I can do some if can access the system.

Everyone needs to do these, up to new module leader and to still cover those that are off sick. Dates are here: https://uclan.padlet.org/kblake1/cu0dbbbc9qzn41jb

there is a MAGS for this group next friday after results come out on 24th november: please respond to queries and ask them to use the resubmission template in this padlet if they truly believe they answered the question: https://uclan.padlet.org/kblake1/uh7gkizlim516evh

---------------------------------------------------------------

September 2019:FRFM-For Pippa to do these and i recommend that you see them through regarding resubs and will be a mix of essays and storyboards. There are about 26. They submit on 14th dec. see dates in padlet. I do their MAGS. Dates are here: https://uclan.padlet.org/kblake1/cu0dbbbc9qzn41jb

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
March 2019 Year 2 Bsc Nursing all fields 80, 20 1.4.20 80 AND 20

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
March 2019 Year 2 Bsc Nursing Theory 1.4.20FULL THEORY

# data[].attributes.body
These notes are provided to assist you to understand your results.Youcan view your results online via myUCLan and if you obtain an award, you will receive a copy of your results in printinthe form of a transcript.The transcriptnot only details your overall resultbut also provides a breakdown of the marks/grades achieved in each of your modules.Having read these notes, if you are still unclear about the meaning of your results, please contact your Schoolfor advice

# data[].attributes.body
26th Feb, 2021-10-4-semester 1
4th June, 2021-0930-1500-semester 2
1st September, 2021-0930-4
contact
Email

pnursing@uclan.ac.uk

The march dates are as follows:

Module Board -26/02/21

Pre Course Board – 05/03/2021

Course Board – 12/02/2021

Mop Up Board – 19/03/2021

# data[].attributes.headline
Scheme that was originall mapped to the Platforms in Future Nurse 

# data[].attributes.subject
Scheme that was originall mapped to the Platforms in Future Nurse 