# data[].attributes.headline
Level 4 because I can identify aperopriate tonal words, able to collect important info from the text, able to construct a flowing comparative paragraph.

# data[].attributes.subject
Level 4 because I can identify aperopriate tonal words, able to collect important info from the text, able to construct a flowing comparative paragraph.

# data[].attributes.body
Stronger constructive elements
Better annotations
Deeper understanding of writing nuance

# data[].attributes.body
I can find the contention and main argument in the text. I can also analyse authors intention and its effects.

I would like Ms Antoniuk to explain the structure of body paragraph, introduction and conclusion.

# data[].attributes.body
I am sitting at a 3, I have an understanding on our topic but need help with how I compare two articles and discuss their differences to a high standard

# data[].attributes.headline
I would place myself as a 3 as I can identify the contention and the implications.

# data[].attributes.subject
I would place myself as a 3 as I can identify the contention and the implications.

# data[].attributes.body
To get to a 5 I need to be able to quickly identify the similarities and differences, and be able to write to time.

# data[].attributes.body
To get to a five I need to practice practice practice

# data[].attributes.headline
I would place myself at a 3 as I am able to confidently identify key arguments, contention, macro elements and comparing features of two articles. I also have a fair understanding of tone, tonal shifts and TFD.

# data[].attributes.subject
I would place myself at a 3 as I am able to confidently identify key arguments, contention, macro elements and comparing features of two articles. I also have a fair understanding of tone, tonal shifts and TFD.

# data[].attributes.body
In order to improve I would need a better understanding of the essay structure through writing practice essays and seeing sample essays.

# data[].attributes.body
I would place myself as a 3 as I feel I can write a reasonable topic sentence relating to both sources, and compare macro elements reasonably.

I would like for Miss Antoniuk to outline: ways to find contention, more elements and clarify the structure

# data[].attributes.body
I would place myself as a 3, as I can identify implications, and identify tones and key arguments.

To get to a 5 I would need to bw able to implement implications and be able to weeve more quotes in.

# data[].attributes.headline
I would place myself at a solid 4 as I can identify tones, the contention, key arguments, TFD, and can write a decent 'what how why' sentence. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I would place myself at a solid 4 as I can identify tones, the contention, key arguments, TFD, and can write a decent 'what how why' sentence. 

# data[].attributes.body
To achieve a 5, I would need to have a better understanding of the comparative essay structure (writing practice pieces) and be able to use varying starting phrases/sentences as well as including quotes that flow.
Miss Antoniuk could assist by ending my life

# data[].attributes.headline
I would place myself as a 3, my languge skills have improved and I am able to figure out the contention and tones.

# data[].attributes.subject
I would place myself as a 3, my languge skills have improved and I am able to figure out the contention and tones.

# data[].attributes.body
In order for me to improve I need to learn how to figure out what particular key arguments there are in the article. Putting the arguments in particular groups.

# data[].attributes.headline
I would place myself as as a 3 on the scale as I can identify the contention and key arguments and I can analyse micro elements. I can also write a paragraph using the comparative structure.

# data[].attributes.subject
I would place myself as as a 3 on the scale as I can identify the contention and key arguments and I can analyse micro elements. I can also write a paragraph using the comparative structure.

# data[].attributes.body
In order to improve, I need to practice writing and annotating to time and in SAC conditions. Miss Antoniuk could help me by possibly running another practice SAC in class.

# data[].attributes.headline
I would place myself on a scale as a 3. Im able to identify the contention and key arguments to some degree. Also I usually find some persuasive elements and what they are making readers thing, feel, do. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I would place myself on a scale as a 3. Im able to identify the contention and key arguments to some degree. Also I usually find some persuasive elements and what they are making readers thing, feel, do. 

# data[].attributes.body
It would help if you went over persuasive elements in more deoth and what they make the reader TFD.

# data[].attributes.headline
I'd place myself at a 3 as I'm comfy with identifying why the author does specific things, pretty good array of tone words.

# data[].attributes.subject
I'd place myself at a 3 as I'm comfy with identifying why the author does specific things, pretty good array of tone words.

# data[].attributes.body
I would place myself at a 3 because I know the issue and can identify key arguments throughout a piece of writing
I'd like Miss Antoniuk to further explain the best way to interpret T.F.D

# data[].attributes.headline
I would place myself as a 4 as I can identify text type, approach and contention, I can write a TFD and can understand body paragraph structure.

# data[].attributes.subject
I would place myself as a 4 as I can identify text type, approach and contention, I can write a TFD and can understand body paragraph structure.

# data[].attributes.body
I'd like Ms Antoniuk to have practise tasks and provide snacks to the class

# data[].attributes.headline
i would place my self at a 3 I can recognise the contention of texts and also tones and approaches.        to get to a 5 I need to be able to recognise macro and micro elements easier and be able to identify main arguments and point in the text.

# data[].attributes.subject
i would place my self at a 3 I can recognise the contention of texts and also tones and approaches.        to get to a 5 I need to be able to recognise macro and micro elements easier and be able to identify main arguments and point in the text.

# data[].attributes.body
I would like miss Antoniuk to talk more about identifying more macro and micro elements.

# data[].attributes.headline
I would place myself at a 3 as I can usually find the contention, key arguments and I think I can usually identify the intended effect of the author.

# data[].attributes.subject
I would place myself at a 3 as I can usually find the contention, key arguments and I think I can usually identify the intended effect of the author.

# data[].attributes.body
To get to a 4 or 5 I want to be able to effectively write a good analysis by being able to structure my paragraphs properly. I'd like Ms Antoniuk to go through structure and specifically focus more on how to compare the two sources.

# data[].attributes.headline
On the scale I would place myself as a three considering that I sit in the middle with my confidence to write the SAC. I already know how to identify key arguments and analyse language from a source to understand what the writer is implying.

# data[].attributes.subject
On the scale I would place myself as a three considering that I sit in the middle with my confidence to write the SAC. I already know how to identify key arguments and analyse language from a source to understand what the writer is implying.

# data[].attributes.body
I would like Ms Antoniuk to help build my confidence to write the SAC so I can achieve full marks.

# data[].attributes.headline
I would place myself at a 5 as my language/vocabulary has grown, I can identify and analysis macro and micro elements, I can effectively structure my response.

# data[].attributes.subject
I would place myself at a 5 as my language/vocabulary has grown, I can identify and analysis macro and micro elements, I can effectively structure my response.

# data[].attributes.body
I'd like Ms Antoniuk to treat herself to a new pair of shoes in a size 9 womens or 7 mens. She could use a new pair of runners