# data[].attributes.headline
Mechanization of the cotton industries was similar in Japan and India in the period c. 1880 to 1930 in such ways as the wages were low and that most of the workers would come from low social classes.

# data[].attributes.subject
Mechanization of the cotton industries was similar in Japan and India in the period c. 1880 to 1930 in such ways as the wages were low and that most of the workers would come from low social classes.

# data[].attributes.body
The cotton industry was similar in Japan and India in the period c. 1880 to 1930 through its production being provided mainly by poor, overworked, women and children; The cotton industry was also similar in Japan and India through the fact that hand spun cotton methods were replaced by machine spun cotton methods.

# data[].attributes.body
Mechanization of the cotton industries was similar in Japan and India in the period c.1880-1930 as the lack of increase of women in factories caused for inventions like machines to spin the yarn that women were not producing in order to keep up with the
demand.

# data[].attributes.body
The cotton industry was similar in Japan and India in the period C. 1880-1930 through the production being provided by women. The cotton industry was also similar in Japan and India because they both had hand spun methods that were replaced by machines which made the job easier. All of the women were worked to death or sickness and only got payed after there first year, but they didn't get payed much.

# data[].attributes.body
The mechanization of cotton maunufacturing in India and China because both regions drew workers primarily from poor rural villages.

# data[].attributes.body
Mechanization of the cotton industries was similar in Japan and India in the period c. 1880 to 1930 in which poor people would work all day in factories for very little money

# data[].attributes.headline
Mechanization of the cotton industries in India and Japan were similar in that the amount of cotton goods produced steadily went up as time went by, and the wages the workers earned rarely ever increased.

# data[].attributes.subject
Mechanization of the cotton industries in India and Japan were similar in that the amount of cotton goods produced steadily went up as time went by, and the wages the workers earned rarely ever increased.

# data[].attributes.body
Mechanization of the cotton industries was similar in Japan and India in the period c.1880-1930 because in both countries the workers we paid low wages and the women came from farming communities to work in factories to make a living.

# data[].attributes.body
Mechanization of the cotton industries in Japan and India were similar in the years 1880-1930 C.E. because women worked in the cotton mills when the cotton still had to be spun by hand, and in both countries they worked for very low wages for long work hours

# data[].attributes.body
Mechanization of the cotton industries was similar in Japan and India in the period c. 1880 to 1930 because both used overworked and underpaid women as laborers.

# data[].attributes.headline
During the period 1880-1930 ce, both the Japanese and Indian textile industries employed young and inexperienced children

# data[].attributes.subject
During the period 1880-1930 ce, both the Japanese and Indian textile industries employed young and inexperienced children

# data[].attributes.body
Mechanization of the cotton industry was similar in Japan and India in the period c. 1880 to 1930 in that many factory workers were sourced from farms and rural areas.

# data[].attributes.body
The point of view of the Buddhist priest in document 4 is supportive to the idea of women working in the mills. He expresses the importance of women making money from the mills to support their farming family

# data[].attributes.body
The main idea of document 8 was that factory workers in Japan had to work very hard for a very long time throughout the day and that most of the workers there were women. In the picture you can tell by the tired look on their faces that they don't want to be there and that they have been working there for a while.

# data[].attributes.body
The point of view from document 5 is of a Japanese industrialist, Tsurumi Shunsuke who claims that cheap workers come from farming communities. His tone is candid on his view of the topic.

# data[].attributes.body
Mechanization of the cotton industries was similar in Japan and India in the period c.1880 to 1930 in that the poor relied
on the money coming from the factory workers to provide for them.

# data[].attributes.headline
Mechanization of the cotton industries was similar in Japan and India in the period c. 1880 to 1930, wages were low and the people whom were paid the low wages were the lowest class of people. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Mechanization of the cotton industries was similar in Japan and India in the period c. 1880 to 1930, wages were low and the people whom were paid the low wages were the lowest class of people. 

# data[].attributes.body
The mechanization of the cotton industries were similar in India and Japan in the period c. 1880-1930 because both nations used the labor of underpaid and overworked women to work the factories.

# data[].attributes.headline
Document 5 is written by a Japanese industrialist, his purpose is to educate other industrialist on where to find cheap jobs

# data[].attributes.subject
Document 5 is written by a Japanese industrialist, his purpose is to educate other industrialist on where to find cheap jobs

# data[].attributes.body
According to Tsurumi Shunsuke the cheap workers came from farm communities to work in factories to make a living of their own.

# data[].attributes.body
The point of view from document 6 is of an Indian economist's opinion on the handwoven cloth industry. Radhakamal Mukerjee affirms that handwoven cloth is not as popular, because machines have taken the place of people weaving cloth. He also supports the idea that the textile industry owes its success to local bankers and investors who supported the industries growth.

# data[].attributes.body
The mechanization of the cotton industry was similar in Japan and India in the period c. 1880 to 1930, in the way that both required the labor of girls and women who were taken advantage of in pay, in comparison to their work loads.

# data[].attributes.body
The mechanization of the cotton industry was  similar in Japan and India because each country had an increase in agricultural, female, and peasant laborers.

# data[].attributes.headline
The point of view of document 9 was from the British Royal Commission of Labour who was sharing that lower class people and small peasants were not being paid the wages they should receive as their pay was constantly the same price over several years.

# data[].attributes.subject
The point of view of document 9 was from the British Royal Commission of Labour who was sharing that lower class people and small peasants were not being paid the wages they should receive as their pay was constantly the same price over several years.

# data[].attributes.body
The point of view of document 4 is that of a Buddhist priest from rural Japan who sees the work of young girls working in cotton mills as good because it is a very profitable job for poor Japanese families. He states that the work of these girls is an invaluable source of income because they earn more than what a farmer would make in an entire year.

# data[].attributes.body
The point of view is that it is okay for workers to receive low wages because that is all that they need to supports themselves and their families.

# data[].attributes.headline
The purpose of document 9 is to show the poor working conditions of peasants that are slaving away at the cotton factories with little to no pay.

# data[].attributes.subject
The purpose of document 9 is to show the poor working conditions of peasants that are slaving away at the cotton factories with little to no pay.

# data[].attributes.body
The Buddhist priest feels remorse for the peasants, due to their poor living conditions and need to send their girls to work in factories just to help them survive. However,  he does acknowledge the good opportunities the factories present. (POV)

# data[].attributes.body
In Doc 6 the authors purpose is to explain how large investors have in the cotton industry have transformes the local means of production

# data[].attributes.body
The purpose of this document was to inform other people where cheap workers which is farming communities because all they need is the bare minimum of support their family

# data[].attributes.body
In the period c. 1880 to 1930, the mechanization of the cotton industry was similar in both Japan and India. This can be seen in both country's workforce consisting of people with rural, and often poor backgrounds. The similarities continue with the constant underpayment of the cotton workers.

# data[].attributes.body
The purpose of document 6 was to explain the decline in handwoven cloth industries. The reason for this was women and other peasants in need for better wages, so they left for machine industries. Therefore an increase of female and other peasants in factories occurred.

# data[].attributes.body
The industrialist believes that Japanese farms make enough to support themselves, and that they can pay the workers very little because they are only supporting one member of a family, ignorant to the struggles of Japanese farms and the effect of low wages (POV)

# data[].attributes.body
The document was intended to explain the decline of the handwoven textile industry in favor of machine manufacturers and the power of joint-stock companies. And promote or congratulate bankers and investors for progressing the industry. (purpose)