# data[].attributes.body
Judges Blackmun, Rehnquist, O'Connnor sided with the principal. Under their ruling, schools have the right to control students' speech when they're involved in school related clubs/groups.

# data[].attributes.body
After this decision a law was made that said during certain situations your free speech can be limited. These include war times and other times that you might incite a panic.

# data[].attributes.body
The SCOTUS ruled that Schenck was guilty. They said the circumstance of your speech and your environment can limist your rights. Therefore saying that Schenck was causing a panic. The SCOTUS compared Schenck's actions to yelling "fire" in a theatre.

# data[].attributes.body
Controversial when announced, the decision remains at the center of the legal controversy over the right to privacy versus the rights of the unborn. This is still a huge controversial topic to this day.

# data[].attributes.body
The Supreme Court ended up being 7-2 and so the court agreed with Roe and upheld her right to terminate

# data[].attributes.body
the Court's opinion remains significant, both for being the first instance of the Supreme Court applying the strict scrutiny standard to racial discrimination by the government

# data[].attributes.body
A group of students were writing two articles for their school news paper, "The Spectrum". The articles were featuring topics such as divorce and teenage pregnancy (which were taken from personal accounts). The principal considered these topics to be inappropriate for the student body. He also wanted the father of the divorce to be given the right to comment on the story and he felt that the changing of the girls' names was not enough to maintain their anonymity.

# data[].attributes.body
Charles Schenck thought that drafting people into the war without them volunteering was unconstitutional.
The US government said that Schenck was violating the Espionage Act.
Schenck responded by saying that the Espionage Act violated the 1st amendment.

# data[].attributes.body
Side One: Under the Bill of Rights, a woman has the right to terminate her pregnancy.
Side Two: The state has a duty to protect prenatal life

# data[].attributes.body
Citizens were being drafted into WWI. A man named Charles Schenck went around and gave flyers to draftees stating that they having to serve involuntarily.

# data[].attributes.body
Korematsu argued that it violated his rights as a citizens

# data[].attributes.body
Supreme Court justice Hugo Black, held that the need to protect against espionage outweighed Fred Korematsu's individual rights

# data[].attributes.body
Executive Order 9066, which ordered Japanese Americans into internment camps during World War II regardless of citizenship.

# data[].attributes.body
A pregnant woman challenged the constitutionality of the Texas criminal abortion laws, which proscribe procuring or attempting an abortion except on medical advice for the purpose of saving the mother's life.

# data[].attributes.headline
Brown vs Topeka Board of education (1954)

# data[].attributes.subject
Brown vs Topeka Board of education (1954)

# data[].attributes.body
Separate states create separate schools on the basis of race between students.The idea of doing this was for both schools to be "separated but equal". Educational values are based solely on race violate the Equal Protection Clause. It does not speak to improvements in black schools. The other side of this disagrees and says it violates factors in the fourteenth amendment.Another downside to this segregation is it effected the learning environment for African American children.

# data[].attributes.body
Argued: 1987
Ruling: 1988
"Did the principal's decision violate the students' rights to free speech?"