# data[].attributes.headline
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.subject
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

I think the For Side won this debate because...

The most convincing argument I heard from the For Side was...

I now share this point of view because...

# data[].attributes.headline
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.subject
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

Based on __________, I think the Against Side won this debate.

The most convincing argument the Against Side presented was...

The Against presented the strongest arguments in this debate. For example,... because...

# data[].attributes.headline
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.subject
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

I think the For Side won this debate because...

The most convincing argument I heard from the For Side was...

I now share this point of view because...

# data[].attributes.headline
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.subject
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

I think the For Side won this debate because...

The most convincing argument I heard from the For Side was...

I now share this point of view because...

# data[].attributes.headline
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.subject
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

Based on __________, I think the Against Side won this debate.

The most convincing argument the Against Side presented was...

The Against presented the strongest arguments in this debate. For example,... because...

# data[].attributes.headline
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.subject
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

Based on __________, I think the Against Side won this debate.

The most convincing argument the Against Side presented was...

The Against presented the strongest arguments in this debate. For example,... because...

# data[].attributes.headline
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.subject
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

I think the For Side won this debate because...

The most convincing argument I heard from the For Side was...

I now share this point of view because...

# data[].attributes.headline
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.subject
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

Based on __________, I think the Against Side won this debate.

The most convincing argument the Against Side presented was...

The Against presented the strongest arguments in this debate. For example,... because...

# data[].attributes.headline
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.subject
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

I think the For Side won this debate because...

The most convincing argument I heard from the For Side was...

I now share this point of view because...

# data[].attributes.headline
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.subject
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

Based on __________, I think the Against Side won this debate.

The most convincing argument the Against Side presented was...

The Against presented the strongest arguments in this debate. For example,... because...

# data[].attributes.body
I think that you ddi a

# data[].attributes.body
Based on Jaeden's point about gaining trust on criminals, I think that the Against Side won.

# data[].attributes.body
Based on your extensive evidence and well structured arguments, I think the against side won this debate.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the For Side won this debate because Claudia posed a very good point about why violent crimes deserve long/harsher sentence: Is the safety of the public more important or the money? I share her point of view that safety should unquestionably come first before money. Although economic of the nation may be important, but if the public is threatened of their safety, those who have talents or those who help contribute to the society may be killed before they are able to contribute. Therefore I think the For side won.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that this side won because its debaters were more articulate and had stronger arguments.

# data[].attributes.body
I think this side won because of Jaden had a lot of emotion

# data[].attributes.body
The against side presented a stronger argument in this debate. Because they gave images and reasoning to support their images.

# data[].attributes.body
Based on your evidence and the pictures of how private prisons actually look like, I think the Agianst Side won this debate.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think this side won they prepared good images that supported their evidence

# data[].attributes.subject
I think this side won they prepared good images that supported their evidence

# data[].attributes.headline
I think this side won because they had pictures that supported their evidence

# data[].attributes.subject
I think this side won because they had pictures that supported their evidence

# data[].attributes.headline
I feel like like/ and his team included better reasoning  

# data[].attributes.subject
I feel like like/ and his team included better reasoning  

# data[].attributes.headline
I think For side won the debate because he pointed out that private prisons saves money from the government to use in other places.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think For side won the debate because he pointed out that private prisons saves money from the government to use in other places.

# data[].attributes.headline
The Against presented the strongest arguments in this debate. For example, they presented how it is only saving money for the boss of the private prisons, but not actually helping as the private prisons are not sanitary and are not securing the prisoners well.

# data[].attributes.subject
The Against presented the strongest arguments in this debate. For example, they presented how it is only saving money for the boss of the private prisons, but not actually helping as the private prisons are not sanitary and are not securing the prisoners well.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think this side won because they even stated the laws

# data[].attributes.subject
I think this side won because they even stated the laws

# data[].attributes.body
Including the pictures of real-life private prisons appeals our pathos.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think this side won because Claudia stated a lot of good evidence and reasoning

# data[].attributes.subject
I think this side won because Claudia stated a lot of good evidence and reasoning

# data[].attributes.headline
I think the opposition team won the debate because they have successfully rebutted and protected their points well.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think the opposition team won the debate because they have successfully rebutted and protected their points well.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think the against side won beacuse they had numerous pieces of evidence. Jaden was very passionate as well.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think the against side won beacuse they had numerous pieces of evidence. Jaden was very passionate as well.

# data[].attributes.headline
Based on the fact that I could not understand the logic behind Claudia and Caden's arguments, I think the con side won the debate 

# data[].attributes.subject
Based on the fact that I could not understand the logic behind Claudia and Caden's arguments, I think the con side won the debate 

# data[].attributes.headline
I think the for side won the debate. Their argument were clrealy stated and backedup through reasonable evidence. The agaisnt side only talked about the morality of private prisons when the for side already covered it. They also state how private prisons benefit other subjects such as efficiency, cost.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think the for side won the debate. Their argument were clrealy stated and backedup through reasonable evidence. The agaisnt side only talked about the morality of private prisons when the for side already covered it. They also state how private prisons benefit other subjects such as efficiency, cost.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think this side won the debate because the other team didn't have any proof that their evidence, reasoning or impact is credible and possible. The other side also didn't go through the logic of this debate and keep going off the topic.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think this side won the debate because the other team didn't have any proof that their evidence, reasoning or impact is credible and possible. The other side also didn't go through the logic of this debate and keep going off the topic.

# data[].attributes.headline
While both teams were not very clear in terms of their arguments' relevance, Kate and Judy's evidence and reasoning were better by a small margin.

# data[].attributes.subject
While both teams were not very clear in terms of their arguments' relevance, Kate and Judy's evidence and reasoning were better by a small margin.

# data[].attributes.body
This team was more articulate than the other team.

# data[].attributes.headline
This team encourages adolescent's opinions to be respected. They also made it clear that their decisions would not be the final decision but just heard by their parents.

# data[].attributes.subject
This team encourages adolescent's opinions to be respected. They also made it clear that their decisions would not be the final decision but just heard by their parents.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think this side was clearer on their topic

# data[].attributes.subject
I think this side was clearer on their topic

# data[].attributes.headline
I think this side won because this side was able to answer every question the opponents asked and she gave enough information to win 

# data[].attributes.subject
I think this side won because this side was able to answer every question the opponents asked and she gave enough information to win 

# data[].attributes.body
I think the Pro side won because they had pretty strong evidence backed with some good reasoning.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think this side won because it had great evidence and also explained how because people want to promote gender equality purposely pick a woman for a job, and how that is unfair to men.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think this side won because it had great evidence and also explained how because people want to promote gender equality purposely pick a woman for a job, and how that is unfair to men.

# data[].attributes.headline
Xin Ru's side won because they were more deliberate in terms of analysing evidence as well as comparing policies.

# data[].attributes.subject
Xin Ru's side won because they were more deliberate in terms of analysing evidence as well as comparing policies.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Xin Run delivered the argument that their side does believe in gender equality. She gives more evidence on how the laws affect the economy.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think this side won because they have great evidence, reasoning and their logic actually makes sense.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think this side won because they have great evidence, reasoning and their logic actually makes sense.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that this side won because Xin Ru gave a really good example about how many companies found loopholes in these laws, causing the law to be incapable of being in control of gender inequality within the companies. I share her point of view that we don't need new laws to prevent gender inequality. If there are loopholes within the laws, the laws would be useless. With these new laws, there will even be more people finding loopholes within the laws. Therefore, I think that the Against side won.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think the pro side won because they pointed out that women worked as hard as men and they still didn't get payed the same amount. they also backed up their claim with credible evidence.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think the pro side won because they pointed out that women worked as hard as men and they still didn't get payed the same amount. they also backed up their claim with credible evidence.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that this side won the debate because they talked about how adolescents' brains aren't fully developed, causing them to make wrong choices. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that this side won the debate because they talked about how adolescents' brains aren't fully developed, causing them to make wrong choices. 

# data[].attributes.headline
based on the arguments the against side presented, i think they won because they stated that private 

# data[].attributes.subject
based on the arguments the against side presented, i think they won because they stated that private 

# data[].attributes.headline
i think this side won because they were very organized and they had the most convincing evidence. it was clear and concise.

# data[].attributes.subject
i think this side won because they were very organized and they had the most convincing evidence. it was clear and concise.

# data[].attributes.headline
In the debate, this side was more able to outweigh the harms of each side as well as give substantive material revolved around the main clash.

# data[].attributes.subject
In the debate, this side was more able to outweigh the harms of each side as well as give substantive material revolved around the main clash.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think the con side won because the had less flaws and verity in their reasoning. On the other hand, the Pro team kept talking about how companies actually benefit off of illegal downloading, without evidence to support that.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think the con side won because the had less flaws and verity in their reasoning. On the other hand, the Pro team kept talking about how companies actually benefit off of illegal downloading, without evidence to support that.

# data[].attributes.body
I think this side won because they had an organised argument

# data[].attributes.body
I think the Con side won this debate because of their clear and concise evidence such as numbers and statistics that got straight to the point.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think this side won though both groups had great reasoning cause having credit for something done is important.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think this side won though both groups had great reasoning cause having credit for something done is important.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think it is a tie because neither team didn't present their points fully.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think it is a tie because neither team didn't present their points fully.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the con side won this debate because they provided good evidences on companies can lose thousands and thousands of dollars just because poor people pirated things. So I think the con side won.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that this side won the debate because they presented reasoning, not just pure evidence 

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that this side won the debate because they presented reasoning, not just pure evidence 

# data[].attributes.headline
I think Rex and Catharine won as they provide multiple pieces of evidence that explain how piracy harm the economy

# data[].attributes.subject
I think Rex and Catharine won as they provide multiple pieces of evidence that explain how piracy harm the economy