# data[].attributes.headline
I think this is the best route to go, especially if it's based on progress. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I think this is the best route to go, especially if it's based on progress. 

# data[].attributes.body
Is Acadience an option? I think it is more objective in implementation and scoring than F&P assessments. -Christina

# data[].attributes.headline
I think the kids have missed so many experiences in science due to the pandemic. This doesn't seem the  best option this year.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think the kids have missed so many experiences in science due to the pandemic. This doesn't seem the  best option this year.

# data[].attributes.headline
This option has more of the community in it, and seems a better option. A broader view of the school community across the grades.

# data[].attributes.subject
This option has more of the community in it, and seems a better option. A broader view of the school community across the grades.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that kids are going to make a lot of progress this year and this is a more authentic choice.

# data[].attributes.body
I have always been uncomfortable with this option since I do not believe in standardized tests and it feels hypocritical to opt out of some and not others

# data[].attributes.body
I wonder if this feels like a lot of pressure on our first year science teacher, especially since we didn’t have science cluster instruction last year. - Jessica

# data[].attributes.body
If we use F&P, would that mean that teachers couldn’t assess their own students at the end of year? I know that’s the case if we used the math performance assessments as our mosl. - Jessica

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think it's a good idea to use F&P, especially since it's our first year using it for real, for real. Also, the growth model/formula is so convoluted, kids who already read at a higher level wouldn't move at the same rate as students who are learning to read. Just my two cents- Jia

# data[].attributes.body
No matter what we use, it's not a true/accurate way to rate ourselves. That being said, I would opt for the test that is the simplest and least likely to cause logistical issues. Science test seems best and out of solidarity with out of classroom teachers, like our cluster colleagues who would arbitrarily be rated based on the math or ELA. If we all opt for science, it's a solidarity move. - Jia

# data[].attributes.body
Is it an aggregate applied to all teachers? Or are classroom teachers for those grades rated on their individual students?

# data[].attributes.body
When students don’t grow much, or enough, what are the implications? This feels like so much additional pressure to put on in an already stressful year.

# data[].attributes.body
Is it about progress? Or straight up reading level? If progress, than it makes some sense- although so many kids are behind and this seems nerve wracking too. Would we be using our own kids as data, a random grade as a school , or the average of data from the whole school?

# data[].attributes.headline
Seems too difficult.  How many kids are going to take it? 

# data[].attributes.subject
Seems too difficult.  How many kids are going to take it? 

# data[].attributes.body
Need to make a quick decision