# data[].attributes.body
clearly identifies the target audience

# data[].attributes.body
vaguely identifies the target audience but not to the full extent

# data[].attributes.body
fails to clearly identify any target audience

# data[].attributes.body
Issue is explicitly stated, medium used is engaging and effective, does not go off topic, solution(s) are provided

# data[].attributes.body
Expresses thoughtful observations on work and previous works. Truthfully states successes and areas of improvement on the work. Should be around 300 words.

# data[].attributes.body
Fails to talk about what was done well and what could have been improved on. Does not reflect on previous projects or makes any observations.

# data[].attributes.body
The manner of publication would only bring awareness to the issue to few members of the intended audience or does not present the issue in an effective way to the intended audience.

# data[].attributes.body
The audience that the remediation address have little to no connection to the topic of interest.

There is no solution or practical solution  stated. The solution have no connection with the topic of interest

The topic, audience and solution are not interconnected.

# data[].attributes.body
publication method poorly presented, information presented is ineffective in conveying topics significance, target audience not reached

# data[].attributes.body
The presentation and the medium employed are easily accessible for the intended audience and the project is effective in communicating the issue to them.

# data[].attributes.body
The final project presents the topic in a unique way that engages with the targeted audience. Has a clear style of presentation (not all over the place). Has a smooth transition between sub-topics.

# data[].attributes.body
Issue is implied, sometimes goes off topic but mostly remains on topic, suggested solutions are missing solid support.

# data[].attributes.body
- Discusses a few things that were done well or not but misses some elements that are included in a successful reflection. - Falls short of fully reflecting on previous work or assignments and the impact they had.

# data[].attributes.body
The final project has somewhat of a clear presentation. Has some aspects of a unique approach to the topic. There is some engagement with the audience throughout the presentation. The presentation might be somewhat confusing to the audience. The organization might not be completely right.

# data[].attributes.body
The project is not creatively done or written and has no clear style. The project chosen does not engage audience. There is no organization to the presentation.