# data[].attributes.body
https://prezi.com/0gono7a7r1hx/a2-evaluation/#

# data[].attributes.headline
Question 3 & 4 - By Jack Marcham & Airi 

# data[].attributes.subject
Question 3 & 4 - By Jack Marcham & Airi 

# data[].attributes.body
Question 3 and 4 are both in video formats which might be effective in explaining in depth what they have done and giving examples through images. However, I cannot evaluate these two questions as they are private videos. This teaches me that if I am to post a video, I will have to make sure that the audience will be able to access it by changing my viewer settings to public.

# data[].attributes.headline
Question 2 - By Jack Marcham & Airi Zdrenka 

# data[].attributes.subject
Question 2 - By Jack Marcham & Airi Zdrenka 

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.slideshare.net/airizdrenka/evaluation-question-2-17975898?ref=http://jackandairimusicvideo.blogspot.co.uk/

Question 2 was addressed through a Slideshare presentation. This was an effective way of segregating their work and explaining step by step what they did. What's more, towards the end they began to delve into depth with analysing what they did through the use of visual aids (arrows). This is good as the audience has more of a clue as to what they did.

However, they have not focused on the main product as well as the ancillary tasks so they have not answered the question to its fully extent. They have not discussed in depth the shared features and the point behind them - why are they needed? The technology used was also fairly basic and not at all developed showing off the skills they have developed. Maybe Padlet would have been a better format to use as it allows a expandable space to go into depth and it enables videos and images making it a bit more interactive to use. Moreover, you can segregate the information through separate paragraphs and the free roam feel to it makes the reading a bit less tedious.

# data[].attributes.headline
Question 1 - By Jack Marcham & Airi Zdrenka

# data[].attributes.subject
Question 1 - By Jack Marcham & Airi Zdrenka

# data[].attributes.body
https://prezi.com/mxixlu2tjdbs/in-what-ways-does-your-media-product-use-develop-or-challenge-forms-and-conventions-of-real-media-products/

For their first question they have presented their answer in a Prezi presentation. This presentation is a good format to separate their answer into sections, which would have been effective for answering this particular question piece by piece.

E.g how we used conventions? How we challenged them? how we developed them? This would give a direct answer to the question. However, the embedded video was not correctly done so this results in not video making the presentation fairly weak as there is no evidence of their work. They gave brief examples of their work however the language used was poor (e.g "obviously tried to appeal to the audience that the genre is popular with, this meant the teen age group both boys and girls.") and moreover, didn't give examples as to how they did their work, meaning they didn't really answer the question well. Instead they wrote as if the reader already knew the changes they made, e.g "as you can see". I feel like the presentation would have been much better if they simply showed their work and changes instead of acting as if you can see changes.

# data[].attributes.body
The 4th question seemed to have been answered but the material (a podcast) was missing. However I can imagine that this technology would have been a very effective way of showing off media construction and their work as through the use of images they can directly talk about what they have done with evidence. Seeing the process and technologies works better than hearing about them through text.

# data[].attributes.body
For question 3, they decided to format their answer through a programme called Glogster, as well as putting added information in simple text. Glogster is a very good way of creating and presenting information that is fun and interactive to read. The context was shown through paragraphing, videos and images, all linking together through design (e.g arrows). Although this was an effective way of presenting the majority of their answer to question 3 in one place, I felt that the design of the 'Glog' could have been worked better to make it a bit easier to follow as with all the graphics, it makes the piece look a bit messy and questionable to which bit of information is relevant to the previous section read. Moreover, the separation of the Glogster and the simple text doesn't work well as it forces the reader to find each piece separately. I find the answer to each question should be all together so the question is directly answered.

# data[].attributes.body
The Prezi presentation answering question 2 was effective as it enabled them to separate their answer and make it as simple as possible. Images could be shown as examples in one slide and the next slide explaining why this branding was important. Overall the answer was fully answer and was easy to follow. The technology also enabled an easier follow as the animation leads you from one slide to the next where other programmes may be enable you to miss a step or free roam. What's more the actual content of the presentation was very well done, showing the synergy of the music video and ancillary tasks side by side through the use of images of their work.

# data[].attributes.body
For their question 1 they showed their work in a vlog. This was effective because it enabled them to express a wide and in-depth answer to the question that would have been too long or tedious to put in writing. However although this was a clever way of giving an in-depth answer, it wasn't interesting to watch. Maybe if the images shown was made bigger or shown more would enable the audience to be more engaged as well as helping explain the point. Another technique that they could have gone into was to implement their voice over the image instead of simply talking in front of a camera (podcast).

# data[].attributes.body
http://innovomusic.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/evaluation-questions.html (The last question at the bottom of the page).

The technology used for question 4 was excellent. Although I am unfamiliar with this programme, it seemed to fit the question perfectly by allowing them to directly show off all the areas of technology that they used. The similar style to slideshare allowed them to talk about one technology at a time which kept a clear presentation that was easy to follow. And then the added piece of technology showing off skill was the hyperlinks that allowed them to give examples of programmes actually being used like Prezi, Blogger and Padlet. This allows the audience to fully acknowledge that they have used these technologies and for a particular purpose. However, again from an entertainment point of view, this presentation was very long and fairly dull to read.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.slideshare.net/IncognitoProduction/evaluation-q3-46286623?ref=http://innovomusic.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/evaluation-questions.html

Slideshare seemed a perfect match for answering question 3. The step by step display of the programme matched the format of the content, by that I mean that they formatted text and images in order of what they changed. So like a narrative you could see the progression of their development which directly answers this question.

However the programme isn't very interactive (other than going back or forward and the videos) and this made the read a little boring, especially as there was a huge amount of content. I feel a Padlet may have been the better option as you would still be able to format it to portray a step-by-step procedure but the programme allows for all the content to be posted on one page. I feel this would be better as then nothing would be separated and the process of reading would seem less tiring. Moreover, for their ancillary tasks, they did not prove/show that there was any feedback in order to change it. If they kept to a similar format to the video then the audience would clearly see that they are responding to critics.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKRzYMuCk0g

Their 2nd question was presented and answered through a video. This was a clever way of explaining a vast amount of information efficiently without being too boring by simply reading. The video also allows them to talk about the images shown in direct accordance instead of simply saying "this is what It looked like". However at times the commentary was unclear as they were either not pronunciating their sentences well or they were too quiet. This makes it hard for the audience to clearly understand what is being said. To resolve this I would have to speak clearly and not too fast that I would not be too difficult to understand.

# data[].attributes.body
https://prezi.com/el_mguiqx30d/in-what-ways-does-your-media-product-use-develop-or-challen/

For question 1 they used Prezi. This was an interesting way of answering the question effectively as it allows developed content to be displayed professionally. By this I mean the content is there in full explanation with screenshots to show exactly what they are talking about and furthermore, it's easy to follow due to the programmes animation between slides - you are actively led to the next slide. Each topic is headlined in accordance with the content allowing the reader to know what they are going to be talking about and what's more the content involves what they have learnt, done and what they would do again. This layout is almost in a narrative style and works very well as it explores the process of their work to a detailed extent. However, I noticed that some layers and presentations overlapped one another. Although you could argue this was for an arty feel, I found it was messy and looked rushed. To resolve this I would simply space out the slides further apart so every part of the presentation was in the clear.