# data[].attributes.body
Twice

# data[].attributes.body
T

# data[].attributes.body
Freedom of religion

# data[].attributes.body
Tze yuen betray us😿

# data[].attributes.body
3) We disagree with this ruling. Based on the rights of a citizen, no one should be discriminated by another. To each their own, we should not be the ones complaining about the loud "noise" but instead we should show the same amount of appreciation for the various religious processions and ceremonies in Singapore.

# data[].attributes.body
1.Freedom of religion

2. It was not a necessity and even though it is quite essetial to the practise.

3.Disagree.several Hindu Singaporeans were allowed to play the band Hindu instruments on St Patrick's Day

# data[].attributes.body
1) Article no. 15 - the rights to practice one 's religion.

2) The playing of musical instruments during Thaipusam was not essential in the procession. Additionally , the public order act overruled article 15 to maintain order for the general public

3) Disagree. A citizen has the right to practice ones religion. This act discriminates against ones religion and beliefs.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Freedom of religion

2. It is because the Judge thinks that it is necessary to play music during the procession but not all hindu's need to play the musical instruments.

3. Disagree. The constitutional law says that they have a right to practise their religion but what is the use of the law if they can't do what they need to do in their procession.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Article 15

2) because the playing of the musical instruments is essential in the procession but not universal. and the playing of musical instruments is restricted by the 42- year old public order act.

3.I disagree. Because citizens have the right to practice their own religion and banning of the musical instruments is unfair because the banned hindu musical instruments were allowed to be played during St. Patricks Day.

# data[].attributes.body
1) The right is freedom of religion.

2) To prevent noise pollution as residents complained about the high levels of noise. They were afraid that the citizens would be unhappy with this procession due to the high levels of noise generated by the Indian Musical instrument

# data[].attributes.body
1. Freedom of religion

2. The judge felt that the playing of musical instruments is not essential and the instruments were banned 42 years ago.

3. I disagree because every citizen has a right to practise one's religion and the hindu instruments are allowed to play on St Patrick Day without being stopped.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The right "freedom of religion - every person has the right to practise one's religion "

2. The judge felt that the playing of musical instruments is essential in the procession but "not universal". He felt that playing of musical instruments was not necessary during the procession as not everyone in the world does it

3. Disagree because every citizen has the right to practise their religion in their own country . Different country practise different things so we should not be so particular on what other country do.

Phoebe

Sonia

Monica

Valencia