# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
An official website of the Seventh-day Adventist Church.

© 2025 © 2024 General Conference Corporation of Seventh-day Adventists
12501 Old Columbia Pike Silver Spring, MD 20904-6601 USA +1-301-680-6000

# data[].attributes.body
Guide how to live your sexual life/existance through the lense of the bible

--> This website seeks to provide relevant, practical, biblical content on human sexuality that upholds the biblical teachings of the Seventh-day Adventist Church. In this space we will address questions that arise on various aspects of human sexuality.

# data[].attributes.body
Focused on different parts of human sexuality, like LGBTQI + community, relationships, etc.

# data[].attributes.body
Traditional Christian values. Views sexuality as an expression of God's love and purpose. It promotes the belief that sexual intimacy is intended for heterosexual marriage.

# data[].attributes.body
The website expresses concerns about contemporary shifts in understanding of gender and sexuality. This organization proposes a return to Christian values.

# data[].attributes.body
As counselors, we should support clients' well-being while also challenging systems or beliefs that may harm or marginalize them.

Many individuals have been negatively influenced by the worldview expressed by religious groups, especially those who identify as part of the LGBTQI+ or other non-traditional expressions of sexuality.

Specifically for those clients who have been raised in a religious household that upholds the values mentioned on the website, they might need to gently challenge internalized shame or guilt.

At a systemic level, counselors should advocate for their clients by pushing comprehensive sex education for everyone, LGBTQI+ protections, women's protections, and access to mental health services.

# data[].attributes.body
Working with this population could be enhanced with:

An understanding of the root of Biblical teachings, views, standards of practice in acting as a "disciple of Jesus/the church/God"

Bible teachings

Scriptures

Biblical lingo and/or terms associated

A multicultural/diverse background and understanding- The church is widely a diverse symbol/organization/collective that many different groups meet under. Not one experience encompasses the entire religion or organization

There are many branches of christianity (Catholic, Protestant, East. Orthodox, etc.)

Adventist is just one of those branches

An understanding of the branch of Adventist Christianity

Sabbath Observance

Diet, Exercise, Health importance (drug and alcohol avoided & diet they believe to be in alignment with teachings)

Living in accordance with the belief Christ will return to Earth (be holy and obedient)--many may struggle with choices included in this

Understanding make up of family, roles, socialization processes

traditional roles

family centered around father

Mother is nurturer

Knowing roles and structure specific to client can assist in guiding them without having to break the structure of their family

Knowing what service, community, and social justice may mean to this group

high commitment to service work

sense of urgency to live due to christ's second coming---service is method seen to tap into religious teachings

Heavy involvement in their community (can be strength)

# data[].attributes.headline
Limiting Perspective on Human Sexuality 

# data[].attributes.subject
Limiting Perspective on Human Sexuality 

# data[].attributes.body
As someone who grew up in a strict Christian church, my initial reaction to this website was recognizing similar beliefs that were damaging and oppressive to one's sense of exploration in their own identity. This website could be beneficial for a heteronormative devout Christian as it promotes its purpose to guide those who want to explore their sexuality through a very specific lens. However, my overall thought is that this website could do more damage than good by promoting systematic beliefs that have been harmful to those who have had internal battles of self expression and identity development. I have actually had a client that has a very similar outlook as this website and it proved to be very difficult for me because he would often weaponize his religion as a means to support his harmful behaviors towards others.

# data[].attributes.headline
An Example of Enforcing Systematic Barriers. 

# data[].attributes.subject
An Example of Enforcing Systematic Barriers. 

# data[].attributes.body
We chose this website to bring attention to the relevancy of the influence strict religions can have on social stigma's and societal barriers in the context of the LGBTQ+ community.

Social Stigma's:

-Heteronormative Framework: This website emphasizes a traditional marriage, meaning a union of one woman and one man. This perspective inherently marginalizes same-sex relationships by not acknowledging their validity or existence within the framework of human sexuality.

-Pathologizing Non-Heterosexual Identities: Articles such as "Sexual Identity: A Reflection" suggest that gender identity should align strictly with biological sex, dismissing the experiences and identities of transgender and non-binary individuals. Such narratives can contribute to the stigmatization of those whose identities do not conform to these views.

-Conditional Acceptance: While the article "Love and Faith: Guidance for Seventh-day Adventist parents of LGBTQ children" advocates for maintaining loving relationships with LGBTQ children, it does so within the confines of adhering to specific religious beliefs. This approach can imply that acceptance is conditional, potentially leading to internalized stigma among LGBTQ individuals seeking affirmation of their identities.

Systematic Barrier's:

-Limited Representation: The website lacks diverse perspectives on human sexuality, particularly those that affirm LGBTQ+ identities. This absence can create an environment where individuals seeking inclusive and affirming information may feel unseen or invalidated.

-Reinforcement of Traditional Gender Roles: By promoting specific roles and expectations based on traditional interpretations of gender, the site may inadvertently perpetuate systemic barriers that restrict individuals from expressing their authentic selves, especially those who do not conform to these roles.

-Potential Influence on Policy and Education: Given its religious foundation, the site's content could influence educational materials or policies within communities that share these beliefs, potentially leading to the exclusion of comprehensive, inclusive sexual education that addresses the needs of all individuals, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity.

# data[].attributes.body
Misunderstandings and Misinterpretations

Not placing heavy emphasis on aspects that are important to those in the religious groups (keeping the Sabbath and lifestyle choices

Advising the client to take part in diets or practices that are not aligned in their teachings

Emphasis on religious leaders for spiritual guidance

Adventists christians rely heavily on spiritual guidances through church leaders

Your work is not sole presence and is done sometimes secondarily to religious advisement

Investigative Judgement

If a counselor is not keen to this idea they can misinterpret the importance and weight that is placed on these people

Downplay the level of anxiety it may bring

Not appropriately validating their concerns expressed through religion

Stigma & Mental Health

Though a counselor comes from a realm which may be more accepting/the same/less does not mean that the client has that same level

Still some present concern in this religion about seeking psychological help--seen as "lack of faith" or "spiritual weakness"

# data[].attributes.body
My response to the worldview presented on the website is mixed. I recognize that religion is an important part of people's lives; it gives structure and a sense of identity, which for some people it is crucial. At the same time, I’m concerned about how limiting or harmful it can be for people who don’t fit into the specific definitions of sexuality and how they are treated by people who think this way.

Overall, I think it would be difficult to have a client who believes these things because I obviously don't, and hearing this kind of hate speech and not being able to say anything must be hard.

# data[].attributes.body
Considering social stigma in relation to our chosen website and population necessitates a complex examination. Christians, belonging to the dominant religious group in the U.S., do not necessarily face the same social stigma that many other religious minorities do—their beliefs, values, and attitudes are largely accepted and/or supported within the U.S. They can even perpetuate social stigma, particularly surrounding topics of human sexuality. This conservatism is certainly represented in the writings of humansexuality.org. They promote the idea of a “holy sexuality”, which refers to “chastity in singleness and faithfulness in marriage”. Though they state that partnerships that fall outside of traditional heterosexual dynamics are technically permitted, such relationships (particularly LGBTQ+ relationships) are "bathed in sin". Humansexuality.org also claims that these "alternatives to the divine design" are "evil forces" attacking traditional institution of marriage.

However, as we consider the role of social stigma in relation to the Adventist population, it is important to acknowledge the possibility that such clients may encounter counselors who hold negative biases towards their group. Issues of countertransference, particularly in situations where such clients are in the care of a counselor who identifies with these alternative sexualities, should be confronted and acknowledged if present. The inverse is no less important---the power imbalance in situations where devout Adventists might be counseling sexual minorities is equally imperative to address.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that this website's intended audience (adventist christians) can navigate and utilize this as a source to guide them in areas they may be struggling. However, I do see the scope of this site tied closely to the Bible which is a very old text. I do not think it leaves much room up for interpretation or alterations that fit the realistic scope of society now. In other words it feels very limiting. Through my religious teachings I know that the world as well as the church has become more open to themes like same-sex marriage. In the old Bible, this is seen as a major sin and almost as evil which I cannot get behind today knowing and supporting those who are important in my life. Again, this is a good guide to living within this faith, however emphasis and relation to current world events does not make this something that I can side with

# data[].attributes.body
Reading the ideas of humansexuality.org was troubling to me, personally. Their promotion of rigidity in regards to sexual relationships and expression felt extremely reductive and harmful to members of sexual minorities, particularly to those who identify as LGBTQ+. I understand the value that such a resource might provide to someone who aligns with this religion or its corresponding beliefs, but I find it difficult to permit the promotion of such ideas when they have the potential to promote immense harm to already vulnerable populations. I would find it extremely challenging to work with a client who held such beliefs as a member of the LGBTQ+ community myself.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
As I was growing up, my father often repeated this quote: "We are coming into troublous times, but let not one of the people of God, by his individual course of action, create a time of trouble beforehand."[1]

As a physician facing various controversial issues, I have tried to "fly under the radar" to avoid creating a self-inflicted "time of trouble!" But recently, I stumbled into a "troublous time" where I had no recourse but to stand firm for principle at the potential cost of my reputation and career.

The names in this story have been changed, but the details are accurate. I hope my experience gives courage to those facing similar challenging issues.

Interacting with Lawmakers

Every year, medical residents across the United States take a day to lobby at their state capitals. This is a required part of residency. It is important for physicians to learn how to interact with lawmakers and advocate for reforms that better the lives of citizens.

Somehow, I missed this during my residency. I think I was always post-call or on a rotation that did not allow a day off in the middle of the week. This bled into my faculty position. Because I had never done it as a resident, I wasn't qualified to lead it as a faculty member. And since it wasn't a particular interest of mine, I had never bothered to go through the steps necessary to lead.

Could I Go?

It was Monday, the start of a very busy week covering the floor service. I had just finished rounding when my residency program director called and asked me to lead a group of residents to advocate at the state capital that Wednesday. The physician who typically takes them was out of town and his backup couldn't do it. No one else was available. Could I go?

I didn't really want to go. It would mean being at the hospital by 5:45am, driving three hours one way, and being gone all day. I had a reasonable excuse: I'm not a member of the organizing academy (membership is expensive), I had never done this before (required to lead), and I was leading the inpatient team (difficult to cover).

The program director agreed, but given those reasons, I definitely couldn't go. I put the idea out of my mind and went ahead with my busy Monday. Then, on Tuesday evening, the program director called again.

"I have found someone to cover the inpatient team. I have already called the Academy, and you don't have to be a member nor have prior experience. They will send a representative to show you the ropes. Please go, I cannot find anyone else."

Reluctantly I agreed. I resigned myself to a boring day lobbying the state congress for better seat belt laws, tighter narcotic control, and healthier school lunches.

I was supplied with a packet of materials before leaving work. I didn't have time to look at any of it. My priority Tuesday night was to be sure my patients were all stable and ready for my colleague who would cover for me.

"I Don't Agree"

The next morning, at precisely 5:45am, five tired residents piled into my car to drive to the capital. I thought they would probably sleep most of the way. But we had barely pulled onto the freeway when Dr. Appleton, sitting in the front seat, abruptly stated, "I don't agree with the positions the academy wants us to advocate for on two bills; I'd like to discuss it with you."

Dr. Appleton is not a Christian. He is open about his dislike of fundamental Christian beliefs. He knows I am a Seventh-day Adventist, and we have had several very cordial discussions about politics and religion in which we found little common ground. Considering this, I was very surprised with what he said next.

"One bill would prohibit gender altering procedures and hormone therapy in minors and another bill would prohibit those procedures to be done without parental consent. The AAP (American Academy of Pediatrics) is advocating against both bills and I strongly disagree with the AAP."

We had never talked about gender issues, but clearly, he was confident that I would agree with him. He then proceeded to tell me his personal story.

He had a troubled background as a child. His parents divorced when he was young. He was very smart, artistic, and sensitive. This made him a target for bullying, which happened frequently. Over time, He grew restless with his identity as a male. He felt he was a female trapped in a male body. Eventually, in college, he started counseling. He was able to process his feelings and realized that he really wasn't a woman trapped in a man's body. He was actually just very depressed. Once his depression was treated, his gender dysphoria disappeared. He fell in love, got married, and now is the proud father of several beautiful children.

"As a child," he said passionately, "I didn't have the maturity to know the ramifications of gender-altering surgery. As an adult, I was able to process my feelings and discovered that I really did not have gender dysphoria- I had severe depression. I would have been misdiagnosed and mistreated."

Soon all six of us were in a vigorous but respectful discussion. Two residents agreed with the Academy's position, one resident didn't care, and two residents strongly disagreed. It was a courteous, three-hour discussion! In the end, all five residents agreed that as a group we should not support the academy's official position on those two policies, but we would support the three other policies dealing with different topics.

Into A Lion's Den

As we neared the capital, my heart turned to ice. I hate conflict. I do my best to remain inconspicuous and fly under the radar, but I couldn't fly under the radar here. I had asked for an Academy representative to be with our group. Had I not invited her, we could quietly do our own thing, but not now. I knew our position would be a slap in the face to that representative. I could lose my job, license, and reputation. I felt like I was voluntarily walking into a lion's den!

We arrived. The capital was filled with residents. We were all ushered into a lecture room, where we sat for the next hour listening to a political harangue on childhood gender dysphoria. Anyone who did not agree with the Academy was labeled uninformed and ignorant. There was no respect or room given to divergent opinions.

One of the two residents who had been mildly supportive of the Academy's position on gender identity was horrified and angered. "We had a respectful discussion in the car," she fumed. "They are biased, unfair, and name calling."

At the end of the session, we were provided scripts of what to say, a list of legislators to visit and a genuinely friendly representative to help us. I excused myself to use the restroom.

The residents were unaware of the heat we would face, but I knew. The academy would hold me personally responsible for our position since I was the supervising physician.

I knelt on the bathroom floor and asked God to help me be brave yet not foolish or obnoxious. These people, though they have an agenda, genuinely care about others. They do not realize that what they are doing is wrong. I needed to approach the issue with respect and grace. I pleaded with God to help me address it with our representative as kindly and tactfully as possible.

When I returned from the bathroom, Dr. Appleton was already having a full-blown argument with the representative.

"God," I thought, "You answered one of my prayer requests. I don't have to bring up the topic-it's already been brought up!"

"Your resident," the representative said to me tersely, "Does not want to advocate for the official Academy position, but he HAS TO! He is part of the Academy and so he must support our positions."

I opened my mouth to respond, but my resident didn't give me a chance.

"No," he said. "I did not have a choice on my Academy membership; it was provided by the residency program. I did not have a choice about coming on this rotation, it was required. But I do have a choice on what I support, and I cannot advocate for the Academy's position on gender dysphoria."

The representative looked at me in shock. Her face was ashen.

"Help me, God!"

"Help me, God," I pleaded. God heard my cry for help and suddenly, I knew what to say.

"I personally cannot support the Academy's position, either," I responded with surprising calmness. "However, there are three of the five bills we can heartily support. How about we advocate for those three bills."

Relief washed over her face. "That's a great idea," she agreed. "Why don't you demonstrate and talk with the first legislator."

Oh, no. I sent up another plea to God for help. I had never done this before, and I had only a vague idea about the remaining three bills.

When introduced to the first legislator, I was so nervous I literally forgot my own name. But God came through again! For the next ten minutes words flowed out of my mouth about three bills I knew nothing about!

As we left the room, the representative remarked, "Wow, you really did do your homework, you knew so much about those bills!" Oh, if she only knew! It was not I who knew a lot about those bills...

The rest of the day flowed smoothly-with only some minor near misses! Like when we got on the elevator with a transgender enthusiast who tried to start a discussion with our group about the gender bill. Thankfully, he called the bill by its numerical number name.

"Which bill are you talking about?" I asked, trying to sound innocent, "I don't know them by their numbers."

"Oh, the bill on the table trying to prohibit gender-altering procedures," the transgender enthusiast said. "I'm so glad the Academy is opposed to that bill. Thanks for coming out to help us fight that bill."

My resident was about to open his mouth when the elevator door opened, and the individual stepped out. I was thankful the elevator door closed quickly!

Lessons Learned

I praised God all the way home. I felt like I had been delivered from the lion's den. However, I was not surprised when my program director and the chair of the department got an email the next day recommending that I have remedial training on gender dysphoria. My chair, a Christian, stated that he allowed his faculty to think for themselves and that he did not feel the need to dictate how I think. I heard nothing further about the incident.

I learned four very important lessons through this experience.

1. There are good people on both sides of the political spectrum who recognize the dangers of gender-altering drugs and procedures for minors. As Seventh-day Adventists, we should not be afraid to stand firm on this issue. 1 Corinthians 6:9-11.

2. We must have a consistent prayer and devotional life to face life's crises without needing last-minute spiritual reinforcement. Daniel 6:10.

3. We must stand firmly for our beliefs with kindness and tact. Daniel did not force his views on others but still stood firmly and without compromise. Daniel 1:9.

4. I must rely on God to provide the right words when faced with an unexpected, challenging situation. Luke 12:12.

Seventh-day Adventists look to the creation story for our model of worship and family. When this conflicts with the culture around us, we must be willing to stand firm in upholding the biblical ideal no matter the cost.
Dr. Stephen Brown is a pseudonym. Story is true but names have been changed.
[1] Ellen G. White, 20LtMs, Lt 117, 1905, par. 9.