# data[].attributes.body
They would be even more enraged, seeing that the monarchs had been hoarding food and wealth.

# data[].attributes.body
If the rioters saw the amount of surplus that the monarchs were living with, the riots would have been even worse. The sheer amount of waste and the fact that the monarchs had exactly what they needed to survive, but were not handing it over would have enraged them (even more) and caused greater violence. Those women needed bread to continue living and they would fight to get it.

# data[].attributes.body
They would be extremely angry to see how lavish the monarchs lives were. They would see how much food they ate and how much they wasted by throwing it in the trash.

# data[].attributes.body
The women would likely feel even more enraged, as they would see how little their monarchs actually cared for the people of France and how disconnected the monarchs were from society.

# data[].attributes.body
If the people of France saw how the upper class lived under the rule of Louis XVI, then they would have been even more furious because of the way they were holding back+overusing food, like cake, and keeping it all to themselves

# data[].attributes.body
If the people rioting could see how the monarchs lived and the abundance of flour, cake and bread they would be even more outraged.

# data[].attributes.body
They would probably be furious about how the monarchs ate. They were given buffets to eat at every meal, and they were given sweats (cake) whenever they wanted. I feel like it would have created a bigger riot but with more violence.

# data[].attributes.body
If the people had seen what life was like in Versailles, they would be enraged and disgusted. Simply because they saw that the monarchs had piles of food at their disposal and massive amounts of money.

# data[].attributes.body
The reason why people don't go against the wealthy today is because back in the 1700s the royalty were considered their form of government while today most of the wealthy's money is either earned or inheritance. They would go after their rulers to try and appoint change but today you really can't do that without getting arrested.

# data[].attributes.body
After seeing how the monarchs lived, the rioters would become enraged because the monarchs have plenty of flour stored away to make their baked goods when they could very easily give some to the people so they can make bread.

# data[].attributes.body
The people of France would have been even more upset seeing the food and wealth that the monarchs had been hoarding. If the monarchs had been in Paris they would understand the severity of the lack of food within the city. Being so disconnected with society, the monarchs relished in their wealth, not even attempting to see how the people were.

# data[].attributes.body
They would be angry because of how the monarchy saved a lot of food knowing how people needed the food to feed their families and themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
They would be very mad because the monarchs had large amounts of flour for their own wealth and to show how the upperclass lives.

# data[].attributes.body
If the women rioting over the scarcity of bread and flour were to see the sheer amount which the monarchs hoarded and wasted they would be enraged and disgusted, though likely would not be all that surprised.

# data[].attributes.body
They would have been even more mad and disappointed to see how they are being treated differently and starving with no food while the monarchs don't have to worry about what to eat next.

# data[].attributes.body
Citizens of the US are not dropping dead in the streets from starvation as they were in France. The government in France was isolated and disconnected, and while the same argument could be made for our own government, the French absolutists were heinous.

# data[].attributes.body
The wealth nowadays comes from hard work and lots of time. Even if these peoples wealth came from their family, the family worked hard to get it. And people now aren't as cruel as they were in the 18th century.

# data[].attributes.body
The women who rioted would feel even more angry than before to discover the amount of food they waste each day instead of going to dying families back at home. This would be an eyeopener to the royal class just to see how unfair the class system really was.

# data[].attributes.body
The rioters would become even more enraged if they saw that the monarchs had an excessive amount of food and baked goods, as well as hoarded amounts of flour. The riots would increase, with the people demanding the monarchs stop being selfish. They would realize just how little the monarchs care for the wellbeing of the people.

# data[].attributes.body
Baron de Montesquieu came up with the concept of the government being split up into 3 parties and the French did something similar with the 3 estates who got to vote on things.

# data[].attributes.body
It was different for the King and Queen of France because they were seen as their form of government, which was disconnected from society, while in America today, our wealth mainly comes from hard work even if it gets past down through the family, at some point someone worked hard for it.

# data[].attributes.body
The general public is not suffering as much as those during the French Revolution. Granted, we still have a huge amount of our population that is below the poverty line, but we aren't split into the estates like France was. The rich are still being taxed, and the general public have enough to survive, therefore, we haven't been pushed to such extremes. The general public in the U.S.A. does hate upon the extremely wealthy, but we are pacified more than the French people were because we know that the wealthy are being taxed, and that their money/riches come from businesses and such vs being born into royalty.

# data[].attributes.body
It is a huge difference between 1789 France and 2023 USA. The majority of people in france were starving with all of the wealth of france in the top 3%. In the USA most of the people are middle class and can afford necessities. That makes rich people less looked down on and just considered rich.

# data[].attributes.body
John Locke was a very crucial philosophe due to his beliefs that everyone is entitled to their "life, liberty, and property." This is important because it helps bring awareness to everyone's natural rights. Additionally, this gave the French People the ability to stand by their own beliefs if the king were to become corrupt. They shall have the right to break away from the king.

# data[].attributes.body
With the ideals of one's natural rights being spread around by the philosophes, the more people in the 3rd estate started to believe that they had the same right to food as the 1st and 2nd estates. This was one of the causes for the french revolution.

# data[].attributes.body
The people would be even more angry because of the selfishness of the monarchs. The mob and the riots probably would've started sooner and been more intense.

# data[].attributes.body
Most wealthy people today earned their wealth and success instead of being born into it, like the Queen and King of France. The general public doesn't rise up and riot against the wealthy today because the wealthy aren't the people in charge.

# data[].attributes.body
I think they'd be pretty angry since the wealthy ate like pigs while they starved and didn't say anything about it. It would also make other aspects of life seem hopeless since the elite few already had so much power over them and now they also controlled whether they starved or not.

# data[].attributes.body
Over time society causes change. There are always new beliefs or political beliefs which cause change over time. There are always new people being born who believe in different things than what the people before them believed.

# data[].attributes.body
The work of enlightenment philosophes would encourage many French people to want to stand up against the government and reform it in a way which seemed more just. Philosophes such as John Locke pushed the belief that the people have the right to overthrow the government if it did not serve its purpose of protecting the rights of its citizens and French citizens did exactly that.

# data[].attributes.body
Three branches was created to make sure other branches had checks and balances so no one will have more power which was created by Montesquieu , but back then it was the same for French people but there was no checks and balances so it was very unfair.

# data[].attributes.body
The Enlightened philosophes changed the way the French people live because they made them think they deserve natural rights and a say in government. This led to more pushback with the government and eventually the French Revolution because they felt like they had no say and weren't being treated justly.

# data[].attributes.body
I think we don't see the general public rising up against "higher class" because most of the United States is somewhat of the middle class. They are able to eat and have a roof over their heads but even for the lower class there are shelters that they can seek out for help. The difference in france was that they were so dissociated from the rest of their people that they didn't seem to care when their people were dropping dead because the lack of food they could of helped with.

# data[].attributes.body
Montesquieu believed in separating the power of government and not giving one branch or class too much power. French absolutists were the exact opposite, and held all the power with none of the responsibility, leading to the French revolution.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it's different today because today we like to idolize those that are better than us and we wish we could be them while at these times the poor just wanted food and their fair share. For some reason we love the rich and watching them live their privileged lives while we struggle to put food on the table.

# data[].attributes.body
Montesquieu is the philosophe that had the idea for 3 parties in government, leading to the 3 estates who voted. France chose to spin this in a medieval way, by giving the RCC and Nobility (3% of pop.) 1 vote each (giving that 3% 2 votes) while the general public (97% of pop.) only got 1 vote, leading to their voice being overpowered.

# data[].attributes.body
To cause great change over time is to first realize there's a problem in the first place. With acknowledgement of an issue then it can be fully discussed on how to solve that problem. Another factor would be commitment for that change. With tackling an issue head on and keeping up with that can help spark change. Overtime the problem will become a lot easier to solve.

# data[].attributes.body
The Enlightened Philosophes of the government shaped the everyday lives of the French people by implementing societies natural rights. One philosophe that was the main voicing behind this change was John Locke with his philosophy in life, liberty, and property.

# data[].attributes.body
The issue described is different for the King and Queen of France than it is today for the people of the US because in the Kingdom of France, people were essentially trapped in the social class that they were born into with no hope of climbing the hierarchical ladder. This meant that if one person was born into the 3rd Estate, like 97% of France's 1789 population, that person would forever be at a disadvantage in society regarding economic status and voice in government. In the US, however, it is possible for people to climb this social ladder, and their voices in the government are not determined by status.

# data[].attributes.body
One philosophe that shaped the everyday lives of the French people was Montesquieu. With his idea of separating power into a style of three branches that holds different powers, this translated to the French using the 3 estate system where people in classes had 1 vote to vote on.

# data[].attributes.body
John Locke believed in the social contract theory. He also believed that if the government breaks the agreement that the people have the right to overthrow the government. This happened in 1789 France where the government was abusing its power and got overthrown.

# data[].attributes.body
They would not be happy at all and feel used. They are getting taxed and the money they work so hard for is getting taken right from them. While the monarchs are living so well they have food to just waste. Food that these women would die for and could use to provide for their families.

# data[].attributes.body
Citizens having wealth is different from monarchs because in most cases of citizens having wealth they usually earn it. But for monarchs if they have an extreme amount of wealth and don't prioritize the people with their money, it not only hurts the people but the country. By hoarding wealth, people become even more poor, not given the chance to gain money.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it was different for the kings and queens in france then the citizens of the usa cause they have lots and lots of generational wealth from decades and beyond.

# data[].attributes.body
The monarchs of France ruled the country which means they had to look out for the people and are supposed to put their needs first, however, this is not what the monarchs did and they became greedy and treated the people horribly. The wealthy people in the US are not ruling the country, they made their money by working their way up.

# data[].attributes.body
Change is caused by hard work and the ambition to make change. For change to be made, you need to identify what needs changing and how it can be changed. People need to be informed of this problem so that you can start causing change. You need to persist and have patience when it comes to causing change, because if you just give up quickly change will never be made.

# data[].attributes.body
Because of John Locke and his belief that everyone was born with a natural right at birth, it helped shape france and allow the people to believe that the 3rd estate should have been equal with the 1st and 2nd estates. If they had to pay taxes so should the others.

# data[].attributes.body
Philosophers such as Montesquieu created the idea of dividing the government into three separate parts. The French used this in their government as they divided their government up.

# data[].attributes.body
They would have been even more mad if they had seen how the monarchs lived because the monarchs had everything and anything they could need. The riots would have been a lot worse.

# data[].attributes.body
Change is caused over time by new ideas that change someone's or a society's view of living. These ideas can make the people question if there is a better way to do something which will create change in time.

# data[].attributes.body
The Enlightened philosophies of the government shaped the everyday lives of the French people by introduced new ideas that encouraged the people to have questions. This made it possible for the people to have their own opinions and to compare their need with the Republic's needs  Along with focusing on the Democratic values and creation of modern, liberal democracies.

# data[].attributes.body
Changes in society occur when new beliefs or ideas are brought into play. Without people continuously thinking outside the box, things would never change or evolve. These changes are essential to how society grows.

# data[].attributes.body
Over time due to the development of technology and sways in social behavior, governments and societies are forced to adapt to the ever-changing opinion of the people. As people became more educated during the enlightenment governments had to adapt to fit the desires of the people.

# data[].attributes.body
Variety causes change. Having different ideas from different/new people can cause a diversity in ideas and beliefs. In the Scientific Rev, scientists and philosophers from all around the world brought new ideas everywhere they went. Having a second mind or more can change thoughts and ideas. With all these new ideas this can cause change over time.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that it was different for the Monarchs of France, because they weren't as subtle as people are today. Due to the war that U.S. had with England and the money being sent by France to the U.S in order to aid them in the war. The taxes were on a major uprise and caused my French Citizens into deep poverty. Nonetheless, with all the struggles in France and scarce resources, the Monarchs and people of versailles still spent great amounts of money and had unlimited food at their disposal. Essentially, the Monarchs just felt that everything was ok and never actually realized how bad it was in Paris for most people.

# data[].attributes.body
Voltaire, the french writer who created the right to assemble and have your freedom of speech, thought, and be you.

# data[].attributes.body
Most of the American class today is working class more than the 3rd class, homeless people. In France, no one would help the less needy but now we do support those who need it, which also the 3rd class can also get up to the 2nd part. But in France, there was no possibility having privileges.

# data[].attributes.body
The everyday lives of the French people were heavily dictated upon by the upper two estates, but during the French Revolution, people began calling upon the ideas of various philosophes. John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau taught them about natural rights and how there needs to be a social contract. The government should have the consent of the people, and if their rights are being breached, they then have the right to riot and turn against the government. Rousseau specifically believed that the government should be following the will of the people, which further convinced the French people to turn on their monarchs.

# data[].attributes.body
Montesquieu created the idea of having 3 different branches for the three different estates dividing the government.

# data[].attributes.body
Change can be caused by a new thought that people believe. Breaking away from the RCC or even the Enlightenment is one of the biggest examples of it. It's caused by new ideas that people want to pursue, like being equal or changing the way they are ruled, and who should be ruling.

# data[].attributes.body
In the U.S.A.'s capitalist system people are taught that the wealthy are deserving of their money and status even when they are born into it and it was built off the exploitation of others. It's seen as justified since many equate wealth to intelligence and hard work and relate it to the myth of the American dream.

# data[].attributes.body
Change can be caused by new ideas and beliefs within society. If society is suffering from a decision the government made, they will riot and cause the government to question if they have handled the situation in a way that benefits everyone.

# data[].attributes.body
Changed evolves over time due to new people like new thinkers which makes up new ideas for society and which causes people to think and be curiosity about

# data[].attributes.body
Reason causes change overtime. During the enlightenment, otherwise known as the age of reason. Enlightened phiosophes helped spread their beliefs and brought about new ideas to cause changes in the government. Past issues or problems are major influences that inspire change, because people today want to fix the mistakes that were made in history.

# data[].attributes.body
The rise and fall of new ideas causes change over time. For example, the changes brought about by the French Revolution only occurred because the people of France living in the 3rd Estate began to look at the world around them and the Enlightened ideas emerging from their very own capital and realize that their lives could be so much better. Also, the RCC only began to dominate the lives of people in medieval Europe because Christianity took root in the Roman Empire and began to spread throughout its provinces. After this happened, it wasn't long before the Roman gods and beliefs were abandoned and the people of Europe became God-fearing.

# data[].attributes.body
Change is caused by a group of people being pushed to their limits.  People may have ideas about change, but they don't make these ideas a reality until truly pushed to do so.  Once they have been taken advantage of, manipulated, and left to suffer with no support, they rise up and create changes that they want to see. People are always thinking, which inherently causes change as they constantly question everything. These ideas spread and as more people learn of, and then agree with these new ideas, they cause subtle shifts towards it.

# data[].attributes.body
Change evolved over type in resources and transportation such as technology, and over time people changed too; the way the spoke, how they dressed, and even how they thought. Philosophes had a huge impact in change too in resources.

# data[].attributes.body
The difference between the monarchs and wealthy people today is the power and wealth that they had generationally. The people were also much lower on the totem pole and now people live in a pretty similar living situation so it feels less disrespectful.

# data[].attributes.body
Change in society is caused by social movements, advancing technology, greed, the natural world, and countless other factors.  People have to adapt to their environment and will naturally seek out how to live the most ideal version of their life and will shape the world around them in order to achieve it.

# data[].attributes.body
Montesquieu's idea of the three branches of government to divide the power, was also used to divide the French estate system.

# data[].attributes.body
The Enlightened philosophies of the government shaped the lives of the French people in the way that John Locke's natural rights of life, liberty, and property began to spread. The people of the 3rd Estate especially began to realize that their natural rights were being violated by the French monarchs. The food shortage was a violation of their right to life and the heavy taxes were a violation of their right to property, as they essentially couldn't afford anything because of them. The concept of absolutism in general was also a violation of their right to liberty.

# data[].attributes.body
Because rich people don't need to provide for the people but the monarch doesn't need to do that.

# data[].attributes.body
Enlightened Philosophes, like Montesquieu, helped the government shape the everyday lives of the French people. For example, Montesquieu came up with the idea of checks and balances, which helped prevent ideas of the old monarchy and develop the new french government.

# data[].attributes.body
A lot of things can cause change overtime. Though I feel that the biggest example of this is people's mindsets. Depending on how they see life and themselves can result in shifts. Then showing other people the way that you think, possibly changing people and opinions overall.

# data[].attributes.body
People with vast wealth today are majorly different from the past kings and queens of France. They don't have people rising up against them, and this is because most money today comes from hard work and not from everyone's pockets that are below them. The monarchs abused their wealth and because of it, people were furious with them. Because today's wealthy population doesn't (usually) abuse the wealth that they gain from people who actually need the money, they don't have people rising up or being furious with the way they spend it.

# data[].attributes.body
Change over time comes from new ideas that can be for better or for worse. These new ideas can go as far as to inspire future governments, just like Montesquieu from the enlightenment. New ideas are limitless,and there will always be new ones so the world as we know it can continue to develop and change.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it is different today for U.S. citizens than it was for the King and Queen in France because today, a large majority of people work for their money and put a lot of time and effort into their jobs. The monarchs had a lot of wealth where they were greedy and treated the people poorly.

# data[].attributes.body
The change over time was cause by new inventions and ideas such as the printing press. These inventions allowed new ideas to spread faster and easier, and allowed philosophers to spread their ideas amongst one another and their country.

# data[].attributes.body
There are a lot of different things that can cause change over time but I think a very big one, is the way people see things and how they think of things. A change in society can change everything for people including how they think. I think that this is one of the main causes of change over time.

# data[].attributes.body
I think they would feel extremely angry and distraught at the way that monarchs were able to live such lavish lives with no care in the world about throwing away food, however these people were starving trying to get food. It would give the rioters perspective on how disconnected the monarchy was from the regular people.

# data[].attributes.body
John Locke was very important in his philosophy of life, liberty and property. By allowing these moral qualities to come to light it allowed the french people to feel like they could stand up for their natural rights, which were not being met by the monarchy at all. When they realized that these rights were not being allowed to them, they were able to revolt from the King in search of these rights.

# data[].attributes.body
As we still still have much poverty in the US today, wealthy people are often looked at for inspiration. Not that the US has people starving in every city corner, but this does happen. However, I feel as though the lower class people feel inspired by what the wealthy have made of themselves. Also living in the 21st century compared to the 18th century may make much of a difference to how the ruler of our country, the President, is not as disconnected as the Monarchy was before, which can also make a difference to the type of society we live in and what has changed.

# data[].attributes.body
Revolutionary ideas, cultural beliefs, religious ideals societal norms, many different things cause change over time. New prospering ideas about what society should be overall in a particular country or part of the world causes change throughout society. Not only that, but the growth of technology causes definite change to society and what values are made concrete to a region.

# data[].attributes.body
If the women had seen how the monarchs were living during the riots, they would feel even more enraged and unappreciated as if their efforts were going unnoticed.

# data[].attributes.body
John Locke's philosophy expressed that everyone was entitled to their natural rights, life, liberty, and property. This influenced many, but especially the 3rd estate as they were convinced they should have access to the same food as the 1st and 2nd class.

# data[].attributes.body
We live in a capitalist society, where anyone has the ability to become wealthy. Because of this, citizens of the US do not riot as those in France did about wealth, because mass amounts of wealth were not limited to anyone.

# data[].attributes.body
We are introduced to new ideas, beliefs, and ways of living everyday. This ultimately causes society to change over time, which is why we live much differently than those during the French Rev. did.