# data[].attributes.body
The women would be enraged by the way the royal family continued to live lavishly while the lower class of France was starving.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the women would be furious with the royal family, because they lived in luxury and ate fancy foods like meats and pastries, while most of France was struggling to meet ends.

# data[].attributes.body
The women in France would be furious. If they witnessed the waste of cake, which takes lots of flour to make, they would be enraged.

# data[].attributes.body
The women wouldn't be happy and be angry because the monarchs are happy and just not caring while the lower class is starving.

# data[].attributes.body
The women would be upset seeing how the monarchs lived because the monarchs lived a lavish life. They had many parties that produced lots of waste. Cakes were left uneaten while the people didn't even have enough flour to make bread.

# data[].attributes.body
If the women were to see how the monarchs lived, they most likely would be outraged as the monarchs had a tendency to waste. The monarchs lived extravagantly and often had huge feasts featuring baked goods. If they could see the amount of waste that the lavish lives of the monarchs created, they would be enraged.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the women would be outraged if they found out the amount of food the monarchs made and wasted. The regular French people were starving and didn't even have enough flour to make bread. The monarchs, however, ate large meals and threw parties almost every night that wasted loads of untouched food.

# data[].attributes.body
The women would be furious to see how the monarchs lived, as their children were dying of starvation, while their leaders were letting tons of food go to waste and were recklessly wasting money.

# data[].attributes.body
The women would most likely get frustrated with their monarchs because they're living a lavish and wasteful lifestyle without any regard to the suffering of the French people who had nothing to eat.

# data[].attributes.body
The rioting women would be disgusted by the amount of waste of not only bread and cakes but other foods.

# data[].attributes.body
The women would feel even worse about their own conditions since the people of Versailles were living in luxury. They had an abundance of foods including lots of flour products that they threw away.

# data[].attributes.body
The women would be extremely frustrated and angry by seeing the way the monarchs lived. They would be disgusted by seeing the amount of bread (or any food in general) waste and pastries that go uneaten.

# data[].attributes.body
The enlightened views of John Locke and the social contract shaped the lives of every French citizen who expected the protection of the French government. When the people felt that the government wasn't protecting them due to the starvation they faced, the government was overthrown by the people, which Locke believed in.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the woman would be upset with the royal family because they lived in luxury. They would eat all this food and they would waste most of it while most of France was struggling to be able to eat.

# data[].attributes.body
They would be outraged because the monarchs use a lot of flour, which was the cause of the bread shortage. They would cook cakes, and through away the extra.

# data[].attributes.body
The people would be even more upset and enraged about how they lived. The royal family did not have to g through any of the struggles the normal civilians had to go through.

# data[].attributes.body
They would be extremely angry that they were being treated so poorly when the royal family, and the rich, were treated so nicely. The upper class was not only treated with plenty of supplies, they were wasting food, when other parts of the country were struggling. They would be even more upset if they found this out about the monarchs.

# data[].attributes.body
While the royal family would eat cake and live an amazing live without a care in the world for the people starving without flour to make bread, this lead to the engagement of the lower class of france.

# data[].attributes.body
The philosophes prompted the French people to fight for their human rights. I think Locke would have influenced them and shown that they were being denied the right to life because they were starving while the monarchs were wasting huge amounts of food.

# data[].attributes.body
The Enlightened philosophies helped the lives of every French citizen by if the government wasn't protecting them and doing their job the people have the right to overthrow the governement.

# data[].attributes.body
John Locke's social contact would shape the relationship between the nations people and the nations monarch. It stated that the people should have free, natural rights while the monarchy protects the people and their rights.

# data[].attributes.body
The women of France used their right to protest the government if they were to infringe on their natural rights. This goes along with John Lockes views of right to overthrow or protest a government if they weren't meeting the peoples needs.

# data[].attributes.body
The King and Queen of France worked for all the citizens in their country, while most of the wealth that has been accumulated in the United States and across the world, is owned by private businesses, rather than the government officials. The money that the government holds is delegated to specific areas that work towards the general welfare of the United States citizens. The King and Queen of France did not promote the general welfare of all the people, rather the wealthy elites, who they partied with.

# data[].attributes.body
The Enlightened philosophes provided new outlooks on what government should be and what it should not. These new revelations created an unrest amongst the French people who recognized that their monarchy was not the attentive and well-natured government it should be. This led to the people recognizing that their suffering was caused by their very own leaders and that change was necessary. John Locke, in particular, would've had one of the largest impacts due to his belief of the social contract and a government that is meant to serve the people not the other way around.

# data[].attributes.body
The enlightened philosophes are what thought of most of the ideals most modern governments were built off of, and after the French revolution, the government was what completely remodeled the government in to a unitary semi-presidential republic with checks and balances in favor of the people, And those checks and balances are an example of an idea thought up by Baron de Montesquieu.

# data[].attributes.body
The King and Queen in France were directly responsible for the lives of the general public, while those with immense wealth in the United States are not. One could argue that wealthy people have an inherent responsibility to help those less fortunate, but that is not their duty as a person, unlike King Louis XIV and Marie Antoinette. They were the ones whose sole job was to ensure their citizens' safety, prosperity, and success.

# data[].attributes.body
the women would be beside themselves if they saw all of the waste that was left sitting out to rot while their families were starving.

# data[].attributes.body
Mary Wollstonecraft argued for women's rights, and many of the French women rioted in the streets because of the scarcity of bread. John Locke was an English philosophe who believed in natural rights and the creation of a social contract between a government and its citizens. When the government refused to follow the social contract, Locke believed that the regular people had the right to rebel and overthrow the government. In France, the monarchs hadn't been paying attention to the needs of their people, so the people started to rise up and riot against the French monarchs.

# data[].attributes.body
The social contact shows how the people in France thought the government would have helped them and they expected protection. When they did not get it, they revolted to fight for their rights.

# data[].attributes.body
People don't rise up against the wealthy today, but rose up against the king and queen, because the king and queen controlled the government and people's lives, while the wealthy today don't.

# data[].attributes.body
The U.S is a capitalist society. The richest of the rich had worked for their money by starting a business our working very hard. The people below the poverty line have the ability to gain wealth. Some people do protest the rich but not as severely. In France, the king and queen were abusing their wealth. Wasting cake, bread, and lots of other kinds of foods.

# data[].attributes.body
The enlightened philosophies gave the idea t fight for your own human rights and stand up for yourself. Human rights should be held above all else, John Locke would have influenced the people in such a way, showing them that they were being denied a life that they deserve while starving as the monarchs eat cake.

# data[].attributes.body
The Enlightened philosophies of the government shaped the everyday lives of the French people because it allowed them to fight for their rights. For example, John Locke, who was a strong advocate of natural rights, enforced the idea that everybody should have life, liberty, and property. Another example would be Voltaire who argued that no matter what, an individual has the right to say what they believed. These philosophes paved the way for the French people to stand up for themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
The Enlightened philosophies shaped the everyday lives of the French people specifically because of John Locke who believed that having one ruler and one monarch was unnecessary. Locke believed that the people should have the right to rule themselves so it justifies the riots coming from the French people after their rulers were acting recklessly.

# data[].attributes.body
As Locke had stated in his social contract, the people created an agreement with the government which shaped how the French people lived every day. They would be given protection with cooperation as they were governed. Similarly Voltaire who emphasized the freedom of speech shaped how the French people would advocate for what they believed was right and fight back against the government, especially with the shortage of bread. This also ties into Locke's idea of natural rights and how the French fought strongly for their rights to the basic necessities, like food.

# data[].attributes.body
The wealth in France all came to the King and Queen, while in the US the wealth is distributed between private businesses and not just the government.

# data[].attributes.body
Most rich people and companies have earned their wealth through hard work and dedication. They are private institutions and have no affiliation with the people of the world. However, the king and queen of France had a duty to protect their citizens. Their wealth was getting in the way of their relationship which caused the people to revolt.

# data[].attributes.body
Enlightened philosophes such as Voltaire and John Locke brought new enlightened ideas to the table. The French people hearing about this made them realize they no longer have to live the way they are. Voltaire advocated for freedom of expression, meaning the French people could say anything they want about the government without repercussions. Hearing Voltaire's idea would influence them to riot. Locke believed everyone had natural rights (life, liberty, and property). He also believed in a social contract that could be broken if the government were to become corrupt. Going along with the idea of the French people rioting and overthrowing the monarchy.

# data[].attributes.body
Most people today have a better quality of life in the US than that of people from France in the 18th century. The monarchs where also responsible for the peoples well being, so if the people are struggling and the monarch is striving, citizens will become outraged. It is also much easier to make a good living for yourself compared to 18th century France. People today have more opportunities to become well-off, or improve of their situation.

# data[].attributes.body
The condition of life causes change over time, because if people are unhappy with their lifestyle, changes are made. Impoverished communities receive funding to try to create programs to help the lives of those who are less fortunate, because of the condition that some or all in the community live in.

# data[].attributes.body
John Locke's philosophy that the government should be in place to meet the needs of its citizens. and if it did not meet those needs then it should be overthrown. this shaped the everyday lives of the french people because the government was ignoring the needs of the people by not giving them food.

# data[].attributes.body
Wollstonecraft argued for women's rights. And many of the french women rioted in the street and outside versaille because of bread.

# data[].attributes.body
In France, the King and Queen held the most money and power, and they were in charge of the well-being of their citizens. The King and Queen of France were the French government, and they were not taking care of their citizens. In the USA, a lot of people who have immense wealth are private business owners, and not the most powerful people in the government. The US government looks out for its citizens and provides programs to help those who don't have much money. It would be unfair for US citizens to riot against the wealthy, private business owners as many of these people worked hard to earn their wealth.

# data[].attributes.body
The reason it was different for the king and queen is because they worked and ran the government and the Country of France. A lot of the really wealthy today are people who own businesses, not necessarily in the government.

# data[].attributes.body
people don't revolt against celebrities because they aren't the ones that make the rules for us. they live with the same rules as us and cannot change them no matter now wealthy they are.

# data[].attributes.body
Although many people live with immense wealth today, the case of the monarchs of France were vastly different than in the USA. In France, the King and Queen were responsible for helping their people and were direct links to the people's suffering by living lavishly and accounting for their debt by heavily taxing the people. The taxes were too substantial for the French people to pay, leading to starvation and suffering. In the USA, however, those who are wealthy are not always those in power. They have no "duty" to the people so they cannot necessarily be held accountable like the monarchs had been. The wealthy aspects of the government also aim to help the impoverished citizens through federal programs. These programs provide aid to the US citizens which usually prevents an uprising. Furthermore, the government in the United States is dictated by the people and the bodies of government are merely just representatives unlike the King and Queen in France who were individuals who maintained most of the power in France.

# data[].attributes.body
John Locke believed that a social contract was formed between a leader and its citizens, but that the citizens could break this contract if their ruler became corrupt and infringed upon their natural rights of life, liberty, and property. This is exactly what the French women did when they revolted against monarchs at Versailles for their lack of bread and food. They used their natural right to protest.

# data[].attributes.body
Change over time is caused by the people. If the people of a great nation are struggling to live and get by, they will want change. This can lead to revolutions and massive change.

# data[].attributes.body
Pressure and environment causes change. The ideas surrounding you and the space your living in all effect how you view things and how you respond to action. The people surrounding you have influence as well. The people of France were in an awful environment, but the government did nothing to change it. So the people of France took it upon themselves to make a change.

# data[].attributes.body
As we live in a society with people with immense wealth, there's no sign of any riots or revolts from the general public because it's not their responsibility to take care of all of the citizens. For the king and queen, their main role is to primarily serve the needs of the people and the country. As the king and queen of France continuously abused their powers and outright neglected the people, there was no surprise that the French people revolted.

# data[].attributes.body
Something that causes change is the feeling of the people and whether or not they like it or not. If people are unhappy about something they change it. If the government still refuses to change it causes a protest or even a revolution.

# data[].attributes.body
The difference between the public rising against the government from the King and Queen of France and the U.S.A today is the power the governments had over people. The King and Queen of France had direct power and control of the decisions that would immediately affect the French people which is why the French rose up against them because of their frustrations. In the U.S.A however, the decisions made aren't going to dramatically effect the basic necessities for people which is why there isn't a large scale rebellion like there was with the French. Although some still rise against the American government for some things, it's not on the same scale that it was for the French who were barely able to live.

# data[].attributes.body
The majority of the wealth held in the United States today is gained by owning a private business or investments, these people are not usually a part of the government. The president's and government officials' money is not the united states' money, the country has its own funds leading the debt not to be traced to a person after their presidency in the way that even if a past president puts the country in even more debt they are not responsible for paying it after their 4 years. Back in the age of the enlightenment, the money that France would have had came from the royal family for the most part.

# data[].attributes.body
It was different for the King and Queen in France than it is in the U.S. because in France, there is a monarch where the King and Queen have complete control over the citizens. However, in the U.S., since there is a democracy, and the people have some say, they gain power and wealth through alternative ways such as private businesses, hard work, or inheritance.

# data[].attributes.body
Something that causes change over time is when the general population realizes a problem and tries overcoming it through observation, science, philosophical beliefs, or violence. It is that constantly trying to solve issues (whether that be on a large or small scale) that we are able to build up our society and hopefully learn from our mistakes.

# data[].attributes.body
The King and the Queen held the money and the power. They were in charge of their citizens. In the US a lot of the wealthy people own their own business and don't necessarily rely on the government.

# data[].attributes.body
The way people live and how they go throughout their life is what causes change. If people are unhappy with their life, they will go and change it. So when the people in France were very upset about living conditions, they revolted to change that.

# data[].attributes.body
The enlightened Philosopies wrote about what the people should be entitled to what their natural rights are given to them by John Locke. What the government should be doing and how there should be checks and balances provided by montesquieu. Mary Wollstonecraft also gave women the empowerment to riot at versailles. Marie Antoinette at one point in the movie also reads a quote from a philosopher to her daughter.

# data[].attributes.body
Technology, nature, and the effects of politics can all cause change over time. Specifically, in France, politics caused change over time as the French monarchs did not look out for their citizens. Marie and her husband became the King and Queen and they disregarded the needs of their people. These choices forced the hand of the French people who fought against the monarchy for their rights and well-being, which would ultimately cause a big change in the make-up of the French government.

# data[].attributes.body
The monarchy in France were the ones responsible for the people. Their government had all the wealth and they were not using the money wisely to protect and keep the governed safe. Obviously unhappy the people rose up against them. While in the U.S.A most of the wealth is held by private businesses which don't control the lives of the people. Although some government officials do have more money than the average citizen, they are not withholding their wealth from the people for their own gain.

# data[].attributes.body
Change is caused by a variety of reasons over time but the most significant is the discovery of new aspects of life and how those aspects create new perspectives on the world around us. Throughout history, the influence of new facts such as the science discovered during the Scientific Revolution led to people becoming restless is the current standard of the world and craving more. The desire to have more than what the current environment is providing creates a motivation to change one's environment to better fit their new perspective on the world. Change is mainly created by unrest and discovery. The constant evolution of our knowledge leads to a desire for change.

# data[].attributes.body
Change is caused when enough people agree that a certain rule or policy in place is deemed obsolete or unfair. if enough people are affected by a rule or policy and are not content with it, they will make ends meet and change it.

An example of this is the American Revolution. the pilgrims who voyaged to the new world so they could freely practice their religion. then the colonists were tired of being taxed without representation and revolted against the British government because they felt that their policy was unjust.

# data[].attributes.body
A big change is caused by many small changes over time. While the small things may not seem to make a difference, they build up and eventually amount to a big change. Change requires persistence and patience because it does not happen overnight. Although it may seem to happen in an instant, change is always due to a series of building events.

# data[].attributes.body
Change overtime is caused by the people. If there is something that the majority of the people do not like then they will do and try everything in their power to try and change whatever it may be.

# data[].attributes.body
Change over time is caused by the people themselves, when there is something the majority of the people don't like they will do everything in their power to try and change it. This could be peaceful protests, petitions or riots. The environment that the people are placed in also has an effect on change and continuity over time. WHen something works it will continue to be in effect, if it doesn't it will end up being changed in the long run.

# data[].attributes.body
Change over time is caused, at its core, by the people and their opinions. People's opinions are greatly influenced by politics, technology, and education, but they are most likely to cause a change when their life is being negatively affected. In France specifically, people would have likely not fought for such an overarching revolution if they had not been starving because of their own ruler.

# data[].attributes.body
Change over time is typically caused by a series of events that happened mainly because there was a mutual feeling of unhappiness among everyone and also a mutual feeling that things needed to change. Usually, a problem is recognized whether its major like societal changes or minor changes in everyday life and steps are taken to solve that problem that generates change.

# data[].attributes.body
Things such as technological advancements, injustice, new ideas, etc. When people are exposed to new ideas and are faced with injustice it is natural to want something to change. When new better ideas come around and many people band together change will come about. Such as during the Scientific Revolution, people were encouraged to think for themselves and not solely rely on the Church.

# data[].attributes.body
The king and Queen ruled over the people they were responsible for ensuring basic needs for their subjects. The king and Queen's people were struggling to feed their families and stay healthy and alive. Wealthy people today doesn't always mean that they are a role of power in the government. They can be independently wealthy and the lower class people are not suffering immensely.

# data[].attributes.body
Overtime, change occurs due to society and the people. There are several factors and beliefs that go into this such as technology, religion, government, and politics. As new ideas come to be, people may start following those beliefs which eventually cause change. Also, with these new ideas, opinions shift which oftentimes results in change.

# data[].attributes.body
Change over time occurs due to different ideas or thoughts being formed by a general public or one person that then gets others on board with the idea. It typically doesn't take one sole person to make a dramatic change that can be seen over time, but if one person initiates it and then others follow, it becomes a change over time. As people start to think on their own and form ideas, they begin to realize how things could be better which is when a change occurs. Whether it's a change in government, daily life, or anything regarding society as a whole, there has to be a large support for the change for it to actually be effective and seen as a development over time.

# data[].attributes.body
Change happens when a group of people have been oppressed for a period of time and they are tired of being discriminated against so they revolted and fight for the rights and change. In the women's rights movement they wanted change so they fought for it. The only way to get change is to fight which will end in war most of the time.

# data[].attributes.body
The women would be full of rage if they saw how the monarchs lived. The waste of materials they are scarce of would drive them up a wall and would lead to worse things than the riots. The monarchs were selfish to waste all of those resources for their desserts and such.

# data[].attributes.body
French women in everyday life showed that they had the right to protest and speak their mind in government and the way they lived. Wollstonecraft's views promoted this lifestyle as she fought for women to be seen in government and for equality between the 2 genders.

# data[].attributes.body
The King and Queen of France is different as they are supposed to help protect and serve their people, that is their duty. The immense wealth we see in the US doesn't fulfill these same roles, the wealthy don't have to serve the common folk. Even though it would be appreciated and that those who are wealthy should help the less fortunate, it isn't expected like it would be for the King and Queen.

# data[].attributes.body
Change over time is caused by technology, the environment, people in general, politics, opinions, and much more. When something n life is being negatively affected, people have the willpower and opinions to make small differences in the outcome to turn it into a positive. The problem is recognized and resources are used to make those changes. Like in France, people (women) wouldn't have rioted if the King and Queen realized the poor were being starved from shortages and offered them help. The starvation was their negative so they came together to try and protest for a positive, more food/resources.