# data[].attributes.headline
Check out this student example of question #1.

# data[].attributes.subject
Check out this student example of question #1.

# data[].attributes.body
Good student example of a response:
"In the 'inner circle', we discussed how fear could be correlated with insanity. Stephen King's idea that we were all insane was a big part of the conversation. We talked about how, as humans, we wanted to test fear, and sometimes crave the adrenaline that it gives. We also talked about horror movies and how they could be the food that satiates humans darkest desires. We also touched on, if horror movies were able to quench that taste and prohibited further action." KR

# data[].attributes.headline
1.  Please complete this at the end of the Day 1 discussion. Click the "plus" button under each question to answer.

# data[].attributes.subject
1.  Please complete this at the end of the Day 1 discussion. Click the "plus" button under each question to answer.

# data[].attributes.headline
Check out this student example of question #2.

# data[].attributes.subject
Check out this student example of question #2.

# data[].attributes.body
Part of the article that I believe was not addressed in full, was why our inner "insanity" causes us to crave and have a want to watch horror films. We discussed why horror films, are daring the nightmare and that we watch them to almost prove something about ourselves. However, I believe that we didn't fully delve into the idea of how the "insanity" in all of us that Stephen King speaks about, is correlated and connected to horror films. MD

# data[].attributes.headline
2. Write your initials at the end of both of your responses to receive credit.

# data[].attributes.subject
2. Write your initials at the end of both of your responses to receive credit.

# data[].attributes.headline
Group A mainly touched on the first half of the article and asked lots of questions. They made some good connections to the real world and also some history.  JS

# data[].attributes.subject
Group A mainly touched on the first half of the article and asked lots of questions. They made some good connections to the real world and also some history.  JS

# data[].attributes.body
A specific point that was made and discussed was that when it comes to being a bystander, many people don't act on anything because they feel like it isn't their business or they have places to be. For example, Sam said that in New York City it is kind of a code not to pay attention to anyone begging for money or help because everyone has a place to be - CS

# data[].attributes.headline
Parts that were not addressed completely were the stabbing of Kitty Genovese and the part about Altruistic Inertia. JS

# data[].attributes.subject
Parts that were not addressed completely were the stabbing of Kitty Genovese and the part about Altruistic Inertia. JS

# data[].attributes.body
A part of the article "We are all Bystanders" that I felt like could of been discussed in more depth was how people react to others demeanor's. For example, in a state of emergency if someone is calm, then more people become calm. This causes a misconception that people get in times when others need help - CS

# data[].attributes.body
One point that was discussed completely was how people in this generation are more likely to be more selfish than selfless. Most people don't want to get involved and deal with what comes after getting involved. Another point was how people are more likely to help someone that they see themselves in because it might be less of a risk. -JW

# data[].attributes.body
Parts that weren't fully discussed were "confusion of responsibility" and the term an "active bystander." -JW

# data[].attributes.headline
some specific points were that a lot of people said the main reason for not interviening was so they can mind their own buisness. ml

# data[].attributes.subject
some specific points were that a lot of people said the main reason for not interviening was so they can mind their own buisness. ml

# data[].attributes.body
Group A made complete points about the psychology behind why people do not help people in need and stay as bystanders.-HB

# data[].attributes.body
I think we talked a lot about how people are bystanders because they are either ignoring the situation in fear or just wanting to mind their own business. MH

# data[].attributes.headline
a lot of the other research cases weren't talked about besides the Genovese case. ml 

# data[].attributes.subject
a lot of the other research cases weren't talked about besides the Genovese case. ml 

# data[].attributes.body
One point that was discussed a lot was how a lot of people do not want to intervene because they wanted to mind their own business and only worry about their own problems, and not burden themselves with the problems of others. -MM

# data[].attributes.body
The group yesterday talked about whether people choose to be bystanders in a situation  of turmoil or they have a fear that's holding them back.
MJ

# data[].attributes.body
Parts of the article that were not addressed completely or at all is why the people in the apartments watched Kitty be murdered. -HB

# data[].attributes.body
Points that were made in the inner circle included connections to history like the Holocaust, the Genovese murder, and even the Dahmer case was mentioned. Some other points that were mentioned include talk about prevention of the bystander effect, how dehumanization happens in the urban environments, and how people think about themselves more so then what is happening to others. -SS

# data[].attributes.body
Specific points that were made were why the bystander effect is a thing and why so many people conform to it. It was also discussed about opinions on the effect and real life examples were talked about. MR

# data[].attributes.body
I think we didn't really talk about the smoke experiment or the other experiments and statistics that were mentioned in the article. MH

# data[].attributes.headline
Group A talked a lot about the bigger themes of the bystander effect KVA

# data[].attributes.subject
Group A talked a lot about the bigger themes of the bystander effect KVA

# data[].attributes.body
I think a topic that could have been touched on more were reasons for being a bystander that weren't about selfishness, such as unwilling responsibility and not wanting to stand out in a crowd. -MM

# data[].attributes.body
a specific point that was made was in cities how it's a mutual agreement between everyone to not acknowledge people on the streets, and just ignore them- DL

# data[].attributes.body
The main point made was that the context of situations is the most important factor at anytime. We mainly discussed the "We are all Bystanders article. This was because it has the best information and examples.

# data[].attributes.body
Group A completely discussed how the bystander effect happens in real life, social media, movies and history.
- CL

# data[].attributes.body
Thoreau's topic about resistance to the government and how it is related to the article about intervening in crimes and other things wasn't addressed fully. I don't think so. MJ

# data[].attributes.body
Points that weren't brought up were Altruistic Inertia and the statistics that were mentioned. MR

# data[].attributes.body
Points that were made were how we ourselves didn't want to intervene because there could be a potential danger in intervening. -S.C.

# data[].attributes.body
the genovese murder was discussed completely in group a because everyone talked about their opinion on it and what they would do in that situation. RD

# data[].attributes.headline
A majority of the actual essay and article weren't actually covered, rather they were referred to once or twice. KVA

# data[].attributes.subject
A majority of the actual essay and article weren't actually covered, rather they were referred to once or twice. KVA

# data[].attributes.body
the studies done and statistics in the article weren't addressed during the conversation- DL

# data[].attributes.body
Some points that were not talked about included talk about the research/statistics that are mentioned in the article and about the physcology studies. The smoke experiment was also not discussed and the definition about Altruistic inertia
. -SS

# data[].attributes.body
theareu's article was barely talked about in group a and I think this was because many people did not understand it. RD

# data[].attributes.body
Specific points that were made were if people are selfish, would you help a person if they needed it, and most of the "We Are All Bystanders" was talked about

# data[].attributes.body
The parts of the article that were not completely addressed were the research that took place. There weren't many references to the text. MC

# data[].attributes.body
Our group didn't discuss much of the first article. This wasn't intended it just happened.

# data[].attributes.body
When discussing reasons why humans act like this its clear the human psychology behind it. We all have an innate feature to avoid these situations due to danger, the time, or the effort.  The why behind the effect is clear. RK

# data[].attributes.body
Thoreau's article was barely discussed

# data[].attributes.body
The first group mainly talked about why people might be impacted by the bystander effect and talked and also mentioned personal experiences where the bystander effect was present -AM

# data[].attributes.headline
the first group mainly discussed how people can relate to the kitty genovese case and how the bystander effect has an impact on everyone in and around the situation - mw

# data[].attributes.subject
the first group mainly discussed how people can relate to the kitty genovese case and how the bystander effect has an impact on everyone in and around the situation - mw

# data[].attributes.body
Points that were discussed completely were real life examples. I think the day 1 group covered that a lot.

# data[].attributes.body
They didn't discuss the actual article and essay. They didn't connect the text to the other one. -S.C.

# data[].attributes.body
Something that wasn't discussed enough or at all is why we wouldn't help if something bad is clearly happening the Genovese murder or if someone is dying on the street.
- CL

# data[].attributes.body
We never discussed the kind of situations Henry was saying people were ignoring. Maybe they could have been very graphic

# data[].attributes.body
One specific point that was discussed was how people tend to have more of a selfish nature and won't go out of their way to help someone. YB

# data[].attributes.body
I don't feel like the article was talked about enough. It may have been brought up a couple of times but most of the conversation was around general knowledge. YB

# data[].attributes.body
I think the parts of the story that were not fully talked about were the Kitty Genovese murder case and the trials that they did with the participates. JG

# data[].attributes.body
One topic that was discussed complete was the Peggy and Stewart story. I think all the points were covered with that story and they discussed why she didn't help him. Another point that I think was fully covered was why someone wouldn't help someone else, weather because they don't want to get involved or they didn't want to risk getting hurt. JG

# data[].attributes.body
Both groups fully discussed why the bystander effect happens and why so many people will conform to everyone around them. Lots of examples of real life scenarios were also discussed. JD

# data[].attributes.body
In the article, the cubicle study was never talked about. I feel like this was forgotten about because so many studies were shown in the article. Thoreau's essay wasn't discussed a lot either. JD