# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the decision. Such general principles are only guidelines intended to maintain the social order. However, they should not be non-negotiable dogmas in exceptional circumstances.

# data[].attributes.body
As it was already noted in the article "different laws apply to people", and I certainly agree with this. We all work in a field where the principles of humanity must come first. Sometimes it is possible and necessary to neglect the laws and regulations, if circumstances so require.

# data[].attributes.body
It’s very nice gestures, HCP should think as human sometimes and put the rules a side

# data[].attributes.headline
I also agree that the rules can be bent from time to time within the framework of ethics and morality. Why are we doctors if we can't fulfill a dying patient's last wish?

# data[].attributes.subject
I also agree that the rules can be bent from time to time within the framework of ethics and morality. Why are we doctors if we can't fulfill a dying patient's last wish?

# data[].attributes.body
Leadership, be it in any field, is the cognitive ability to know when to break the rules and when to keep them.  One must not forget the liberties of others involved and should take them into consideration when making a decision. A wise leader has the ability to know how to go around their team.

# data[].attributes.body
Decision like that may be made, but there suppoded to be some conditions:
if the patient is alone in his room - that is understandable, but in case of any other patients being in the room - he should be transfered to separate room, where dog not gonna give any discomfort or danger to other patients.

# data[].attributes.body
I Think that in this case allowing the dog in tle department is a good decision, it plays an important role in the process of patient’s dying, it might be beneficial for the patient.

# data[].attributes.body
In terms of 'breaking the rules' I think it's important to take into account different aspects of the situations - well-being of the individual as well as other people that could potentially be involved (in this case other patients at the department). In my opinion presence of the patient's dog will be of great benefit to the individual. As long as the other patients are not harmed by it (eg. from epidemiological perspective) I think it's fine to break the
rule.

# data[].attributes.body
Maybe I don't understand medical leadership right but I don't see it here.

I feel that the lead taken here is perhaps emotional. There is a reason dogs aren't allowed in: allergies, hygiene, among other things. There was no decision to shift the patent in the other room and so forth. So, I disagree with the method undertaken.

# data[].attributes.headline
It is important to look at the patients not only through the procedures we need and should do but also as a humans whose needs also should be considered

# data[].attributes.subject
It is important to look at the patients not only through the procedures we need and should do but also as a humans whose needs also should be considered

# data[].attributes.body
I think its fine for one day but not long term as its a hospital.

# data[].attributes.body
It was about sympathizing with patients. even though it was not following the hospital policy, she decided to take responsibility for the sake of making the child happier.

I believe the authorities always have to leave space for the person in charge to make such decisions which have a huge impact to the patients.

# data[].attributes.headline
I agree, although it can always be arranged in a non hospital place, but it takes some effort to do it 

# data[].attributes.subject
I agree, although it can always be arranged in a non hospital place, but it takes some effort to do it 

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I totally agree with the presented cae. I believe empathy and helping others should be ranked first before therapeutics and medicine. If the condition is terminal and untreatable, regulations are nothing from the perspectives of a dying person. Mercy should be above all.

# data[].attributes.body
It's a hard decision, against common  rules but it't just a small exeption bringing so much joy to a man in suffer. We should be humans, always.

# data[].attributes.body
The column shares how the doctor treated his patient with competence (professionally). However, he also put in his mind about consience and compassion. That healing people do not occur only about body, but also mind.

# data[].attributes.body
- Patients are treated like humans with feelings and emotions, especially near the end of their life
- Dog could be allowed only if some sterile conditions would be preserved. Sometimes an animal is the closest friend or the only family that the person has

# data[].attributes.body
While it is empathetic to let the dog come to the hospital, we should imagine if we had to grant this wish to every dying person. If the mortality rate of the hospital is low, then we can allow pets as peoples dying wishes. For a populace country like Nigeria where hospitals are crowded, it will not be a reasonable decision to grant such dying wishes. Its best to understand how people feel but we shouldn't feel what they feel otherwise doctors and medical professionals will be clouded by emotions and not do a good and objective job.

# data[].attributes.headline
Unexpected situations require unexpected behaviors. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Unexpected situations require unexpected behaviors. 

# data[].attributes.body
Processes are made to ensure transparency and ease of workflow. However, some (exceptional cases) require special treatment, which truly identifies true leaders who can act in such conditions.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree, although it may not be entirely legal. Pets are part of our family, so that was perhaps the most important thing for this patient before he died.

# data[].attributes.body
Sometimes you have to make up your decision, which may be forbidden due to actual law. However the decision that has been made was absolutely correct. The man was