# data[].attributes.headline
In relation with EBLIDA strategic strands

# data[].attributes.subject
In relation with EBLIDA strategic strands

# data[].attributes.body
to deepen the strands if there is a need of expertise, research, study, specific knowledge.

# data[].attributes.body
Clearer regulation of activity framework: reports midyear, yearly, participation of chairs in EC meeting ect.

# data[].attributes.body
EG participation in the elaboration of the Annual conference content, f.ex., responsibility pf parallel sessions or workshops

# data[].attributes.body
EG members to be e delegate from Eblida side to participate in conferences, seminars etc. in relation with their theme.

# data[].attributes.body
Reconsider how the chair is chosen and elected

# data[].attributes.body
Procedure described to recruit, invite etc members of EG among EBLIDA members

# data[].attributes.body
Minimum and maximum number of participants;

Frequency of meetings:
2 / year (one semi-in-person, during the EBLIDA conference, in the spring; another in the autumn)
Frequency may increase whenever the subject under study/analysis requires it - scheduling must be done by the group itself, during the work

Chair and secretary - At least one of them shoul be in the EC. Secretary should replace Chair when absent;

Reports do the EC: Report the activity each quarter. It there's nothing to report, than that is what should be said: Nothing to report.

Ther should be one member of Secretariat with the task to support de WG.

# data[].attributes.headline
An EC delegate in each WG or direct relation with the Director?

# data[].attributes.subject
An EC delegate in each WG or direct relation with the Director?

# data[].attributes.headline
Studies or Research needs (without connexion with WG)

# data[].attributes.subject
Studies or Research needs (without connexion with WG)

# data[].attributes.body
This isn't a priority, but...

Instead of deciding each year if there should be a working group for the conference inside the EC, there should be a permanente committee: EC President, VP, Treasurer, 2 members from the EC, Secretariat, including the Director and 2 or 3 people from the welcoming country.
Advantages:
They could star working and have a first in person meeting during the previous conference;
The steady members can bring accumulated know-how and strategies for an easy organisation.

# data[].attributes.body
Should we creat the possibility for EBLIDA members to suggest lines of work, which would be evaluated by the EC?
We would probabley get a lot of not so good ideas, but it would be a sign of openness

# data[].attributes.headline
Fixed groups for big topics coming from de EBLIDA activity?  Legislation, Intellectual property.. and  punctual groups for concrete topics? 

# data[].attributes.subject
Fixed groups for big topics coming from de EBLIDA activity?  Legislation, Intellectual property.. and  punctual groups for concrete topics? 