# data[].attributes.body
Group 3
I think that we did not speak from the slides and presented well our script was also good.

# data[].attributes.body
Group 3, I think we did well, majority of the time we didn't read off the slides.

# data[].attributes.body
Group 1 because they were good

# data[].attributes.body
I think grp 1 was the best as they spoke loud and clearly and they seemed very well prepared. They also kept eye contact with the audience.

# data[].attributes.body
grp 1 they put in the most effort

# data[].attributes.body
I like the presentation slides and speakers of group 3 they were confident and well prepared on the topic they were presenting.They were engaging and spoke with life

# data[].attributes.body
Group 5 because it is very releavent to the topic

# data[].attributes.body
Grp 1 was very clear and accurate and organised. They have great infographics but Nathan and Zong Ding could be a little louder.

# data[].attributes.body
group 1 13/16

bc of their slides were creative and relevant to the topic and were very detailed

# data[].attributes.body
Grp 4
Their slides are relevant to the topic

# data[].attributes.body
I feel group one did a good presentation. They had relevant information. The only problem they had was that some presenters gradually moved away from the audience and got softer.
14/16

# data[].attributes.body
I think group 1’s presents was the best. Their presentation was nicely done up and they seemed very prepared and ready to present. They sounded confident , and they were able to project their voices well. Their, content was relevant and they were knowledgeable about their topic which they were assigned.

# data[].attributes.body
Group 5 had many elaborate information that was easy to undertsand. Their presentation was very interesting and in their interview they put subtitles in it. They even had a survey for the SST students whoch provided something interactive to do.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Group 5 is the best. They had relevant information with relevant infographics while having presenters who spoke clearly and explained the slides well

# data[].attributes.body
I think group one did a great job in presenting the slides and information. They were confident and understood their topic well.

# data[].attributes.body
I found group 5 intruiging and witty.
They also project their voice Rilly well too. Nicely done I guess.

# data[].attributes.body
Group 5.  They gave multiple good points that they could elaborate on. They had a more creative way of presenting their research by putting it in mindmaps and surveys.  14/15

# data[].attributes.body
I found group 1 to be the best. They delivered their information with much clarity and I found myself engaged with their presentation, the video was also well made and I could tell they put in a lot of effort to make the presentation. My rating world be a 14/16

# data[].attributes.body
Group 6. I think they did very well as I thought that their presentation of their slides was very nice and their information was very reliable and true

# data[].attributes.body
I think that group 3 is the best as they presented the info correctly and engaged the audience with our words so 13/16

# data[].attributes.body
I vote that group 3 had the best presentation as their communication was good and it was relevant to their topic too

# data[].attributes.body
I found group 3 to be the best as I liked that they showed what types of relationships there was and went more in-depth with it and they also explain how to build a relationship. They also had eye contact and were confident with their presentation.

# data[].attributes.body
I found group 5 to be the best group. They had relevant information, though some were inaccurate. They included a survey and mindmap which I didn’t find in many groups. They were confident though looked at the Mac multiple times. They also provided in depth perspectives and great explanations. I rate this a 14/16