# data[].attributes.headline
A Taskvideo file without a patient number (May 12th) ⭐️⭐️

# data[].attributes.subject
A Taskvideo file without a patient number (May 12th) ⭐️⭐️

# data[].attributes.body
DB-fmriTaskvideosexlab_Run1-4: Which patient does this data belong to?

# data[].attributes.body
I realized the data for Run1 and Run4 are identical with H4 in ibili-h4_DS-fmriTaskvideosexlab_Run1_4. This subject didn’t have individual log data, so I couldn't retrieve the original data. Could you send me either log files for run 1-4, or an excel file that includes run1-4?

# data[].attributes.body
*we've talked about this on a call, but I'd appreciate it if you could see if you happen to have data on more subjects by any chance.

You shared with me the demographic responses from 25 subjects, but I realised only 14 out of these 25 subjects are the ones in the Data Summary table. Could you confirm this for me?

# data[].attributes.headline
Baseline measures  in SPSS (May 12th) ⭐️⭐️

# data[].attributes.subject
Baseline measures  in SPSS (May 12th) ⭐️⭐️

# data[].attributes.body
If I've read the Taskvideo files correctly, the experiment took place in the following order: Fixation > QRSS > instruction for neutral > neutral > QRSS > fixation > instruction for sex > sex> QRSS > instruction for QP > QP > instruction for PANAS > PANAS.

Meanwhile, SPSS included the following items for R1.
・Média de R1_Baseline1_Neutro
・Média de R1_Baseline1_Neutro2
・Média de R1_Baseline2_Neutro
・Média de R1_Baseline1_Sexual
・Média de R1_Baseline2_Sexual

I initially imagined these were the average scores for the QRSS, but QRSS has been recorded only three times. Could you explain to me what these five items correspond to?

Alternatively, you could share with me the protocol document and I can try to decipher using a translation app!

# data[].attributes.body
- The date indicates when I created the case.
- The star ratings (1-3) speaks to the urgency of the case
- I'll put new requests/questions under "To Sandra", so please put your answers by commenting on each post. After you add comments, move the post to the "Answered / Completed" section so that I know which ones to look at. After I've read it and think the case has been resolved, I'll move it to "Read by Haruna". If it requires further clarification, I'll add a comment and move back to the "To Sandra" section.

# data[].attributes.headline
Demographics and sociopsychological data for all subjects (May 16th) ⭐️⭐️

# data[].attributes.subject
Demographics and sociopsychological data for all subjects (May 16th) ⭐️⭐️

# data[].attributes.body
Could you also share with me the demographics and sociopsychological data, like age and IIEF?

I have a file named "Base de Dados SEXLAB IBILI.sav", but when I checked, the file only had the responses for H13 :)

# data[].attributes.body
*not related to research

if your friends know any reliable English-speaking psychiatrist in Porto (or Lisbon, if they see patients virtually) who can perform adult ADHD assessment, with an ability to issue a prescription order depending on the diagnosis and treatment preference, I'd appreciate any info <3 (I've checked CMIL but their doctor is on leave)

# data[].attributes.headline
PRT files (6/14) ⭐️⭐️⭐️ (the highest priority for now)

# data[].attributes.subject
PRT files (6/14) ⭐️⭐️⭐️ (the highest priority for now)

# data[].attributes.body
I remember from the meeting with Joao that you showed us one of the prt files (which was for H25/CN Run4), so I thought you might also have access to some other subjects/runs. I currently don't have any prt. files, so could you send them to me?

In case you don't have all of them, I've also reached out to Joao to see if he has them or could help me with the log-prt conversion process.

# data[].attributes.headline
re: IASR (not related to this research!) 

# data[].attributes.subject
re: IASR (not related to this research!) 

# data[].attributes.body
Are most members of your lab attending IASR? If so, how long will you be gone for? I'm just asking this because I thought I'd be the only one in Porto for these dates 😂

# data[].attributes.headline
A reminder to share the documents on experimental procedure (05/25)

# data[].attributes.subject
A reminder to share the documents on experimental procedure (05/25)

# data[].attributes.body
Just as a reminder!

# data[].attributes.headline
A reminder to confirm group labels for H29, 30, 32, 33 ⭐️⭐️⭐️

# data[].attributes.subject
A reminder to confirm group labels for H29, 30, 32, 33 ⭐️⭐️⭐️

# data[].attributes.body
Could you remind me of the meaning of these codes from [fmriTaskvideosexlab] files?

1. The difference between [nada] and [nunca]

2. QRSS

3. QP

# data[].attributes.body
What's PENSAM? I'm assuming it corresponds to QP in fmriTaskvideosexLab so maybe it becomes clear if you've already answered that question for me :)

# data[].attributes.headline
Missing dcm./ima. files (May 11th) ⭐️⭐️⭐️

# data[].attributes.subject
Missing dcm./ima. files (May 11th) ⭐️⭐️⭐️

# data[].attributes.body
dcm./ima. files for H31 seem to be missing (instead, I've found H52, which wasn't in the summary table)

# data[].attributes.headline
Summary measures for eye-tracking data (May 20th) ⭐️⭐️⭐️

# data[].attributes.subject
Summary measures for eye-tracking data (May 20th) ⭐️⭐️⭐️

# data[].attributes.body
Re: eye-tracking data, did Joao share with you any summary measures, or the number/duration of fixations to the manually pre-drawn areas of interest (faces/genitals for erotic clips) for each sample?
>I don't have anything of that kind. Can you please ask João if he can help you with that?

This is the only information I need from the eye-tracking data (for now), so I'd like to utilise existing work if someone else has already done this.

Otherwise, do you know the coordinates for the AOIs of each film? If not, I'll schedule a call with Joao so he can give me a tutorial.
>Unfortunately not

# data[].attributes.headline
Possibly mislabelled fmriTaskvideo files (May 12th) ⭐️

# data[].attributes.subject
Possibly mislabelled fmriTaskvideo files (May 12th) ⭐️

# data[].attributes.body
These files are the same, but one says subject 4 and the other says H16

FM-fmriTaskvideosexlab_Run1-4 (in a folder named FM_sl_subj4)

ibili-h16 FM-fmriTaskvideosexlab_Run1_4

We have another file named "ibili-h4_DS-fmriTaskvideosexlab_Run1_4", so maybe both of the above are H16?

# data[].attributes.headline
Could you share with me a file named "Protocolo_sexlab.m"? (May 12th) ⭐️⭐️⭐️

# data[].attributes.subject
Could you share with me a file named "Protocolo_sexlab.m"? (May 12th) ⭐️⭐️⭐️

# data[].attributes.body
Joao told us that there’s a file called Protocolo_sexlab.m, which contains snippets to run on MATLAB to convert acq. to prt. (for a summary view), but this file was missing. Could you share it with me?

# data[].attributes.headline
A missing penile data for H43 (May 11th) ⭐️⭐️

# data[].attributes.subject
A missing penile data for H43 (May 11th) ⭐️⭐️

# data[].attributes.body
The table says penile data for H43 is available but it seems to be missing

# data[].attributes.body
The summary table says the penile data for H29 is missing but there's a file named "ibili-h29_SEQ_2.acq"

# data[].attributes.headline
A missing Taskvideo file (May 12th) ⭐️⭐️⭐️

# data[].attributes.subject
A missing Taskvideo file (May 12th) ⭐️⭐️⭐️

# data[].attributes.body
Files for 17 and H20 seem to be missing

# data[].attributes.headline
The subject type in Taskvideo file for H31 (May 12th) ⭐️

# data[].attributes.subject
The subject type in Taskvideo file for H31 (May 12th) ⭐️

# data[].attributes.body
H31 were assigned “H13” for their subject type in runs 2-4. Since the timestamps for runs 2-4 follow that of the first run, and they’re different from that of runs 1-4 for H13, I’m assuming this is just a typo, but would you agree with it?

# data[].attributes.body
The data summary table you shared with me said the post-task responses (PANAS, QRSS, QP) for H27 & H43 were missing, but they seemed to be included in the Questionários_ressonância_para_spss. Can I consider them as having complete responses?

In contrast, H51 was missing though the summary table said all the responses were available.

Additionally, I found two responses (rows) from H29 in Questionários_ressonância_para_spss, but did you mean to paste a response from a different subject instead? Perhaps H51?

# data[].attributes.body
My understanding is that the DSM criteria alone cannot differentiate pED from organic ED, and filtering out the organic ED will require urological/psychological exams, but does that sound right?