# data[].attributes.body
Continue to add to assessment and support materials

# data[].attributes.body
WestEd partnership was productive and effective

# data[].attributes.body
Leverage learning with EL roadmap was beneficial

# data[].attributes.body
When/how to refresh our tech?

# data[].attributes.body
Student forums were a plus

# data[].attributes.body
Hire college students for EL supports and Avid, etc.

# data[].attributes.body
EL counselors for elementary

# data[].attributes.body
Focus PL for teachers on EL

# data[].attributes.body
Tech instructors @ elementary

# data[].attributes.body
PBIS - Please revisit w/school sites

# data[].attributes.body
Shorter surveys/spotlight questions throughout the year instead of all at once

# data[].attributes.body
Pair classified with strong articulate admin. or teachers to translate the educationese...Google

# data[].attributes.body
Parent Engagement - How do parents prefer to be engaged? Are there parent trainings at the start of school to inform parents of rules, resources, how to advocate properly?

# data[].attributes.body
Why change curriculum if it's working?

# data[].attributes.body
After school PD preferred

# data[].attributes.body
SE support needs increased, but PD for PBIS and resources have decreased

# data[].attributes.body
PBIS Tier I training for all
*Include child dev. teacher in PD for district wide initiatives such as PBIS- minimum Tier I level*

# data[].attributes.body
Involve parents in PBIS trainings

# data[].attributes.body
MH very effective communication with all stakeholders, follow through

# data[].attributes.body
Who pays for PIP? Site or district? Principals get cheap and won't pay for the program, same with play works- put at all sites.

# data[].attributes.body
Some schools have more PD than other schools, can teachers have a choice?

# data[].attributes.body
I think that secondary students need more time to experience electives to get outside experiences in figuring out what to be when they grow up.

# data[].attributes.body
With all the hiring of new teachers, teachers need all of the training for PBIS. Your veterans need to revisit.

# data[].attributes.body
ELD specialists and counselors for incentives

# data[].attributes.body
PBIS stores at all elementary schools with district funding

# data[].attributes.body
Need to see new teacher PD in all curricular areas

# data[].attributes.body
Need mental health professionals to teach weekly lessons in classes

# data[].attributes.body
Teachers need training for when students have meltdowns

# data[].attributes.body
Will CCEIS program be expanded to other sites?

# data[].attributes.body
What support for teachers with EL standards and strategies?

# data[].attributes.body
Lack of specific metrics and tracking of the various academic programs is concerning. It's hard to give feedback without having all the data.

# data[].attributes.body
What is the data results with the wok of TOSA's reading specialists?

# data[].attributes.body
Lacking a EL specialist(s) district-wide

# data[].attributes.body
Culturally inclusive practices for ALL staff members

# data[].attributes.body
Need PBIS level training I for all teachers

# data[].attributes.body
All schools have no $ for PBIS rewards especially non-title II

# data[].attributes.body
What is data from Edmentum/Edgenuity to show student success?

# data[].attributes.body
G2 Coaching - Metric
Benchmark Metrics -

ELS 53 -> 66

Math 62 -> 71

S. ELA 53 -> 52

S. Math 38 -> 53

EL Reclass. Rate 10.8%

Is it the STAR that is used to ensure the efficacy of coaching support?

# data[].attributes.body
Teacher surveys are good to see for buy in, but we need a clearer metric to measure efficacy

# data[].attributes.body
Truly, the curriculum for Jump Start should be revised. It is almost completely ineffectual. And again, what is the metric used to show efficacy?

# data[].attributes.body
Imagine Learning is used to show effective programs, but there is no metric used to show efficacy- our reclassification rate seems to be stagnant

# data[].attributes.body
EL Support in Wonders is ineffective

# data[].attributes.body
PBIS can be very effective when there is a school buy in. Without the staff buy in, it becomes unsustainable.

# data[].attributes.body
Parents need to be involved in PBIS

# data[].attributes.body
District should provide financial support for PBIS incentives

# data[].attributes.body
Imagine Learning - any program that requires consistent student participation daily at school persistent and home is ineffective

need EL curriculum

# data[].attributes.body
Why do schools not have PBIS funds from district's budget to support SEL

training teachers

implement schoolwide incentive programs, assemblies, parent trainings?

# data[].attributes.body
Looking forward to see the CAASPP results for math at the schools with WestEd training to see if this worked

# data[].attributes.body
Pearson vs. SWUN curriculum/program

# data[].attributes.body
PBIS funds for schoolwide incentives that don't come out from Title I funds

# data[].attributes.body
Need EL expert to look at our data to see if our Wonders Curriculum, Imagine Learning, etc. are effective because our EL reclassification & CAASPP scores for EL have flatlines for the past 5 years