# data[].attributes.body
·         The humanoid from Maid in Japan is sufficiently adaptable to make a suitable career for elderly people with nobody else to look after them.

·         It can take phone messages and read out mails.

·         Wakamaru is programed to call emergency services if a person has an accident.

·         It has a Speech-recognition Software

·         Jules from Text B can mimic the facial expressions and lip movements of a human being.

·         It´s so realistic that humans forget it is actually a robot.

·         It is useful in healthcare settings.

·         It is capable of looking like a human, behave like a human and also feel like a human.

·         Wakamaru is not cheap. It requires a high monthly maintenance charge.

·         This robot is a limited edition. Only 100 robots went on sale.

·         In text B, scientists believe that exposed people would be disconcerted by humanoid automatons. People would try to form a social relationship with the robot.

# data[].attributes.body
·         Text A is written in an article of a magazine (“The independent”).

·         The full text is divided into 6 paragraphs with underlined and bold words so it catches the reader´s attention.

·         The title is quite big and in bold so the audience can read it easily. And apart from that, it has a striking style.

·         Text A has the source of the article at the bottom of the page with the name of the author, the editorial and the date.

·         Text B is divided into four paragraphs.

·         The title catches the reader´s attention since is written in an informal style.

·         Give us a smile! Seems to be a scientific text and it´s part of a web page (It has http:// at the top and a bar at the right of it).

·         It does not have the source or any information of the author.

·         It has several quotes of scientists.

# data[].attributes.body
·         Both texts talk about robots and the use they have.

·         Text A is situated in Japan and the robot was made by a Japanese brand. But on the other side, text B happens in England and it was made by scientists.

·         Robot from text A has a robot shape and it is one meter high but robot from text B has a realistic human body and soft skin which interacts by human expressions.

·         Robot from text A was not a revolution in technology but Jules from text B was the first robot with realistic human-looking faces.

·         They were both created to be useful in healthcare systems.

·         They both work with speech-recognition software.

# data[].attributes.body
Even though both texts talk about how technology devices can help us in the future, they have various differences. They both created a robot to be useful in healthcare systems, but they were created in different places. While Wakamaru was created by a Japanese brand in Japan, Jules was created by scientists from England. They both use speech-recognition software but the differences are in the appearances. Japan robot on the one hand looks like a robot and it is a meter high but on the other hand Jules looks like a human being. And here is what scientists are more concerned about. Scientists believe that apart from being a useful robot, exposed people would be disconcerted by humanoid automatons. People would try to form a social relationship with the robot. On the other side of the text, we find Wakamaru, that apart from being a very useful tool, it is very expensive and it requires a high price maintenance. Although Wakamaru does not look like a human as Jules, it can have sensitive responses and answer like a human does. Jules on the other side is capable of looking like a human, behave like a human and also feel like a human and sometimes humans even forget that it is actually a robot.

According to the structure of the texts, text A is written in an article of a magazine. You can find the source of it at the bottom of the text (“The independent”). The title of the article is uite big and in bold so the audience can read it easily. It has got a striking style. But we as readers can not see that in text B. Text B does not have the source or any information about the author and it has got several quotes from scientists about the experience with the robot. The title though catches the reader´s attention since it is written in an informal style. They both have a tittle that readers find hard to figure out what the text is about.

As a conclusion I must say that both texts are very interesting and keep the readers’ attention throughout the texts. Their styles and the robots themselves could be different, but the ideas from the companies are almost the same.