# data[].attributes.body
The Eduflow is appropriate for the subjects that provide theological and conceptual content (like math, science, language & social science) because it's easier to create rubrics and build concrete structure of content flows. (Practical subject like PE, Arts, Music might no be suitable)

# data[].attributes.body
Evaluate the quality of the evaluation in order to foster good feedback

# data[].attributes.body
1. Suitable subjects: Literature, Social Sciences, Humanities ( peer-review is a suitable method to grade answers which are mostly subjective)
2. But it can be suitable for subjects with fact-based learning contents ( Science, Math) because you can incorporate videos and stuff , but peer-review is not very useful.

# data[].attributes.body
maybe add a field where teachers could present the general introduction of tasks or rules for class

# data[].attributes.body
It might be useful if teachers have the possibility to provide a grading rubric so that it is easier for students to give adequate feedback.

# data[].attributes.body
add a forum for discussion/clarification questions

# data[].attributes.body
It would be good to provide questions and answers field in the same screen

# data[].attributes.body
LMS integration

# data[].attributes.body
Provide onboarding process for teachers

# data[].attributes.body
if the design is very much like a blog or social media you might be inclined to give short and not very rich feedback.
Maybe give it a bit of a more offical look so you actually 'feel' the assessor role
.. but you know. a very subjective point here

# data[].attributes.body
The structure and user interface of the platform that might be challenging with many details structure for teacher to prepare (It requires technical skill of teacher to set it up).

# data[].attributes.body
It can be suitable for every subject, because Eduflow offers lots of possibilities to include videos, questions, etc.

For example for a language course, Eduflow is good for peer-review from native speakers. So they, can give direct feedback

# data[].attributes.headline
it is suitable for learning languages especially where peer learning between native speaker is possible 

# data[].attributes.subject
it is suitable for learning languages especially where peer learning between native speaker is possible 

# data[].attributes.body
1. Logical branching of questions.
2. Providing hints how to move on the further questions.
3. Easier way to find the review done by your partners.

# data[].attributes.body
anonimity on peer-review

# data[].attributes.body
Limited for teaching wide array of Subjects

# data[].attributes.body
Probably would be better to display the comments anonymously, so the students might be more comfortable to give a neutral comment or when they disagree with some ideas

# data[].attributes.body
Introduction video about what this tool can be specifically used

# data[].attributes.body
Fun way to get reviews and feedback

# data[].attributes.body
-Not applicable for some types of assignments
-Discussion feature is not very well organized

# data[].attributes.body
People might have hard time to setup and access

# data[].attributes.body
1. Everything is online - some people have no adequate technical equipment to do it.
2. Needs a more clear path how to proceed after finishing one of the steps.
3. One tiny technical issue is enough to disrupt the learning process . ( for ex: In the demo, we could not see feedback from our peers).

# data[].attributes.body
Create the envinroment where students can receive informative feedback rather than just receiving scores

# data[].attributes.body
Fun way to engage in peer review and get learner feedback on a subject matter

# data[].attributes.body
The flow and well-sequenced of the activity that easy to follow for student.

# data[].attributes.body
Works best with open ended questions
Fun

# data[].attributes.headline
need time to lean the students how to use it especialy for primary school students 

# data[].attributes.subject
need time to lean the students how to use it especialy for primary school students 

# data[].attributes.body
depends on the review-ability of content
this doesn't necessarily depend on the subject

# data[].attributes.body
Automation of peer-reviewing process and flow of activities. The  platforms' integration makes it easier for students to attend online classes.

# data[].attributes.body
Save time for the instructors to give feedback for students because they can receive feddback from their peers

# data[].attributes.body
-Can be used in many subjects.
-Great for peer review of writing
-Can be integrated with many LMS
-Can control individual paths for differentiation

# data[].attributes.body
Peer-review is not anonomous. Reluctant to give honest opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
The main functionality is not clear. Is it for peer-review in specific? Or ir is like other LMSs? What makes it different from other LMSs

# data[].attributes.body
might be a problem with pair work, esp. in the cases when not everyone is writing a review

# data[].attributes.body
Increase collaboration among students

# data[].attributes.body
1. Sequential - allows you to better selforganize yourself.
2. Peer review itself - more  direct feedback from the fellow students, not only instructor.
3. Scoring - nice overview of the feedback.
4. Has a place for self-reflection.
5. Everything is written down on one place.
6. Easy to use.

# data[].attributes.body
needs some time to set up/explain everything properly

# data[].attributes.body
Learners can work independently
Accepts Videos