# data[].attributes.body
More $$$$$

# data[].attributes.headline
Bigger study with a million dollars of funding

# data[].attributes.subject
Bigger study with a million dollars of funding

# data[].attributes.body
Reporting more detailed criteria, control group, measure of addition to knowledge base

# data[].attributes.headline
baseline data, kirkpatrick 1 and thematic content

# data[].attributes.subject
baseline data, kirkpatrick 1 and thematic content

# data[].attributes.body
6/18 without previous foam training

# data[].attributes.body
“would also be good to have an example of a poor
resource.”

# data[].attributes.body
“part of the beauty of FOAM is that it can be done
individually and asynchronously.”

# data[].attributes.body
13/18 would be nice to have in addition to journal club

# data[].attributes.body
All attendees
noted their ability to appraise FOAM resources as “confident” or “very confident” following the session.

# data[].attributes.body
No behavior change, knowledge gain proven

# data[].attributes.body
pem fellows, 2 sites, cincinatti and michigan

# data[].attributes.body
focus on evaluation of resource, rather than the clinical question or resource itself

# data[].attributes.body
Blog / podcast tool to assess and discuss

# data[].attributes.body
FOAM as an informal literature review (prone to bias, not systematic). Accessible on shift and easy to digest

# data[].attributes.body
Find a way to critically appraise foammed, journal club approach is an option

# data[].attributes.body
One person's answer may be different from another's. That's ok!

# data[].attributes.body
To get some diversity of opinion and different insights to the question. Remember, we are reading the paper for the first time. This may take a few minutes

# data[].attributes.body
In your small groups, to ultimately come up with a shared final answer that you will document at the top