# data[].attributes.body
While the Spanish, English, and french all came for similar reasons, their methods all varied greatly, from the people chosen to settle the Americas (the English chose middle class farmers, artisans, tradesmen, while the french came as fur traders, merchants, and missionaries, ect)

# data[].attributes.body
English colonies were royal charters, French colonies were trading posts, Spanish colonies were conquered native lands
As well, English colonies were self governed, French colonies were under direct royal control, and Spanish colonies were ruled by royal proxy governments

# data[].attributes.body
On of the ways that the colonies were different was that the English colonies were widely more successful in terms of the total population, which grew to almost 1.5 million by the turn of 1700. the French and Spanish however were very slow in their growth and New France only had 15,000 people in their colony by 1700.

# data[].attributes.body
The colonizers had different goals for pursuing colonies, some did it for religion and others for money. The culture and politics in their colonies varied. The colonists these countries sent to their colonies were different, some sent soldiers, some sent wealthy elites, and some sent lower-class workers and members of persecuted religions. Some colonizers were more successful than others.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the colonizers were more similar than different. They did have some major differences but overall many similarities. They all were based on religion or trading, used slave labor, and didn't have the best relationships with the native americans.

# data[].attributes.body
Each Individual colony had their own ways of going about life. even though they had some similarities the differences out weighed them. These included the religion which was practiced(Christianity or not or different tolerances), the way they dealt with the natives(either made alliances or tried to push them off their own land), and Each colony made their own form of government and ways to control their people.(taxing the citizens and whether or not they had a dictator or group of leaders)

# data[].attributes.body
The colonizers may seem to be similar in the broad scheme of things but they rarely share the same similarities if you look deeper. Yes, they all seeked riches and wealth, but the way they carried out such tasks varied, for example, the Spanish making their way to a wealthy status by conquering other nations, unlike the French who took ad

# data[].attributes.body
Different colonizers each sent different groups of settlers, with different objectives. The French didn't send Protestants or peasant farmers to the Americas, while England had no hesitation to do so. the French settlers established fur trading posts whereas the English established proper settlements with their farmers. The Spanish also had entirely different goals, because when they arrived they believed natives were heathens and so they only sought to kill them, unlike the French who had worked with them to trade fur.

# data[].attributes.body
Spanish colonizers came to conquer and expand their territories. The English came for new opportunities and royal charter commissions, and the French were out for trading and subsidizing their other colonies.
The English interacted with the Natives very minimally and had more diplomatic regulations with them. The French were on good relations with the Natives, and allied with them. While the Spanish assimilated with the Natives.

# data[].attributes.body
English colonies were self government. French colonies were ruled under the King. Spanish colonies were ruled by the servants of the Crown.  Also, the English came to America for freedom of religion. Spanish colonizers came to expand their empire. French came to America for trading.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the colonizers were more similar than different, in that while they certainly did have many underlying differences, overall all of the English, French, and Spanish colonies were founded for either trade or religious reasons, relied on slavery to support their economy, and all had mixed relationships with Native American tribes.

# data[].attributes.body
The colonizers were more different than similar because of their intentions in the Americas. The English had royal charters and focused on expanding their land and economy. The French were under control of their monarchy and wanted to spread their religion and trade. Spanish conquistadors were very focused on spreading their religion to Native Americans and expanding their territory.

# data[].attributes.body
The intentions of colonization were to expand to America and earn wealth. The Spanish clearly had this as their goal as they conquered the Aztecs and gained much gold and silver. England had similar intentions and competed against Spain for their wealth. The French had a strong alliance with natives and traded skins with them. There were also the plantation colonies such as the tobacco and sugar plantations that increased worldwide trade.

# data[].attributes.body
Overall, all three of the colonies were founded for the purpose of trade and land. All of their relations with the natives were also very similar as it led to warfare, such as the Indian War of 1622, the Rise of the Iroquois, and the Pueblo Revolt.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the colonizers different because they were all sent out for various reasons- the English wanted to reform their chruch's; spain seeked to colonize and get tribute from native's; and the french wanted to trade fur

# data[].attributes.body
There were more differences than similarities because each nation had very different results in success in their colonies such as the English with 1.5 million compared to the French's population of 40,000. Different political systems and economic systems allowed for this difference in population.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that though there were a few similarities like the original intentions of the settlers they still were very different. They had so many differences from how they were run, to the people who settled there, to their interactions with the natives.  The best example of the differences is the people who settled theses areas, For the English we see middle class farmers and others who see opportunity for wealth, Spain colonies were settled by missionary's and solders, and France was settled by fur traders and merchants.

# data[].attributes.body
The colonizers were more different than similar because from England they were middle-class farmers, specialists, and criminals were brought over. From the french merchants and missionaries were brought over, and from Spain, were mainly conquistadors and military personnel.

# data[].attributes.body
The colonizers did have similarities, but the number of differences were greater. The English used royal charters to establish colonies while the Spanish conquered. The French and Dutch colonized by using trade systems with economic goals, rather than religious goals.

# data[].attributes.body
Their main reason and goal for the Americas was different. The English wanted to expand their population and borders by focusing on settlement, the French wanted to make economically useful settlements so fewer and focused on fur. While the Spanish wanted to do military conquest and eliminate all other cultures. They did also set up massive plantations and mining operations.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the colonisers were more similar than different because they all had the same drive to colonize in North America. all though they had different main goals they all followed a very similar path with trade religion and relations/ rivalry with the natives

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the colonizers were more different than they were similar in the aspect of their economic and imperial goals. The English looked for new opportunities, Spain wanted wealth and expansion of territory, and the French traded.

# data[].attributes.body
England, France, and Spain all sent over people to colonize the new world and they all came from Europe, Crossed the atlantic, and had some religious motives to do so.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that one of the reasons that relations between Natives and Europeans turned worse over time is because as Europeans started to get a foothold in the area. It became much easier to stage attacks, get border tensions, and to justify going to war.

# data[].attributes.body
Over the years Europeans have been exploiting, slaughtering and taking the land of Natives. With all the wars and burning of villages Natives have had many reasons to not like Europeans. Their relationship was going for the worst ever since they met. Europeans took their land without thinking twice (in most cases).

# data[].attributes.body
The relations between the native populations and the colonists seems to always move to aggression, regardless of the starting condition. English and Spanish relations started and continued to be aggressive for a while. French relations started cooperative but then moved to aggressive late. I would be willing to predict that over time the colonies will stop directly interacting with the native populations and would begin to start trying to find ways to ignore the natives. The change to aggression is likely due to a need to expand the colonies and a perceived right to the native's land, and the predicted move to ignoring the native populations might be due to the human and resource cost of fighting native wars, which were notoriously costly for both sides of these conflicts.

# data[].attributes.body
Native American interactions shifted from support to turning against them. With colonists and conquistadors knowing the generosity of the Natives, they took advantage of the Natives and began expansion into their territory. Once Native treaties had been affected (via crop damage, disease, or expansion), the Natives' opinion turned against the colonists, leading to revolts and armed conflicts, further contributing to disease, damage, and tension. One such example is the Powhatan War, which began over territorial dispute and the rapid expansion of the colonists, any treaty that the Natives had with the English, they refused to abide by and ended up attacking in retaliation.

# data[].attributes.body
The interactions with Natives changed because of their rapid expansion in land through plantations and increased populations. These features of growth caused some of the Natives to become more aggressive than they were before or causing some of the colonizers to become more aggressive as both thought that the other was trespassing on their land.

# data[].attributes.body
Native and colonial relations changed for the worse, with natives initially being thanked by English colonizers for their assistance, that is until they were no longer of use and seemed to be more of an obstacle in expanding. Colonizers would begin using indigenous people in slave labor, taking their land, and slowly dwindling down native populations through disease and wars.

# data[].attributes.body
Interactions with colonizers and Natives were initially rather tense and conflict-prone due to being from different cultures and having differing goals, but as time went on certain tribes forged alliances with settlers, either following conflict or to become allies against a shared enemy, whereas other interactions remained rather tempestuous.

# data[].attributes.body
Interactions with Natives changed as European colonies became more stable and developed. Europeans started to encroach more on Natives and that motivated a lot of conflict. However the mindsets of being superior Europeans used to validate this encroachment and conflict was not new.

# data[].attributes.body
The continuing contact between the Natives and Europeans changed from a somewhat friendly relationship to large scale exploitation and conflict with the Natives due to their primitive technology and differences in religion. The constant of this interaction was that the Europeans would attempt to expand which forced the Natives to fight or lose territory and this is seen in the first major conflict between the Natives and English colonizers; the Powahatan War.

# data[].attributes.body
The colonist relations with Natives had varying changes. Some colonies had poor relations with native people, while others were good. The Spanish had poor relations with Natives because they only saw them as only fit for killing and control. The English were dependent on the Natives and the French as well as the Dutch formed alliances with surrounding native tribes. As colonies progressed, goals changed, that in turn led to conflicts such as greed for farms and land. However, there were continuing relations that remained peaceful and strong.

# data[].attributes.body
Native interactions changed because of the goals of European colonizers. Though the two groups were initially on friendly terms, the Europeans gradually became more focused on boosting their economy and power. This caused them to expand into Native American territory, causing revolts and conflicts, such as the Powhatan Wars. However, some European and Native American relationships stayed the same, such as the French who respected and allied with the Native Americans.

# data[].attributes.body
Interactions with the natives changed over time because the natives started to rebel against the colonists' abusive nature towards them. This is evident in the Pueblo revolt where the Pueblos were somewhat successful in rebelling which ultimately led to the Spanish treating the Natives more leniently. The interactions stayed the same because the colonists still needed to ally with the natives to maintain their position. Trade was still a common interaction.

# data[].attributes.body
As the colonizers came into the Americas the Indians need to change their way of living especially those who had their land taken over and were pushed out. These reactions which the Natives had on the Colonies changed as these colonies erupted and grew larger. Some of the Colonizers realized that after they ere settled they weren't really needed anymore and this changed the types of interaction the too groups had such as wars and or part time treaties. The two groups also believed in different religions and this changed the way the natives looked at the English, Dutch, French, and the Spaniards.

# data[].attributes.body
The interactions with the Natives changed over because the settlement engaged in trade with the Natives and try to convert them to believe in God but the Natives don;t lie it so they start rebel against the settlement.

# data[].attributes.body
Interactions with natives changed overtime because the Europeans were greedy and focused on expanding their land and influence so they treated Natives badly because they felt they were standing in their way. As you can see with the Powhatan wars because they had an alliance at first until the Europeans tried to take advantage of the Natives.
After a while the Europeans started stealing Native land and crops and using them as slaves. One way interactions stayed the same was Europeans always seemed to think of the Natives as less than and tried to convert or take advantage of them.

# data[].attributes.body
As the Colonizers need for land grew, they took more and more land from indigenous people, and as their labor needs grew they enslaved indigenous people. this growth in demand from the Natives turned relations with them sour really quick.

# data[].attributes.body
For the most part, relations and interactions with native populations have changed. While there still is interaction and trade of sorts that goes on between native populations, the roles and relationships have changed dramatically. First of all, the title of Native and the title of settler has been vastly diluted with more relations going on between the two groups. Also conflicts have become far less violent. There are still designated areas that are native land that have been decided on mostly by the settlers.

# data[].attributes.body
The interactions changed with the natives because of there revolts there was still a marked prejudice against them but the colonists became sightly more fearful of the natives. But they still were prejudiced against them and they continued to take more Indian land but in so doing they were more brutal with the natives.

# data[].attributes.body
The easiest way to look at it is in general, if the European people stood to gain something from a good relation with the natives, generally they maintained decent terms, as soon as that use runs out however, the Europeans often times have no issues disregarding human rights for their own benefit.

# data[].attributes.body
The interactions of Natives have greatly changed with little of it remaining the same during the arrival of the Europeans. The European way of life differed from the Native American's way of life, thus leading to conflicts tending to follow with violence. Diseases greatly affected the Natives as many died from diseases passed from the Europeans and in turn the loss of land. Trading did provide material wealth to both sides, giving the Europeans many cash crops while the natives exchanged furs in turn for guns. French relations with the natives were very good, providing each other with their material needs without affecting their environments.

# data[].attributes.body
The relationship between the colonizers and the Natives was very dependent, if the Natives had not offered aid to any of these people they would not have survived in this unknown world, but as soon as the Europeans became self-sustaining and grew more powerful than the natives they began to enforce their will upon them. they began to push them back into smaller territories but still traded with them for valuable goods that the English could not produce on their own.

# data[].attributes.body
The relations between Natives and the early settlers changed as it started out with alliances, support, and even some trade. Throughout time, the settlers began to develop more rapidly, so they were interested in more dominance, land, and trade profits. This led to warfare and tensions with Natives as the settlers began to demand for more of the Natives belongings.

# data[].attributes.body
interactions with the natives changed while trade increased and more colonisers were present creating tention between peoples which led to wars. for example the beaver war, as both the french and natives were looking to expand trade they were both compeating for the same market which lead to a conflict

# data[].attributes.body
These relations between the Native's never seemed to end well. They would always lead to conflict due land invasions and their attempts to impose their religious beliefs on them. What stayed the same was the trade between these native's and alliances because although there were rising tensions the conflict would almost invariably and inevitably lead to the native's under their control.

# data[].attributes.body
Man all 3 of these nation had their similarities but I think they are more similar because what one did usually was seen in the others. They weren't all different due to the colonies having relatively similar goals in colonization.