# data[].attributes.body
Claim: Imperialism is a bad idea because no one wins in the end.
Ethos: He was in Burma AND worked for the Imperial side of it.
Pathos: The description of the elephant that was shot for no good reason, other than saving face.
Logos: How futile it is to believe that a small amount of people count oppress countless. Soon the oppresses become the oppressed.

# data[].attributes.body
Orwell's claim that Imperialism or better yet a tyrannical government brings out the worst in all people involved in the story from Orwell having to shoot the elephant but also the villagers who didn't care about the elephant until it was going to get shoot so they could harvest it's meat for food.

# data[].attributes.body
His claim is that British Imperialism affects both the British, and the people forced under British rule, negatively.
Ethos- He shows that he was there, and that he disagrees with the system that he was on the winning side of
Pathos-  He makes you hate him and the Burmans for showing the elephant dying slowly, and makes his audience see the dehumanization caused by  Imperialism
Logos - He shows the lack of a use for control over these kinds of countries in Britain's current condition at the time.

# data[].attributes.body
Claim: Imperialism is not a good or bad thing but it needs to have been fixed in this time period. He talks about even though he thinks about things in a certain way that his way of thinking is not the right way of thinking. His saying the shooting of the elephant is not a good idea because they use it as a way kind of utility not just an a animal and that it is needed to work and live with the nature that is around them.

# data[].attributes.body
Claim: Imperialism is a form of government that is toxic for all parties involved. Those who are native to the country that is under imperialistic rule are opressed, and the ones that have occupied said country are constantly put under scrutiny.

Ethos: Is it wrong of Orwell to shoot the elephant just because the Burmese want him to? As an officer of the law, shouldn't he be obligated to do the right things.
Pathos: Orwell drags out the death f the elephant in vivid detail. The heart wrenching scene depicts the elephant struggling to stay alive while at the same time refusing to die.
Logos: Logically, in order for the people to be safe, the elephant should be safe. Logically, the elephant should not be shot because its too valuable to its owner to be shot dead.

# data[].attributes.body
Imperialism is not good it is in fact bad and smelly don't do it.

There is a lot of pathos regarding anything related to the elephant, especially towards the end where he went into full detail about how long it took the elephant to actually die.

# data[].attributes.body
Claim: Orwell's claim is that imperialism is bad for everyone involved. In this case, it's bad for him (the oppressor) because to the Burmese, he's one of the ones that stole their country. And the Burmese are forced of their freedoms the once had as an individual country.
Ethos: Orwell thought he had the power (because of his position), but it was the Burmese that influenced his decisions.
Logos: Orwell tries to give reason  to not shooting the elephant. He explains the importance of the elephant alive.
Pathos: How he describes the suffering and eventual death of the elephant and how the Burmese reacted to this act.

# data[].attributes.body
Orwell claims that imperialism leaves nobody untainted. Both the oppressors and those oppressed are changed for the worse.
Ethos - He was an officer, "in control" of a huge group of people, and yet they had more power over him then he had over them
Pathos - Long, painful description of him choosing to kill an elephant rather than seem weak, makes us feel angry, but also understand.
Logos - Describes the politics behind imperialism and shows how little good was a result, as opposed to how much was bad.

# data[].attributes.body
Orwell's claim is that imperialism is evil. That the entire system ruins everyone.
Ethos(ethics/morals)- when the man is run over and killed, no one does anything for him, killing the elephant because he didn't want too be embarrassed
Pathos(emotions)- the description of the elephant dying
logos(Logic)- stupid to shoot the elephant because it is a useful machine

# data[].attributes.body
The claim is that Imperialism causes issues around him. He think that imperialism doesn't work.
Pathos- He shows the emotions and description of the elephant dying. The struggles he has about is. The elephants pain and the dreading out of how long it took. It makes us upset and feel the emotion

# data[].attributes.body
Orwell got mad about Imperialism being a big issue in his area. So he shot an elephant. Ethos is cool ;D

# data[].attributes.body
Orwell's claim is that imperialism dehumanize people, and oppressed the people that live and oppressors themselves

Ethos-he lived all of this
Pathos-All the emotions for the elephant and how this animal life is more valued to him than the people he watch over
Logos-How the elephant is like a machine and they are valuable

# data[].attributes.body
Orwell's claim is that imperialism doesn't work. In the case of Burma, the British imperial rule is oppressing the native Burmese people. This not only oppresses the Indian people that live there but the oppressors themselves.

Ethos- After the Elephant finally dies and the Burmese people are already stripping the elephant to the bone.

Pathos- "But I did not want to shoot the elephant. I watched him beating his bunch of grass against his knees with that preoccupied grandmotherly air that elephants have. It seemed to me that it would have been murder to shoot him.

Logos- When Orwell describes how valuable the elephant is because it is "a machine."

# data[].attributes.body
claim: Imperialism is bad, he grew up in the system and he knows how corrupted it is
ethos: he lived the story, and grew up in the system
pathos: the emotion he used when describing the elephants death
logos: elephant was very valuable, it was referred to as a machine

# data[].attributes.body
1. Imperialism causes dehumanization, brings out the worst in people.
2. Ethos: He lived the story himself and was born into the system.
Logos: When he says an elephant is so valuable like a machine so he doesn't want to shoot it.
Pathos: How he describes the death of the elephant and how it's super sad :(

# data[].attributes.headline
(Abby) Claim: Imperialism is an evil that should cease to exist in the world. It's created dehumanization in both authority and townspeople.

# data[].attributes.subject
(Abby) Claim: Imperialism is an evil that should cease to exist in the world. It's created dehumanization in both authority and townspeople.

# data[].attributes.body
Ethos: His credibility lies in being from the country that both holds claim over Burma, but also lives in Burma.
Pathos: The  brutal killing of the elephant shows the inhumane ways the townspeople treat their neighbor's death as well as  how Orwell feels compelled to kill the elephant.
Logos: He logically shows the negative nature within Burma (that he relates to Imperialism.)

# data[].attributes.body
Orwell's claim is that imperialism is not a good thing.
Pathos; When he talks of everyone hurrying to skin and take the meat of the elephant, because they're starving. It's an appeal to emotion, by the fact that when I hear what is happening, it is such a wrong situation, in many cases, because it wasn't the right thing to do.
Ethos; Where he debates the right and wrong of shooting the elephant. The reasoning behind believing him would because he lived through it and he was there in that moment.
Logos; How it'd be stupid and wrong to shoot the elephant because of how valuable it is, especially to the owner of the elephant. It shows how wrong it truly is, but he still does it because he doesn't want to be embarrassed .

# data[].attributes.body
Logos: Imperialism works to torture both the oppressed and the oppressors, and is therefore futile.
Ethos: Orwell has lived in Britain's imperialistic system his whole life, and is therefore speaks from experience when describing it, making him a credible source.
Pathos: The racial slurs Orwell uses when referring to the Burmese, as well as the highly descriptive language he uses when describing the death of the elephant are both examples of pathos.

# data[].attributes.body
Orwell's claim is that imperialism SUCKS for everyone.
ETHOS N STUFF- he talks about growing up in the imperialistic system that is Burmaaaaaa
PATHOS- DUDE HE MAKES YOU HATE HIM SO STINKIN MUCH, HE KILLED AN ELEPHANT
LOGOS- He pretty much is like, "Hey boi, ya know imperialism is terri-bad for the oppressed and the dudes in powa."

# data[].attributes.body
Imperialism is bad and unhealthy for everyone. Orwell tells a story of his position as a police officer, he and the people he watches over are unhappy. After an elephant goes on a spin, he is requested to take care of said elephant. People soon follow him as he approaches with a gun and he feels pressured and kills the elephant feeling guilty afterwords.
Ethos: His credibility of being in Burma and his position as an officer.
Pathos:
Logos: