# data[].attributes.body
Kahoot is engaging

# data[].attributes.body
Students may be left out if they do not have Internet connection or smart phones.

# data[].attributes.body
One downside is that kahoot and socrative is more for short, quick answers.

# data[].attributes.body
Can parcel out work outside of class. Increase lesson time.

# data[].attributes.body
Lack of connectivity. Students may not have smart phones
Some students still don't have the concept of using ict in their learning - eg to refer to Google classroom on their own initiative

# data[].attributes.headline
Strengths of the ICT tool: Can get the students to be interested in the lesson. Cos the brain is always seeking for novelty.

# data[].attributes.subject
Strengths of the ICT tool: Can get the students to be interested in the lesson. Cos the brain is always seeking for novelty.

# data[].attributes.body
+ unlimited no. of words

# data[].attributes.body
1. Engaging. Competitive.
2. Time constraints. Sometimes students are not focused on the subject contents. Need stable network connectivity.

# data[].attributes.body
Student engagement would be enhanced and can be used in a lower energy environment.

# data[].attributes.body
Need good time management and planning in order to set up the different assignments to cater to the class. Also, a need to monitor students' input and contributions frequently. Students will need to have access to the Internet (and computers, of course) in order to participate. Good platform though cos all students have a GAFE account. Might need to bring them to the computer lab to conduct lesson if we want 100% participation

# data[].attributes.body
The immediacy of the responses for Kahoot and Socrative allows for quick feedback to teachers on students' learning.

# data[].attributes.body
Kahoot is great but the type of content assessment you can have is rather limited... I think it's because it is a MCQ style thing. Difficult to use for evaluative-type work.