# data[].attributes.body
ARGUMENTS:
1. I´M AGREE/ I THINK/ I BELIEVE ...
2.
3.

# data[].attributes.body
1. It depends of the person. For example: in the world a lot of people considerate uglys and  this  same People  wanna have a beuty kid not like them. Even i know the case of a friend that her mom wanted to operate her in a early age.
2.  Another reason  beacause am neutral is because  the benefit  that it comes with is that can erase  mamá of genetic  dispares even the cáncer can dissappear.
3. But this problem is complicated to control haven in count the time i will take and the more problems that it will cause

# data[].attributes.body
I'm in a neutral position.

I think there are enough arguments for both sides.

We can see advances in technology that can not only help us to evolve easily but also help medicine.
But it would make more obvious the differences that humans have, difference's are great but it becomes bad when we take it to in a humiliation thing, it could make things like "your parents didn't want you to become as ugly as them so they designed you" or to a point that there are more designed people to exclude those who were born naturally.

Every aspect of technology is going to end into war campaigns, but these advanced humans can be the difference.

It is already a reality, most of homosexual people who wants to have a family are doing this.

Taking a religious position in this would only cause to be repetitive into a no.

# data[].attributes.body
I'm disagree.
Sometimes the new artificial intelligence supposes to facilitate the life of humans, but according to my position, I think that it does not facilitate but that every day it would make human life more complex, because it is difficult to live in such a superficial world, thinking that we want to get out of that common framework of social and aesthetic stereotypes.
Also, this supposes that this experiment goes wrong and complicates the life of the baby or the mother, which can generate not very pleasant mutations.
There would be an ideological change in terms of wanting to innovate with the design of babies.

# data[].attributes.body
my position is neutral since this procedure could prevent many diseases but it makes me very little human to alter babies genetically.

One of the good things that genetic alteration could bring is to avoid malformations, but even knowing this, I still think that the essence of a natural birth would not be present.

# data[].attributes.body
I think from mi opinion that it's very neccesary explore things like that, because all the evolve and develope that could give us to the humanity, the genetic design is amazing, we could design people to especial works and activites like war, sports, academic, scientist etc, change the genetic to our self benefit, avoid illnesses that can kill us only for our genetic code and the ADN and change de physic of the body to make it more durable, healthy, strong, smart etc, from my self opinion I thin that i'ts very neccesary to do this things without all the reasons that avoid this pracctice

# data[].attributes.body
1. I’m disagree creating babies because the question of ethics is very important, the children created are the product of stereotypes such as blue eyes, tall, blond hair, that would cause people who were conceived by natural reproduction to experience psychological problems and even suffer from bullying.
2. I’m disagree cause biologically failures may occur, at least one of those babies can go out with genetic, deformed problems or anything like that. in the same way that they can be super human, they can be human with physical problems.
3. The social theme is very important, we know what there are very radical people around the world, the creation of perfect babies if it is not used well can trigger the end of the human race, the abolition of human rights, because governments could use these super humans to controle the rest of the people.
4. I’m disagree cause the perfect babies are a double-edged weapon and I'm sure the human being will use it to do evil

# data[].attributes.body
- Diseases like cancer can be cured
- It can improve the facial aesthetics of people
- Maybe people could be smarter

But this could also bring problems, such as people losing their free thinking and becoming like robots without feelings.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the idea of in the future being able to change de gens of an embryo, pretty much because of the main reason behind this, Wich is to eliminate any kind of like diseases or genetic predisposition, any "problem" that could have a negative impact on his life, Wich I think gives the embryos a better chance, first to survive if like the desease or "problem" could make him more vulnerable, second it just give them more posibilities in a lot of aspects on life, like what if the person wants to be a swimmer and have a severe asthma, I mean he or she could still be a swimmer but not in the same way a non asthmatic person could. Of course there's nothing guaranteed but at least it gives them a chance. In the aesthetic aspect it needs to be more careful, is not something I would do but if someone wants to, I don't see the problem with that, everyone can live their life like they want, but that person has to be given the risk of the procedure.

# data[].attributes.body
I'm in a negative position

Because all this is just something purely aesthetic, they will be more machines than human beings, all this reminds me a lot of "Star Wars" where they were genetically altered clones,
Just to be war machines, their sole purpose was war, clearly living beings but no humanity, Perfection will never be achieved, man believes that the more polished it is, the more complete it will be, the more poetically perfect, but the reality is that the key to perfection is Start with the imperfections, the stone to polish our strengths are the imperfections

# data[].attributes.body
I am in a neutral position because we need to investigate new things, we need that to evolve and the development that can give us humanity, genetics, advances in technology that can not only help us evolve, medicine, we could design people to work, for wars, etc.. and finally it can also help us solve diseases with DNA

# data[].attributes.body
I'm in a neutral position 'Cause the designer babys can be good and also bad for the world, and future. The medicine can help to Kids that comes with a malformations, and that can be a progress for the medicine area and science

Also can it be dangerous, because the goverments are so powerful and they can take advantage, and create "perfect people" or "people ready for war" like a soldier.

And sure some rare parents wants a stereotyped child, and that's horrible, you can't change your children just for a beauty standard

# data[].attributes.body
I diesagre since the Child can get mal formación, because it isnt 100% proofed by science, so it is not saec.
People sust jo triste for stethic

People who use these methods tend to be very superficial as they only think about their physique, which can affect the child psychologically, because the upbringing of that child will be very stereotyped, which can damage their way of seeing life as a result of their parents.

If this procedure is performed and the baby dies, it can already be considered an omissium, because it is a high level of gestation where it can be considered a living being.

# data[].attributes.body
Arguments:
1. My position is neutral.
Since the human exist, always have the need to cure ourselves and how to make the life more easier and better.The medicine constantly is searching ways to do the life beautiful and sweet.Now we have the technology to improve our physic and our health. The manage of ADN give us the possibility of be more in this planet, can be give us skills, better health, improve our intelligence. For example if we created all the people with the same intelligence and same athletic skills, will be fear, everyone can be a scientist or a pro player.

2. If we are to exaggerate, at the point to be a autor of science fiction, faced the ADN is dangerous, because we been alterated the normal sequence of our genetic material, and that can be result in the creation of other kind of human a diferent species. In the wors face can be create a cell that cannot be life, and if life maybe have very health problems. Imagine that we create a human that kill ur generation.

3.however, no matter how increíble will be create a other human, other type of life, other type of cells, the social factor will be a porblem, the racism, the exclution, the Injustice with the other spicies, will happen part of a problem that we don't even result, we have the probability of buff the human, but the problem to equal the sociaty.

# data[].attributes.body
I am in a neutral position because the design of babies benefits those who are born with some mischooling, wich by altering, the embryo could be born with all parts of their body, this being a great progress for science and biology.

Its disadvantages are that these people who are genetically altered can be taken by the government as a war machine and someone "perfect" that surpasses everyone.

And finally, it is the criterion of each one when taking it with ethics and moral resiving his son as he is or just wanting to see them esteriotly beautiful.

# data[].attributes.body
My point of view is in a neutral position, because I see various cons and pros that this new innovation brings, and as we can see the technological advances through the years up to now, this project that wants to be carried out in genetic design and being able to change the genes of fetuses. This can cause irreversible failures in the human, new motions.

And the great benefits that can be achieved with this great discovery is the power to transform humans by giving them new immunities, and giving children who may be born with problems the opportunity to be able to change their gene in the future.