# data[].attributes.body
Good: camera foucinho , speaker seems confident and makes good use of his hands

# data[].attributes.body
Ahhh....Typography....use it for good!

# data[].attributes.body
Good:
- Has establishing shot
- An opening credit (but its silly, confusing - guess he's trying to be funny. I checked out and didn't understand it's purpose)
- Controlled camera work
- Approachable
- Clear audio
- The warning was cute.

# data[].attributes.body
The scroll of the disclaimer is too fast so you can't read it. All I saw was "you may die"

# data[].attributes.body
I have no idea what this video is about. Pro=entertaining nonsense
Whassup with the hella long intro
He put on his nice shirt

# data[].attributes.body
Good:
Woodworking shop is a legit environment - lends to credibility
Humor
Campy

Distractors:
Light shine
Humor was also a bit distracting and in poor taste

# data[].attributes.body
Distractor: Graphics - timing, quality and busy-ness; camera angles, content is confusing

# data[].attributes.body
gotta love a yooper
what? text too fast
he's scaring me
what is happening?
too many fonts
Stumpy

# data[].attributes.body
Way to back lit!
Bad background
Bad composition
Audio quality is better, but speaker is verbose
Seems to not follow her own advice - no credibility

# data[].attributes.body
Enhancers: prepared and well-delivered intro
Distractor: Camera angle, shadow on face, background

# data[].attributes.body
Distractors
Background is distracting
lighting is poor.  (backlit)
She is talking about glasses glare, but she still has a major glare on her glasses

# data[].attributes.body
Hotspot on her face

# data[].attributes.body
She is mentioning everything that is wrong with her video right from the start. Camera angle is not right. The flood of light from the window

# data[].attributes.body
lighting bad
what is sneaking out the closet
credibility
unscripted?
loud and clear

# data[].attributes.body
Good composition and lighting. I liked that we were tight on the subject.

# data[].attributes.body
LowerThird-intro --good to have but zipped away too fast

# data[].attributes.body
Both speakers spoke with authority yet personable

# data[].attributes.body
Enhancer: Tight shot on face
Distractor: transitions and distracting hand movements from first speaker; lighting was too low

# data[].attributes.body
Could use a litte B roll

Audio much better than video 1

# data[].attributes.body
- very conversational; natural
- some people found the extreme close-up too distracting
- background is a little boring but not distracting
- framed decently

# data[].attributes.body
Weird transition

# data[].attributes.body
Distracting:
Cropping was an issue for me.
Poor cut transitions
Background was distracting.
Good:
consistency, balance

# data[].attributes.body
Part of their heads is cut

# data[].attributes.body
Changes in focus too abrupt

# data[].attributes.body
passionate about topic
scripted, good framing
distractor: quick transition
Video 3
Lighting, glass reflection, background
camera angle

Video 3
too long intro
scattered content, does not flow
what is the topic?
background too busy

# data[].attributes.body
Much better audio. Very relaxed tone. Everyone seemed very approachable. I like the title and position on the video so that when people go to the school they recognize these people and it makes them more comfortable with the environment

# data[].attributes.body
Enhancers - seemed excited about topic

Distracter - background noise

# data[].attributes.headline
Didn't introduce himself so credibility not established.

# data[].attributes.subject
Didn't introduce himself so credibility not established.

# data[].attributes.body
Enhancer: Had good info if you could get to it.

# data[].attributes.body
Seemed like an expert
Introduced the topic
liked the do not do tips

# data[].attributes.body
hollow sound required too much effort to hear.

# data[].attributes.headline
Lots of distracting items in the environment

# data[].attributes.subject
Lots of distracting items in the environment

# data[].attributes.headline
Kept moving device around but w.o any purpose

# data[].attributes.subject
Kept moving device around but w.o any purpose

# data[].attributes.body
Explained what he was going to do, good eye contact, sharing a person experience

# data[].attributes.body
Video 1
Couldn't see the object.
No script

Video 2
background
quick change of focus

Video 3
Want to know better up front...what the end result
Lighting poor
batman angle

Enhancer
Video 2
scripted, but felt conversational
tight shot
quick transitions

Video 3
Sound loud/clear

# data[].attributes.body
Very wordy. Not great lighting. Reverb in audio

# data[].attributes.body
He didn't tell us what he wanted to talk about.

There was no script, bad lighting and camera positioning, no framing.

With a little direction and coaching, he could produce a welcoming tutorial about this subject. Approachable.

# data[].attributes.body
sound quality poor

# data[].attributes.body
speaking all over the place, sound bad, foreground

Video 2
no b-roll, visually jarring cuts
faces too up close
dim light
too talky

# data[].attributes.body
VIDEO 1:
A lot in the environment
Um

Starts and stops

Eye contact

Not a clean flow

Not close enough to see header enough

Who is his audience?

VIDEO 2:
Cut too close

Voice inflections were good

Eye contact with someone off camera

Planned speaking points

Few filler words

Good cadence

Nice introduction text box

VIDEO 3

Side lighting
Eyeglass glare

Background too casual

Does not come off as expert

Webcam used

Start out with the good situation and then example back to show how could be an issue

High gain on her mic is good but can cause distortion (‘s’ sounds like a whistle)

Credibility from the beginning is very important

VIDEO4

Advertisement
He attempted to have a relevant background but it is real?

Horrible animations

Horrible music

Font on text boxes

Humor is very much a fine line

What was the intro?

What is the point?

Scrolling into too fast

4x3 ratio stuff is old

Strange disclaimer at the top about better videos available in HD

# data[].attributes.body
Distractors:
Poor audio quality
Distracting items on the table

Enhancer:
Had the item he was talking about

# data[].attributes.body
No Script

Video 2
Good Quality
Knew what they were talking about
Good Camera with lower thirds with their names/ titles

Video 3
If you're talking about the glare on your glasses, then make sure your video does have glare on the glasses

# data[].attributes.body
Distractors: Audio, Framing, Lighting
Enhancer: Good information, just hard to get to if you couldn't get past the distractors

Video #2
Distractors: Transitions, Graphics
Enhancers: Good audio, good information

# data[].attributes.body
Enhancer:
Spoke with confidence.

Distractor:
The background noise.
Poor lighting.
Too many objects/focal points on the table.

Video 2
Enhancer:
-On message
-Knew what it was about.
-Charasmatic.
-They seemed to look at camera.

Distractor:
-Lighting.
-Awkward transition.
-Captions not there long enough.
-Framing of shots cut off heads.

# data[].attributes.body
Bad: audio, shifty eyes,

Good: he's doing the video to help

Video 2:

Good: camera angle, audio, naming on screen, transitions are there; passion to subject, good lighting

Bad: jumpy transitions

Video 3:
Bad: converging lines, low angle, lens distortion, bad directional lightning
Good: Audio pretty good, consistent loudness,

Video 4:
Bad: 4:3 ratio, odd talk, busy background

Good: background does add some credibility

# data[].attributes.body
Enhancer: Had the actually piece to look at.

Distracter: Sound in the back and he looked distracted by something to the left of him. Need more video angels

# data[].attributes.body
Bad audio
Distracting foreground elements
2:

# data[].attributes.headline
Reverb on audio, can not see detail on item holding

# data[].attributes.subject
Reverb on audio, can not see detail on item holding

# data[].attributes.headline
Can't really see the device he's demo-ing

# data[].attributes.subject
Can't really see the device he's demo-ing

# data[].attributes.body
Can't see the device- lighting..
Video 2:  Captions too short
Video 3: Well, the glare is there!
Video 4: Ramblin' man!

# data[].attributes.body
Video 1
Enhancer:
had device in his hand to show what he was talking about
Detractors: audio (echo), flow, background cluttery (as was table), shifty eyes

Video 2
Enhancer:
Speakers were natural, flow was good, we'd be happy with these videos!
Detractor: heads are cut off on top, might be a bit dark (but might be projector?)

Video3
Enhancer: speech is clear
Detractor: lips/audio doesn't match, background is distracting, glare from glasses is distracting (if she's making a point, turn it off quickly so we see a difference)

Video 4
Enhancer: Has an entertainment factor, relatable to his audience
Detractor: Long intro, doesn't make his point quickly enough