# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
AMLE - Association for Middle Level Education

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Successful middle schools engage students in all aspects of their learning. There are many strategies for accomplishing this. One such strategy is student-led conferences. As a classroom teacher or administrator, how do you ensure that the information shared in a student-led conference provides a balanced picture of the student's strengths and weaknesses? The answer to this is to balance both summative and formative classroom assessment practices and information gathering about student learning.

Assessment is a huge topic that encompasses everything from statewide accountability tests to district benchmark or interim tests to everyday classroom tests. In order to grapple with what seems to be an over use of testing, educators should frame their view of testing as assessment and that assessment is information. The more information we have about students, the clearer the picture we have about achievement or where gaps may occur.

Defining Formative and Summative Assessments
The terms "formative" and "summative" do not have to be difficult, yet the definitions have become confusing in the past few years. This is especially true for formative assessment. In a balanced assessment system, both summative and formative assessments are an integral part of information gathering. Depend too much on one or the other and the reality of student achievement in your classroom becomes unclear.

Summative Assessments are given periodically to determine at a particular point in time what students know and do not know. Many associate summative assessments only with standardized tests such as state assessments, but they are also used at and are an important part of district and classroom programs. Summative assessment at the district/classroom level is an accountability measure that is generally used as part of the grading process. The list is long, but here are some examples of summative assessments:

State assessments

District benchmark or interim assessments

End-of-unit or chapter tests

End-of-term or semester exams

Scores that are used for accountability for schools (AYP) and students (report card grades).

The key is to think of summative assessment as a means to gauge, at a particular point in time, student learning relative to content standards. Although the information that is gleaned from this type of assessment is important, it can only help in evaluating certain aspects of the learning process. Because they are spread out and occur after instruction every few weeks, months, or once a year, summative assessments are tools to help evaluate the effectiveness of programs, school improvement goals, alignment of curriculum, or student placement in specific programs. Summative assessments happen too far down the learning path to provide information at the classroom level and to make instructional adjustments and interventions during the learning process. It takes formative assessment to accomplish this.

Formative Assessment is part of the instructional process. When incorporated into classroom practice, it provides the information needed to adjust teaching and learning while they are happening. In this sense, formative assessment informs both teachers and students about student understanding at a point when timely adjustments can be made. These adjustments help to ensure students achieve, targeted standards-based learning goals within a set time frame. Although formative assessment strategies appear in a variety of formats, there are some distinct ways to distinguish them from summative assessments.

One distinction is to think of formative assessment as "practice." We do not hold students accountable in "grade book fashion" for skills and concepts they have just been introduced to or are learning. We must allow for practice. Formative assessment helps teachers determine next steps during the learning process as the instruction approaches the summative assessment of student learning. A good analogy for this is the road test that is required to receive a driver's license. What if, before getting your driver's license, you received a grade every time you sat behind the wheel to practice driving? What if your final grade for the driving test was the average of all of the grades you received while practicing? Because of the initial low grades you received during the process of learning to drive, your final grade would not accurately reflect your ability to drive a car. In the beginning of learning to drive, how confident or motivated to learn would you feel? Would any of the grades you received provide you with guidance on what you needed to do next to improve your driving skills? Your final driving test, or summative assessment, would be the accountability measure that establishes whether or not you have the driving skills necessary for a driver's license-not a reflection of all the driving practice that leads to it. The same holds true for classroom instruction, learning, and assessment.

Another distinction that underpins formative assessment is student involvement. If students are not involved in the assessment process, formative assessment is not practiced or implemented to its full effectiveness. Students need to be involved both as assessors of their own learning and as resources to other students. There are numerous strategies teachers can implement to engage students. In fact, research shows that the involvement in and ownership of their work increases students' motivation to learn. This does not mean the absence of teacher involvement. To the contrary, teachers are critical in identifying learning goals, setting clear criteria for success, and designing assessment tasks that provide evidence of student learning.

One of the key components of engaging students in the assessment of their own learning is providing them with descriptive feedback as they learn. In fact, research shows descriptive feedback to be the most significant instructional strategy to move students forward in their learning. Descriptive feedback provides students with an understanding of what they are doing well, links to classroom learning, and gives specific input on how to reach the next step in the learning progression. In other words, descriptive feedback is not a grade, a sticker, or "good job!" A significant body of research indicates that such limited feedback does not lead to improved student learning.

There are many classroom instructional strategies that are part of the repertoire of good teaching. When teachers use sound instructional practice for the purpose of gathering information on student learning, they are applying this information in a formative way. In this sense, formative assessment is pedagogy and clearly cannot be separated from instruction. It is what good teachers do. The distinction lies in what teachers actually do with the information they gather. How is it being used to inform instruction? How is it being shared with and engaging students? It's not teachers just collecting information/data on student learning; it's what they do with the information they collect.

Some of the instructional strategies that can be used formatively include the following:

Criteria and goal setting with students engages them in instruction and the learning process by creating clear expectations. In order to be successful, students need to understand and know the learning target/goal and the criteria for reaching it. Establishing and defining quality work together, asking students to participate in establishing norm behaviors for classroom culture, and determining what should be included in criteria for success are all examples of this strategy. Using student work, classroom tests, or exemplars of what is expected helps students understand where they are, where they need to be, and an effective process for getting there.

Observations go beyond walking around the room to see if students are on task or need clarification. Observations assist teachers in gathering evidence of student learning to inform instructional planning. This evidence can be recorded and used as feedback for students about their learning or as anecdotal data shared with them during conferences.

Questioning strategies should be embedded in lesson/unit planning. Asking better questions allows an opportunity for deeper thinking and provides teachers with significant insight into the degree and depth of understanding. Questions of this nature engage students in classroom dialogue that both uncovers and expands learning. An "exit slip" at the end of a class period to determine students' understanding of the day's lesson or quick checks during instruction such as "thumbs up/down" or "red/green" (stop/go) cards are also examples of questioning strategies that elicit immediate information about student learning. Helping students ask better questions is another aspect of this formative assessment strategy.

Self and peer assessment helps to create a learning community within a classroom. Students who can reflect while engaged in metacognitive thinking are involved in their learning. When students have been involved in criteria and goal setting, self-evaluation is a logical step in the learning process. With peer evaluation, students see each other as resources for understanding and checking for quality work against previously established criteria.

Student record keeping helps students better understand their own learning as evidenced by their classroom work. This process of students keeping ongoing records of their work not only engages students, it also helps them, beyond a "grade," to see where they started and the progress they are making toward the learning goal.

All of these strategies are integral to the formative assessment process, and they have been suggested by models of effective middle school instruction.

Balancing Assessment
As teachers gather information/data about student learning, several categories may be included. In order to better understand student learning, teachers need to consider information about the products (paper or otherwise) students create and tests they take, observational notes, and reflections on the communication that occurs between teacher and student or among students. When a comprehensive assessment program at the classroom level balances formative and summative student learning/achievement information, a clear picture emerges of where a student is relative to learning targets and standards. Students should be able to articulate this shared information about their own learning. When this happens, student-led conferences, a formative assessment strategy, are valid. The more we know about individual students as they engage in the learning process, the better we can adjust instruction to ensure that all students continue to achieve by moving forward in their learning.

References

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003) Assessment for Learning: Putting it into practice. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.

Butler, D.L. & Winnie, P.H. (1995) Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281.

Sadler, D.R. (1998) Formative assessment: revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 77-84.
Catherine Garrison is a professional development specialist at Measured Progress, Dover, New Hampshire. cgarrison@measuredprogress.org Michael Ehringhaus, Ph.D., is director of professional development services at Measured Progress, Dover, New Hampshire. mehringhaus@measuredprogress.org
For more information about Measured Progress, visit www.measuredprogress.org

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Formative and Summative Assessments in the Classroom

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Printable article Successful middle schools engage students in all aspects of their learning. There are many strategies for accomplishing this. One such strategy is student-led conferences. As a classroom teacher or administrator, how do you ensure that the information shared in a student-led conference provides a balanced picture of the student's strengths and weaknesses?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
AMLE - Association for Middle Level Education

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
One of the hallmarks of middle level education is the process of understanding students and responding to their needs. In recent years, researchers have stressed the role of assessment in this process. As expectations for accountability have increased, suggestions for improving assessment have proliferated to the point that many educators feel overwhelmed. To help focus attention on central issues, authors of a recent Association for Middle Level Education (AMLE) research summary reviewed investigations of the uses of assessment in middle level education (Capraro et al., 2011). Their report emphasized the essential role of formative assessment in providing data acquired to assist and manage student learning. They concluded that four aspects of formative assessment were fundamental: (a) questioning, (b) feedback, (c) peer assessment, and (d) self-assessment. This research summary extends the general analysis of assessment to examine ways that successful teachers incorporate formative assessment with feedback in their instructional practices.
Connecting Assessment and Instruction

Tenets of This We Believe addressed:

Varied and ongoing assessments advance learning as well as measure it.

Comprehensive reviews of research on formative assessment have emphasized the fact that it occurs continuously in the flow of instruction (Ruiz-Primo, 2011; Shavelson et al., 2008). Assessments range from spontaneous and informal to comprehensive and formal. "Where a particular formative assessment practice falls on the continuum depends on the amount of planning involved, its formality, the nature and quality of the data sought, and the nature of the feedback given to students by the teacher" (Shavelson et al., 2008, p. 300).

Shepard, Hammerness, Darling-Hammond, and Rust (2005) defined formative assessment as "assessment carried out during the instructional process for the purpose of improving teaching or learning" (p. 275). The key to formative assessment effectiveness is the extent to which teachers can use insights from assessments to guide instruction and provide feedback. Shepard and her colleagues identified the essential elements of the formative process by drawing on three basic questions from Atkin, Black, and Coffey (2001): "(a) where are you trying to go? (b) where are you now? and (c) how can you get there?" (p. 278).

In an extensive review of the literature on formative assessment and learning processes, Black and Wiliam (2009) identified five strategies essential to the integration of assessment with instruction:

1. Clarifying and sharing learning intentions and criteria for success.

2. Engineering effective classroom discussions and other learning tasks that elicit evidence of student understanding.

3. Providing feedback that moves learners forward.

4. Activating students as instructional resources for one another.

5. Activating students as the owners of their own learning. (p. 8)

While successful practices may vary by subject and style, good formative assessment requires a clear sense of what the lesson is trying to accomplish and an accurate interpretation of students' responses to understand what students know at that moment. The other essential requirement is feedback.
Assessing Understanding and Providing Feedback
Shepard and her colleagues (2005) noted, "One of the oldest findings in psychological research (Thorndike, 1931/1968) is that feedback facilitates learning" (p. 287). As evidence of the importance of feedback, they referred to a comprehensive meta-analysis by Kluger and DeNisi (1996) that showed that the average effect size of feedback on achievement as .40 (as cited in Shepard et al., 2005). Successful teachers understand the importance of feedback and use teachable moments in lessons as opportunities to guide learning. As Black and Wiliam (2009) emphasized:

In formulating effective feedback, the teacher has to make decisions on numerous occasions, often with little time for reflective analysis before making a commitment. The two steps involved, the diagnostic in interpreting the student contribution in terms of what it reveals about the student's thinking and motivation, and the prognostic in choosing the optimum response: both involve complex decisions, often to be taken with only a few seconds available. (p. 13)

Shepard and colleagues stressed the importance of creating a supportive climate for learning in which students trust the teacher and each other to provide constructive feedback.

This means that feedback must occur strategically throughout the learning process (not at the end when teaching on that topic is finished); teacher and students must have a shared understanding that the purpose of feedback is to facilitate learning; and it may mean that grading should be suspended during the formative stage. Given that teachers cannot frequently meet one-on-one with each student, classroom practices must allow for students to display their thinking so the teacher will be aware of it, and for students to become increasingly effective critics of their own and each other's work. (p. 288)

Types of Feedback
In their instructional practices, successful teachers create "moments of contingency," in which they can find out what students understand and do not understand about specific concepts (Black & Wiliam, 2009, p. 10). A study by Heritage, Kim, Vendlinski, and Herman (2009) demonstrated how complex the formative process is, even with veteran teachers. Experienced participants in an intensive professional development course on teaching mathematics could readily identify the elements of mathematical problem solving involved and gaps in students understanding. Almost all of the participants struggled to identify options for intervention, however.

Written feedback. The impact of written feedback varies considerably, depending on the instructional context (Bruno & Santos, 2010; Werderich, 2006). To examine specifically the characteristics of written feedback that promoted better learning, Bruno and Santos (2010) analyzed content specific interactions in eighth grade physics and chemistry classes in a Portuguese middle school. Researchers identified three categories of written feedback: corrections, explanations, and complements. Corrections included comments such as ''You wrote that a solid appeared. Is there a formation of a solid in every chemical reaction? Try to give a general definition of chemical reaction'' (p. 114). Feedback asking for explanations included comments such as ''Why do you think water is a good solvent?'' and ''How do we know if the velocity of a chemical reaction is greater or lower?'' (p. 114). An example of feedback asking for complementing the answer is ''Analyze the formulated hypotheses and the experiments done by the other groups and try to identify other factors that have been maintained constant'' (p. 114).

Bruno and Santos (2010) found that written feedback that asked for explanations had the least impact on improving student learning. The timing of the feedback and the consistency of feedback were crucial to students' use of it to improve on their experiments. The researchers concluded, "The success of feedback depends on the teacher's knowledge of the difficulties, skills, and personality of each student regarding a particular situation" (p. 119).

Assessment conversations. Although most teachers use group discussions to learn more about students' understanding, the most successful teachers do so with clearer focus and reflection that is more sophisticated. Ruiz-Primo (2011) studied the nature of assessment conversations extensively in a series of reports. She concluded that successful teachers develop assessment conversations using their knowledge of subject matter and of students. More specifically, successful assessment conversations incorporate two central elements:

Clarifying learning goals. The learning goal or target that is in the teacher's mind has the potential to be included as part of an assessment conversation through the following actions:
-Reminding the students about the learning goal or learning target during the conversation
-Reminding students about the purpose of an activity
-Connecting the discussion (conversation) to the learning goal

Collecting/eliciting information: questioning. The strategies used to collect information that makes students' thinking evident to the teacher are critical in determining the nature of the dialogue. Questioning is a strategy that easily can be used to start and continue an assessment conversation. For assessment conversation purposes, teachers' questions should be:
-Open-ended
-Tapping into diverse types of knowledge. (Ruiz-Primo, 2011)

A report by Ruiz-Primo and Furtak (2006) provided several detailed examples of assessment conversations. In one illustration, the teacher was leading a discussion with students about their interpretations of data related to displaced volume. When a student noted that objects floated better in saltwater, the teacher began a demonstration using beakers and hardboiled eggs. After she asked students to observe and repeat the experiment in different ways, students agreed that eggs float in saltwater and sink in tap water. A student then shares an example of floating in the ocean at a beach and the discussion continues:

Teacher: What does salt have to do with it?

Student: Salt makes it more dense.

Teacher: What does that mean, salt makes it more dense?

Student: Thicker.

Teacher: Thick is kind of, not a science word but, it's a description. Thicker. Let's go back to what Sandy was saying. She said something about, it has more what in it?

Student: Matter. (Ruiz-Primo & Furtak, 2006, p. 224)

As Ruiz-Primo and Furtak noted, this teacher anticipated the example of saltwater, used students' comments to show their thoughts, and provided a prompt that led to a working explanation of density. (Please see the annotated reference for more information).
Conclusion
With so much information on topics related to assessment, middle level educators may use research with successful teachers to identify the most important elements of the process. This research summary draws from comprehensive reports and empirical research to provide a sense of direction. Although this summary synthesizes only a small portion of the research, priorities for practice seem clear. When teachers want to integrate assessments with lessons most effectively, they need to begin by sharpening their answers to the three central questions: Where are you trying to go? Where are you now? How can you get there? With a more detailed developmental progression of concepts, teachers can plan for moments of contingency in their lessons, generating questions they can use to elicit students' understanding more precisely. Stronger content analyses and more focused questions can then frame feedback that is more effective, especially when the classroom climate is supportive.

With these three questions clearly in mind, almost any activity in the classroom can provide an opportunity for informal assessment. The types of assessment conversations that Ruiz-Primo (2011) has chronicled clearly require advanced preparation. Less formal conversations can provide glimpses of students' thoughts and context for feedback when teachers have internalized progressions of concepts and questions to accompany them. Informal written assessments such as short essays or tickets out the door can be prompts for brief conversations. Work samples can provide context for debriefing discussions in which students articulate their ideas and teachers offer feedback. Understanding these key elements may thus provide a working framework for connecting assessment and instruction in teachers' classroom practices.

References

Atkin, J. M., Black, P., & Coffey, J. (2001). Classroom assessment and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5-31.

Bruno, I., & Santos, L. (2010). Written comments as a form of feedback. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 36(3), 111-120.

Capraro, R. M., Roe, M. F., Caskey, M. M., Strahan, D., Bishop, P. A., Weiss, C. C., & Swanson, K. W. (2011). Research summary: Assessment. Retrieved from: http://www.amle.org/Research/ResearchSummaries/Assessment/tabid/2580/Default.aspx

Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., & Herman, J. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 24-31.

Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2011). Informal formative assessment: The role of instructional dialogues in assessing students' learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 15-24.

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2006). Informal formative assessment and scientific inquiry: Exploring teachers' practices and student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(3 & 4), 205-235.

Shavelson, R. J., Young, D. B., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Tomita, M. K., & Yin, Y. (2008). On the Impact of curriculum-embedded formative assessment on learning: Collaboration between curriculum and assessment developers. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 295-314.

Shepard, L., Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., & Rust, F. (2005). Assessment. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford, (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 275-326). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Werderich, D. E. (2006). The teacher's response process in dialogue journals. Reading Horizons, 47(1), 47-74.

Annotated References

Ruiz-Primo, M. A. & Furtak, E. M. (2006). Informal formative assessment and scientific inquiry: Exploring teachers' practices and student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(3 & 4), 205-235.

Researchers reported the results of a case study conducted with four middle school science teachers using assessment conversations. Teachers interpreted students' evolving understanding of concepts related to mass, volume, and density and used these insights to modify instruction. Assessment conversations were structured as four-step cycles: the teacher elicits a question, the student responds, the teacher recognizes the student's response, and then uses the information to guide student learning (ESRU). Part of a larger quasi-experimental study of matched pairs of teachers addressing the same content with differing approaches, researchers videotaped 49 lessons across four connected units to evaluate teachers' use of the ESRU cycle of lesson conversation. Pre/posttests of conceptual understanding and embedded assessments provided measures of achievement. The most sophisticated uses of the ESRU cycle featured metacognitive questions such as "Why do you think so?" as well as questions that elicited comparisons of explanations with feedback about thought processes. Analysis of gain scores across the units showed that students made the highest gains with teachers who enacted assessment conversations more consistently.

Note: This article included specific examples of conversational dialog for readers who want to understand assessment conversations more specifically.

Chin, C., & Teou, L. (2009). Using concept cartoons in formative assessment: Scaffolding students' argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 31(10), 1307-1332.

Created by Keogh and Naylor (1999), concept cartoons are a strategy to help students initiate discussion and debate in which cartoon characters engage in dialogue on specific scientific topics. Visually engaging cartoons can represent the scientific knowledge and common misperceptions of a particular concept. In this study the researchers examined the dialogue and written responses of students to four different concepts cartoons. Students aligned themselves with one of the characters and explained why they did so, either verbally or in writing. The researchers recommend the strategy as a way of scaffolding assessment conversations when the students are justifying their positions verbally. In addition the researchers found that the discussion templates created for this study gave structure and focus to the scientific conversation among students.

Note: This study gives specific examples of concept cartoons, discussion templates, students' drawings, whole-class teacher questioning and other tools used to scaffold the small-group discussions.

Keogh, B., & Naylor, S. (1999). Concept cartoons, teaching and learning in science: An evaluation. International Journal of Science Education, 21(4), 431-446.

Young, V. M., & Kim, D. H. (2010). Using assessments for instructional improvement: A literature review. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 18(19). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/809

Young and Kim reviewed more than 100 empirical studies of teachers' use of assessments that were conducted between 1980 and 2008. Results underscored the complexity of assessment processes. Over time, teachers have had greater access to data sources, and administrators have placed greater emphasis on using data to guide instruction. How well teachers accomplish this goal varies considerably, however. Key factors are individual (teachers' understanding of student learning and subject matter, teachers' capacity for interpreting and using information) as well as contextual (the nature of data systems, access to expertise, time for studying data, the relevancy of the data itself). Evidence suggested that in spite of increasing emphasis on assessment, teachers develop assessment primarily through trial and error. The researchers concluded, "Whether and how data inform instruction depends on teachers' assessment practices, the data that are relevant and useful to them, the data they typically have access to, and their content and pedagogical knowledge" (p. 1).

Recommended Resources

Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center. (n.d.). Formative assessment. Retrieved from http://www.aacompcenter.org/cs/aacc/print/htdocs/aacc/formative_assessment.htm

Dodge, J. (2009). 25 quick formative assessments for a differentiated classroom. New York, NY: Scholastic.

Gregory, G. H., & Chapman, C. (2007). Differentiated instructional strategies: One size doesn't fit all. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2003). Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Authors

David Strahan is the Taft B. Botner Distinguished Professor in the School of Teaching and Learning at Western Carolina University. He is a member of AMLE's Research Advisory Committee and Executive Advisor for the AERA Middle Level Education Research Special Interest Group. His major research interests are responsive instructional practices and teachers' professional growth.

Carrie Rogers is an Assistant Professor in the School of Teaching and Learning at Western Carolina University. Her interests are examining the learning trajectories of teacher candidates and the development of agency and leadership capacity of novice teachers.

Citation

Strahan, D., & Rogers, C. (2012). Research summary: Formative assessment practices in successful middle level classrooms. Retrieved from http://www.amle.org/BrowsebyTopic/Research/Article/
TabId/198/ArtMID/696/ArticleID/108/Formative-Assessment-Practices.aspx

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Formative Assessment Practices in Successful Middle Level Classrooms

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
One of the hallmarks of middle level education is the process of understanding students and responding to their needs. In recent years, researchers have stressed the role of assessment in this process. As expectations for accountability have increased, suggestions for improving assessment have proliferated to the point that many educators feel overwhelmed.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
MindMup 2 - Mind Map in the cloud. Zero-friction, free online mind mapping. The most productive online mind map canvas on the Web. Supports Freemind mindmap import/export.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Fist to Five Formative Assessment - Chelsey Ellison, Forbes Middle School

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
6th grade science teacher Chelsey Ellison discusses the Fist to Five technique and demonstrates its use in her classroom. Reuse permitted under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported license. Editing, remixing, and commercial use are prohibited.