# data[].attributes.headline
I think it's impossible for the human brain to know everything cause as smart as people are their must still have a limit, So no matter how much knowledge we get, it's definitely not comparable to the knowledge we don't know yet, so I absolutely agree with the statement  " i know that i know nothing"  - Feliza

# data[].attributes.subject
I think it's impossible for the human brain to know everything cause as smart as people are their must still have a limit, So no matter how much knowledge we get, it's definitely not comparable to the knowledge we don't know yet, so I absolutely agree with the statement  " i know that i know nothing"  - Feliza

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the Socrates implies that what we know is limited since there are things that we don't know. I don't know if I agree or disagree since it's a little confusing.

For the Descrates' theory I'm still confuse and I'm not sure how it is related but I think the idea of Descrates' theory is not to doubt one self. For example, if I don't doubt myself then I know that I'm right. I think this theory can only be proven by ones thought or opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
I cannot agree, nor do I disagree with both Socrates' and Descartes' statements, because I am confused with the statements to begin with, and I think that it is not sensible for me to give an opinion on something I do not understand.

For the implication of the statements, I think that Socrates and Descartes both think that knowing is being, so by knowing something you are being that thing? (sorry if it doesn't make sense, this is very confusing and I don't have a PhD on Philosophy)

Socrates' statement also happens to be a paradox. By knowing that he knows nothing, he doesn't know that he knows nothing, because he knows nothing, but that is not true since he knows that he knows nothing, thus the paradox.

Descartes' statement is a statement created when he tried to create a statement that could not be doubted. He found out that he could not doubt his own existence, as he was the one doing the doubting, so if he wouldn't have existed he wouldn't have been able to doubt it in the first place. But also by existing, he cannot doubt that he existed.

# data[].attributes.body
I think what socrates means is that the knowledge that human can know/understand is very limited. The ratio of we not knowing was much more bigger than what we know

# data[].attributes.body
"I know that I know nothing". The ratio of our what we know and what we don't know can possibly be an immense difference. No matter how much we learn and understand, it will always be a limited amount due to the idea that what we don't know is infinite. This saying is a demonstration of Socrates' humility and a paradox where the knowledge you currently have is either insignificant or false compared to the knowledge that we have yet to uncover. We are not capable of understanding the true knowledge of everything due to us potentially misunderstanding it; additionally, knowledge itself is ever-changing. Our current knowledge will be constantly rendered irrelevant and insignificant with the introduction of new knowledge and so on.

I don't really understand what Descartes said, but I think he was trying to say that one's existence is justified due to thoughts based on knowledge.

# data[].attributes.body
the Socrates' famous phrase interprets that being ignorant was better or wiser than being wrong, fulfilling the oracle's answer. And this is why Socrates says that he is wise because he knows nothing. It is so true, people who are ignorant are better than people who believe the wrong as right.

while Decrates' theory "I think, therefore I am" is implying that us as human being have knowledge as a supporting base that we exist as human beings

# data[].attributes.body
"i know that i know nothing" i think that this statement refers to the fact that our human brains can only know a handful of knowledge from the infinite amount in this world. The knowledge we know is considered so little or "nothing" in contrast to what we don't know.

# data[].attributes.body
Socrates said then can be understood in different ways. It is possible today to know more about Socrates than he knew himself, because there are more layers of analysis which can be made to his statements and lifestyle, using tools which weren't available then.

# data[].attributes.body
I know nothing as we humans don't know anything that isn't taught or told to us as we aren't omnipotent beings that control the universe.

# data[].attributes.body
The statement "I think therefore i am" solidifies that one knows they exist, one knows they know something. However the first statement seems more limiting, and more pointing towards the fact that nobody actually knows anything, because information could be a deceit and false, for all we know, the one educating us of the knowledge we know today, might not even be a fully credible source (I'm looking at you Ms Dita 🤨)

# data[].attributes.body
for me, both Socrates' And Descartes' statement holds a very fundamental statement on improving our thinking mindsets. "I know that I know nothing" implies that they acknowledged that they know nothing hence, they want to improve their knowledge more and more.

and for Descartes' "I think therefore I am" implies that I cannot doubt about me existing. because as a human being, we already have acknowledged that we exist as human beings and that we are real(??)

# data[].attributes.body
"i know that i know nothing"
i think socrates means that theres so much things we dont know compare to what we know. and yeah i can agree with this sentence because it does makes sense. for example, i dont think that i know anything, most of the things i "know" is mostly taught by other people, and i dont think i know that much information either.

"i think therefore i am?"
im guessing that descrates means that humans knows that they know things for example like the fact that humans know that theyre there.....(i dont know how to explain please help :) )

# data[].attributes.body
On what the socrates said it can be viewed in different perspective such as in the positive and negative way. As Human evolve, we tend to discover new knowledge and things we didn't know before thefore i agree for the first statement. "I think, therefore I am?' theory is like how the socrates implies to human as what we think could be possible without know if it has any evidence

# data[].attributes.body
Not every human being knows everything that exist in this life, life has its own mysteries and sometimes we cannot always solve  these mysteries but yet we urge ourselves to solve it no matter what, I guess it's the feeling of wanting to be fulfilled that doesn't makes us stop.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with both of the statement, the first one  "I know that I know nothing" because we human have limitation, and there still a lot of knowledge and understanding that we don't know, and that human understanding and knowledge is limited. And the one who came up with the new knowledge and understanding it, was human. There also alot of thing we haven't explore in this world

# data[].attributes.body
"I know that I know nothing" i think that refers that we don't know many things, and know only a few things, I think this is confusing.

I don't really know the meaning of "I think therefore I exist"? but in my opinion, it is about the existence of one thing that is certain to exist in this world

# data[].attributes.body
at some point i am in between. I dont agree to the point "we know nothing" the human evolution has allowed us to develop hence allowing us to know more about ourselves and those around us, however i do agree where we dont know all. therefore with the theory of "i think, therefore i am" relates to no doubting the existence of anyone or anything.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with both statements because we as humans basically make up our own knowledges and theories about the world and they are all only seen from out perspective so maybe the true nature of things we might never know. And i agree with Descrates too because to be able to think is the only experience that cannot be replicated or augmented like our other senses, in other words, being able to think is our proof of existing i think the statements do not contrast eachother

# data[].attributes.body
Socrates statement of "I know that I know nothing" implies on how some humans know that the knowledge that they possesses  is miniscule in comparison to the universe. This statement also explain that having humility as humans could lead to more knowledge. This Descartes quote "I think, therefore I am" explains on how we humans never doubt on our existence since we are heer. Both travel on the same wave length of doubts, one have many doubts where one don't. Maybe...

# data[].attributes.body
Because when we were born we weren't registered with all these information in our heads

# data[].attributes.body
The verb 'I know' signifies the fact that he is self aware, and leading on with 'nothing' reinforces this. It shows that he was aware of the fact that he was still learning, in the phrase, 'I know nothing', and the undertones suggest that those who don't accept their wrongdoings and think that they know 'everything', will never learn.

# data[].attributes.body
I think this implies that idiocrisy (yes I made this word) is the path to knowledge and greatness. Because you knowing nothing means you dont know anything so youre just letting your curiosity get the best of you. Meaning you will be eager to learn something. To be honest I want to agree.

This relates to Descrates as being the more smart or aware equivalent. As in you know what you know therefore you own it.