# data[].attributes.body
Ograbme is Embargo just spelt backwards. The authors POV of this cartoon is regarding to a fight of preventing the trade of occurring with the foreign people.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Jefferson was justified and his purchase to Louisiana was accepted because it was for the protection of lands and making the country better but he was still considered a hypocrite even if he did all this.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the case of Marbury and Madison was the change by spreading the power between 3 branches and by providing the government and supreme court more power.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the decentralized government was the government for the owners that were not held in a position so then  they spread it out evenly for everyone. I think the quote Jefferson mentions is that he wants the nation to be united and to come up together.

# data[].attributes.body
It shows that they would bring other candidates down in order for them to look good and look professional.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe Jefferson's action of going against his principles by purchasing the Louisiana territory was justified. Even if it was seen as hypocritical by many to go against his principle, the purchase was too good to be passed and it was for the better of the nation as it would double its geography.

# data[].attributes.body
Ograbme is just embargo spelt backwards. For the political cartoon i believe that the author's pov was against the embargo act and the act in general made them furious.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that his actions for the Louisiana Purchase was justified because although he went against his own principles he did it for the better of the country in mind.

# data[].attributes.body
"Ograbme" refers to embargo but it's spelled backwards. The author's POV of this political cartoon was that they were biased against the Embargo Act ,which caused the restriction of the exported goods.

# data[].attributes.body
"Ograbme" is just embargo backwards, the point of view of the author who made the political cartoon is someone who is against Embargo Act.

# data[].attributes.body
The Ograbme refers to a term embargo but backwards. The authors pov of the author is that people, including himself, is angry of how the Embargo Act works and how it is restricting everybody to trade with foreign people.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe his purchase for Louisiana was justified, he was just hypocritical to go against his principles.

# data[].attributes.body
Ogrambe is the word embargo spelled backwards. During the time of the creation of the political cartoon, the embargo act would be implemented in which the author is against it as it is restricting the nation's ability to export goods, which their economy heavily relied on.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe Ograbme is simply Embargo backwards and the pov of the author of this political cartoon is angry for the Gov's choices for restricting trade

# data[].attributes.body
Ograbme is embargo reversed. The POV the artist maintains is that it was a damaging one, especially to the Americas who are not able to import or export any goods at all, to and from any foreign land, with the turtle representing the embargo itself and stopping America by biting at a merchant.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that that he was justified in the purchase. For one, I think it was pretty peculiar that Congress didn't give him permission to make the purchase, if the people had been wanting to move westward for the longest time so this purchase would have pleased people to no end with the addition of new land. Although it was hypocritical for him to do this, he immensely increased the size of the nation which would allow for a plethora of new opportunities the nation could look forward to. But I do believe in sticking to one's guns and it was fairly shameful and disrespectful of him to do this, even with the outcome.

# data[].attributes.body
No, I think he was not justified, but he did succeed in gaining a mass amount of land, but in a shady and unjustifiable relation.

# data[].attributes.body
Its just Embargo Backwards+ it was biased towards being mad at the government for stopping trade from occuring

# data[].attributes.body
Ograbme is simply embargo spelled backwards, as for the authors point of view it was basically anger at the American Government for restricting trade

# data[].attributes.body
No I don't think it was justified (heavily contradicted his supposed mindset, and morally wasn't justified as there was Indians who had no say in the exchange of their land) but I understand why he did it (an offer that was too good to pass up)

# data[].attributes.body
yes i do think he was justified even though he was being kind of hypocritical he feared the costs of construction of the powers delegated to the national government, i do think it was justified because he had many reasons for it such as expansion, protections and lands Alaizja

# data[].attributes.body
Marbury v. Madison federal judiciary got strong by establishing the power of judicial the federal courts declared legislation Alaizja

# data[].attributes.body
Marbury v. Madison will strengthen the federal judicial by expanding its power of judicial review

# data[].attributes.body
The case of Marbury v Madison expanded the power of the Supreme Court by granting them the ability to review laws, and see if they were unconstitutional, which is know as judicial review.

# data[].attributes.body
The Marbury Vs. Madison case changed the balance of power between the three branches of gov't by giving them the power to void any laws signed by congress and president and saying if it was unconstitutional or constitutional depending on what it was.

# data[].attributes.body
The power was well distributed because the Judicial could now check laws and declare them constitutional, or veto them as saying they are unconstitutional

# data[].attributes.body
In the case between Marbury V Madison, it increased the power of the Supreme Court in which they were granted the ability to review laws created by the Congress and reject it if it is seen as unconstitutional, which came to be known as the Judicial Review.

# data[].attributes.headline
by spreading the power between 3 branches, it gives the government more power

# data[].attributes.subject
by spreading the power between 3 branches, it gives the government more power

# data[].attributes.body
With the Marbury v Madison case, it would significantly change the power structure of the 3 branches. The balance of power is already in a good state but by giving the Judiciary branch a leg above the others would cause chaos and an unbalanced system.

# data[].attributes.body
The Marbury v Madison case would change the balance of power between the 3 branches because this gave the Supreme Court more power. The Supreme Court was now able to look at laws, review them and decide if they were unconstitutional.

# data[].attributes.body
Marbury v Madison case changed the balance of power by giving the Judiciary Branch the permission to check the laws or review them if they are not constitutional or constitutional so that they could reject the said law.

# data[].attributes.body
After the case of Marbury vs. Madison, it gave the Judiciary branch to review any laws passed by Congress to check if they are constitutional or not and are able to nullify the passing of said law, otherwise known as judicial review.

# data[].attributes.body
Before the Supreme Court didn't have much power, this case (Marbury vs Madison) allowed it to make a "Judicial Review" which would be an important tool in deciding the outcomes of cases based on whether the argument was "Constitutional" or not

# data[].attributes.body
decentralized government means to not give all the power to one person and i beleive this “We are all [Democratic-] Republicans, we are all Federalists” was said to basically try and make then think we are all one- Alaizja

# data[].attributes.body
Decentralized government is more of a separation of equal power throughout the government to ensure the government is not in too much power. He does not want the political parties to form division in the country.

# data[].attributes.body
-A decentralized government is a form of system in which the powers of the nation is spread throughout its government.
-He mentioned the quoted sentence in his first speech to not exclude those of different parties as to not further divide the nation.

# data[].attributes.body
Decentralized government refers to a type of government that disperses power over different bodies rather than power amongst individuals. For Jefferson's quote, he's saying that we are still Americans no matter what views other have.

# data[].attributes.body
decentralized government means the spread of power. this is to prevent someone from having too much power. (it creates a fair government). i think Jefferson said it in his speech to show and/or give people the comfort that their "voices are heard" and no one will be left "unseen" because at the end of the day they are all "Americans"

# data[].attributes.body
"Decentralized government" means a government is when a government has equal power between groups. Jefferson said that to remind everyone that no matter your political view, you're the all the same.

# data[].attributes.headline
Decentralized government is when the power is distributed amongst multiple people

# data[].attributes.subject
Decentralized government is when the power is distributed amongst multiple people

# data[].attributes.body
I think it means that the power is distributed rather than given to one person

# data[].attributes.body
The power is essentially spread thin

# data[].attributes.body
Decentralized Government is when a government distributes it's powers evenly to different groups. As for what Jefferson is saying, I believe he wants to point out that everyone no matter what political views they have are the same.

# data[].attributes.body
It means that spreading the power (states) rather than centralizing it (federal). As for his quote, he's saying that even though they might have different political stances, they are still all Americans.

# data[].attributes.body
The government power is not all held in one place but rather spread out.

# data[].attributes.body
Decentralized government is a government which powers are not held in one person or position and so they spread it out evenly. In his quote, Jefferson wants the nation to be united and not be in seperate identities.

# data[].attributes.headline
to decentralize the government they didnt want all the power appointed to one person or thing so they spread it out equally 

# data[].attributes.subject
to decentralize the government they didnt want all the power appointed to one person or thing so they spread it out equally 

# data[].attributes.body
Decentralized government refers to a form of government whose powers is spread between different bodies, which all together, makes up the government and not just a single unit that represents the nation. And by his quote, he wishes to unite the nation under a single identity, as Americans, and not by separating each other based off of how we view politics.

# data[].attributes.body
It shows that they didn’t have respect for each other and they just wanted to win

# data[].attributes.body
they need to make the other candidate look bad in order for them to look good

# data[].attributes.headline
doesnt show maturity and will bring each other down to make themselves look good

# data[].attributes.subject
doesnt show maturity and will bring each other down to make themselves look good

# data[].attributes.body
It reveals their means of winning, going to length that might seem too aggressive.

# data[].attributes.body
it demonstrates their morals and beliefs in a true way, showing how they only put up an act to gain more popularity (votes) if that makes sense....

# data[].attributes.body
The way Jefferson and Adams attack their opponents shows the lack of respect they have and how willing they are to win.

# data[].attributes.body
It shows the need to make one another look bad to make the other seem like the better candidate

# data[].attributes.body
They think that the most important aspect is having more pride and having less negative aspects will win over the other. This shows how the aggressiveness is very direct and tries to heavily pursue the people.

# data[].attributes.body
they chose to say all the negative things that could possibly convince people not to vote them and it shows a lot that they don't have respect for each other and just focusing on winning

# data[].attributes.body
I think it shows that they're willing to bring down their opponent verbally, making them willing to do anything to get the people to see the other in a bad light,

# data[].attributes.body
It shows the lack of respect and dignity that both candidates have and are led by personal interests and empowering their side and views of government, rather than uniting the nation, especially with the state that the nation was in at the time.

# data[].attributes.body
It displays their beliefs but in a more agressive, violent way if that makes sense

# data[].attributes.body
im not sure if im correct but i think  Andrew Jackson was a president

# data[].attributes.headline
An old man who was president long before I was born

# data[].attributes.subject
An old man who was president long before I was born

# data[].attributes.body
I do not know who Andrew Jackson is but I think he was a member of Congress and was an important person.

# data[].attributes.body
I'm not really sure but maybe he was someone who served a big purpose in the government or had a big role.

# data[].attributes.body
Michael Jackson's great great grandpa.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't remember much about him but all I can remember was that he was the seventh president of the United States.

# data[].attributes.body
Michael Jackson's twin brother that nobody knows which is why there are theories of Michael Jackson still living.

# data[].attributes.body
i think Andrew Jackson was a president (not sure)

# data[].attributes.headline
I know he was a statesman thingy kinda guy 

# data[].attributes.subject
I know he was a statesman thingy kinda guy 

# data[].attributes.body
I know I've heard of him but don't know too much so imma just say he was a duck scientist

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Andrew Jackson was one of our Presidents, and I think he is significant to starting the westward expansion.

# data[].attributes.body
He was one of the early presidents, don't know exactly when. I do remember hearing that he was a pretty controversial figure. He is also on the $20 bill I believe.

# data[].attributes.headline
Mercedes.                                     I have no idea but maybe someone who made laws or something 

# data[].attributes.subject
Mercedes.                                     I have no idea but maybe someone who made laws or something 

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew Jackson is one of the president in the United States who made controversial actions during his presidency.

# data[].attributes.body
Maybe a vice-president that handled all the foreign affairs and was in charge of the debt that still exists