# data[].attributes.body
Increase communication (↑)
↓
improve people‘s level of social support
↓
keep in contact with families and close friends & develop new relations
-------------------------------------------------------
However, it benefits more of the upper layer of the society (The rich gets richer)
Online social relations are weaker than offline ones

# data[].attributes.body
The technological change may produce structural unemployment in certain extend，Some scholars deem ta workers may be expelled from a company or a sector, but sooner or later they will be hired by other companies or reabsorbed by a different economic sector.

# data[].attributes.headline
Exploring the possible futures generated by the development of artificial intelligence and arguing the relation between technology and structural unemployment is still controversial under the right social and industrial polices based on the present data at least four different possible development.

# data[].attributes.subject
Exploring the possible futures generated by the development of artificial intelligence and arguing the relation between technology and structural unemployment is still controversial under the right social and industrial polices based on the present data at least four different possible development.

# data[].attributes.body
This research examined the social and psychological impact of the internet.

greater use of the Internet was associated with declines in participants'communication with family members in the household, declines in the size of their social circle, and increases in their depression and loneliness.

# data[].attributes.body
This source was argued the relation with technology and structural unemployment and it was be divided into 4 factors to discuss such as unplanned end of work scenario; planned end of robots scenario; unplanned end of robots scenario, and planned end of work scenario. And this will depend on political awareness, the level of infrastructure, and the degree of democracy.

# data[].attributes.body
I think this source argue that technology can be change people's lives, and also reduce people's employment.

# data[].attributes.headline
However, consistent with a “rich get richer” model, using the Internet predicted better outcomes for extraverts and those with more social support but worse outcomes for introverts and those with less support.

# data[].attributes.subject
However, consistent with a “rich get richer” model, using the Internet predicted better outcomes for extraverts and those with more social support but worse outcomes for introverts and those with less support.

# data[].attributes.headline
We should accept non-work, although this will decrease the human prosperity and significance. But it can be contained by some ways. 

# data[].attributes.subject
We should accept non-work, although this will decrease the human prosperity and significance. But it can be contained by some ways. 

# data[].attributes.headline
First, I argue that there are good reasons to embrace non-work and that these reasons become more compelling in an era of technological unemployment. Second, I argue that the technological advances that make widespread technological unemployment possible could still threaten or undermine human flourishing and meaning, especially if (as is to be expected) they do not remain confined to the economic sphere. And third, I argue that this threat could be contained if we adopt an integrative approach to our relationship with technology. 

# data[].attributes.subject
First, I argue that there are good reasons to embrace non-work and that these reasons become more compelling in an era of technological unemployment. Second, I argue that the technological advances that make widespread technological unemployment possible could still threaten or undermine human flourishing and meaning, especially if (as is to be expected) they do not remain confined to the economic sphere. And third, I argue that this threat could be contained if we adopt an integrative approach to our relationship with technology. 

# data[].attributes.body
Technological advances have made extensive technical unemployment possible, so there is a compelling reason to accept non-work. This may threaten or damage the prosperity and significance of humankind, and in particular may go beyond the economic realm. However, if we take some comprehensive approaches to our relationship with technology, this threat can be contained.

# data[].attributes.body
The problem identified at the end of the last section concerns the human relationship with automating technologies. I argued that if meaning and fulfillment are at least partly determined by how our individual activities join up with the external world, then there is something to worry about if automating technologies takeover most domains of human activity. They could sever the necessary links between what we do and what happens in the world. In making this argument, I was highlighting a potential flaw in our relationship with technology. To a large extent, we still view technology as something external to us: as a tool for shaping and reshaping the world. For most of human history, those technological tools were controlled and manipulated by human hands and minds. So there was a sense in which they empowered our own achievements. But with the growth of automation and AI, this becomes less and less true. The tools have become ever more externalised. It is this externalisation that looks like the major threat to continued meaning and fulfillment.