# data[].attributes.body
Vos examens sont corrigés. Vous pouvez me contacter pour connaître votre moyenne. Je peux également vous envoyer vos copies par retour de mail.
La correction des examens sera posté ci-dessous

# data[].attributes.body
COMPREHENSION ORALE 2

# data[].attributes.body
COMPREHENSION ORALE 1

# data[].attributes.body
COMPREHENSION ORALE 2

# data[].attributes.body
COMPREHENSION ORALE 1

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Correction - TD anglais à réaliser pour le 01:04

# data[].attributes.body
LE 8 AVRIL DE 14h à 16h.
Les sujets vous seront envoyés par l'administration. Chaque TD aura un sujet différent que j'ai préparé.
- COMPREHENSION ECRITE ( with your own words, pas de copié/collé du texte )
- EXPRESSION ECRITE  entre 160 et 200 mots
Il faudra m'envoyer votre copie à 16h sur ma boite mail:
karen.reymond@ac-lyon.fr ou karen.reymond@univ-st-etienne.fr

# data[].attributes.headline
WEEK 11 --> Travail à réaliser - cours du 31/03 à faire pour le 08/04

# data[].attributes.subject
WEEK 11 --> Travail à réaliser - cours du 31/03 à faire pour le 08/04

# data[].attributes.body
1. Lire la correction du TD précédent
2. Lire la fiche méthodologie pour l'écriture d'un essai et la mémoriser
3. Faire le quiz de grammaire. Le but ici est de travailler sur les erreurs grammaticales récurrentes que vous faîtes en expression écrite afin de les éviter pour le partiel de la semaine prochaine.
4. Réaliser la compréhension orale 1 (ne lisez pas le script avant de faire l'activité svp sinon cela n'a aucun sens)
5. Réaliser la compréhension orale 2 (ne lisez pas le script avant de faire l'activité svp sinon cela n'a aucun sens)

Merci de m'envoyer vos compréhensions orales  par mail à l'adresse suivante: karen.reymond@ac-lyon.fr
Merci d'indiquer en objet du message: NOM, Prénom, numéro de TD.

Pour information, je reçois la grande majorité de vos travaux mais certains ne m'ont toujours rien rendu ... c'est plutôt embêtant ... si les personnes concernées pouvaient se manifester rapidement en m'envoyant un mail cela serait parfait!

# data[].attributes.headline
WEEK 10 --> Travail à réaliser - cours du 25/03 à faire pour le 31/03

# data[].attributes.subject
WEEK 10 --> Travail à réaliser - cours du 25/03 à faire pour le 31/03

# data[].attributes.body
0. Lire la correction du TD précédent
1. Prendre connaissance / apprendre le vocabulaire
2. Surligner les crimes dans la liste qui correspondent aux "white -colar crimes"
3. Compléter le tableau: Regrouper le verbe avec nom correspondant (A-F)
4. Compléter le texte avec le bon verbe en employant la forme passive (voir document annexe sur la voie passive)
5. Expression Ecrite TYPE EXAMEN (entre 160 et 200 mots)! Attention à bien structurer votre écrit (paragraphe, mots de liaison, et à faire attention aux erreurs courantes).
6. Compréhension Ecrite TYPE EXAMEN -> répondre aux 5 questions ATTENTION Répondez en reformulant le texte, aucune paraphrase ne sera acceptée!

Merci de m'envoyer votre compréhension écrite et votre expression écrite  par mail à l'adresse suivante: karen.reymond@ac-lyon.fr
Merci d'indiquer en objet du message: NOM, Prénom, numéro de TD --> beaucoup ne l'ont pas fait pour le travail de la semaine dernière

# data[].attributes.headline
THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT AND EXTRADITION .DOC

# data[].attributes.subject
THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT AND EXTRADITION .DOC

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT AND EXTRADITION

# data[].attributes.headline
THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT AND EXTRADITION .PDF

# data[].attributes.subject
THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT AND EXTRADITION .PDF

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT AND EXTRADITION

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Host Scott Simon talks with Jeffrey Beard, secretary of the California Department of Corrections, about high incarceration rates and the social effects they have on communities. Beard is a member of a National Academy of Science committee studying the high rates of incarceration in the United States.

SCOTT SIMON, HOST:

This is WEEKEND EDITION from NPR News, I'm Scott Simon. Jeffrey Beard has watched America's prisons grow larger and larger every year adding prisoner after prisoner. He began working in the Pennsylvania Corrections system in the early 1970s when there were about 8,000 prisoners. He was secretary of corrections by the time he left in 2010 and by that time Pennsylvania had more than 50,000 people in its prisons.

It's a trend that's matched all around the country. Jeffrey Beard is now secretary of corrections and rehabilitation in the state of California. A couple of years ago, that state's prison system had grown so perilously overcrowded the Supreme Court ruled it was cruel and unusual punishment and ordered the state to reduce its prison population by more than 30,000.

That job now falls to Jeffrey Beard. Secretary Beard joins us from Sacramento. Thanks so much for being with us.

JEFFREY BEARD: Sure thing, Scott. I'm happy to be here today.

SIMON: And why is - as a generalization - why has the prison population grown to large?

BEARD: I think it, back in the 1970s, there was a number of things going on. We began our war on drugs, starting locking up people who used drugs and sold drugs for longer and longer periods of time. At the same time, the public was very concerned about violent criminals, and sentences got longer for those violent criminals. And so today, the prison populations around the country have been driven largely by the fact that we have locked up more and more less serious offenders and we have locked up offenders for longer periods of time.

SIMON: What are the consequences of having so many people locked up? I mean, certainly for the people who are inside the prisons, certainly for their families, but also the communities from which they come.

BEARD: Well, there's many consequences. First of all, you're taking people out of the communities, you're sending them away into the prisons for many, many years. They get lost from their families and then when they're released and come back into the community, they have a very difficult time getting jobs, they have a difficult time finding a place to live. They have the stigma of incarceration that's hanging over them and it just becomes very, very difficult for them to reconnect to the communities.

SIMON: Secretary Beard, I've heard a number of commissions who have studied the matter say that there's a need in the United States for what are sometimes called creative sentencing arrangements or alternatives to incarceration. How do you see it?

BEARD: What you have to do is look at who's going to the prison system in the first place, and about 70 percent of the people who go into prisons have a substance abuse problem. So instead of sending those people with substance abuse problems into the prison system, if we instead did a better job of providing substance abuse treatment to them in the communities, fewer of them would end up interfacing with the criminal justice system in the first place.

About 20 percent of the inmates who we get into the prison system have a mental health problem. Again, if we did a better job dealing with the mentally ill in the community, we could reduce the number of them who then interface with the criminal justice system. Many of the inmates who come into the prison system have low educational level, they have no job skills. And so if we did a better job in our high schools, increased our graduation rates, all of those things could help reduce the number of people who end up going into our prison system.

SIMON: Secretary Beard, with respect, I think, as I don't have to tell you, there are also people who say, look, I'm sorry for the fact that this man or woman who committed a crime had such poor prospects in life and has such a low education, but if they did something wrong, there's a crime that they have to pay for.

BEARD: Well, yes. At the point that they commit the crime, I agree with you, they have to pay for that crime. If it's a less serious crime, however, they don't necessarily have to go into the prison system. And if you decide you want to put them in the prison system, that's fine. But what's going to happen is they're going to be more likely to go out and commit new crimes again in the future.

So, I mean, that is one way to handle it. That's what we've been doing in this country now for years. And what we see is our prison population's exploding and people sitting in jails for longer and longer periods of time. And it has cost an awful lot of money. You know, it's a matter, do you want to keep spending billions and billions and billions of dollars locking up people in an unproductive fashion, or do you want to try to deal with the root causes that brought people to prison in the first place. And do you want to also try to deal with some of these less serious offenders in a different way and perhaps save yourself an awful lot of money and reduce the amount of crime that's occurring in our communities as it is?

SIMON: Jeffrey Beard is California's secretary of corrections and rehabilitation. He joins us from Sacramento. Secretary Beard, thanks for being with us.

BEARD: Thank you.

Copyright © 2013 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio record.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Dealing With 'Root Causes' To Tackle Incarceration Rates

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Host Scott Simon talks with Jeffrey Beard, secretary of the California Department of Corrections, about high incarceration rates and the social effects they have on communities. Beard is a member of a National Academy of Science committee studying the high rates of incarceration in the United States.

# data[].attributes.headline
Travail à réaliser - cours du 18/03 à faire pour le 24/03

# data[].attributes.subject
Travail à réaliser - cours du 18/03 à faire pour le 24/03

# data[].attributes.body
1. Lire la fiche intitulée "VOCABULARY QUIZ"
2. Lire la feuille de cours intitulée "THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT AND EXTRADITION"
3. Faire la compréhension écrite 'THE JULIAN ASSANGE CASE" : lire les deux textes + faire les 4 activités
Merci de m'envoyer vos travaux par mail à l'adresse suivante: karen.reymond@ac-lyon.fr
Merci d'indiquer en objet du message: NOM, Prénom, numéro de TD

# data[].attributes.body
Bonjour à toutes et à tous

Dans le cadre de la continuité pédagogique prévue par l'UJM, nous allons poursuivre notre travail cependant ce dernier s'effectuera à distance pour le moment.

Il nous a été demandé de poster nos travaux sur Claroline. Pour ma part, cela apparait dans mes espaces d'activité /  DROIT L2 / puis Karen Reymond. Je vais doubler la publication des documents de travail sur Claroline et notre Padlet habituel (en bas du padlet). Les documents seront postés en .PDF et .DOC pour que tout le monde puisse y accéder.

Par ailleurs, je vous conseille de profiter de ce temps d'"éloignement social" pour prendre du temps (dont vous manquez certainement d'ordinaire) pour vous exposer à l'anglais au quotidien : lire, visionner, écouter (podcasts, séries, films, etc)... c'est comme cela que l'on progresse !

N'hésitez pas à me contacter si vous avez des questions ou rencontrez des difficultés particulières.

Bon courage à toutes et à tous, and take care,

Bien à vous,

Karen Reymond

# data[].attributes.body
Expression orale --> mock trial

# data[].attributes.body
Expression orale --> mock trial
Exercices de vocabulaire p44 / p45
Compréhension Orale --> Dealing with Root Causes to tackle incarceration rates p46

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The 13th Official Trailer #1 [HD] Netflix, Ava DuVernay

# data[].attributes.body
http://reason.com/reasontv/2010/08/26/professor-mark-kleiman-on-too

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Filling Up Prisons Without Fighting Crime: Mark Kleiman on America's Criminal Justice System

# data[].attributes.body
Correction du superlatif / comparatif
Compréhension Orale --> type examen --> Mark Kleiman about the american justice system
Trailer --> 13th
Lecture du doc p 43 + Discussion --> work in small groups and discuss

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Have you ever wondered how judges and magistrates decide the sentences they pass? Try our new interactive guide to sentencing.

# data[].attributes.body
Consignes + Grille d'évaluation

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The 13th Official Trailer #1 [HD] Netflix, Ava DuVernay

# data[].attributes.body
INFO - EXAMEN EOI
START US PRISONS

# data[].attributes.body
Compréhension orale

# data[].attributes.body
Correction des exercices sur la voix passive
Lecture de la suite du dossier
Compréhension orale

# data[].attributes.body
Correction B. Answer the following questions
Correction C. Make as many sentences as you can about the text using the following phrases: while/whereas/contrary to/...

# data[].attributes.headline
CE - The Law Explored: Could Robots Replace Lawyers?

# data[].attributes.subject
CE - The Law Explored: Could Robots Replace Lawyers?

# data[].attributes.body
Gary Slapper1 Explores the Complexities of English Law in Plain Language

From Times Online, August 8, 2007

[A]n international robot conference in the US [...] got me thinking: what, if anything, in [...] law can be done by robots? Could machines do the work of lawyers and judges? [...] in truth, while computers can help greatly they can’t do the legal work itself. [...]

As with many scientific and technological changes, what starts as a flight of imagination gets progressively closer to reality. In 2006, a Chinese criminal court began using computers to determine the length of custodial sentences for people convicted of offences. The [...] Court uses software which covers about 100 different types of crime [...]. After a conviction, the judge keys in details of the case using formatted answer boxes, clicks Enter, and the computer automatically calculates the appropriate sentence.

The software’s developer [...] has said it is designed to ensure standardised decisions on prison terms. One common idea of fairness (achieved by this system) is that convicted people should be sentenced without reference to any of their personal or social characteristics [...]. These would be evident to a human judge [...] but a computer is not prejudiced in that way. At least not unless its software has been slanted with any bigotry.

There are, though, some aspects of judges’ work that it is difficult to imagine being done by a computer in a way that is desirably different from the way a real judge would operate. In the appeal courts, which clarify and declare what the law is, appeal judges often have to weigh up points of legal and social policy that can’t be scientifically calculated by a computer. For example, a computer can’t adequately calculate in what circumstances the law should stifle freedom of expression in order to protect those who might be offended by criticism.

Admittedly, some computer software like that used by economists or in computer games about simulated cities is quite sophisticated. It could be adapted to help appeal courts resolve law. But even if law can be calculated by a computer, when the judge presses Enter the resultant judgment can be nothing more than the implementation of policies that are written into the software.

Should employers be liable if their employees suffer nervous breakdown through overwork of which managers were aware? Is serious injury caused in consensual adult sadomasochistic sex criminal? Questions like these, which have been resolved by appeal courts (they ruled yes in both those cases) can’t be calculated by a machine without it being given an immense range of highly subtle thoughts. And it isn’t clear that an electronic circuit-board decision in such cases would be better than a blood-fed brain one.

In one sense, law is a science. It is a complex body of knowledge and technique taught and practised systematically. Law is made, interpreted, applied and repealed according to precisely set procedures. [...] But, despite all that, there’s a lot of social policy in judgments, and allowing computers to make some sorts of decision doesn’t really take the policy element out of law, it just displaces it into the hands of the legal software designers. [...]

Professor Gary Slapper is Director at the Centre for Law at the Open university.

A. Say whether the following statements are true or false and justify by quoting the text.

1- Law courts using computers belong to fiction. FALSE
As with many scientific and technological changes, what starts as a flight of imagination gets progressively closer to reality.

2- Computers are used in Chinese law courts. TRUE
In 2006, a Chinese criminal court began using computers to determine the length of custodial sentences for people convicted of offences.

3- Computers are used only in a few cases. FALSE
The [...] Court uses software which covers about 100 different types of crime

4- Computers are used so as to define the length of sentences. TRUE
"Chinese criminal court began using computers to determine the length of custodial sentences for people convicted of offences" & "clicks Enter, and the computer automatically calculates the appropriate sentence."

5- Such a system is aimed at more objectivity. TRUE
The software’s developer [...] has said it is designed to ensure standardised decisions on prison terms

6- Such a system is totally unbiased. FALSE
There are, though, some aspects of judges’ work that it is difficult to imagine being done by a computer

7- There are no humans involved. FALSE
appeal judges often have to weigh up points of legal and social policy that can’t be scientifically calculated by a computer.

8- Computers can’t do all the judges’ work. TRUE
appeal judges often have to weigh up points of legal and social policy that can’t be scientifically calculated by a computer.

9- Computers in a law court are not 100 % reliable. TRUE
And it isn’t clear that an electronic circuit-board decision in such cases would be better than a blood-fed brain one.

B. Answer the following questions.

1- What are the nature and origin of the document?

2- Could machines do the work of lawyers and judges? What is the journalist’s answer to this question?

3- What are the pros and cons of each solution according to the journalist?

4- Why do you think the Chinese have begun using computers in law courts?

5- Do you share the journalist’s views? Why or why not?

C. Make as many sentences as you can about the text using the following phrases:

while / whereas; contrary to / unlike; though / although / even though; however / yet / still / nevertheless; despite / in spite of