# data[].attributes.body
Dr. Hardaker delves deep into a forensic linguist's stylistic analysis of emails provided by Paul Ceglia and Mark Zuckerberg in a lawsuit by Ceglia for half of Facebook in 2010. Suddenly, Zuckerberg's immense fame and wealth is put at jeopardy, and Ceglia could now be propelled into the seemingly unreachable world of prosperity and power.
What will happen to the one of the world's most renowned young prodigy?

# data[].attributes.body
In 2004, Zuckerberg launched Facebook, but Ceglia is not listed as a credited creator.

# data[].attributes.body
Ceglia presents to the trial with the contract between him and Zuckerberg, as well as 11 emails that were supposedly sent between the two of them that would prove Ceglia's accusation correct. Zuckerberg presented with 35 emails known to be written by him. As this is a linguistic perspective on the trial, we will be discussing solely the emails.

# data[].attributes.body
Stylistics is a subdiscipline in Linguistics in which the style that people write are studied and deduced - simply put, it studies the variation in language via analysis of the styles particular to a person. In essence, it studies a person's idiolect, the speech particular of an individual.
So how was this relevant to the Zuckerberg v. Ceglia case?

# data[].attributes.body
Differences:
- While Zuckerberg uses proper apostrophes in contractions/possessives, there were 4 times in Ceglia's provided emails where this didn't occur.
- Zuckerberg writes the ellipsis without spaces between the dots, as well as between the dot and the word prior; one found in Ceglia's emails contains spaces between the dots.
- Zuckerberg will write things like "backend," "frontend," and "cannot" as one singular word, but it's observed that in the questioned emails that "backend" and "cannot" are split into two.
- The word "Internet" is capitalized by Zuckerberg, but in its one occurrence in Ceglia's emails, it is in lower-case.
- Zuckerberg does not use run-ons, but these occur at least 9 times in the questionable emails.
- To open sentences, Zuckerberg frequently uses Okay, And, Anyhow, Also, But, Then, and However while the disputed emails used Further, Additionally, Thus, Again, First, Mostly, and Paul.
- After an if-clause, Zuckerberg uses commas, which are observed 13/15 times in his known emails but do not occur at all in the 3 times they potentially could in Ceglia's emails.
Similarities:
- Both sets have an occurrence of ending the email with Thanks!
- One of Ceglia's emails begin with "Sorry," and 4 of those written by Zuckerberg do as well.

# data[].attributes.headline
Obstacles to the Stylistic Analysis of the emails

# data[].attributes.subject
Obstacles to the Stylistic Analysis of the emails

# data[].attributes.body
1. Software that autocorrects
2. Opportunity for a characteristic style to occur - We have to understand how often a feature could have occurred vs. if it actually did.
3. There are ellipses ( ". . .") in Ceglia's emails, indicating that a part of the email has been cut out.

# data[].attributes.body
The court ruled in favor of Zuckerberg, as McMenamin's analysis concluded that there was significant differences between the disputed and known-Zuckerberg emails, with the 2 very minimal similarities not interfering with his conclusion.

# data[].attributes.body
In the grand scheme, such a case represents just how significant idiolects are to a person's character - they can quite literally make or break one's future.