# data[].attributes.body
Copy and paste the following in a new post and fill in the blanks.

Scholars ____________, __________________, and ____________ seem to be having a conversation about _______________.
I think this because I identified ____, _____, _________ repeating/occuring as a pattern in these texts.
I think they are talking about this because____________________.
I find this interesting because ___________________________.

# data[].attributes.body
Copy and paste the following into a COMMENT for each of your peers.

Yes, these scholars seem to be talking about _____________. They might also, however, be talking about ___________, ____________, ____________ and so it might be even more productive to explore the conversation in terms of ____________________.

# data[].attributes.body
Scholars, Carillo, Parrott, and Edward and Paz seem to be having a conversion about debunking literacy myths with solutions and ideas. I think this because I identify that writing and reading help develop literacy skills, literacy takes time to learn, and creativity makes a good writer, repeating/occurring as a pattern in these texts. I think they are talking about this because college students don’t see the point in literacy besides passing a course. I find this interesting because I have never doubted my reading and writing abilities until now.

# data[].attributes.body
Scholars Yancey, Carillo, and Miller/Schulz seem to be having a conversation about how teachers/professors need to improve their methods or change their strategies in order help teach students better and help them mentally by providing their own solutions or ideas to show how their own methods/strategies are better and effective than the school/colleges. I think this because I identified claims about schools needing to improve their methods as students are feeling frustrated, how the scholars' own strategies/methods need to be implemented into the academic system, and how their methods/strategies are more effective in teaching students which I see repeating/occurring as a pattern in these texts. I think they are talking about this because students are struggling to keep up and understand the literacies the schools/colleges provide which leaves them to be frustrated and disinterested in reading and writing which is threatening the education system causing less writers in the world. I find this interesting because I never knew that other writers or experts in writing wants a change to the schools methods in teaching literacies and how they think that the schools/colleges are affecting the students in negative way which is causing students to become stressed and overwhelmed.

# data[].attributes.body
Scholars Bunns, Parrot, Edward, and Paz seem to be having a conversation about student potential. I think this is because I identified taking time, practicing, and not thinking they'll be good first try occurring as a pattern in these texts. I think they are talking about this because they want students writers to know that they won't be good the first time they write and that they should take their time and shouldn't get frustrated when their writing isn't perfect. I find this interesting because many students want their writing to be perfect and its something that takes time for you to complete and it can't be something you're good off the bat. This also interest me because I never really heard of genius writers who think their writing is perfect.

# data[].attributes.body
Scholars Miller and Schulz, Carrillo, and Brockman seem to be having a conversation about how to improve literacy in the academic system by implementing certain strategies and methods teachers can use to help students. I think this because I identified multiple claims in the article stating strategies on how to improve literacy, new methods of teaching, and how schools should do a better job of incorporating these claims repeating as a pattern in these texts.

I think they are talking about this because Carillo talks about how reading and writing should be taught at the same time, how Brockman thinks universities shouldn't disregard techniques deemed high school strategies and how Miller and Schulz believe schools should implement a multitude of literacies, specifically the 4. All of these claims relate specifically to implementing strategies and methods that can be taught in the school system. I find this interesting because they are trying to argue with the school system's ways of teaching and incorporating literacies. I also think it's interesting that the authors believe that there are certain ways to improve literacy by using certain methods or strategies because the school system has been around for a long time and one would think that they would have perfected this by now.

# data[].attributes.body
Scholars Bunn, Carillo and Miller/Shultz seem to be having a conversation about the importance of literacy.
I think this because I identified asking questions while reading, teaching reading and writing synchronously , and finding new ways to teach repeating/occurring as a pattern in these texts.
I think they are talking about this because they want to be able to have better prepared college students.
I find this interesting because its a completely new topic I haven't heard of before and it's rarely talked about.

# data[].attributes.body
Scholars Yancey, Miller & Schultz, and Carrillo seem to be talking about the concept of reading and writing and how the curriculum can be improved by focusing on reading and writing practices adopted by students and teachers. I know this because I saw ideas about how students should prepare to interact with the real world, learn about issues and ideas in society by reading, writing, and engaging through different media in order to effectively interact with the contemporary world as a pattern in these texts. I also saw that the authors talked about how preparing for college is not only knowing how to read and write but also knowing how to do it effectively for a specific audience, genre, and purpose. I noticed these ideas repeating in sources like “Writing in the 21st Century” (Yancey 2009), “University Literacy: A Multiliteracies Model” (Miller & Schutz 2014), and in “Reading and Writing Are Not Connected” (Carrillo 2017).

I think they are talking about this because they want to improve the reading and writing curriculum by teaching to praise the process of writing instead of the results because this can encourage students to take risks and think critically to better prepare for college literacies. I think they want teachers to pay more attention to how they teach to read and write, but also the purpose for which this is done.
I find this interesting because I agree with many of the things the scholars stated. I can clearly make connections between their points and my own experiences. Reading about this has helped me understand how to read and write effectively by analyzing my past and current habits.

# data[].attributes.body
Scholars Edward & Paz, Murray, and Parrot seem to be having a conversation about breaking free from certain stereotypes. I think this is because we have identified the wrong doing of saying that only some people are geniuses making it damaging for everyone else. This makes everyone else follow in the "geniuses" shadows, while going through fear of not being worthy enough to become a great writer. I think they are talking about this because everyone writes yet not only do writers feel as if they need to be known as geniuses, younger students such as high schoolers feel the need to sound smart within their writing in order to impress the teacher. I find this interesting because not many people have came to understand this. To some people it is always about being know as the best or in this case a "genius". This is because it is what is being expected from them and they see it in society to be known as a genius.

# data[].attributes.body
Scholars Edward and Paz, Murray, and Parrott seem to be having a conversation about breaking the stereotype that good writers were born that way. I think this because I identified that they all have the idea that anybody can become a good writer with enough time and practice repeating as a pattern in these texts. I think they are talking about this because some writers may have the mentality that writers were born good and may feel discouraged, however that is not the case, and these 3 argue that you writing skills can always be improved by practicing. I find this interesting because despite how obvious this is, a lot of people keep this mentality and don't understand how to practice their skills. These people try to find the "right" way to read and write, however you must practice the way you best intake information.

# data[].attributes.body
Scholars Miller/Shultz, Bunn, and Carillo seem to be having a conversation about the relationship of reading and writing but more specifically the way that they are learned and how their affect in people's futures. I think this because I identified the need of diversity in literacy, reflection on the way one has interpreted literacy, and the lack of challenge occurring as a pattern in these texts. I think they are talking about this because it's something that is so common because if students experience those things they'll follow in the same pattern. All of these writers talk about the way that while a person develops, if they aren't challenged or taught a certain way they'll have trouble with literacy. They need to have diverse and challenging literacy in their lives so when they get to college they can have an easier time with both reading and writing. But also having critical thinking skills and interpreting what they're reading. I find this interesting because what they talk about in each of their texts explains what happens but we don't really understand it. We just convince ourselves that we're bad at writing because of our skill set. In reality it was due to the way we learned literacy and the lack of challenge in our development.

# data[].attributes.body
Scholars Bun, Miller, Carrillo, and Yancey seem to be having a conversation about how writing can be made better by methods introduced by the authors which push for a way to improve college students ability to write. I think this because in the articles I've examined, each one speaks volume about how college students are limited in their ability to write, how to write, and what to write as a repeating pattern in these texts. I think they are talking about this because it highlights the value of quality writing that is a result of the students hard work and that they are able to write whatever they wish without any restrictions. I find this interesting because in my own personal experience, I've had to deal with this throughout my middle and high school years.

# data[].attributes.body
Scholars Bunn, Carillo, and Miller & Shulz seem to be having a conversation about the difference between secondary education writing methods and college writing. I think this because I identified in all three readings how crucial reading like a writer, economic gaps, and the communication skills is in the world of writing. I think they are talking about this because all sources focus on the importance of writing, specifically the preparation of writing. Preparation of writing is crucial for college professors, and these three sources emphasize this idea. Various sources explain how high school teachers need to do better when it comes to the amount of boundaries and rules they place among high school students. Which is something they have to get unfamiliar with in college. I find this interesting because it connects with the idea that high school and college writing education is very different, considering in high school teachers do not value the pre-writing process as they do in college.

# data[].attributes.body
Scholars Bunn , Carillo and Miller/ Shultz seem to be having a conversation about the importance of reading and writing in literacy I think this because many of the same patterns arrive like teaching reading and writing and how reading and writing has impacted many different students. I think they are talking about this because they want us to know more ways to write and have us prepared in college when we begin to write essays with the assignments that will be given. I find this interesting because I have not explored and learned most of the information that was explained through these articles.

# data[].attributes.body
Scholars Parrot, Edwards, Paz, and Murray seem conversing about the writing process. I think this because I identified "Genius Authors""Good Students," and "Origina-ry authors"  repeating throughout these texts and they are all used to prove these ideals wrong about writers and the process of writing. And this is because they all mention some form of the writing process which contradicts the idea that writers are born perfect and write whenever they want. I find this interesting because many people ignore how difficult it can be to register and the process it takes to write.