# data[].attributes.body
Interviewer: Weng Sum

Interviewee: Sam

Feedback:

1. like the opening - where he says the mentions that the details are confidential and I can leave anytime

2. the questions are well thought out

3. able to followup well

# data[].attributes.body
Interviewer: Amelia

Interviewee: Janice

1. Goated questions!! Unfortunately im not a gamer

2. She seem very disappointed in me

3. Better questions that cater to non gamers

# data[].attributes.body
Interviewer: Yi Xuan

Interviewee: Ryan

Feedback:

1. Can afford to probe more – ask more how and why questions instead of assumption questions or deviating to an entire different line of questioning

2. Certain questions were good but due to lack of probe, it didn't propel me to want to reveal more aspects of my life.

3. I did not feel a strong enough sense of trust to share that with the interviewee

4. Interviewee was friendly and reassuring throughout, which was good

# data[].attributes.body
Interviewer: Lionel Lee

Interviewee: Liu Rongxuan

What was done well:

Questions structured well and way of questioning was calm and not intrusive.

Good at gently probing for sensitive info without making me well uncomfortable.

Well-spoken

What could be improved:

Could’ve went a bit deeper into certain details

# data[].attributes.body
Group 1

Interviewer: Jesher

Interviewee: Janelle

Feedback:

1. it was good that there was a lot of follow up qns asked

2. can highlight more on the privacy of personal information

# data[].attributes.body
Interviewer: Joween

Interviewee: Annabelle

Feedback:

1. Questions asked were holistic and structured well (amazing)

2. Can include normalising statements to further seek understanding and follow-up more

# data[].attributes.body
Interviewer: Kit Nga

Interviewee: Phoebe

Feedback:

what was done well:

good body language

good eye contact

made sure i was comfortable

made sure i understood the study and asked clearly for my consent

what could be improved:

can introduce herself and her background more

can ask me more background questions to ease me into the interview

# data[].attributes.body
Interviewer: Helena

Interviewee: Alyssa + Mary

1. Flawless structure

2. Felt very safe with her

3. Can follow up more with questions

# data[].attributes.body
Interviewer: Xin Wei

Interviewee: Regene

Feedback:

1. there were enough questions and they were nicely phrased!

1. i was quite comfortable during the interview (no overly sensitive questions etc.)

2. i liked that i was given like a summary of the types of questions that were gonna be asked in each section

3. maybe can include a debrief at the end?

# data[].attributes.body
Interviewer: Janelle

Interviewee: Jesher

Feedback:

1. Questions were comprehensive and follow up questions were good

2. Good probing to get more info from the person

# data[].attributes.body
Interviewer: Sam

Interviewee: Weng Sum

Feedback:

1. Made me feel comfortable and trusting from the beginning

2. Good probing and follow ups but some reactions were mixed

3. Debrief is good, makes me understand the study's purpose and reassured

# data[].attributes.body
interviewer: janice

intervieweee: amelia

1. asked a lot of personal questions which made me uncomfortable

2. attempted to ask sensitive questions without the appropriate follow up

3. attempted to make me feel comfortable by controlling her tone of voice

4. attempted to make me feel comfortable at the beginning by asking opener questions

# data[].attributes.body
Interviewer: Ryan Choo

Interviewee: Yi Xuan

Feedback:

1. Questions were probing, and I could tell that the interviewer was listening.

2. The briefing was comprehensive and good, interviewer also kept the details of his other interviewees confidential.

3. The pacing was comfortable.

# data[].attributes.body
Interviewer: Regene

Interviewee: Xinwei

Feedback:

1. the logical flow of the questions is really smooth, the interview is structured well

2. I feel safe and would love to share more with the interviewer

3. Maybe can try to explore topics from different angles

# data[].attributes.body
Interviewer: Jing Yi

Interviewee: Mandy

Feedback:

1. Really calming aura and thorough with consent

2. Responsive, but doesn't influence the participant, so she made me feel like I was heard and that my words were valued

# data[].attributes.body
Interviewer: Annabelle

Interviewee: Joween

Feedback:

1. introduction made me feel at ease and was engaging - got me talking and made me want to answer further questions.

2. Managed to convince me on the confidentiality and privacy of the study - sensitive questions were also asked well.

3. Can include a debrief at the end

# data[].attributes.body
Interviewee: Lee Lionel

Interviewer: Liu Rongxuan

What was done well:

Good job in making me comfortable (gentle probing)

Did the general > specific questions

Good debrief

What could be improved:

Lesser questions

Ask for more specific details (ie. how long do you spend on content creation)

# data[].attributes.body
Interviewer: Phoebe

Interviewee: Kit Nga

Feedback:

1. very good body gestures

2. warmed up with the questions

3. asked a variety of questions

4. did not input any personal opinions

5. could have probed more and followed up

# data[].attributes.body
Interviewer : Alyssa and Mary

Interviewee : Helena

Feedback :

1. Well structured

2. Interviewers really try to make interviewee feel comfortable with sensitive questions

3. Questions are well asked (wording+follow up questions)

4. Informed interviewee about research objectives

5. Didn't make any assumptions about interviewee

# data[].attributes.body
Interviewer: Mandy

Interviewee: Jing Yi

Feedback:

made interviewee feel very comfortable

questions were well-phrased (didn't sound accusatory)

good flow of interview

could probe more (if given more time)