# data[].attributes.headline
Both are secondary, since there are no sources

# data[].attributes.subject
Both are secondary, since there are no sources

# data[].attributes.body
Maybe the one on the left is secondary because it is talking about 1920 but it was posted in 2025? I think??

# data[].attributes.headline
Both are secondary sources because they are not in the moment reporting / they are writing with primary sources.

# data[].attributes.subject
Both are secondary sources because they are not in the moment reporting / they are writing with primary sources.

# data[].attributes.body
Both are secondary sources because neither of them speak on present or personal experiences.

# data[].attributes.headline
DeBois secondary because it is talking about another document

# data[].attributes.subject
DeBois secondary because it is talking about another document

# data[].attributes.headline
Both are secondary; both are adding an idea to something/someone that exists or has already happened. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Both are secondary; both are adding an idea to something/someone that exists or has already happened. 

# data[].attributes.body
The left one is secondary and the right one is primary.

# data[].attributes.body
The one on the right is secondary because it says "at the time" so its talking about the past, but from the present

# data[].attributes.body
both are secondary

they are not from the direct moment

# data[].attributes.body
they are not speaking in the present

# data[].attributes.body
Both are secondary sources

# data[].attributes.body
Both are secondary sources as they come secondhand and not from the present.